FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

Plaintiff: 

United Nations petition — incomplete report 

1 

FORMAL COMPLAINT VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway 

Date: April ……. , 2009 

Surname: Winther First names: Wilhelm Werner Gender: Male 

Birthplace/-date: NO-Ålesund — May 17, 1963 Nationality: Norwegian 

Present address: Åsen 4, NO-6270 Brattvåg, Norway 

Contact information: 

Norwegian authorities should send their communications/representatives etc to 

my counsellor in NO-Ålesund, Mr Johs. A ASPEHAUG (P.O Box 837, 6001 

Ålesund [PRV: Kipervikg. 5 — ―Grimmergården‖ — Ålesund]). 

Due to persistent, dangerous and totally illegal harassment and interference from 

Norwegian authorities, representatives from foreign governments, human rights 

organizations and tribunals etc should apply couriers satisfyingly identifying 

themselves as authentic messengers — no letters should be forwarded through, 

e.g, the official postal services of Norway (i.e ―Posten Norge BA‖) or DHL, and 

no confidential information should be transferred by telecommunication or 

direct consultation with aforesaid counsellor (Mr Aspehaug is trustworthy 

enough, but his office etc ‘ve been unlawfully surveilled by Norwegian authorities 

for years). 

Norwegian authorities are much likely to v.g; obstruct phone calls, steal telefac- 

similes/letters, erase e-mails and to bug/surveil/eavesdrop clothes, luggage, PCs, 

calculators, cellular phones, hotel rooms, restaurants, shops, public health facilities, 

libraries, closed sessions, cars/taxicabs, parks and — pet animals etc. 

1

Accused: 

Name: The Kingdom of Norway. 


Leading members of the Norwegian Courts of Appeal, Odelsting, Lagting, Inter- 

locutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Court of 

Impeachment, and Council of State item principal representatives of corresponding 

royal house, conciliation courts, city courts and rural district courts are 

all amongst those explicitly culpable in this case — in addition to the Director 

General of Public Prosecutions and various public prosecutors, military officers, 

chiefs of police, police station chief inspectors, district recorders, physicians, 

nurses, ambulance drivers, psychologists, social security/welfare officers and 

state employed engineers item members of the Norwegian Ministry of Justice, 

Department of Health and Social Security, Parliament and Government etc. 

Comments on disqualification: 

Nearby complaint is handed over to the sheriff office in NO-Brattvåg, Norway 

— cf the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec 223, first period. 

Said office has a central position as legally charged in this case. 

As regards corresponding disqualification etc of various police authorities, the 

district recorders, public prosecutors, Director General of Public Prosecutions, 

conciliation courts, city courts, rural district courts, Courts of Appeal, Odelsting, 

Interlocutory Appeals Committee of the Supreme Court, Supreme Court, Court 

of Impeachment and royal house etc, cf; the Norwegian Public Administration 

Act sec‘s 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10; the Norwegian Courts of Justice Act sec‘s 1, 

2:b, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 26:a, 33:a, 33:b, 52, 53, 60, 

65, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120 

and 121; the Norwegian Constitution sec‘s 1, 3, 5, 9, 12, 13, 21, 25, 26, 28, 30, 

31, 40, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 83, 86, 87, 88, 

93, 102, 110:b and 110:c; enclosed Documents ##103, 108, 115, 135, 147, 161, 

214, 240, 315, 339, 377, 599, 627, 633, 1536, 2037, 2418, 2907, 3217, 3611, 

4000, 4318, 4502, 4575, 4588, 5007, 5817, 6009, 6078, 6097, 7011, 7084, 7090, 

8017, 8123, 8168, 8197, 9045, and 9080, item Aphorisms &c ##1–166. 

2 


by Wilh. Werner WINTHER, Norway


In section 2 of the Norwegian ―Human Rights Act‖ of May 21, 1999, it is expli- 

citly laid down that the Council of Europe‘s ―Convention for the Protection of 

Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms‖ (the ―European Convention on 

Human Rights‖), the ―Universal Declaration of Human Rights‖ as well as the 

United Nations‘ ―International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights‖ are fully 

applicable as Norwegian law, and in sec 3 ib it‘s brought home that provisions 

confirmed through conventions and protocols mentioned in sec 2 in case of 

controversy are prior to other legislation. 

Hence — with respect to said disqualification(-s) etc — the following Articles 

of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 

the Universal Declaration of Human Rights item the International Covenant 

on Civil and Political Rights are brought into legal force in adjacent case: 

―CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF 

HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS‖ 

Article 13: 

Everyone whose rights and freedoms as set forth in this Convention are 

violated shall have an effective remedy before a national authority 

notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons acting 

in an official capacity. 

Article 14: 

The enjoyment of the rights and freedoms set forth in this Convention 

shall be secured without discrimination on any ground such as sex, race, 

colour, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social 

origin, association with a national minority, property, birth or 

other status. 

Article 17: 

Nothing in this Convention may be interpreted as implying for any State, 

group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any act 

aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein 

or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the 

Convention. 

3 



3

Article 18: 


The restrictions permitted under this Convention to the said rights and 

freedoms shall not be applied for any purpose other than those for which 

they have been prescribed. 

Article 2: 

―THE UNIVERSAL DECLARATION 

OF HUMAN RIGHTS‖ 

Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Decla- 

ration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, 

religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth 

or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of 

the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or terri- 

tory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self- 

governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty. 

Article 6: 

Everyone has the right to recognition everywhere as a person before 

the law. 

Article 7: 

All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to 

equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any 

discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to 

such discrimination. 

4 



4

Article 8: 


Everyone has the right to an effective remedy by the competent national 

tribunals for acts violating the fundamental rights granted him by the 

constitution or by law. 

Article 10: 

Everyone is entitled in full equality to a fair and public hearing by an 

independent and impartial tribunal, in the determination of his rights and 

obligations and of any criminal charge against him. 

Article 28: 

Everyone is entitled to a social and international order in which the rights 

and freedoms set forth in this Declaration can be fully realized. 

Article 29 (3): 

These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the 

purposes and principles of the United Nations. 

Article 30: 

Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, 

group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act 

aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein. 

―INTERNATIONAL COVENANT 

ON CIVIL AND POLITICAL RIGHTS‖ 

TSVP! 

5 



5



Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes to respect and to 

ensure to all individuals within its territory and subject to its jurisdiction 

the rights recognized in the present Covenant, without distinction of any 

kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, 

national or social origin, property, birth or other status. 


Each State Party to the present Covenant undertakes: 

(a) To ensure that any person whose rights or freedoms as herein 

recognized are violated shall have an effective remedy, 

notwithstanding that the violation has been committed by persons 

acting in an official capacity; 

(b) To ensure that any person claiming such a remedy shall have his 

right thereto determined by competent judicial, administrative or 

legislative authorities, or by any other competent authority provided 

for by the legal system of the State, and to develop the possibilities 

of judicial remedy; 

(c) To ensure that the competent authorities shall enforce such 

remedies when granted. 

Article 3: 

The State Parties to the present Covenant undertake to ensure the equal 

right of men and women to the enjoyment of all civil and political rights set 

forth in the present Covenant. 


Nothing in the present Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any 

State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or perform any 

act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms recognized 

herein or at their limitation to a greater extent than is provided for in the 

present Covenant. 

6 



6



There shall be no restriction upon or derogation from any of the fundamental 

human rights recognized or existing in any State Party to the 

present Covenant pursuant to law, conventions, regulations or custom on 

the pretext that the present Covenant does not recognize such rights or 

that it recognizes them to a lesser extent. 


All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the deter- 

mination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and 

obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public 

hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established 

by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from all or part of a 

trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) or national security 

in a democratic society, or when the interest of the private lives of the 

parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary in the opinion of the 

court in special circumstances where publicity would prejudice the in- 

terests of justice; but any judgement rendered in a criminal case or in a suit 

at law shall be made public except where the interest of juvenile persons 

otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial disputes or the 

guardianship of children. 

Article 16: 

Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person be- 

fore the law. 

Article 26: 

All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any 

discrimination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law 

shall prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and 

effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, 

colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or so- 

cial origin, property, birth or other status. 

7 



7


The Norwegian Courts of Justice Act provides that: 

1. All judges (except lay-judges and assessors) must sign a binding 

assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (sec 60, cf 

sec 52 ib item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21); 

2. Only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury 

through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected 

(sec 76, cf sec‘s 52, 53 and 65 ib); 

3. Nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances 

potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (sec 108 — cf sec‘s 52 

and 109 ib). 

Moreover — in the Norwegian Constitution, Article 110:c, it‘s stressed that 

(sic): 

―It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to respect and 

ensure human rights. Specific provisions for the implementation of 

treaties hereof shall be determined by law (cf, vg, the Norwegian 

Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999 — sec‘s 2 and 3).‖ 

On account of preceding observations, it‘s evident all instances/persons menti- 

oned beneath the heading ―Accused‖ in nearby complaint are entirely disquali- 

fied from exercising any degree of judicial authority in this case.....; they‘re 

those legally reported/charged, and should be treated as suspects. 

However — Norwegian authorities may correctly apply Article 93 in their Con- 

stitution (sic): 

―In order to safeguard international peace and security or to promote 

the international rule of law and cooperation between nations, the Stor- 

ting may, by a three-fourths majority, consent that an international orga- 

nization to which Norway adheres or will adhere shall have the right, 

within objectively defined fields, to exercise powers which in accordance 

with this Constitution are normally vested in the Norwegian authorities, 

although not the power to alter this Constitution. For the Storting to grant 

such consent, at least two thirds of the Members of the Storting shall be 

present, as required for proceedings for amending the Constitution. 

The provisions of this Article do not apply in cases of membership in an 

international organization, whose decisions only have application for 

Norway purely under international law.‖ 

Norwegian authorities are hereby encouraged to fulfill their juridical obligations 

as stated above and entrust impartial representatives from the United Nations 

with the formal responsibility for investigating, prosecuting and adjudicating etc 

8 



8


the various crimes wherewith the Kingdom of Norway are charged in this legal 

case unique in Norwegian history of law. 

In any event the provisions of Article 21 (c) — second period — in the 

Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment 

or Punishment are promoted as legally preponderant – sic: 

―The Committee shall deal with a matter referred to it under this 

article only after it has ascertained that all domestic remedies have 

been invoked and exhausted in the matter, in conformity with the 

generally recognized principles of international law. This shall not 

be the rule where the application of the remedies is unreasonably 

prolonged or is unlikely to bring effective relief to the person who 

is the victim of the violation of this Convention (cf Doc #4588, pp 

119–121 item Articles 1, 4, 9, 12, 13 and 20 etc of the Convention 

against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment 

or Punishment. Said Convention has particular regard to Article 7 

of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights item 

Article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights — both of 

which provide that no one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, 

inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.).‖ 

As widespread and grave abuse of the ―Cobweb-optics‖* (*cf Doc‘s ##123, 627 

and 3217) occupies a decisively central position in this particular case, persons 

directly or indirectly representing the USA must be avoided as (lay) judges, experts 

and investigators for reasons alluded to in Doc #2037, p 91. 

The members of the actual juries in this case will face a pack well-educated and 

politically experienced liars who will do their very best to manipulate and deceive 

them.....so, by reason of the intellectual challenges represented by this and 

other facts of the case, none possessing a general IQ as measured on the WAIS, 

Stanford-Binet or PM 47 (―PM 48‖, Raven — 40 min deadline) test subordinate 

to, respectively; 142, 145 or 143 should be accepted as (lay) judges or ex- 

perts in forthcoming trials. 

For their professional convenience, prospective jury members et al should be 

aware the following facts and figures: 

Several of the notorious culprits in this case possess‘ a general IQ equal 

or superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale — speaking about the 

degree of sheer psychopathy, fraudulence and criminal inclination, Mr 

Paul HELLANDSVIK (IQ 148 — cf Doc‘s ##4575 [p 117] and 4588 

[p 120]), Mr Thorleif MARKEN (IQ 143 — cf Doc #1536, p 87), 

9 



9


Mr Arne RUSET (IQ 140 — cf Doc #377, pp 41–44), Mr Ivar 

OFTEDAHL (IQ 140 — cf Doc #377, pp 28 and 41) and Mr Carsten 

SMITH (IQ 153,5 — cf p 68 etc) are amongst the most dangerous. 

Average Stanford-Binet IQ for Norwegian physicians and nurses are 

125 and 118, respectively (i.e full-scale WAIS IQ 123,5 and 117, 

respectively — cf Doc #1536, pp 85–86). As regards Norwegian 

Parliament members, average Stanford-Binet IQ is 127,5 (possessing 

a general IQ of 152, the theologue Mr Inge LØNNING is the 

noometric dux of this lamentable assembly suggestively termed the 

―Snake Pit‖ or ―Pillbox‖), and for Norwegian police officers 113,5 

(i.e full-scale Wechsler IQ 112,5 — cf Doc #1536, p 86). 

The best qualified Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service agents all 

has an IQ between 128 and 132 (cf Doc #377, p 41. While 90% of 

regular Norwegian police officers has clearly marked, psychopathic 

personality traits, the actual prevalence of explicit psychopathy/sa- 

dism are 100% amongst the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service 

officers), and — as stated in Doc #3217 (p 106, cf pp 103–104) — the 

Norwegian Minister of Gross Injustice, Mr Odd Einar DØRUM, has a 

Stanford-Binet IQ of 137. 

With his 155 Stanford-Binet score Mr Egil Tryggve STORÅS (cf 

Doc #377, p 41) possess‘ the highest general IQ of the Norwegian co- 

unty physicians and amongst those actual to interrogate/prosecute usw 

in this case. Mr Storås is mentally unsound, and — fearing personal dis- 

grace and professional setbacks etc, he‘s hardly expected to deliver 

truthful testimonies (— though, of course, he‘ll attempt to convince 

the jury et al his explanations and views are perfectly honest and 

unbiased). 

Background information 

The reader should constantly keep in mind Norwegian authorities unscrupu- 

lously will exploit every adequate opportunity to erase, steal and 

falsify/alter to their advantage any piece of evidence communicated through 

nearby complaint — empirically they‘re much prone to manipulate, espy, ha- 

rass/intimidate, incarcerate, obstruct, weaken and explicitly harm/attack potent- 

ial/actual witnesses in this and other cases where Norwegian officials are the 

factual culprits.....and the presentation of forthcoming matter are by and large 

accommodated these disquieting facts. 

10 



10

OSLO 1992 


We‘re back to August, 1992. At that time I was living in Oslo, Norway, where I 

regularly/daily engaged in human rights and eleemosynary/peacekeeping work. 

In connection to my altruistic endeavors, I frequently visited idealistic organizat- 

ions and periodicals etc — sometimes I made lapidary notes about this activity 

in my diaries: the 5 th I had an assignment with ―Gateavisa‖* (*a liberal street pa- 

per) and the subsequent day with ―FMK‖* (*a pacifist coalition).....then, the 7 th , 

I had appointments with e.g the newspapers ―Dag og Tid‖ and ―VG‖* (*―Verdens 

Gang‖) in order to secure moral support and specialized know-how for said 

publication/association. There was seldom less than 20 distinct visits etc of this 

kind a month, and later — after permanently settling in NO-Brattvåg — I‘ve 

met two of the coryphaei from this likable and humanitarian milieu in Oslo 

through the organization ―We Shall Overcome‖* (*a private support structure 

for persons mainly in conflict with psychiatry).....; I‘m talking about Tormod 

and Ulf. 

Both university educated and well above average intelligent, Tormod and Ulf 

told the same, depressing story: they‘d been systematically terrorized by the 

Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service for years exclusively because they actively 

battled human rights violations, warlike preparations and various criminality 

perpetrated by v.g Norwegian politicians and police officers. They‘d both seri- 

ously contemplated applying for political asylum, but their family commitments 

had spoiled these plans. Nevertheless; Tormod — then the leader of the We 

Shall Overcome organization — had received some official, pecuniary compen- 

sation for parts of the illegal terror imposed by Norwegian police. Ulf and 

Tormod agreed the police premeditatedly had attempted to ruin their health and 

economy etc by e.g launching utterly false accusations thus forcing them into 

destructive and highly stigmatizing contact with the state operated, psychiatric 

hell-machinery. 

It should be emphasized that the maltreatment of Ulf and Tormod no way is 

unique: within outlined milieu nearly all principal human rights activists in Oslo 

had equally disgusting experiences with Norwegian authorities and with the police 

in particular — óne had to run away from a train while on Inter-Rail in a 

foreign country eagerly persecuted by a bunch armed security officers (the Am- 

erican diplomat successfully arranging his final escape had the episode investi- 

gated through his excellent contacts in the intelligence services, and it was read- 

ily uncovered the authorities in the actual country had received at least one veri- 

fiable warning from the Norwegian ―Security‖ Service Police in Oslo who had 

11 



11


reassured them the peaceloving pacifist indeed was a most dangerous saboteur 

and spy who had travelled to their nation solely to effectuate massive terrorist 

attacks etc), another told how representatives from the police had spread po- 

tentially lethal pathogens in his apartment in Oslo (unfortunately for the police 

officers trustworthy neighbors observed the attempted assassination — before 

the curtains were drawn. The victim returning to his apartment somewhat later, 

became seriously sick, but survived) — the women narrated about frequent and 

totally groundless body strippings/searches.....; stark naked they‘d been dorsally 

handcuffed and forced to kneel — while one police woman squeezed their heads 

between her thighs and held their chained hands, another sitting on the floor or 

kneeling behind them penetrated and vigorously stimulated their vagina and 

rectum with gloved fingers (many of these sexually motivated assaults lasted 

more than 15 minutes, and usually included prolonged and sometimes painful 

rubbing of the victim‘s clitoris — two of the girls told they habitually feigned 

orgasm in order to dupe and satisfy the nauseatingly oversexed police women. 

It must be thoroughly underlined none of the actual victims were prostitutes or 

criminals/druggies; they were all hearty philanthropists condemning human 

rights violations and narcotics!). 

We‘re still in Oslo, 1992, but now in the month of September. 

Chiefly due to the excruciating injustice I‘ve undergone, I‘m totally opposed to 

disclosing details anywise of larger and especially strategic value to Norwegian 

authorities.....in consequence, succeeding summary may be ―partially obscure‖: 

I‘ve always appreciated a given amount physical activity, so — upon finishing 

more sedentary tasks in the evening, I normally stepped into my running shoes 

to get some outdoor exercise. 

During my vesperal — occasionally nocturnal — exertions, I‘d noticed Ms 

FINNE-GRØNN (daughter of Mr Jørgen Magnus FINNE-GRØNN). 

She worked as a nurse, and each evening she‘d leave her apartment in Rasmus 

Vinderens vei at approximately the same time. Walking down said street she‘d 

e intersect the suburban commuter railway at Blinderen and turn sharply right — 

heading for the private house of her old parents requiring her assistance before 

bedding. 

Perhaps it was the 2 nd at 10:30 PM — while Ms Finne-Grønn proceeded on 

foot towards the center of Vinderen* (*region in Oslo) — I saw a suspicious 

man lurking behind some bushes right outside her apartment.....and maybe I 

instantly recognized this person, doubtlessly a foreigner, as one I the previous 

12 



12


month had scared and chased while he — armed with a handgun — lay in wait 

for Ms Finne-Grønn in a private garden in Villaveien* (*a street) a few meters 

from her parents house. I‘m pretty sure the neighbors heard ―something‖ that 

evening.....and feel completely convinced no one were hurt. In any event, at 

10:45 PM, Ms Finne-Grønn reached her parents house a few minutes later — 

in good condition. 

On account of the possible observation of a potential murderer the previous eve- 

ning, I surely guarded the area outside Ms Finne-Grønn‘s apartment the 3 rd . 

Less than 15 minutes before she appeared outside this evening, I observed the 

man I feared had planned to kill her surreptitiously install himself around 25 

meters westabout the crossroads where Rasmus Vinderens vei meet Anne 

Maries vei* (*a street). Following the normal route to her parents, Ms Finne- 

Grønn couldn‘t possibly escape the alleged brute awaiting her (a few hours 

earlier he‘d — most likely — murdered his wife)..... 

Anyhow; the actual evening she hesitated.....peering into the dark she sensed 

something not was quite right.....then she did an about-face and returned to her 

apartment. Five minutes later Ms Finne-Grønn was back outside the freehold 

flats where she lived — she‘d changed her previously light overcoat with a 

dark ditto. Now — she‘d never done that before — she tiptoed along the north- 

ern facade of the building turning sharply right at the corner.....then carefully 

proceeding following adjacent riverbank southwards. 

At reasonable distance I watched Ms Finne-Grønn as she rambled rather 

irresolutely about — hoping she decided to follow Hafslundveien* (*a street) 

all the way to Slemdalsveien* (*a street) where she safely could continue to 

Frøen and Lille Frøens vei* (*a street) comfortably reaching her parents house 

suchwise. But no: she turned off into Anne Maries vei — and less than 100 

meters northwards I had to wade across a river in order to intersect her if she 

came too close the uxoricide maniac ensconced at the end of said road. 

Ms Finne-Grønn evidently looked for a place where she dry-shoed etc could 

proceed to the suburban commuter railway east of her...but, unable to move 

ahead into the dark and rough terrain on her right hand safely, she fatally deter- 

mined to advance northward — indubitably targeting the previously indicated 

crossroads. I supposed the presumable slayer hiding at the end of Anne Maries 

vei had his pistol damned prepped for the occasion, and I knew a clever marks- 

man would hit Ms Finne-Grønn with the first round if she took another 25 steps 

onward.....so, in order to stop her, I had to disclose my presence. From my post 

10 meters ahead of her I suddenly leapt unto the street — expecting her to be 

frightened. But: instead of turning back fleeing out of the danger zone, Ms 

Finne-Grønn studied me attentively a few seconds before smiling delighted — 

stepping straight towards me! I‘ve never doubted she is a charming lady, but 

the time and place for a romantic rendezvous were somewhat — inconvenient 

13 



13


(besides, I dare add, I had excellent personal contact with another nice nurse at 

that time)! 

So, much to her surprise, I gestured her to halt and march away in the opposite 

direction.....which she reluctantly did.....but she surely felt I‘d been very unkind 

even refusing to talk to her (I‘m quite sure Ms Finne-Grønn had understood my 

abrupt behavior much better if she knew the corpse of her stipulated would-be 

killer‘s wife newly had been discovered at a parking-place conjoining the head- 

quarters of Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation a few hundred meters south- 

east of us). 

The imaginable murderer? — I guess somebody might have seen him as he — 

less than 3 minutes after Ms Finne-Grønn had left me — ran madly off in the 

direction of a nearby nuthouse.....; ―something‖ had apparently terrified him! 

For juridical etc reasons, I‘m essentially unwilling to guarantee the absolute 

correctness/completeness of the information found inside the stippled frames 

above, but I strongly encourage able/impartial investigators to undertake inde- 

pendent research. 

May the 27 th , 2005, I consulted the administration of the Norwegian Broadcasting 

Corporation regarding the corpse left right outside their office doors 

Sep 3 rd , 1992.....but neither the radio nor the TV news department had recorded 

any information about it — strange, isn‘t it? The Norwegian Broadcasting 

Corporation is wholly controlled by Norwegian authorities, of course, and thus 

the main-disperser of state forged propaganda! 

As for the latter date, I paid the headquarters of the Christian Democratic Party 

in Oslo my first and only visit that day — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK (cf 

Doc‘s ##1022, 1049 and 2037 etc) occupied a modest office on my right hand as 

I entered their vapid base..... 

Let‘s go on.....: 

14 



14


Due to the threatening situation previously described, I dearly wanted Ms 

Finne-Grønn to change her hazardous routines a bit in regard to her nosto- 

parental visits — so, the 4 th , I sent her a concise (and inoffensive) note to 

attain this objective. 

The 5 th Ms Finne-Grønn decided to inform the police about the situation. The 

police station at Majorstua, Oslo, promptly assigned an officer to watch her flat 

in her absence, and ordained a provisional bodyguard and motorcycle escort as 

well. 

‗Excellent — if they‘re able to protect her I finally can concentrate on my 

athletic endeavors!‘, I was thinking. 

Late in the evening the 6 th she was back outside her apartment — wearing one 

of her dark overcoats, she stealthily moved to-and-fro mostly concealed by a 

dense hedge.....trying to figure out the goings-on, she intently studied every 

passerby. 

By now she had permanently altered some of her night-tide routines and exhibited 

a hopefully prophylactic degree of reasonable suspicion.....so — for the 

moment — I felt slightly alleviated. 

Ensuing days I leisurely inspected the police activities around Ms Finne-Grønn, 

and it soon became regrettably manifest they were incapable of rendering her 

required assistance. Anxious for her life, I scornfully gazed at the various plain- 

clothesmen as they lackadaisically strayed about in the vicinity of her dwelling 

— they‘d understood next to nothing! 

Ms Finne-Grønn was repeatedly seen wholly unprotected in the murky area 

around her parents house, and I decided the murderer had to be caught rather 

quickly. Some days later he was duly arrested — he‘d practically reported 

himself, and obviously longed for a prison cell where he could feel somewhat 

safe...! 

Greatly relieved the manslaughter were jailed, I hoped for a few days off.....but 

now the truly big problems commenced! 

Unable to contrive the missing links and markedly confused by the complex 

chain of causation generally, the police exhibited maladapted interest for me the 

last part of September. Well acquainted with the different aspects of the case, I 

continued my life much as normal and did no attempts whatsoever to mystify or 

conceal e.g my movements in the neighborhood. 

The officers from Majorstua Police Station had my identity at this point of time, 

and suddenly started to act explicitly menacing — to a given person they ad- 

15 



15


mitted they‘d planned to arrange a psychiatric internment for me. 

The arrogant police officers had undeniably comported themselves woefully 

clumsy, and rightfully felt intellectually and otherwise inadequate; someone — 

―come hell or high water‖ — had to pay for their incontestable awkwardness! 

The seemingly irresistible urge to compensate for assorted shortcomings 

through stark falsehood and extensive nefariousness, soon turned out as one of 

the foremost hallmarks of these fundamentally vicious ruffians..... 

While I visited miscellaneous associations etc in Oslo October 6 th , spiteful 

officers from Majorstua Police Station did their best to denigrate my reputation 

vis-à-vis my landlord and a pensioned ambassador in the immediate neighbor- 

hood. A native Norwegian, the ambassador had been permanently stationed e.g 

in Thailand.....and it‘s hardly unfair to describe him as a slimy turncoat with a 

clear-cut predilection for nasty intrigues, espionage and perversions. 

The police arranged an appointment with aforementioned ambassador in order 

to utilize his private house a modest stone‘s throw west of my apartment as a 

kind of headquarters for oncoming terrorism..... 

Returning to my attic-lodging in the late afternoon, I immediately recognized 

intruders employing at least óne forged key had searched the unpretentious 

living room. Inspecting the small balcony adjoining the garret, I quickly discov- 

ered a couple insulated wires inchoatively hidden by corresponding girders and 

corner stud. Following the thin cords with the eyes, two of them ran along the 

outside wall to the ground where they continued southwards, while another pair 

apparently led into the apartment beneath. 

I frequently employed said veranda for laundry purposes, and firmly knew none 

of described wires had been there a week ago..... 

‗Well — let‘s see what these bullies are up to!‘, I said to myself. 

A few hours later I put on my tracksuit and went outside — it was dark. 

I barely ran a kilometer before heading for my dwelling house — wading across 

a nearby river, I surreptitiously advanced from east.....reaching the residence 

garden unseen by the hectoring enemy. I‘d decided to inspect depicted wires 

somewhat closer.....and as supposed: from the southwesternmost part of the 

foundation those reaching the ground (largely concealed) continued westward 

to adjacent street before sneaking along the trunk of an aged tree almost to the 

top — in the dim light from a vicinal street lamp I saw the threadlike conductors 

traversing several meters above the road.....straight into the previously 

indicated ambassador‘s private garden! 

From my covert beneath the ambassador‘s domicile, I now studied the police 

16 



16


officer I beforehand knew had been stationed in the former diplomat‘s lawn. 

Partially hidden by surrounding shrubs he intentionally kept in the dark, but 

each time he sucked his revered cigarette a tiny gleam dimly illuminated his 

facial features — it was one of the notorious undercover agents. 

I cautiously withdrew the same way as I came, and ran around roughly 20 min- 

utes before returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei* (*a street) the ordi- 

nary way. 

The next days the police continued their sentinelling outside the ambassador‘s 

house — they‘d installed cobweb-optics (cf p 9) inside my flat, and bombarded 

the attic with ultrasound by night (my landlord slept in a room underground, 

and were hardly seriously affected by the terror — though he was noticeably 

more confused and indisposed than usual these days). The ultrasound-cannon 

was mounted on a tripod in the ambassador‘s garden (they always removed it 

before dawn), and drew electricity from a power socket inside his house — he 

certainly knew about it! 

The ultrasound-terror wasn‘t a success for the police; notwithstanding a few 

tactical adjustments, I carried on most of the human rights work etc as custo- 

mary (— anyhow: perfectly aware the police illegally would surveil and 

terrorize her if she was found, I‘d forbidden my girlfriend to visit/contact me 

since the middle of September). 

During their numerous break-ins the police had installed several electronic 

hootanannies both inside and around my lodging — one of these accursed 

gadgets were discovered in a narrow dead end of the attic less than 50 centimeters 

from my bed... 

The police behaved both ridiculous and unacceptably unethical, so Oct 10 th (at 

02:20 AM) I signalized to their guard in the ambassador‘s garden to go indoor 

— he‘d been seen in any case, I morsed. After fifteen minutes I‘d received no 

reply, so — flashlight in hand — I entered the balcony again. I‘d morsed 3–4 

characters when the brand new flashlight battery permanently went out of busi- 

ness! I retreated inside, but 5 minutes later I was back on the modest veranda; 

a man in his thirties frenetically struggled to remove as much of aforementioned 

wires as possible! — ungraciously stumbling in the jungled cords, he took flight 

like a badly moonstruck cuckoo upon detecting my peering presence.....! 

October 11 th I attended a vesper service for university students at ―Misjons- 

kirken‖* (*a church), Oslo, while a bearded hobgoblin from the Norwegian 

Police ―Security‖ Service attempted to photograph all the churchvisitors (the 

17 



17


police had also stationed two well-known plainclothesmen right outside corre- 

sponding porch/aisle). 

Returning to my apartment in Ivar Aasens vei, I wasn‘t much surprised to learn 

the police again had burglarized it. Nevertheless — a new and ominous trend 

had been initiated this evening; studying some vacuum-packed sausages I 

quickly discovered the miniscule pinprick underneath the price tag, and the 

newly baked rye bread had been contaminated with a scarcely visible granulate! 

This was, however, nothing but a sinister confirmation of what I‘ve been told 

by other human rights activists; Norwegian police verily utilized pathogens and 

poisonous substances to harm/assassinate persons ideologically or otherwise 

opposed to their ghastly extensive criminality suo motu and ex officio! 

Going collectively bananas, the bootless police officers now launched a dozen 

strikingly hatefull attacks to annoy and cripple me. 

The 15 th — at 04:30 AM — a toolwielding motorcyclist from Majorstua Police 

Station sabotaged the streetlight outside my dwelling, and forthcoming midnight 

the entire street lay bathed in darkness! 

Due to the nocturnal ultrasound-terror, I routinely took a nap in the morning be- 

fore going to the center of Oslo. Underneath I heard my landlord utilizing the 

phone before leaving in his car, and I prepared to sleep for an hour and a half — 

it was the 24 th day of October. 

Laying prone on the bed relaxing, an unexpected noise reached my ears; appa- 

rently the sound of water running in the domiciliary plumbing system! This was 

curious, because I knew the landlord not yet had returned — so, under otherwise 

normal conditions, I should be the only person in just now..... 

Still reclining on the bed, I‘d prepared mentally to go downstairs when the 

oxygen evidently was ―sucked‖ out of the small attic abode — rendering breath- 

ing impossible! I flung myself out of the room rather swiftly — rushing down 

the stairs heading for the exterior door..... 

Outside I forthwith entered nearby garage — grabbing a laid away matchbox, I 

inhaled deeply before advancing upstairs. I‘d left the apartment door ajar, and 

now I tried to light one of the safety matches in the quarter-opened doorway — 

it ignited, but extinguished after maximum 2 seconds. Stretching my arms 40– 

50 centimeters into the apartment, I attempted to enkindle a couple 

matches.....but they didn‘t strike at all! Flinging the door agape, I withdrew 

alfresco where I quickly found the matches to be in perfect condition. 

Staying outside nearly 20 minutes before reentering the flat, I had no difficulties 

burning up one of the matches, but I unclosed a window and opened the balcony 

door though — the stuffy air had a peculiar odor.....not unlike that of 

18 



18

carbon dioxide gas (CO2). 


Staying indoor watching the apartment this afternoon, one of the uniformed and 

police cooperating rangers I‘d seen the preceding day either fell or — very 

uncoordinately — jumped down from the lower roof as I abruptly flung open 

one of my eastward windows....! 

Anyhow — the most pernicious assault by far this day, was planned and directed 

by the well-known but feckless Norwegian parascientess Ms Anna Elisabeth 

WESTERLUND. A fatally improper onslaught, Ms Westerlund appeared out- 

side my flat next day — carrying out a certain ritual before leaving.....; I won‘t 

characterize her as an upright or particularly wise individual! 

Completely reneging juridical regulations and social codes, the cops subsequent 

days exploited every manifest opportunity to make trouble.....so — in the be- 

ginning of November, I departed for Sweden. 

Arriving in Stockholm, it became clear Norwegian police had informed their 

Swedish colleagues about my presence. Anyhow — my mission was a perfectly 

legal one: forthcoming problems rather forecasted, I‘d decided to deposit some 

written and particularly valuable material outside Norwegian borders. 

Said stuff discreetly and successfully transmitted, I immediately returned to 

Norway — 

It should be duly underscored the police never found anything unlawful or other- 

wise objectionable during the various break-ins touched upon above — neither 

had they justifiable reasons for suspecting any degree of criminality. 

What they actually discovered in my apartment — besides human rights papers 

and pacifist-oriented magazines, was a few legal documents confirming I‘d 

reported the misconduct of a former police officer — Mr Frederik BARTH — 

to the national association of barristers. 

Operating his counselor agency from Akersgata* (*a street), Oslo, I‘d consulted 

Mr Barth in 1990. Mr Barth behaved more or less adequate until I mentioned Mr 

Magne ENG — brother of the intensely Nazi-sympathizing police physician Mr 

Hans ENG* (*Born in Oslo 1907, Dr Eng — like many other Norwegian police 

employees — zealously supported the Nazi-German ―Endlösung‖. Actively taking 

part in the deportation etc of Norwegian Jews, he was indirectly guilty e.g of 

genocide — but, darned significantly; he was never indicted for this notorious 

and exceedingly opprobrious criminality! Imprisoned from 1948–1949 he was 

19 



19


wholly and scandalously pardoned March 3 rd , 1950, and immediately resumed 

his ―medical practising‖.). 

From spacious accommodations in Møllergata* (*a street), Oslo, Mr Magne Eng 

and his highly questionable staff engaged in seemingly charitable business activities.....but 

when he — by way of a third party — learned I was strongly opposed 

to the extermination of Jews enthusiastically partaken by his brother, he 

promptly decided to swindle me for US$5000! 

Anyhow; to support my de facto remuneration claim I had a prodigious bunch 

receipts/contracts which — horribile dictu — Mr Barth now aggressively and 

consultatory disjunctively flung up in the air with a sudden jerk.....spreading the 

copious documentation all over his office floor! 

Well — the national association of barristers naturally found the rather illmannered 

Mr Barth guilty of malconduct ex officio.....a troublesome fact he and 

his Nazi-friendly fuzz-chums never ‘ve been quite able to stomach — 

The police officers irregularly begriming my flat in Ivar Aasens vei also found 

legal papers indicating I‘d reported one of their depraved colleagues item the no- 

toriously fractious Director General of Public Prosecution — Mr Georg Fredrik 

RIEBER-MOHN — for premeditated dereliction of duty etc. 

Telltalely a member of the beforehand contaminated Supreme Court since 1997, 

the vindictive Mr Rieber-Mohn should be a main target for everybody whole- 

heartedly striving to lessen official corruption and covert racism in Norway. 

It ought to be emphasized parts of the blatant misconduct exhibited by the police 

in Oslo were nourished by slandering brought about by — particularly — Mr 

Olav HOFF, NO-Langevåg. 

Pt employed at the district recorder‘s office in NO-Ålesund, Mr Hoff 7–8 years 

earlier had displayed undesirable interest for me — he‘d vg registered that misfortune 

and illness always befell those taunting me, and he wondered why. I 

honestly replied I was an extraordinary upright person condemning wrongdoing 

absolutely, so — whoever had accused or annoyed me was indeed wicked and 

thus liable to punishment. 

Nevertheless — based on lamebrained misconceptions, spite and most undue 

curiosity, Mr Hoff willfully provoked and clearly applauded some of the rabid 

terror exercised by his colleagues in Oslo. 

In connection to the human rights document sent the permanent Representative 

of the Russian Federation to the United Nations — Ambassador Andrey I 

DENISOV — September 20, 2004 (cf Doc #3217), officers anxious to destroy 

pieces of evidence against themselves arranged a fire at Majorstua Police 

Station, Oslo, in the evening eight days later. Earlier that day I had informed 

outlandish representatives of the United Nations and the European Union etc 

about the unlawful document copying/theft, and feedback from these and other 

20 



20


instances scared the downright iniquitous cops..... 

Officers from Majorstua Police Station ‘ve continued persecuting and illegally 

terrorizing me until today, i.e August 2006. 

As for my landlord in Oslo, Mr Fridtjof HØYER, he probably suffered lasting 

health impairment as a result of the police waged terrorism — and, in all like- 

lihood, he became the victim of at least óne serious offence committed to hide 

this criminality..... 

A grandchild of the famous Norwegian Fridtjof NANSEN, Mr Høyer had exhausted 

himself nursing his disabled wife before she died. Despite numerous 

applications, Norwegian authorities bluntly refused to provide required assi- 

stance and — as the wearying work gradually sapped his strength, they‘d told 

Mr Høyer his recurrent requests for help to his sick spouse were triggered by 

mental illness! 

Mr Høyer never fully recovered from the malicious injustice, and frequently 

lamented the lack of adequate empathy exhibited by his own children. 

Above mentioned rangers were commissionaires from a special contingent para- 

troopers known to cooperate closely with Norwegian police vg in anti- and 

counterterrorism matters. 

Military value and civilian applicability otherwise unquestioned, their present 

liaison with the severely vitiated police force is eclectically contravening, pro- 

fessionally deleterious and deeply disgraceful indeed.....; corresponding corps 

d‘elite should enjoy sheltered training facilities and operational freedom wholly 

exempt suborning influence from detrimentally crackbrained police principals! 

Waging gross injustice rather than war in this case, the paratroopers should 

purchase a physical, moral and purely intellectual standard unequalled by 97% 

of Norwegian police officers. 

Said Ms Westerlund was a notorious police collaborator, and she didn‘t fare 

very well neither before nor after her death..... 

Before expiring in 1995, she testamentary donated her brain to the university 

in NO-Bergen, and one of the pathologists dissecting it — Mr Inge MORILD — 

also conducted a post-mortem examination of my murdered fiancée in Nov- 

ember 1996 (cf Document #599, pp 47–49)..... 

From the passenger station in Stockholm I phoned my sisters in Norway — 

afterwards, in a narrow passageway, I confronted one of the Swedish plainclothesmen 

with the fact he‘d eavesdropped/recorded corresponding conver- 

sation utilizing a wireless device: ‗You‘ll hand over a copy of that tape to Nor- 

wegian police!‘ I said to him. He nodded — but they didn‘t like it.....they felt 

something was wrong with this case, he said, and wondered if I could spell 

21 



21


out the goings-on for him. I gave a short account. ‗Good luck!‘ he cheered. 

Waiting for the train to Oslo, another Swedish police officer frustrated asked me 

what kind of rancid hodgepodge their Norwegian colleagues tried to serve them. 

I explained. ‗Goddamn, what a mess! — they‘re completely crazy!‘ he snarled, 

and reassured me he noway supported the Norwegian cops in this case. 

Norwegian authorities constantly and underhandedly searching for opportunities 

to explain away etc their rotten misconduct, it is thoroughly stressed the truly 

subhuman diabolism exercised by the police in Oslo were through and through 

evil-intended and without extenuating circumstances. 

Moreover; Norwegian authorities didn‘t suspect I possessed any kind of valuable 

material before leaving for Sweden in 1992, and knew nothing whatsoever 

about the content of vg Document #599 before it was published in 2002! 

ÅLESUND/HJELSET/BRATTVÅG 1992 

Arriving Oslo, I continued by train to NO-Åndalsnes where I met my two 

sisters and the boorish troublemaker Mr Jon Rune NYGÅRD* (*allegedly 

engaged with my youngest sister) — twas November the 4 th . 

I‘d planned to rent an apartment in Ålesund forthcoming day, and found it convenient 

to share roof with my sisters and Mr Nygård until then. 

I was about to enter bed when aforementioned Mr Olav Hoff and a female phy- 

sician, Kristin HENDEN, came into the house. Pretending my mental condition 

bothered them, Mr Hoff told they intended to bring me to a nearby hospital for 

further examination. 

Though Mr Hoff‘s contemptible double-dealing and the perverted state of 

affairs generally were perfectly evident from the onset, I said nothing about 

it.....usually I swear to the ―accuse-me-and-condemn-yourself-policy‖ in cases 

like this — 

At the infirmary at Åse (a few kilometers east of NO-Ålesund) I was compul- 

sory committed by the physician Ms Elin THOMASSEN DYRHAUG — Mr 

Hoff enacted his self-appointed role as countersigning ―tutor/guardian‖, of 

course! 

I was forced to swallow some debilitating drugs, and locked up in a cozy hos- 

pital pokey overnight. In the morning two police officers transported me by car 

22 



22


to the funny farm at Hjelset right east of NO-Molde — 

My first encounter with the loony bin at Hjelset proceeded pretty much as be- 

forehand expected — never previously interned, I was certainly well prepared 

for the fiendish absurdities awaiting me though.....! 

From 1975–1979 I was an active member of the Norwegian Boy Scouts movement, 

and much of the time I functioned as a Scoutmaster. One of the lads I 

taught e.g first aid, pioneering/bivouacking, semaphoring/morsing, splicing/ 

knotting/roping, religion, lifeline maneuvering, improvised cooking, tracking, 

map/compass reading, mountaineering and general outdoor survival etc, was 

aforesaid — Mr Jon Rune NYGÅRD. 

I can‘t say any of the scouts proved eminently teachable, and when Mr Nygård 

finally managed to learn the Morse code by heart, he was immensely proud! — 

as a matter of fact he earnestly recalled this ―mnemonic achievement‖ as one of 

his truly remarkable intellectual feats for many years onwards.....! 

Certainly not the brightest in my scout troop, Mr Nygård nevertheless surpassed 

everybody in one, distinct discipline: malingering! 

Instructing both Boy and Girl Scouts in first aid techniques as v.g cardiopulmo- 

nary resuscitation, complicated fracture treatment, pulmonary edema relief, 

arrest of arterial bleeding, management of traumatic diaphragm hernia, minor 

surgery and emergency handling of second and third degree burns etc, Mr 

Nygård unquestionably was the choicest casualty dummy! 

Cosmetically pallid, pseudo-wounds frightfully agape and with artificial blood 

trickling from ears and mouth etc, he most definitely seemed death-struck, and 

several times persons unfamiliar with his bizarre talent for simulation indeed felt 

convinced they faced an authentic emergency situation.....! 

As Mr Nygård commenced secondary education, parts of his personality 

changed for the worse — he became nauseatingly stuck-up, machinating and 

outright mendacious. He‘d left the Boy Scouts a few years earlier, and without 

the positively stabilizing influence from this uncorrupted youth movement he 

soon proved a willing victim for the depraving impact wielded by some of his 

classmates. One day I accidentally met Mr Nygård in NO-Mauseidvåg, he 

straightaway confessed he‘d planned to harm me in one way or another. This 

sudden hostility was totally unprovoked and unreasonable, so I immediately 

23 



23


demanded an explanation. He admitted I always had treated him properly and 

never offended him in any way, but he felt like backstabbing and injuring me 

anyhow.....he didn‘t know exactly why, he said, and agreed it surely would be 

wrongful. 

Though Mr Nygård weighed 113 kg and was an enthusiastic soccer player, I had 

always been much stronger and battlewise than him — if attacking me, he‘d 

been defeated forthright.....and he knew that. 

Before parting I asked if he somehow felt envy towards me, and he replied he 

most likely did. 

Mr Nygård waited more than 10 years before realizing his vow to harm me.....; 

the actual opportunity arose the night to November the 5 th , 1992 — then he 

grabbed his mother‘s phone..... 

First he phoned Mr Olav Hoff (at that time employed at the local sheriff office), 

and then the nearby casualty department at NO-Åse. 

Mr Hoff was beforehand informed by his colleagues in Oslo about my presence, 

and had waited for this preplanned excuse to falsely accuse and illegally apprehend 

me. At this time I was wholly aware the married Mr Hoff for years had 

abused his position as a police officer to gain sexual favor from a number of 

women, and his flirtatiously manipulative behavior vis-à-vis the young and 

naive Ms Henden was rather ostentatious this night. Later he was convicted for 

some of his sexual turpitude, but the extension and negative consequences of his 

misconduct was never uncovered by the partially corrupted jury. 

Several representatives from the hospital at NO-Åse had been clandestinely 

involved in the putrid complot against me before I reached the Ålesund-region, 

and Ms Elin Thomassen Dyrhaug was absolutely one of them — she was e.g 

identical with the slightly disguised woman exhibiting peculiar interest for me 

on the train to Åndalsnes! 

Whereas Ms Thomassen Dyrhaug decidedly is one of the principal culprits in 

this disastrous case, the real architect behind the nosocomial conspiracy was 

Ms Aase SVENDSEN ROLAND (b April 29, 1938) — one of her befriended 

colleagues and the professionally incompetent and repugnantly immoral leader 

of the psychiatric department at indicated hospital. 

Married with the chief of health in Møre og Romsdal county — Mr Per 

ROLAND (fully aware and actively supporting his wife‘s nauseating criminal- 

ity, Mr Roland is another principal offender in this case) — and with solid 

political connections, Ms Svendsen Roland had a nearly optimal basis for exert- 

ing her vehemently corruptive influence. 

Ms Svendsen Roland was also more or less acquainted with my parents in 

advance, and with her criminal predisposition, suppressed sexuality, Christian 

24 



24


delusions and sadomasochistic inclination etc, she didn‘t hesitate falsely 

accusing and groundlessly terrorizing me. 

Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and Ms Elin Thomassen Dyrhaug was both amongst 

the physicians who had planned, approved and recommended the totally illegal 

terror waged against me in Oslo! 

Before the iatrogenic atrocities in Oslo, the emotionally wayward and intellectually 

trifling Ms Svendsen Roland had been shrewdly manipulated by my parents 

who convinced her my strategically hustle-bustle eclosion and ensuing rejection 

of them in 1984 was spurred by impulsivity and unsoundness. 

Affected by my parents prevarication and willingly ignoring readily documentable 

facts of the case, Ms Svendsen Roland subsequently committed the truly 

fatal error in her life..... 

Following grave and perhaps psychopathologically motivated child abuse, my 

parents irrevocably lost my confidence in 1968 — a troublesome fact they always 

‘ve taken considerable pains to hide. The child battering continued until 

1975, and during the period we lived in NO-Langevåg my father‘s older sister, 

Ms Judith MOLVÆR, several times threated to report the ill-treatment to the 

national child welfare. 

When I left my home in NO-Mauseidvåg in 1984, it was an extremely wellplanned 

move — a necessary step I‘d been prepared for since my earliest boy- 

hood. In 1975 I decided to design the company logo unmistakably reflecting this 

fact — a piece of circumstantial evidence convenient for future application.....: 

A crowned and winged double-u/-you applied e.g as letterhead and spread 

throughout the world — the announced ―flight of the W‖ is clearly 

perceived.....cf illustration (the logo‘s three-pointed princess‘ crown — 

1 

W/E-3-∑ 

25 



W/E-3-∑ 

25


representing the 3 sisters mentioned in Doc #599 [Centurie I:76] — is also a sty- 

lized ―W‖, ―E‖, ―3‖ and ―∑‖.....the digit ―1‖ is seen as the crown‘s 

substratum/vinculum/integer and single bond. The ―W‖ — turned upside down 

so as to resemble twin-peaks towering above an edged depression — 

symbolizing the DALSEGG-sisters [cf Doc #599, pp 47–54 usw. 

Toponymically/literally the surname ―Dalsegg‖ means ―dale‘s edge‖] whose 

foundation rely on me, also represents an artistic version of the letter ―E‖ 

[―Elin‖], the number ―3‖, the mathematical symbol ―∑‖ [―summation of‖ — 

signaling conclusions] and the rear sight of a firearm etc. Dextrorotating the 

logo 90º it‘ll thus read W/E-31-∑ — levogyrating it 90º it‘ll also read W/E-31-∑ 

[in 1996 my fiancée, Elin — one of said sisters — was shoot down in Ålesund* 

{*literally ―the narrow passageway separating v.g a pair principally — cf 

―principal girl/boy‖ — interrelated islands/peaks etc. The etymological/suffixal 

transfiguration and logogrammatic interpretation of portrayed townscape also 

reads as ―significance/portent/earshot/proclaim/reliable/healthy/unimpaired‖. It 

should be noted my fiancée was murdered in Skaregata — literally the ―Notchstreet‖ 

— toponymically/derivatively denoting aforementioned depression and 

the bottomed way passing tween/twain the W‘s cleaved and sloped design 

profoundly reflecting the symbolically out-of-the-way elevation of dispirited and 

otherwise sinistrous circumstantial indicators.} the 31 st of October.....the actual 

month is represented by the alphanumeric position of the letter ―J‖ {corresponding 

traitor‘s forename initial}, while the initial of the murderer‘s first 

name — ―R‖ — is established by the alphanumeric distance between the 

characters ―E‖ and ―W‖.] 

Not composing a wholly conventional UN-report, I feel free quoting a poem by 

the Belgian Nobel laureate Comte Maurice MAETERLINCK: 

―Les trois sœurs ont voulu mourir 

Elles ont mis leurs couronnes d‘or 

Et sont allées chercher leur mort. 

S‘en sont allées vers la forêt: 

‗Forêt, donnez-nous notre mort, 

Voici nos trois couronnes d‘or.‘ 

La forêt se mit à sourire 

Et leur donna douze baisers 

Qui leur montrèrent l‘avenir. 

Les trois sœurs ont voulu mourir 

S‘en sont allées chercher la mer 

Trois ans après la rencontrèrent; 

26 



26


‗Ô mer, donnez-nous notre mort, 


Et la mer se mit à pleurer 

Et leur donna trois cents baisers, 

Qui leur montrèrent le passé. 

Les trois sœurs ont voulu mourir 

S‘en sont allées chercher la ville 

La trouvèrent au milieu d‘une île: 

‗Ô ville, donnez-nous notre mort, 


Et la ville s‘ouvrant à l‘instant 

Les couvrit de baisers ardents, 

Qui leur montrèrent le présent.‖ 

The monetary unit in Norway is ‖krone‖ — literally ―crown/couronne‖. 

The abbreviation ―K-O‖ at the lower part of the logo stands for ―kick-off/kick 

off‖ and ―strikeout-operation‖. The ―K‖ also relate to the 10 th /11 th , and the ―O‖ 

to the 14 th /15 th — the tactically interpolated ―hyphen‖ marks the fatidic/ontological 

division expressed as semiological confirmation of the semblable 

duplicity and figurative orogeny synecdochically evoked by the sororal 

transubstantiation and calendric synchoresis of chronologically interrelated 

opposites factitiously promoted through the connotative separation emblematically 

embodying the distinct features of forecasted capital offence). 

The ice-blue logo printed on white stationery heralds my foreordained surname 

— ―Winther‖ — as well as the ―wintry/glacial/chilly‖ conditions sublunary 

typecasting my ―In-ter-twin-ED ≡ ‗Me—ta-mor—phos-is‘‖ (about literally: 

―Ego sum lux [mundi] — though, thankfully, an intentionally dimming light‖ 

most appropriately leaving the rightfully doomed Earth in increasingly obscurity 

[cf Centurie-III:94, Doc #599 usw]). 

My carefully constructed company name was: ―Department of News‖ 

— i.e; depart -ment of nEWs (the suffix ―-ment‖ presaging the specified 

object/action/process) and thus — ―the depart -ment of new/nominative EWs‖. 

In their characteristically fraudulent and muddleheaded manner, Norwegian 

authorities ‘ve attempted to portray my superbly structured disentanglement 

from their noxious coercion as pathologically dictated — nefarious suppression 

27 



27


of bothersome facts and exegetic information shedding light on their feculent 

criminality ‘ve constantly been of paramount importance to them. 

Also for my parents whom I left deliberately hurried in 1984 has it been 

important to think up a spurious but — to themselves — soothing expla- 

nation in respect of my deceptively dramatic take-off. 

In any case the condemnation of the satanic persecution, torture and falsifications 

etc brought about and supported by Norwegian authorities and my pa- 

rents are absolute, unalterable and sempiternal; all requests for absolution will 

be turned down, no pecuniary compensation will be regarded as adequate or 

even slightly attenuating, and religious pietism/penitence won‘t affect the 

deservedly brutal fate awaiting those guilty. 

Returning to the star-crossed conditions in Ålesund 1992, it should be emphasized 

I already before entering the private house of Mr Nygård‘s mother dis- 

covered distinct and fresh traces outside the main entrance confirming my ene- 

mies just had left the place — inside I immediately noticed a dozen signs betray- 

ing the dwelling pretty short time ago had been infected by audiovisual spy- 

accoutrements. Due to the continuous terrorism exercised by sadistic police 

officers et al in Oslo, I hadn‘t slept since Oct 23 rd .....but still my deductive and 

observational capacity by far surpassed that of the treacherous pigwidgins and 

moral lepers about to betray me (i.e; my sisters and Mr Nygård were wholly 

unaware the house had been bugged etc, and even the most manifest vestiga left 

by the intruders escaped the flawed attention of these haughty and mentally 

unstable half-wits)! 

Arriving the abhorred bughouse and political prison at Hjelset, I furtively carried 

out a couple technical tests objectively confirming what I beforehand knew; the 

federal slammer had very recently (many of the clear-cut clues were certainly 

less than 24 hours old) been contaminated with the infernal Cobweb-Optics* 

(*cf Doc‘s ##123, 627, 2037 and 3217) and pinhole-microphones — though, at 

that time, the infection were limited to rooms I supposedly had to utilize (WCs 

and bath-/bedrooms included). 

Forthcoming inspections and tests gave credence to the fact the Cobweb-Optics 

not had been installed other places than those normally frequented by me — not 

even in the compartment for ―particularly dangerous‖ detainees (as for today, 

however, the Cobweb-Optics and concealed microphones are probably abused 

practically all over the execrable institution)! 

Anyhow — by November 1992 my skillful stalwarts had been discreetly and 

successfully emplaced both inside and in strategical vicinity of the vitiated 

laughing academy; the amount final proofs intelligently collected by these 

dauntless champions and professional entourage are truly enormous, and their 

sharp-witted testimonies will be unconditionally devastating for my hope- and 

28 



28

honorless foes! 


As natural for hominoid faeces, my state paid enemies clung foully together 

also at Hjelset — now the altogether false and trenchantly sphacelated concoc- 

tion fabricated to incarcerate me had to be ―consolidated‖ through pretendedly 

scrupulous, catamnestic annotations etc. 

The misbegotten son of a manic-depressive drunkard, the psychologist Mr Hans 

Peter MØLLER was amongst the first creeps I encountered at the madhouse — 

sporting an unkempt hairstyle conspicuously resembling a machine-gunned 

magpie‘s nest, he decidedly had the look of a bombed and shell-shocked circus 

clown! 

A fundamentally pusillanimous, immature and perfidious good-for-nothing, Mr 

Møller compensated for some of his shortcomings through attributing his own, 

despicable frailness and vile nature to me. Criminally jumbled up with the 

pharisaic falsehood characterizing the abject weakling and hitlerite alienist* 

(*while 20% of primary care physicians [general practitioners] in Norway can 

be correctly described as clearly anti-Semitic and/or naziphile, corresponding fi- 

gure for psychiatrists pendulates between 50 and 55%. Viewed as a single 

group, medical practitioners in Norway ‘ve been extremely overrated — 

morally, 

intellectually, socially and medicomechanically) Mr Magnus AASHEIM, the 

commentaries entered in the ―medical record‖ by Mr Møller presumably belongs 

to the most low-minded fiction ever penned in Norwegian! 

In said record the out-and-out criminal and medico/politician authorized assaults 

launched by the police in Oslo had been described as purely imaginary, of 

course, and the fibbing swine had shunned no iniquitous extremes to portray me 

as paranoid and to cover-up their sickly vicious corruption. 

As beforehand announced it‘s not my intention to furnish my diabolic foes with 

especially useful information, so — at this point in the process — my direct co- 

untercomments are tactically limited to declaring more than 90% of the slimy 

stuff included in the scandalous record thoroughly false and deliberately mis- 

guiding! 

Acquainted with their forthcoming treachery long before they actually were 

born in 1966 and 1970 respectively, it should nevertheless be underlined I al- 

ways ‘ve held back any information my sisters prospectively could abuse — e.g 

by passing it on to hostile persons. 

When I met these fickle and neurotic wenches at Åndalsnes in 1992, they hadn‘t 

seen me since 1984 — as for today, they both enjoy perpetual enemy-status due 

29 



29


to attempted and harmful cooperation with rabidly criminal representatives of 

Norwegian authorities.....; all contact with them are strategically dictated, the- 

atrically amicable and genuinely unwished. 

The hell-destined exponents of satanic machination and unprovoked fiendish- 

ness, I had also systematically and abundantly fed the bedlam-employees et al 

with disinformation from the very first minute — seemingly trivial gestures and 

―random‖ remarks all ingeniously contributed to the final doom and interminable 

anguish inconvertibly assigned these throughly rotten subhumans and 

their equally depraved, extramural accomplices. 

Fatally cocksure he correctly had understood and masterfully controlled the 

macabre situation, Mr Aasheim frequently busied himself falsifying my 

―medical record‖ and actively engaged in conspiratorial contact with culpable 

police officers and the rope-ripe vermin from the hospital at NO-Åse etc — in 

his private office he had dissembled several documents unambiguously testi- 

fying his essentially criminal and dangerously schizophrenic personality..... 

As for the police, they largely maintained their well-known tailgating whenever 

I was allowed to go outside the stinking nuthouse — and I certainly knew these 

mentally deranged and bloody criminals should engender vast difficulties and 

illegally blockade justice also in the future..... 

December 21 th I was released from the political state prison at Hjelset, and 

forthright settled in NO-Brattvåg where one of my cousins, Mr Egil HÅVIK, 

had offered me temporary lodgment. 

Before kicking off the from A to Z daffy and lawless terror-campaign against 

me in Oslo, Ms Aase Svendsen Roland and her deranged partners in crime collusively 

obtained operational permission from e.g the Norwegian Parliament, 

Government, Supreme Court and King‘s Council.....! 

Ms Svendsen Roland personally knew several of the local county representatives 

to the national assembly in Oslo, and Ms Laila KALAND — a superintendent 

nurse from NO-Sykkylven — clearly played a central role as commère introducing 

corresponding and sickly warped scheme to the beforehand corrupted pack 

constituting the Norwegian ―Storting‖ (the other Storting representatives from 

Møre og Romsdal County in 1992 was; Mr Rikard OLSVIK, Mr Anders 

TALLERAAS, Mr Ingvard SVERDRUP, Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, 

30 



30


Mr Per SÆVIK, Mr Gudmund RESTAD, Mr Lodve SOLHOLM, Ms Marie L 

WIDNES and Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM). 

A tainted Labour Party representative like the Norwegian Prime Minister — Ms 

Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND — herself, Ms Kaland et al handily acquired 

governmental support for the assuredly morbid and stark illegal assaults against 

me. 

Ms Harlem Brundtland and her mafiosi in turn presented the disastrous complot 

for the Norwegian monarch, Mr Harald HEADLESS, who spitefully approved 

the insanities in the usually hebdomadal Council of State. 

The premier and his/her ministers normally constitute the greater part of the 

King‘s Council, and at the actual time in 1992 the Norwegian Government 

looked suchwise: 

Prime Minister: — Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND (Labour Party) 

Secretaries: Mr Ole BERREFJORD, Mr Svein R HANSEN, Mr Øystein 

SINGSAAS, Mr Bjørn SKOGSTAD AAMO and Ms Gerd-Liv VALLA 

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs: 

— Mr Thorvald STOLTENBERG (Labour Party), foreign affairs 

— Mr Bjørn Tore GODAL (Labour Party), trade 

— Ms Kari NORDHEIM-LARSEN (Labour Party), international 

development etc 

Secretaries: Mr Jan Laurits EGELAND, Mr Jon Ivar NÅLSUND and Ms 

Helga Maria HERNES 

The Ministry of Justice and the Police: 

— Ms Grete FAREMO (Labour Party) 

The Ministry of Defence: 

— Mr Johan Jørgen HOLST (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Elsa Lisbeth ERIKSEN 

The Ministry of Finance: 

— Mr Sigbjørn JOHNSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretaries: Mr Svein Harald ØYGARD and Mr Jan AABOEN 

The Ministry of Agriculture: 

— Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Ottar BEFRING 

The Ministry of Transport and Communications: 

— Mr Kjell OPSETH (Labour Party) 

31 



31

Secretary: Ms Anne-Karin SAUS 


The Ministry of Education, Research and Church Affairs: 

— Mr Gudmund HERNES (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Randi ØVERLAND 

The Ministry of Fisheries: 

— Mr Jan Henry T OLSEN (Labour Party) 

The Ministry of Children and Family Affairs: 

— Ms Grete BERGET (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Stig Erik FOSSUM 

The Ministry of Local Government and Labour: 

— Mr Gunnar BERGE (Labour Party) 

The Ministry of Cultural Affairs: 

— Ms Åse KLEVELAND (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Lene LØKEN 

The Ministry of Social Affairs: 

— Ms Grete KNUDSEN (Labour Party), social affairs 

— Mr Werner CHRISTIE (Labour Party), health affairs 

The Ministry of Trade, Industry, Petroleum and Energy: 

— Mr Finn KRISTENSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Gunnar MYRVANG 

The Ministry of Government Administration: 

— Ms Oddny ALEKSANDERSEN (Labour Party) 

The Ministry of Environment: 

— Mr Thorbjørn BERNTSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Børre PETTERSEN 

The President and Vice President of the Norwegian Storting was Mr Jo 

BENKOW (Conservative Party) and Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL (Labour 

Party), respectively. 

32 



32


The President and Vice President of the Norwegian Lagting was Mr Hans J 

RØSJORDE (Progress Party) and Mr Jostein Fjærvoll (Christian Democratic 


The President and Vice President of the Norwegian Odelsting was Ms Inger 

Lise GJØRV (Labour Party) and Ms Tora AASLAND HOUG (Socialist Left 


The corrupted Supreme Court was in 1992 constituted thus: 

— Mr/Ms XXXXXXX (Director) 

— Mr Carsten SMITH (Chief Justice) 

— Mr Arne CHRISTIANSEN (judge) 

— Mr Helge RØSTAD (judge) 

— Mr Tore SINDING-LARSEN (judge) 

— Mr Jan R SKÅRE (judge) 

— Mr Gunnar AASLAND (judge) 

— Mr Rolv HELLESYLT (judge) 

— Mr Jens BUGGE (judge) 

— Mr Jan FRØYSTEIN HALVORSEN (judge) 

— Mr Nils P LANGVAND (judge) 

— Mr Trond DOLVA (judge) 

— MR Finn BACKER (judge) 

— Mr Tore SCHEI (judge) 

— Mr Ketil LUND (judge) 

— Mr Steinar TJOMSLAND (judge) 

— Ms Karenanne GUSSGARD (judge) 

— Ms Liv GJØLSTAD (judge) 

— Ms Vera L HOLMØY (judge) 

King Harald Headless‘ personal and predominantly insane/psychopathic aidesde-camp 

by 1992: 

— Mr Ivar GJETNES 

— Mr Tore ERIKSEN 

— Mr Eivind C HAUGER JOHANNESSEN 

— Mr Carl Magne HANSEN 

— Mr Tom H KNUTSEN 

— Mr Aage BARTNES 

King Harald Headless‘ Lord Chamberlain and Marshal of the Court (A 

1992) was Mr Kaare LANGLETE and Mr Lars Petter FORBERG, respectively. 

33 



33


Supporting the psychotic complot against me from the onset, the office of the 

Director General of Public Prosecutions was headed by Mr Georg Fr. 

RIEBER-MOHN and Mr Tor-Aksel BUSCH. 

The County Governors of Møre og Romsdal and Oslo og Akershus (A 1992) 

— Mr Alv Jakob FOSTERVOLL and Mr Kåre WILLOCH — are particularly 

interesting persons in this connection.....penologically. 

Members of the Norwegian Storting 1989–1993 

Akershus County: 

— Mr Reiulf STEEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Helen BØSTERUD (Labour Party) 

— Mr Thor-Eirik GULBRANDSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Anneliese DØRUM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jo BENKOW (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Kaci KULLMANN FIVE (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Jan PETERSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Eva R FINSTAD (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Tore HAUGEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Anne ENGER LAHNSTEIN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Finn THORESEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Jan Erik FÅNE (Progress Party) 

— Ms Tora AASLAND (Socialist Left Party) 

— Mr Paul CHAFFEY (Socialist Left Party) 

Aust-Agder County: 

— Ms Brit JØRGENSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tore A LILTVED (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Helga HAUGEN (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Jens MARCUSSEN (Progress Party) 

Buskerud County: 

— Mr Erik DALHEIM (Labour Party) 

34 



34


— Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL (Labour Party) 

— Mr Trond JENSRUD (Labour Party) 

— Ms Åse KLUNDELIEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Hallgrim BERG (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Arild HIIM (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Steinar MARIBO (Progress Party) 

Finnmark County: 

— Ms Oddrun PETTERSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Karl Eirik SCHJØTT-PEDERSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Reidar JOHANSEN (Socialist Left Party) 

— Mr Anders AUNE (Aune-List) 

Hedmark County: 

— Mr Kjell BORGEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Eirin FALDET (Labour Party) 


— Ms Sylvia BRUSTAD (Labour Party) 

— Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT (Labour Party) 

— Mr Johan C LØKEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Ragnhild Q HAARSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Magnar SORTÅSLØKKEN (Socialist Left Party) 

Hordaland County: 

— Mr Hallvard BAKKE (Labour Party) 

— Ms Grete KNUDSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Leiv STENSLAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ranveig FRØILAND (Labour Party) 

— Mr Olav AKSELSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Arne SKAUGE (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Arne ALSÅKER SPILDE (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Erna SOLBERG (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Nils O GOLTEN (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Svein ALSAKER (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Britt HARKESTAD (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Magnus STANGELAND (Centre Party) 

— Mr Hans J RØSJORDE (Progress Party) 

35 



35


— Mr Knut HANSELMANN (Progress Party) 

— Ms Inger-Marie YTTERHORN (Progress Party) 

— Ms Kjellbjørg LUNDE (Socialist Left Party) 

Møre og Romsdal County: 

— Mr Rikard OLSVIK (Labour Party) 

— Ms Laila KALAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Anders TALLERAAS (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Ingvard SVERDRUP (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Per SÆVIK (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Gudmund RESTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Lodve SOLHOLM (Progress Party) 

— Ms Marie L WIDNES (Socialist Left Party) 

Nordland County: 

— Mr Bjarne MØRK EIDEM (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ragna BERGET JØRGENSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Rolf BENDIKSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Åshild HAUAN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Inger PEDERSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Petter THOMASSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Thea KNUTZEN (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Dag Jostein FJÆRVOLL (Christian Democratic Party) 

Mr Peter ANGELSEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Harry JENSEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Inge MYRVOLL (Socialist Left Party) 

— Ms Lisbeth HOLAND (Socialist Left Party) 

Nord-Trøndelag County: 

— Ms Inger Lise GJØRV (Labour Party) 

— Mr Roger GUDMUNDSETH (Labour Party) 

— Mr Inge STALDVIK (Labour Party) 

— Ms Wenche FROGN SELLÆG (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Per AUNET (Socialist Left Party) 

36 



36

Oppland County: 


— Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG (Labour Party) 

— Ms Berit BRØRBY LARSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Johan M NYLAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Marie BRENDEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Dag C WEBERG (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Syver BERGE (Centre Party) 

— Mr Peder I RAMSRUD (Progress Party) 

Oslo County: 

— Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND (Labour Party) 


— Ms Sissel RØNBECK (Labour Party) 

— Mr Bjørn Tore GODAL (Labour Party) 

— Ms Marit NYBAKK (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jan Peder SYSE (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Annelise HØEGH (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Per-Kristian FOSS (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Anders C SJAASTAD (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Kristin CLEMET (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Eleonore BJARTVEIT (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Carl I HAGEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Pål Atle SKJERVENGEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Tor Mikkel WARA (Progress Party) 

— Mr Theo KORITZINSKY (Socialist Left Party) 

— Ms Kristin HALVORSEN (Socialist Left Party) 

Rogaland County: 

— Mr Gunnar BERGE (Labour Party) 

— Ms Gunn Vigdis OLSEN-HAGEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Magnar SÆTRE (Labour Party) 

— Mr Gunnar FATLAND (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Thorhild WIDVEY (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Sverre MAURITZEN (Conservative Party) 

— Mr John S TVEIT (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Borghild RØYSELAND (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Ole Gabriel UELAND (Centre Party) 

— Mr Jan SIMONSEN (Progress Party) 

37 



37


— Mr Petter BJØRHEIM (Progress Party) 

— Mr Eilef A MELAND (Socialist Left Party) 

Sogn og Fjordane County: 


— Ms Astrid M NISTAD (Labour Party) 

— Mr Dagfinn HJERTENES (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Lars Gunnar LIE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Leiv BLAKSET (Centre Party) 

Sør-Trøndelag County: 

— Ms Marit ROTNES (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ulf GUTTORMSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Mary KVIDAL (Labour Party) 


— Mr Harald ELLEFSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Siri FROST STERRI (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Kåre GJØNNES (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Tove Kari VIKEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Per RISVIK (Progress Party) 

— Mr Erik SOLHEIM (Socialist Left Party) 

Telemark County: 

— Ms Ingeborg BOTNEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ragnhild BARLAND (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ingvald GODAL (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Solveig SOLLIE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr John Ingolf ALVHEIM (Progress Party) 

— Mr Børre RØNNINGEN (Socialist Left Party) 

Troms County: 

— Mr William ENGSETH (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ranja HAUGLID (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jan H ELVHEIM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Svein LUDVIGSEN (Conservative Party) 

38 



38


— Mr Terje NYBERGET (Progress Party) 

— Mr Rolf Ketil BJØRN (Socialist Left Party) 

Vest-Agder County: 

— Mr Sigurd VERDAL (Labour Party) 

— Ms Aud BLATTMANN (Labour Party) 

— Mr John G BERNANDER (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Jon LILLETUN (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Vidar KLEPPE (Progress Party) 

Vestfold County: 

— Mr Ernst WROLDSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Karin LIAN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jørgen Hårek KOSMO (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ole Johs. BRUNÆS (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Ingrid I WILLOCH (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Oscar D HILLGAAR (Progress Party) 

— Ms Inger D STEEN (Socialist Left Party) 

Østfold County: 

— Mr Gunnar SKAUG (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tom THORESEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Åsa SOLBERG (Labour Party) 

— Mr Sigurd HOLEMARK (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Odd HOLTEN (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Edvard GRIMSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM (Progress Party) 

— Ms Wenche LYNGHOLM (Socialist Left Party) 

39 



39




— Ms Solveig TORSVIK (Labour Party) 

— Mr Vidar BJØRNSTAD (Labour Party) 

— Mr Kjell ENGEBRETSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Grethe FOSSLI (Labour Party) 

— Ms Anneliese DØRUM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jan Tore SANNER (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Kaci KULLMANN FIVE (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Jan PETERSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Eva R FINSTAD (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Valgerd SVARSTAD HAUGLAND (Christian Democratic Party) 


— Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Stephen BRÅTHEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Paul CHAFFEY (Socialist Left Party) 


— Ms Brit JØRGENSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Gunnar HALVORSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tore A LILTVED (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Terje SANDKJÆR (Centre Party) 


— Mr Erik DALHEIM (Labour Party) 

— Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL (Labour Party) 

— Mr Thorbjørn JAGLAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Sigrun ENG (Labour Party) 

— Mr Hallgrim BERG (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Arild HIIM (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Per Olaf LUNDTEIGEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Roy WETTERSTAD (Progress Party) 

40 



40



— Ms Mimmi BÆIVI (Labour Party) 


— Mr Reidar JOHANSEN (Socialist Left Party) 

— Ms Johanne GAUP (Centre Party) 


— Ms Eirin FALDET (Labour Party) 



— Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT (Labour Party) 

— Mr Bjørn HERNÆS (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Ragnhild QUESETH HAARSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Ola D GLØTVOLD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Magnar SORTÅSLØKKEN (Socialist Left Party) 


— Mr Hallvard BAKKE (Labour Party) 


— Ms Rita TVEITEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ranveig FRØILAND (Labour Party) 


— Mr Oddvar NILSEN (Conservative Party) 


— Mr Are NÆSS (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Anita APELTHUN SÆLE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Magnus STANGELAND (Centre Party) 

— Ms Bjørg HOPE GALTUNG (Centre Party) 

— Mr John DALE (Centre Party) 

— Mr Hans J RØSJORDE (Progress Party) 

— Ms Kjellbjørg LUNDE (Socialist Left Party) 

— Mr Lars SPONHEIM (Liberal Party) 


— Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN (Labour Party) 


41 



41


— Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ottar KALDHOL (Labour Party) 

— Mr Anders TALLERAAS (Conservative Party) 


— Ms May Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD (Christian Democratic Party) 


— Mr Jørgen HOLTE (Centre Party) 

— Ms Eli SOLLIED ØVERAAS (Centre Party) 


— Mr Gunnar BREIMO (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ragna BERGET JØRGENSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG (Labour Party) 

— Mr Odd ERIKSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tomas NORVOLL (Labour Party) 

— Mr Petter THOMASSEN (Conservative Party) 


— Mr Peter ANGELSEN (Centre Party) 

— Ms Inga KVALBUKT (Centre Party) 

— Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Inge MYRVOLL (Socialist Left Party) 

— Ms Lisbeth HOLAND (Socialist Left Party) 


— Ms Aud GAUNDAL (Labour Party) 

— Mr Roger GUDMUNDSETH (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jon Olav ALSTAD (Labour Party) 

— Ms Marit ARNSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN (Centre Party) 

— Ms Jorunn HAGELER (Socialist Left Party) 


— Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG (Labour Party) 

— Ms Berit BRØRBY LARSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Johan M NYLAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Marie BRENDEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Dag C WEBERG (Conservative Party) 

42 



42


— Mr Syver BERGE (Centre Party) 

— Ms Marit TINGELSTAD (Centre Party) 

Oslo County: 

— Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND (Labour Party) 


— Mr Jens STOLTENBERG (Labour Party) 



— Ms Marit NYBAKK (Labour Party) 

— Mr Jan Peder SYSE (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Annelise HØEGH (Conservative Party) 


— Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Anders C SJAASTAD (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Arne HAUKVIK (Centre Party) 

— Mr Carl I HAGEN (Progress Party) 

— Ms Ellen Christine CHRISTIANSEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Erik SOLHEIM (Socialist Left Party) 

— Ms Kristin HALVORSEN (Socialist Left Party) 

— Mr Erling FOLKVORD (Red Electoral Alliance) 


— Mr Tore NORDTUN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Oddbjørg AUSLAND STARRFELT (Labour Party) 

— Mr Magnar SÆTRE (Labour Party) 

— Mr Gunnar FATLAND (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Thorild WIDVEY (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Einar STEENSNÆS (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Hilde FRAFJORD JOHNSEN (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Magnhild MELTVEIT KLEPPA (Centre Party) 

— Ms Unn AARRESTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Jan SIMONSEN (Progress Party) 

— Mr Eilef A MELAND (Socialist Left Party) 



43 



43


— Ms Astrid M NISTAD (Labour Party) 

— Mr Lars Gunnar LIE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Håkon GIIL (Centre Party) 

— Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD (Centre Party) 


— Mr Ola A RØTVEI (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ulf GUTTORMSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Gunn Karin GJUL (Labour Party) 


— Mr Harald ELLEFSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Siri FROST STERRI (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Ola T LÅNKE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Ms Tove Karin VIKEN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Morten LUND (Centre Party) 

— Mr Øystein DJUPEDAL (Socialist Left Party) 


— Mr Sigvald OPPEBØEN HANSEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ragnhild BARLAND (Labour Party) 

— Mr Bent HEGNA (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ingvald GODAL (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Terje RIIS JOHANSEN (Centre Party) 

— Ms Solveig SOLLIE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr John Ingolf ALVHEIM (Progress Party) 

— Mr Børre RØNNINGEN (Socialist Left Party) 

Troms County: 

— Mr William ENGSETH (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ranja HAUGLID (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tor NYMO (Centre Party) 

— Ms Rita ROALDSEN (Centre Party) 


— Mr Rolf Ketil BJØRN (Socialist Left Party) 

44 



44



— Mr Rolf Terje KLUNGELAND (Labour Party) 

— Ms Aud BLATTMANN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Sigurd MANNERÅK (Centre Party) 



— Ms Anne Helen RUI (Labour Party) 

— Ms Karin LIAN (Labour Party) 


— Mr Ole Johs. BRUNÆS (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Arild LUND (Conservative Party) 

— Ms Eva LIAN (Centre Party) 

— Mr Oscar D HILLGAAR (Progress Party) 


— Mr Gunnar SKAUG (Labour Party) 

— Mr Tom THORESEN (Labour Party) 

— Ms Ane Sofie TØMMERÅS (Labour Party) 

— Ms Signe ØYE (Labour Party) 

— Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM (Conservative Party) 

— Mr Odd HOLTEN (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Edvard GRIMSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM (Progress Party) 

45 



45



Labour Party (65 representatives): 

Chairman: Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG 

Deputy Chairman: Mr Tom THORESEN 

Secretary: Ms Berit BRØRBY 

Members: Mr Dag Terje ANDERSEN, Mr Vidar BJØRNSTAD, Mr Haakon 

BLANKENBORG, Ms Grethe FOSSLI, Mr Tore NORDTUN, Mr Kjell 

OPSETH, Mr Ola RØTVEI, Mr Gunnar SKAUG, Ms Oddbjørg STARRFELT, 

Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN. 

— Mr Jon Olav ALSTAD, Nord-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Dag Terje ANDERSEN, Vestfold County 

— Mr Bendiks H ARNESEN, Troms County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Vidar BJØRNSTAD, Akershus County (justice) 

— Mr Haakon BLANKENBORG, Oppland County 

— Ms Aud BLATTMANN, Vest-Agder County 

— Mr Erling BRANDSNES, Hedmark County 

— Mr Gunnar BREIMO, Nordland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Berit BRØRBY, Oppland County 

— Ms Mimmi BÆIVI, Finnmark County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Erik DALHEIM, Buskerud County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Sigrun ENG, Buskerud County 

— Mr Kjell ENGEBRETSEN, Akershus County 

— Mr Odd ERIKSEN, Nordland County 

— Ms Eirin FALDET, Hedmark County (sociologist) 

— Mr Gard FOLKVORD, Hordaland County 

— Ms Grethe FOSSLI, Akershus County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Grethe G FOSSUM, Hedmark County 

— Ms Ranveig FRØILAND, Hordaland County 

— Ms Aud GAUNDAL, Nord-Trøndelag County (Lagting member) 

— Ms Gunn Karin GJUL, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Ms Reidun GRAVDAHL, Oppland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Sigurd GRYTTEN, Hordaland County 

— Ms Kirsti KOLLE GRØNDAHL, Buskerud County (Lagting member) 

— Mr Gunnar HALVORSEN, Aust-Agder County 

— Mr Sigvald OPPEBØEN HANSEN, Telemark County 

— Mr Bent HEGNA, Telemark County 

— Ms Britt HILDENG, Oslo County 

— Mr Anders HORNSLIEN, Oslo County 

46 



46


— Ms Inger Lise HUSØY, Oslo County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Einar JOHANSEN, Finnmark County 

— Ms Laila KALAND, Møre og Romsdal County (Lagting member) 

— Mr Ottar KALDHOL, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Ms Karin KJØLMOEN, Nord-Trøndelag County 

— Ms Synnøve KONGLEVOLL, Troms County 

— Mr Rune E KRISTIANSEN, Oslo County 

— Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Mr Frank Willy LARSEN, Buskerud County 

— Ms Karin LIAN, Vestfold County 

— Ms Rikke LIND, Akershus County 

— Mr Leif LUND, Hordaland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Liv Marit MOLAND, Aust-Agder County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Sverre MYRLI, Akershus County 

— Ms Astrid Marie NISTAD, Sogn og Fjordane County (justice) 

— Mr Tore NORDSETH, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Tore NORDTUN, Rogaland County 

— MR Tomas NORVOLL, Nordland County 

— Ms Marit NYBAKK, Oslo County 

— Ms Gunn OLSEN, Telemark County 

— Mr Kjell OPSETH, Sogn og Fjordane County 

— Ms Torny PEDERSEN, Nordland County 

— Mr Jan Petter RASMUSSEN, Rogaland County (justice) 

— Mr Torstein RUDIHAGEN, Oppland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Anne Helen RUI, Vestfold County (member of the Lagting), nurse 

— Mr Ola RØTVEI, Sør-Trøndelag County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Einar Olav SKOGHOLT, Hedmark County (Lagting member) 

— Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG, Nordland County 

— Ms Oddbjørg AUSDAL STARRFELT, Rogaland County (health care) 

— Mr Tariq SHAHBAZ, Oslo County 

— Mr Tom THORESEN, Østfold County 

— Ms Rita TVEITEN, Hordaland County 

— Ms Ane Sofie TØMMERÅS, Østfold County (justice) 

— Ms Gunhild ØYANGEN, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Ms Signe ØYE, Østfold County 

Progress Party (25 representatives): 

Chairman: Mr Carl I HAGEN 

Vice-Chairman: Mr John I ALVHEIM 

Secretary: Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM 

47 



47


Members: Mr Hans J RØSJORDE, Mr Øyvind VAKSDAL, Mr Per Ove 

WIDTH 

— Mr John I ALVHEIM, Telemark County (nurse) 

— Mr Torbjørn ANDERSEN, Aust-Agder County 

— Mr Per Roar BREDVOLD, Hedmark County 

— Mr Dag DANIELSEN, Oslo County 

— Ms Ursula EVJE, Akershus County 

— Mr Fridtjof Frank GUNDERSEN, Akershus County 

— Mr Carl I HAGEN, Oslo County 

— Mr Øystein HEDSTRØM, Østfold County 

— Ms Siv JENSEN, Oslo County 

— Mr Vidar KLEPPE, Vest-Agder County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Terje KNUDSEN, Hordaland County 

— Mr Ulf Erik KNUDSEN, Buskerud County 

— Mr Øyvind KORSBERG, Troms County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Per Erik MONSEN, Vestfold County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Harald Tom NESVIK, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Mr Thore Aksel NISTAD, Oppland County 

— Mr Hans J RØSJORDE, Hordaland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Per SANDBERG, Nord-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Jan SIMONSEN, Rogaland County (justice) 

— Mr Lodve SOLHOLM, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Mr Jørn L STANG, Østfold County (justice) 

— Mr Christopher STENSAKER, Sør-Trøndelag County (Lagting) 

— Mr Kenneth SVENDSEN, Nordland County 

— Mr Øyvind VAKSDAL, Rogaland County 

— Mr Per Ove WIDTH, Vestfold County (member of the Lagting) 

Christian Democratic Party (25 representatives): 

Chairman: Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK 

Vice-Chairman: Mr Einar STEENSNÆS 

Members: Ms Valgerd SVARSTAD HAUGLAND, Mr Odd HOLTEN, Ms 

Randi KARLSTRØM, Mr Ola T LÅNKE, Ms Anita APELTHUN SÆLE 

Deputy members: Ms Åse Gunhild WOIE DUESUND, Ms May-Helen 

MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD, Ms Rigmor KOFOED-LARSEN, 

Mr Gunnar LIE, Mr Are NÆSS, Mr Ivar ØSTBERG 

— Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Ms Åse Gunhild WOIE DUESUND, Aust-Agder County 

— Ms May-Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD, Møre og Romsdal County 

48 



48


— Ms Valgerd SVARSTAD HAUGLAND, Akershus County 

— Mr Odd HOLTEN, Østfold County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Hilde FRAFJORD JOHNSON, Rogaland County (anthropologist) 

— Ms Randi KARLSTRØM, Finnmark County 

— Ms Rigmor KOFOED-LARSEN, Oppland County (nurse) 

— Mr Lars Gunnar LIE, Sogn og Fjordane County 

— Mr Jon LILLETUN, Vest-Agder County 

— Mr Arne LYNGSTAD, Nord-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Ola T LÅNKE, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Finn Kristian MARTHINSEN, Buskerud County (justice) 

— Mr Are NÆSS, Hordaland County (physician) 

— Mr Bror Yngve RAHM, Telemark County 

— Mr Lars RISE, Oslo County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Jan SAHL, Nordland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Elsa SKARBØVIK, Vestfold County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Einar STEENSNÆS, Rogaland County 

— Ms Anne Brit STRÅTVEIT, Vest-agder County (Lagting member) 

— Ms Anita APELTHUN SÆLE, Hordaland County 

— Mr Ingebrigt S SØRFONN, Hordaland County 

— Ms Åse NILSSEN WISLØFF (Lagting member/justice), nurse 

— Ms Kari ØKLAND, Nordland County 

— Mr Ivar ØSTBERG, Troms County 

Conservative Party (23 representatives): 

Chairman: Mr Jan PETERSEN 

Vice-Chairman: Mr Per-Kristian FOSS 

Members: Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD, Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN, Mr Svein 

LUDVIGSEN, Ms Siri FROST STERRI 

— Mr Børge BRENDE, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Ole Johs. BRUNÆS, Vestfold County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD, Oslo County (justice) 

— Mr Per Kristian FOSS, Oslo County 

— Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN, Vest-Agder County 

— Mr Ingvald GODAL, Telemark County 

— Mr Trond HELLELAND, Buskerud County 

— Mr Bjørn HERNÆS, Hedmark County (justice) 

— Mr Sverre J HODDEVIK, Sogn og Fjordane County 

— Ms Annelise HØEGH, Oslo County 

— Mr Bent HØIE, Rogaland County 

— Mr Ivar KRISTIANSEN, Nordland County 

49 



49


— Mr Svein LUDVIGSEN, Troms County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Inge LØNNING, Oslo County 

— Mr Petter LØVIK, Møre og Romsdal County (member of the Lagting) 

— Ms Kjellaug NAKKIM, Østfold County 

— Mr Oddvard NILSEN, Hordaland County 

— Mr Jan PETERSEN, Akershus County 

— Mr Jan Tore SANNER, Akershus County 

— Ms Sonja Irene SJØLI, Akershus County (Lagting member), nurse 

— Ms Erna SOLBERG, Hordaland County 

— Ms Siri FROST STERRI, Sør-Trøndelag County (Lagting member) 

— Ms Inger STOLT-NIELSEN, Rogaland County (Lagting member) 

Centre Party (11 representatives): 

Chairman: Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN 

Members: Mr Morten LUND, Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD, Ms Marit 

TINGELSTAD 

Deputy members: Mr John DALE, Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN 

— Mr John DALE, Hordaland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN, Nordland County 

— Mr Ola D GLØTVOLD, Hedmark County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Johan J JAKOBSEN, Nord-Trøndelag County 

— Ms Magnhild MELTVEIT KLEPPA, Rogaland County 

— Ms Anne ENGER LAHNSTEIN, Akershus County 

— Mr Morten LUND, Sør-Trøndelag County 

— Mr Tor NYMO, Troms County (justice) 

— Mr Gudmund RESTAD, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Ms Jorunn RINGSTAD, Sogn og Fjordane County 

— Ms Marit TINGELSTAD, Oppland County (member of the Lagting) 

Socialist Left Party (9 representatives): 

Chairman: Ms Kristin HALVORSEN 

Vice-Chairman: Ms Karin ANDERSEN 

Members: Mr Hallgeir H LANGELAND, Mr Rolf REIKVAM 

Deputy member: Øystein DJUPEDAL 

— Ms Karin ANDERSEN, Hedmark County 

— Mr Olav Gunnar BALLO, Finnmark County (physician) 

— Mr Øystein DJUPEDAL, Sør-Trøndelag County 

50 



50


— Ms Kristin HALVORSEN, Oslo County 

— Mr Hallgeir H LANGELAND, Rogaland County 

— Mr Inge MYRVOLL, Nordland County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Rolf REIKVAM, Akershus County 

— Ms Lisbet RUGTVEDT, Oslo County 

— Ms Ågot VALLE, Hordaland County (health care) 

Liberal Party (6 representatives): 

Chairman: Mr Lars SPONHEIM 

Vice-Chairman: Mr Gunnar KVASSHEIM 

— Mr Odd Einar DØRUM, Oslo County 

— Mr Terje JOHANSEN, Akershus County (member of the Lagting) 

— Mr Leif Helge KONGSHAUG, Møre og Romsdal County 

— Mr Gunnar KVASSHEIM, Rogaland County 

— Mr Lars SPONHEIM, Hordaland County 

— Ms May Britt VIHOVDE, Hordaland County (member of the Lagting) 

Non-Partisan Representatives (1 representative): 

— Mr Steinar BASTESEN, Nordland County 

The Storting representatives from Møre og Romsdal County are, in this 

connection, particularly interesting: 


— Ms May-Helen MOLVÆR GRIMSTAD (Christian Democratic Party) 


— Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM ORHEIM (Labour Party) 

— Mr Asmund KRISTOFFERSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Lodve SOLHOLM (Progress Party) 

— Mr Harald Tom NESVIK (Progress Party) 

— Mr Gudmund RESTAD (Centre Party), former police officer 

— Mr Leif Helge KONGSHAUG (Liberal Party) 

— Mr Petter LØVIK (Conservative Party) 

51 



51


Deputy representatives for the Labour Party in Møre og Romsdal County: 

— Mr Ottar KALDHOL, Ulstein 

— Mr Kjell Terje FEVÅG, Kristiansund 

— Ms Grethe BJØRLO, Ålesund 

— Mr Jan SILSETH, Sunndal 

— Mr Bernhard RIKSFJORD, Aukra 

— Ms Gudny FAGERHOL, Ørsta 

Deputy representatives for the Christian Democratic Party in Møre og 

Romsdal County: 

— Mr Modulf AUKAN, Tustna 

— Ms Anne Lise LUNDE, Stranda 

— Mr Svein Atle ROSETH, Nesset 

— Ms Reidun VIGESTAD BERGE, Ørsta 

— Mr Magnar HEGGERNES (police officer), Vanylven 

Deputy representatives for the Progress Party in Møre og Romsdal County: 

— Ms Gerd FLADSET, Averøy 

— Mr Arve Hans OTTERLEI, Fræna 

— Mr Jan Steinar ENGELI JOHANSEN, Averøy 

— Mr Oscar Jarle GRIMSTAD, Hareid 

— Mr Gustav HAREIDE (physician), Ålesund 

Deputy representatives for the Conservative Party in Møre og Romsdal 

County: 

— Mr Dagfinn RIPNES, Kristiansund 

— Ms Elisabeth RØBEKK NØRVE, Ålesund 

— Mr Lars RAMSTAD, Rauma 

— Ms Marianne HOFSETH, Ålesund 

Deputy representatives for the Centre Party in Møre og Romsdal County: 

— Mr Jørgen HOLTE, Volda 

— Ms Eli SOLLIED ØVERAAS, Vestnes 

— Mr Per Ivar LIED (aspirant Ministry of Foreign Affairs), Stranda 

52 



52


— Ms Else BRANDVOLL ANDRESEN, Surnadal 

Deputy representatives for the Liberal Party in Møre og Romsdal County: 

— Ms Aud FOLKESTAD, Stranda 

— Ms Sylvia HAMMERSVIK, Molde 

— Mr Arne Birger TUNHEIM, Giske 

— Mr Iver G NORDSETH, Smøla 



— ANDERSEN Torbjørn (Progress Party) 

— DUESUND WOIE Åse Gunhild (Christian Democratic Party) 

— HALVORSEN Gunnar (Labour Party) 

— OLSEN Jan Olav (Conservative Party) 


— ANDERSEN Anne Berit (Conservative Party) 

— ERIKSEN Dagrun (Christian Democratic Party) 

— GITMARK Peter (Conservative Party), stand-in for Mr Ansgar 

GABRIELSEN 

— KLUNGLAND Rolf Terje (Labour Party) 

— LILLETUN Jon (Christian Democratic Party) 


— ARNØY HALL Siri (Socialist Left Party) 

— BJØRNSTAD Vidar (Labour Party) 

— CHRISTIANSEN Julie (Conservative Party) 

— DAHL André (Conservative Party), stand-in for Mr Jan PETERSEN 

— ENGEBRETSEN Kjell (Labour Party) 

— EVJE Ursula (Progress Party) 

— FOSSLI Grethe (Labour Party) 

— HAGA Åslaug (Centre Party) 

53 



53


— HOLSTAD Einar (Christian Democratic Party), stand-in for Ms 

Valgerd S HAUGLAND 

— HØGLUND Morten (Progress Party) 

— KVAKKESTAD André (Progress Party) 

— ONARHEIM Leif Frode (Conservative Party) 

— REIKVAM Rolf (Socialist Left Party) 

— SANNER Jan Tore (Conservative Party) 

— SJØLI Sonja Irene (Conservative Party) 


— BERGO LUND Magnar (Socialist Left Party) 

— ENG Sigrun (Labour Party) 

— HELLELAND Trond (Conservative Party) 

— HUNDHAMMER HEIEREN Beate (Conservative Party) 

— JAGLAND Thorbjørn (Labour Party) 

— KNUDSEN Ulf Erik (Progress Party) 

— MARTHINSEN Finn Kristian (Christian Democratic Party) 


— BALLO Olav Gunnar (Socialist Left Party) 

— NIELSEN Eva (Labour Party) 

— ROBERTSEN Raymond (Conservative Party) 

— SCHJØTT-PEDERSEN Karl Eirik (Labour Party) 


— ANDERSEN Karin (Socialist Left Party) 

— BREDVOLD Per Roar (Progress Party) 

— BRUSTAD Sylvia (Labour Party) 

— FALDET Eirin (Labour Party) 

— GLØTVOLD Ola (Centre Party) 

— HERNÆS Bjørn (Conservative Party) 

— STORBERGET Knut (Labour Party) 

— WISLØFF-NILSSEN Åse (Christian Democratic Party) 

54 



54



— AKSELSEN Olav (Labour Party) 

— EKELAND Silja (Conservative Party), stand-in for Ms Erna 

SOLBERG 

— FRØILAND Ranveig (Labour Party) 

— HAGESÆTER Gjermund (Progress Party) 

— HALLERAKER Øyvind (Conservative Party) 

— HANSEN Torbjørn (Conservative Party) 

— LJONES Ingmar (Christian Democratic Party) 

— LUND Leif (Labour Party) 

— LYSBAKKEN BJØRLO Audun (Socialist Left Party) 

— NILSEN Oddvard (Conservative Party) 

— SKJÆLAAEN Rune (Centre Party) 

— SORTEVIK Arne (Progress Party) 

— SÆLE APELTHUN Anita (Christian Democratic Party) 

— SØRFONN Ingebrigt (Christian Democratic Party) 

— VALLE Ågot (Socialist Left Party) 

— VIHOVDE May Britt (Liberal Party), stand-in for Mr Lars 

SPONHEIM 

— WOLDSETH S Karin (Progress Party) 


— AUKAN Modulf (Christian Democratic Party), stand-in for Mr Kjell 

Magne BONDEVIK 

— GRIMSTAD MOLVÆR May-Helen (Christian Democratic Party) 

— JACOBSEN Bjørn (Socialist Left Party) 

— KRISTOFFERSEN Asmund (Labour Party) 

— LØVIK Petter (Conservative Party) 

— NESVIK T Harald (Progress Party) 

— NØRVE RØBEKK Elisabeth (Conservative Party) 

— ORHEIM BEKKEMELLEM Karita (Labour Party) 

— SOLHOLM Lodve (Progress Party) 

— ØVERAAS SOLLIED Eli (Centre Party) 


— BASTESEN Steinar (Coastal Party) 

— ELLINGSEN Jan Arild (Progress Party) 

— ELVIK Åsa (Socialist Left Party) 

55 



55


— ENOKSEN Odd Roger (Centre Party) 

— HANSEN Geir-Ketil (Socialist Left Party) 

— KRISTIANSEN Ivar (Conservative Party) 

— PEDERSEN Torny (Labour Party) 

— SAHL Jan (Christian Democratic Party) 

— SOLBERG Hill-Marta (Labour Party) 

— STRØM Tor-Arne (Labour Party) 

— SVENDSEN Kenneth (Progress Party) 

— VOIE Søren Fredrik (Conservative Party) 


— BJØRKLUND Kjetil (Socialist Left Party) 

— BLANKENBORG Haakon (Labour Party) 

— BRØRBY Berit (Labour Party) 

— ENGER Inger S (Centre Party) 

— NISTAD Thore A (Progress Party) 

— RUDIHAGEN Torstein (Labour Party) 

— THOMMESSEN Olemic (Conservative Party) 

Oslo County: 

— ERIKSEN Ine-Marie (Conservative Party), stand-in for Mr Per-K 

FOSS 

— FROYN Bjørgulv (Labour Party) 

— GRANDE SKEI Trine (Liberal Party), stand-in for Mr Odd E 

DØRUM 

— HAGEN Carl I (Progress Party) 

— HALVORSEN Kristin (Socialist Left Party) 

— HILDENG Britt (Labour Party) 

— HOLMÅS Heikki (Socialist Left Party) 

— JENSEN Siv (Progress Party) 

— KJÆSTAD Hans R (Conservative Party), stand-in for Ms Kristin K 

DEVOLD 

— LARSSEN Heidi (Conservative Party) 

— LØNNING Inge (Conservative Party) 

— NYBAKK Marit (Labour Party) 

— RAFIQ Afshan (Conservative Party) 

— RISE Lars (Christian Democratic Party) 

— STOLTENBERG Jens (Labour Party) 

— SØRENSEN Heidi (Socialist Left Party) 

56 



56



— GJEDREM Olaf (Christian Democratic Party), stand-in for Mr Einar 

STEENSNÆS 

— HØIE Bent (Conservative Party) 

— KLEPPA MELTVEIT Magnhild (Centre Party) 

— LANGELAND Hallgeir H (Socialist Left Party) 

— MELING Siri A (Conservative Party) 

— NORDTUN Tore (Labour Party) 

— SIMONSEN Jan (independent) 

— STARRFELT AUSDAL Oddbjørg (Labour Party) 

— TØRRESDAL Bjørg (Christian Democratic Party) 

— VAKSDAL Øyvind (Progress Party) 

— VALLERSNES Finn Martin (Conservative Party) 


— HODDEVIK Sverre (Conservative Party) 

— RINGSTAD Jorunn (Centre Party) 

— RØYS GRANDE Heidi (Socialist Left Party) 

— OSMUNDNES Per Steinar (Christian Democratic Party), stand-in for 

Mr Magne AARØEN 

— SANDAL Reidar (Labour Party) 


— ALVHEIM John I (Progress Party) 

— HANSEN OPPEBØEN Sigvald (Labour Party) 

— HOLMBERG Kari Lise (Conservative Party) 

— MOLVIK Sigbjørn (Socialist Left Party) 

— OLSEN Gunn (Labour Party) 

— RAHM Bror Yngve (Christian Democratic Party) 

Troms County: 

— ARNESEN Bendiks H (Labour Party) 

— JENSEN Lena (Socialist Left Party) 

— KONGLEVOLL Synnøve (Labour Party) 

— KONRADSEN Åge (Conservative Party) 

57 



57


— KORSBERG Øyvind (Progress Party) 

— ØSTBERG Ivar (Christian Democratic Party) 


— ARNSTAD Marit (Centre Party) 

— GAUNDAL Aud (Labour Party) 

— HANSSEN Bjarne Håkon (Labour Party) 

— LYNGSTAD Arne (Christian Democratic Party) 

— RYAN Inge (Socialist Left Party) 

— SANDBERG Per (Progress Party) 


— DJUPEDAL Øystein (Socialist Left Party) 

— GISKE Trond (Labour Party) 

— GJUL Gunn Karin (Labour Party) 

— HOFSTAD Linda Cathrine (Conservative Party), stand-in for Mr 

Børge BRENDE 

— LUND Morten (Centre Party) 

— LÅNKE Ola T (Christian Democratic Party) 

— MALVIK VAGGEN Ingvild (Socialist Left Party) 

— MOMYR Michael (Conservative Party) 

— STENSAKER Christopher (Progress Party) 

— ØYANGEN Gunhild (Labour Party) 


— FLÅTTEN Svein (Conservative Party) 

— HOGSNES Hans Kristian (Conservative Party) 

— KOSMO Jørgen Hårek (Labour Party) 

— MONSEN Per Erik (Progress Party) 

— RUI Anne Helen (Labour Party) 

— SKARBØVIK Elsa (Christian Democratic Party) 

— THORKILDSEN Inga Marte (Socialist Left Party) 

— WIDTH Per Ove (Progress Party) 

58 



58



— DYBEVIG Carsten (Conservative Party), stand-in for Ms Ingjerd 

SCHOU 

— ENGESET Martin (Conservative Party) 

— HANSEN May (Socialist Left Party) 

— HANSEN Svein R (Labour Party) 

— HEDSTRØM Øystein (Progress Party) 

— HOLTEN Odd (Christian Democratic Party) 

— RØD Henrik (Progress Party) 

— ØYE Signe (Labour Party) 

The Norwegian Government Oct 25 th , 1996–Oct 17 th , 1997 

Prime Minister: — Mr Thorbjørn JAGLAND (Labour Party) 


— Mr Jens STOLTENBERG (Labour Party) 

The Ministy of Defence: 





— Ms Anne HOLT (Labour Party) 

— Ms Gerd-Liv VALLA (Labour party), from Feb 2 nd , 1997 


— Mr Reidar SANDAL (Labour Party) 




— Ms Sissel RØNBECK (Labour Party) 

59 



59



— Ms Turid BIRKELAND (Labour Party) 


— Mr Dag Terje ANDERSEN (Labour Party) 


— Mr Bjørn Tore GODAL (Labour Party), foreign affairs 

— Ms Kari NORDHEIM-LARSEN (Labour Party), international 

development etc 

The Ministry of Petroleum and Energy: 


— Ms Ranveig FRØILAND (Labour Party), from Dec 19 th , 1996 

The Ministry of Health and Social Affairs: 

— Ms Hill-Marta SOLBERG (Labour Party), social affairs 

— Mr Gudmund HERNES (Labour Party), health affairs 

The Ministry of Trade and Industry: 


The Ministry of Planning and Coordination: 

— Mr Terje RØD-LARSEN (Labour Party) 

— Mr Bendik RUGAAS (Labour Party), from Nov 29 th , 1996 



The Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development: 


60 



60


The Norwegian Government Oct 17 th , 1997–Mar 17 th , 2000 

Prime Minister: — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK (Christian Democratic 

Party) 





— Ms Eldbjørg LØWER (Liberal Party), from Mar 15 th , 1999 


— Mr Peter ANGELSEN (Centre Party) 


— Ms Aud-Inger AURE (Christian Democratic Party) 

— Mr Odd Einar DØRUM (Liberal Party), from Mar 15 th , 1999 




— Ms Guro FJELLANGER (Liberal Party) 


— Mr Odd Einar DØRUM (Liberal Party) 

— Mr Dag Jostein FJÆRVOLL (Christian Democratic Party), from Mar 

15 th , 1999 




— Mr Kåre GJØNNES (Christian Democratic Party) 


— Mr Knut VOLLEBÆK (Christian Democratic Party), foreign affairs 

— Ms Hilde FRAFJORD JOHNSON (Christian Democratic Party), 

international development and human rights 

61 



61



— Ms Marit ARNSTAD (Centre Party) 


— Ms Magnhild MELTVEIT KLEPPA (Centre Party), social affairs 

— Mr Dagfinn HØYBRÅTEN (Christian Democratic Party), health 

affairs 



The Ministry of Labor and Government Administration: 

— Ms Eldbjørg LØWER (Liberal Party) 

— Ms Laila DÅVØY (Christian Democratic Party), from Mar 15 th , 1999 




— Ms Ragnhild QUESETH HAARSTAD (Centre Party) 

— Mr Odd Roger ENOKSEN (Centre Party), from Mar 15 th , 1999 

The Norwegian Government Mar 17 th , 2000–Oct 19 th , 2001 

Information up-to-date Sep 25 th , 2001 

Prime Minister: — Mr Jens STOLTENBERG (Labour Party) 

Secretaries: Mr Jonas GAHR STØRE, Mr Norvald MO, Mr Tom 

THERKILDSEN, Ms Lisbeth BERG-HANSEN 

Political advisers: Ms Hilde SINGSAAS, Ms Kathinka MEIRIK 

The Ministry of Labour and Government Administration: 


Secretary: Ms Marianne SEIP HAUGSNES 

Political adviser: Ms Hilde Kristine NYSTEN THORKILDSEN 


— Ms Karita BEKKEMELLEM ORHEIM (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Solveig SOLBAKKEN 

62 



62


Political advisers: Mr Kjell Erik ØIE, Ms Eli Anne HOLE 



Secretaries: Mr Vidar OVESEN, Ms Ellen MO, Ms Hege Marie 

NORHEIM 

Political adviser: Mr Torbjørn GIÆVER ERIKSEN 


— Mr Otto GREGUSSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Ellen BERGLI 

Political adviser: Ms Venke NORDEIDE 



Secretary: Mr Øystein SINGSAAS 

Political adviser: Ms Tonje WESTBY 


— Ms Hanne HARLEM (Labour Party) 

Secretaries: Mr Øystein MÆLAND, Ms Anne Lise RYEL 

Political adviser: Mr Kjetil MJØSUND 


— Mr Trond GISKE (Labour Party) 

Secretaries: Ms Nina TANGNÆS GRØNVOLD, Ms Randi ØVERLAND 

Political adviser: Mr Wegard Håkon HARSVIK 



Secretaries: Mr Steinar PEDERSEN, Mr Audun TRON, Mr Sverre 

BUGGE, Mr Einar GELIUS 

Political adviser: Ms Marianne AASEN AGDESTEIN 


— Ms Ellen HORN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Roger INGEBRIGTSEN 

Political adviser: Ms Aina HOLST 


— Mr Bjarne Håkon HANSSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Sveinung VALLE 

63 



63


Political adviser: Ms Sikke NÆSHEIM 


— Ms Siri BJERKE (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Mr Stein LIER-HANSEN 

Political adviser: Mr Jo Stein MOE 



Secretaries: Ms Britt SCHULTZ, Mr Tore O SANDVIK 

Political advisers: Mr Trygve BOLSTAD, Ms Helga PEDERSEN 



Secretary: Ms Bjørg Kirsten SANDAL 

Political adviser: Mr Erlend JAHNS BROLI 


— Mr Terje MOE GUSTAVSEN (Labour Party) 

Secretary: Ms Eirin Kristin SUND 

Political adviser: Mr Arnt Frode JENSEN 


— Ms Guri INGEBRIGTSEN (Labour Party), social affairs 

— Mr Tore TØNNE (Labour Party), healt affairs 

Secretaries: Mr Lars Erik FLATØ, Mr Tore HAGEBAKKEN 

Political advisers: Ms Inger Marit N EIRA, Ms Eva Torunn JUPSKÅS 


— Mr Thorbjørn JAGLAND (Labour Party), foreign affairs 

— Ms Anne Kristin SYDNES (Labour Party), international development 

Secretaries: Mr Jan BØHLER, Mr Raymond JOHANSEN, Mr Espen 

BARTH EIDE, Ms Sigrun MØGEDAL 

Political adviser: Ms Anne Marit BJØRNFLATEN, Mr Håvard 

AAGESEN 

64 



64


The Norwegian Government Oct 19 th , 2001– 

Information up-to-date Mar, 2005 

Prime Minister: — Mr Kjell Magne BONDEVIK (Christian Democratic 

Party) 

Ministry of Agriculture and Food: 


Ministry of Children and Family Affairs: 

— Ms Laila DÅVØY (Christian Democratic Party) 

Ministry of Culture and Church Affairs: 


Ministry of Defence: 

— Ms Kristin KROHN DEVOLD (Conservative Party) 

Ministry of Education and Research: 

— Ms Kristin CLEMET (Conservative Party) 

Ministry of Finance: 


Ministry of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs: 


Ministry of Foreign Affairs: 

— Mr Jan PETERSEN (Conservative Party), foreign affairs 

— Ms Hilde FRAFJORD JOHNSON (Christian Democratic Party), 

international development etc 

Ministry of Health and Care Services: 

— Mr Ansgar GABRIELSEN (Conservative Party) 

Ministry of Justice and the Police: 

— Mr Odd Einar DØRUM (Liberal Party) 

Ministry of Modernisation: 

— Mr Morten Andreas MEYER (Conservative Party) 

65 



65


Ministry of Local Government and Regional Development: 


Ministry of Petroleum and Energy: 

— Ms Thorhild WIDVEY (Conservative Party) 

Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs: 

— Mr Dagfinn HØYBRÅTEN (Christian Democratic Party) 

Ministry of Trade and Industry: 

— Mr Børge BRENDE (Conservative Party) 

Ministry of Transport and Communications: 

— Ms Torild SKOGSHOLM (Liberal Party) 

Ministry of the Environment: 

— Mr Knut Arild HAREIDE (Christian Democratic Party) 

The Norwegian Supreme Court — Jan, 1998 

Mr Gunnar BERGBY (Director), b Aug 28, 1947 

Mr Carsten SMITH (Chief Justice), b Jul 13, 1932 

Ms Vera HOLMØY (judge), b Apr 27, 1931 

Mr Jan Rasmus SKÅRE (judge), b Jan 17, 1929 

Mr Gunnar AASLAND (judge), b Apr 15, 1936 

Mr Jens BUGGE (judge), b May 10, 1930 

Mr Trond DOLVA (judge), b Jul 13, 1934 

Mr Tore SCHEI (judge), b Feb 19, 1946 

Ms Liv GJØLSTAD (judge), b Jan 9, 1945 

Mr Ketil LUND (judge), b Oct 14, 1939 

Ms Karenanne GUSSGARD (judge), b Jan 2, 1940 

Mr Steinar TJOMSLAND (judge), b Jul 23, 1948 

Ms Kirsti COWARD (judge), b Dec 19, 1940 

Mr Magnus AARBAKKE (judge), b Oct 14, 1934 

Mr Eilert STANG LUND (judge), b Jul 15, 1939 

Mr Lars OFTEDAL BROCH (judge), b Jan 1, 1939 

Mr Hans FLOCK (judge), b Apr 18, 1940 

Mr Magnus MATNINGSDAL (judge), b Sep 29, 1951 

66 



66


Mr Georg Fredrik RIEBER-MOHN (judge), b Aug 13, 1945 

Ms Karin M BRUZELIUS (judge), b Feb 19, 1941 

The Norwegian Supreme Court — Dec, 2000 


Mr Carsten SMITH (Chief Justice), b Jul 13, 1932 

Ms Vera HOLMØY (judge), b Apr 27, 1931 

Mr Karl Arne UTGÅRD (judge), b Mar 6, 1951 


Mr Jens Edvin A SKOGHØY (judge), b Feb 16, 1955 

Mr Trond DOLVA (judge), b Jul 13, 1934 

Mr Tore SCHEI (judge), b Feb 19, 1946 






Mr Magnus AARBAKKE (judge), b Oct 14, 1934 







Ms Nina FRISAK (judge), b Nov 28, 1950 

The Norwegian Supreme Court — May, 2005 


Mr Tore SCHEI (Chief Justice), b Feb 19, 1946 

Mr Karl Arne UTGÅRD (judge), b Mar 6, 1951 


67 



67


Mr Jens Edvin A SKOGHØY (judge), b Feb 16, 1955 

Ms Inger-Else STABEL (judge), b Dec 14, 1946 

Mr Ole Bjørn STØLE (judge), b Apr 9, 1950 












Mr Sverre MITSEM (judge), b Jul 3, 1944 

Ms Toril Marie ØIE (judge), b Jul 17, 1960 

The Norwegian Supreme Court commanded by Chief Justice Mr Carsten 

SMITH and nonchalantly ―supervised‖ by Mr Gunnar BERGBY has constantly 

been a main source of diabolic rancor, injustice and corruption in this case, 

and — though he left his post in 2002 — recent intelligence have demonstrated 

Mr Smith still actively entertains his satanically dictated virulence towards me. 

It‘s not impossible Mr Smith and Mr Bergby may be directly linked to the acutely 

fiendish Black Mass slaughtering of a young demimonde lured into the base- 

ment of the Supreme Court erection under false pretenses (in 1992/-93 it was 

still easy to access/leave corresponding building entirely undetected by guards 

and other security measures). Frequently strolling the streets around the Supreme 

Court and governmental high-rise blocks in Oslo, the likable and good- 

looking ―woman of the profession‖ had several politicians/officials amongst her 

customers, and her convenient ―disappearance‖ was sequentially hushed up, of 

course — 

Covert affiliation to regular Satanism and occult sects may partially explain 

outlined immolation..... 

In 1992 Mr Harald HEADLESS (cf p 31) willingly sanctioned the stark illegal 

and doubtlessly cracked conspiracy against me, and since then he and his nearest 

family ‘ve exhibited particular and — to me — wholly undesirable interest for 

my personal undertakings. 

The criminal inclination, unfairness, grave disrespect for the human rights and 

general ignominy persistently displayed by the official royal family of Norway 

in this case, clearly excludes friendly and even diplomatic relations with them 

68 



68


(cf Aphorisms ##135, 136 and 137 etc). It should also be called attention to the 

disgraceful fact Harald Headless‘ father, King Olav V, had one of his faithful 

employees incarcerated and maltreated at a state controlled bedlam exclusively 

because he championed the human rights of other and unseemly hounded/exploited 

courtiers..... 

However; there has also been a number indecorous, markedly loony and unduly 

maleficent aggressions not directly attributable to said, royal family themselves 

— but to their various courtiers/intendants usw. 

By November 1993 King Harald Headless‘ Lord Chamberlain, Marshal of 

the Court and private secretary was Mr Lars Petter FORBERG, Mr Arne 

OMHOLT and Ms Berit TVERSLAND, respectively. 

His aides-de-camp was: Mr Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr 

Jon RIKTER-SVENDSEN, Mr Kai Ole HOLTER, Ms Anne RYDNING, Mr 

Per Hermann BODAL and Mr Terje ÅGREN, respectively. 




His aides-de-camp was: Mr Petter Andreas ASK, Mr Tor Arnt SANDLI, Mr 

Ole SANNES, Mr Nils Petter GRANHOLT, Mr Per HØIBY and Ms Merete 

Kristine GUNDERSEN, respectively. 




His aides-de-camp was: Mr Bjørn RUUD, Mr Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Øivind 

BERGENE, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr Gunnar Torgny STOKLAND, Mr 

Anders RANGUL and Ms Anne RYDNING, respectively. 




His aides-de-camp was: Mr Ulf Erik HUSEBØ, Mr Jørgen BERGGRAV, Mr 

Jon RIKTER-SVENDSEN, Mr Kai Ole HOLTER, Mr Per-Hermann BODAL, 

Mr Terje ÅGREN and Ms Anne RYDNING, respectively. 

By May 2005 King Harald Headless‘ Lord Chamberlain, Marshal of the 

Court and private secretary was Mr Rolf T ANDERSEN, Mr Arne OMHOLT 

and Ms Berit TVERSLAND, respectively. 

69 



69


September 4 th , 1992, the Norwegian PM, Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND, 

opportunistically changed several of her governmental ministers — those 

removed was: 

The new ministers was: 

Cf pp 31–32 of nearby report. 

Ms Tove VEIERØD 

Ms Tove STRAND GERHARDSEN 

Ms Oddrun PETTERSEN 

Ms Kari GJESTEBY 

Mr Ole KNAPP 

Mr Kjell BORGEN 

Mr Werner CHRISTIE 

Mr Jan Henry T OLSEN 

Mr Finn KRISTENSEN 

Ms Grete FAREMO 

Ms Grete KNUDSEN 

Ms Oddny ALEKSANDERSEN 

Ms Kari NORDHEIM-LARSEN 

Mr Gunnar BERGE 

For penological etc reasons, the criminaloids Mr Werner CHRISTIE, Ms Grete 

FAREMO and Ms Grete KNUDSEN should be singled out. 

It‘s of particular interest that Ms Gro Harlem Brundtland‘s youngest son, 

Jørgen, committed suicide Sep 24 th , 1992 — a few days before the cops sabotaged 

my tenancy agreement and initiated their terrorism (cf pp 15–18)..... 

Before finally succeeding, Jørgen had attempted to kill himself several times 

earlier in his short lifetime — a sinistrous fact by 1992 wholly unknown to his 

MD/MPH-mother (significantly enough Ms Harlem Brundtland has functioned 

as Director of Health Services for Oslo‘s schoolchildren.....she engaged in re- 

search on children‘s health issues at Nic Waal‘s Institute, and has described the 

notoriously criminal Norwegian alienists — Mr Leo EITINGER [1912–96] and 

Mr Ørnulv ØDEGÅRD [1892–1976] — as likable psychiatry teachers). 

May 13 th , 1998, the World Health Assembly elected Ms Harlem Brundtland 

Director-General of the World Health Organization* (*WHO) — cf Doc 

#377, entry of said date* (*it should be underlined my fiancée was murdered as 

a result of iniquities brought about by Ms Harlem Brundtland and her criminally 

depraved accomplices. As regards the president of the villainous kangaroo court, 

70 



70


Mr Ivar OFTEDAHL, there still circulates a fistful incensing anecdotes in NO- 

Molde illustrating his goatish show-off, lawlessness, heavy drinking and gene- 

rally bunglesome demeanor etc. If Ms Harlem Brundtland is an unsuccessful 

mother, Mr Oftedahl is most certainly a defective father — both largely respon- 

sible for the psychiatric usw misery of their respective children [in 1998 we 

carried out punctilious investigation proving the apartment of Mr Oftedahl‘s 

son — Ravn OFTEDAHL — had been infected by cobweb-optics* {*cf vg 

Doc‘s ##123, 2037 and 3217} underhandedly installed at request from his per- 

verted dad]). 

In the Constitution of the WHO it‘s laid down the following principles are fundamental 

to the happiness, harmonious relations and security of all people: 

Health is a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and 

not merely the absence of disease or infirmity. 

The enjoyment of the highest attainable standard of health is one of the 

fundamental rights of every human being without distinction of race, 

religion, political belief, economic or social condition. 

The health of all peoples is fundamental to the attainment of peace and 

security and is dependent upon the fullest co-operation of individuals and 

States. 

The achievement of any State in the promotion and protection of health is 

of value to all. 

Healthy development of the child is of basic importance; the ability to 

live harmoniously in a changing total environment is essential to such 

development. 

Informed opinion and active co-operation on the part of the public are of 

the utmost importance in the improvement of the health of the people. 

Governments have a responsibility for the health of their peoples which 

can be fulfilled only by the provision of adequate health and social 

measures. 

According to Article 1 in the WHO Constitution the objective of the organization 

shall be the attainment by all peoples of the highest possible level of 

health, and in order to achieve this objective (Article 2) the functions of the 

organization shall be: 

71 



71


a) to act as the directing and co-ordinating authority on international health 

work; 

b) to establish and maintain effective collaboration with the United Nations, 

specialized agencies, governmental health administrations, professional 

groups and such other organizations as may be deemed appropriate; 

c) to assist governments, upon request, in strengthening health services; 

.....etc.....and; 

v) generally to take all necessary action to attain the objective of the 

organization. 

Ms Harlem Brundtland‘s and the Norwegian Government‘s etc radically dis- 

orderly conduct vis-à-vis me point by point seriously violates the WHO 

statutes.....: 

Since 1992 it has been a main objective for Norwegian authorities to maim 

my general health, ruin my social relationships, isolate me, deny my juridical 

rights, subdue/quench legal complaints to international fora, mar my re- 

putation, intimidate me, induce pecuniary destitution, provoke harmful tribu- 

lations, obstruct globally lifesaving work, minimize my standard of living 

and — if possible — incite criminality and unethical behavior (cf Doc #4588 

etc). 

The pernicious misconduct of Norwegian authorities in this case are precisely 

described in the Bible, Isaiah 59:5–8 (corresponding statements are 

wholly valid independent of your religious faith and theological opinions — 

cf Doc #2037, ―Norwegian Vice Spreading‖): 

―They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spider‘s web. Whoever 

eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. 

Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves 

with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence 

are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed 

innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and 

destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; 

there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into 

crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.‖ 

72 



72


In many respects Mr Ivar Oftedahl and Ms Harlem Brundtland represents the 

archetype of my Norwegian foes; frailty, ignoble/plebeian, crabby, evil/base, 

corrupted/criminal, unstable/dishonest, lunatic/schizophrenic, hypocritical/ 

pharisaic, malevolent/envious, arrogant/aggressive and sickly self-assertive 

miscreants attempting to compensate for their shortcomings, inferiority complex 

and psychopathology through ascribing their nasty defects, wickedness, 

mental derangement and systematic lawbreaking to others (cf Doc‘s ##633 

[―Norwegian Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrome‖] and 2037 [―Off- 

icial Norwegian Hypocrisy and Malevolence‖]). 

Though human status correctly may be granted my Norwegian enemies, they 

surely belongs to a particularly noxious subgroup bipeds strongly guided and 

impressed by stark diabolism, madness, injustice and general lowmindedness 

— the presence and influence of these infernally vile terrorists 

are of course absolutely detrimental to any civilized society respecting the 

human rights, guarding righteousness, and fostering ethicality, personal magnanimity, 

intellectual/scientific eminence and artistic dexterity usw. 

Amongst the many malefactors exerting themselves to harm me all these years, 

we also find Mr Lars FRØNSDAL (b Dec 01, 1945) — one of the alcoholized, 

drug abusing and markedly perverted public prosecutors in Oslo. 

The summer 1992 a few women observed Mr Frønsdal stark naked in one of 

Oslo‘s public parks — drunk as a fiddler‘s bitch and messing around with his 

beer bottles in a bag....! 

Well.....Mr Frønsdal may assuredly embrace his Mary Jane — or another 

lady, crack his flasks, be on the hog, speed downtown, lick his stamps, buy 

junk from Charlie, ride high on a good horse, practice space-basing, enjoy his 

swipes, hunt Mars hares in civic greens and have a few buttons missing 

without interference from me.....inasmuch as he doesn‘t blame me for his 

dependence, withdrawal symptoms and bad trips etc.....but: — that‘s exactly 

what he‘ve done! 

Subsequent to his unapparelled stunt, Mr Frønsdal was badly in need of a 

seemingly plausible alibi explaining his rather amusing comportment.....so, 

consequently, one of his helpful and mendacious buddies confidentially told 

him I probably had added some ―mystical substance‖ to his beer or shit pro- 

foundly upsetting his beforehand cracked brain! As might be expected of a 

desperate and debauched boozer in such an unpleasant situation, the warped 

public prosecutor devoured this alternative explanation hook, line and sinker! 

Let‘s make it perfectly clear: I‘m wholly unacquainted with Mr Frønsdal and 

I‘ve never had any kind of contact with him, and has — of course — not 

intoxicated etc his beer/narcotics/drugs! 

In this connection it may be appropriate to emphasize that the combination of 

alcohol and cocaine* (*C17H21O4N) is particularly dangerous — the 

73 



73


cocaethylene thus produced by the liver is strongly addictive and may affect 

the heart lethally.....a significant number abuse-related deaths has been caused 

by this potentially backstabbing euphoriant. 

In 1992 the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service was officially/nominally 

headed by Mr Jan Steinar GRØNDAHL (chief) and Mr Kjell Gunnar ESKILT 

(second in command) — chief of police in Oslo was Mr Willy HAUGLI. 

Other noticeable police principals in the Oslo-area in 1992 includes (though 

depraved/criminal individuals, some of those named are without guilt in this 

specific case): 

Ms Ellen HOLAGER ANDENÆS 

Mr Roger ANDRESEN 

Ms Marit BAKKEVIK 

Mr Øystein BERGER 

Mr Bjørn BIGSET 

Mr Kjell BJERKE 

Mr Nicolai BJØNNES 

Mr Lars O BROCH 

Ms Ann T BUGGE 

Mr Lars Henrik BØHLER 

Ms Else DAHL 

Mr Sigmund ENGEN 

Mr Morten ERIKSEN 

Mr Jostein E ERSTAD 

Mr Iver T FRIGAARD 

Ms Siri FRIGAARD 

Mr Truls FYHN 

Mr Anstein GJENGEDAL 

Mr Bjørn GRAN 

Ms Anne-Marie GRAN 

Mr Erling GRIMSTAD 

Mr Kjell GROBE 

Mr Tore GRÆGER 

Mr Jan A GUNDERSEN 

Mr Oddvin HAGE 

Mr Stein E HAUGEN 

Ms Ellen M HAUGSRUD 

Mr Helmer HAUKAAS 

Mr Bjørn HEGGELUND 

Mr Stein HELGESTAD 

Mr Jørn HOLME 

74 



74


Mr Bjørn HOLMSEN 

Mr Arne HUUSE 

Mr Einar HØGETVEIT 

Mr Lars HAAVIK 

Mr Stein Egil IKDAL/IKDAHL (police physician) 

Mr Hans-Petter JAHRE 

Mr Frank JENSEN 

Mr Olav JOHANSEN 

Mr Svein O KRISTIANSEN 

Mr Leif A LIER 

Mr Sverre LILLENG 

Mr Knut R MIKKELSEN 

Mr Gaute NESVIK 

Mr Leif Erik NILSEN 

Mr Roy Henry NILSEN 

Mr Thomas NORTVEDT 

Mr Lasse QVIGSTAD 

Mr Thomas RANDBY 

Mr Per REHORST 

Mr Arne RUSTAD 

Mr Svein T RØER 

Mr Leif SELJESÆTER 

Mr Einar SKEI 

Mr Kolbjørn SKJERVENGEN 

Mr Bjørn SKUGGEVIK 

Mr Jostein SKÅRE 

Mr Sveinung SPONHEIM 

Ms Trine STANDAL 

Mr Lars STOLTENBERG 

Ms Marit SULANDER 

Mr Kim R SUNDET 

Ms Inger L SÆTREN 

Mr Per SØNSTELID 

Mr Vidar THOLIN 

Mr Kai E TØRDAL 

Mr Dag ULIMOEN (police physician) 

Mr Stein ULRICH 

Mr Georg VETTI 

Mr Per E VOLLEDAL 

Mr Geir WANGANSTEN-ØYE 

Ms Inger WIIG 

Ms Halldis WINJE 

Ms Ingrid WIRUM 

75 



75


Mr Per WAAGE 

Mr Morten YGGESETH 

Mr Odd H ØSTEBØ 

At the office of the Norwegian PM (in Akersgata 42, Oslo), Ms Gro Harlem 

Brundtland, we should notice (some of those mentioned are without guilt in this 

specific case): 

— Ms Inger ANDERSEN 

— Mr Dag BERGGRAV 

— Mr Ole BERREFJORD 

— Mr Per Arne BJERKE 

— Ms Torill ENGSETH 

— Mr Trond FEVOLDEN 

— Mr Bjørn T GRYDELAND 

— Ms Målfrid AA. HELLAND 

— Ms Kari KJENNDALEN 

— Ms Sigrun H LØKEN 

— Mr Aage MONSEN 

— Ms Inger RØISE 

— Mr Trygve SCHIØLL 

— Mr Arne SPILDO 

— Ms Gerd-Liv VALLA 

— Mr Øivind ØSTANG 

— Mr Bjørn SKOGSTAD AAMO 

Amongst those employed by the Norwegian Ministry of ―Justice‖ and the Police 

in 1992, should be mentioned (though criminal/depraved persons, some of those 

named are without guilt in this specific case): 

Mr Bjørn ASKIM 

Mr Bernt O BAHR 

Mr Svein BERBU 

Ms Vigdis BERG 

Mr Bjørn BERGGREN 

Mr Øystein BLYMKE 

Mr Tom BRUNSELL 

Mr John BRUVIK 

Mr Kåre BØDAL 

Mr Tore-Jarl CHRISTENSEN 

Ms Kirsti COWARD 

76 



76


Mr Werner DALSVEEN 

Mr Leif T ELDRING 

Mr Eystein ERIKSEN 

Mr Ulf ERTZAAS 

Mr Steffen FELBERG 

Mr Jørgen FLOOD 

Mr Erling FOSSE 

Ms Inger M FRIDHOV 

Mr Johan FROM 

Ms Anne FRØSTRUP 

Mr Per GAMMELGÅRD 

Ms Hilde GAARDER 

Mr Ole HAFNOR 

Mr Harald T HAMBORG 

Mr Yngve HAMMERLIN 

Mr Gunnar HARR 

Mr Geir HAUGSTVEIT 

Mr Torgeir HEIMLI 

Mr Jan T HELLIESEN 

Mr Christian F HORST 

Ms Kari JENSEN 

Mr John JOHANSSON 

Mr Jon KAPELRUD 

Ms Ingelin KILLENGREEN 

Mr Arnulf KJÆSETH 

Ms Sissel KOFOED 

Mr Per O KVAM 

Ms Wenche KVERNELAND 

Mr Asbjørn LANGÅS 

Mr Johannes LARSEN 

Mr Kåre LEIKSETT 

Mr Tor LØKKEN 

Mr Tor MEHL 

Mr Kristian MØRKØRE 

Mr Arild NESDAL 

Mr Stein L NILSEN 

Mr Knut OLSGAARD 

Mr Stein OWE 

Mr Vidar REFVIK 

Ms Marit ROSSEHAUG 

Mr Morten RUUD 

Mr Ivar SIMASTUEN 

Mr Kaare SINGSAAS 

77 



77


Ms Evelyn SKARNES 

Mr Per Arne SKOGSTAD 

Ms Ingrid SMEDSRUD 

Ms Berit SOLLIE 

Mr Kyrre STENBRO 

Ms Astri TVERSTØL 

Mr Rasmus VASSHUS 

Mr Einar VATNE 

Mr Arild VIST 

Mr Jens S WEGNER 

Mr Rolf B WEGNER 

Mr Thorleif WAALER 

Mr Hans Olav ØSTGAARD 

Mr Kjell Bjørn AARØ 

Mr Audun AASEBØ 

Ms Eli T AASHEIM 

In 1992 the Norwegian Ministry of Social Affairs and the adjoining Public 

Health Department was — inter alios — manned by (though predominantly 

depraved/criminal/insane earthlings, some of those listed are without guilt in 

this particular case): 

— Ms Anne ALVIK 

— Ms Ellen AMUNDSEN 

— Ms Elin ANGELVIK 

— Mr Jon Olav ASPÅS 

— Mr Reidar S BANG 

— Mr Ketil BENTZEN 

— Mr Knut Å BERGE 

— Mr Kjell BILDØY 

— Ms Inger E BIRKELAND 

— Mr Andreas BJELDE 

— Ms Anne S BORGE 

— Ms Malin BRATTSTRØM 

— Mr Knut BROFOSS 

— Ms Helma BØHLER 

— Mr Hans E BØRRESEN 

— Ms Elfriede BØRSUM 

— Mr Knut B CRISTOPHERSEN 

— Mr Svein EIK 

— Ms Jorunn FRYJORDET 

— Ms Grete GJERTSEN 

78 



78


— Ms Grethe HAMMARQVIST 

— Mr Rolf HANSEN 

— Mr Bodolf HAREIDE (NB!) 

— Mr Harald E HAUGE 

— Ms Anne B HEM 

— Ms Bjørg Eva HENRIKSEN 

— Mr Peter F H HJORT (NB!) 

— Mr Fredrik H HOFFMANN 

— Mr Knut HOLM 

— Ms Kari HOLST 

— Mr Egil HORNELAND 

— Ms Karen M HVAM 

— Mr Finn HØVIK 

— Ms Inger J HAALAND 

— Mr Christian BOE KIELLAND 

— Mr Ingar Kr. KOMPELIEN 

— Mr Petter KRAMÅS 

— Mr Alfred KVALHEIM 

— Ms Heidi LANGAAS 

— Ms Unni LUND 

— Ms Lisbeth LØCHEN 

— Mr Thomas MAURITZEN 

— Mr Torbjørn MORK 

— Mr Knut MUNCH-SØEGAARD 

— Mr Arnt MYHRER 

— Ms Unn NICOLAYSEN 

— Ms Randi NILSEN 

— Mr Jon O NORBOM 

— Mr Leif NORLI 

— Ms Trine NORMANN 

— Ms Jorun O NYGÅRD 

— Ms Synnøve NYMO 

— Mr Øystein OPDAHL 

— Ms Anne ORTH 

— Mr Reidar RAND 

— Ms Aase ROKVAM 

— Mr Mons RUD 

— Mr Jan RØSEGG 

— Mr Harald SALVESEN 

— Ms Ellen SEIP 

— Mr Ketil SKOGEN 

— Mr Bjarne STRAND 

— Ms Laila B STUB 

79 



79


— Ms Eli SUNDBY 

— Ms Liv SUNNANÅ 

— Mr Øyvind SÆBØ 

— Ms Kari SØNDERLAND 

— Ms Liv TELLE 

— Ms Ellen M THORBJØRNSRUD 

— Mr Jan TVEDT 

— Mr Kåre TØNNESEN 

— Ms Gerd M VANDESKOG 

— Ms Elisabeth VAAGEN 

— Ms Tove VEIERØD 

— Ms Britt VENNER 

— Ms Mette WALAAS 

— Mr Reidar ØKLAND 

— Ms Rikka ØSTBYE 

— Mr Roger ØSTBØL 

— Mr Ketil ØSTVEDT 

— Ms Ingrunn AALVIK 

— Mr Hans J ÅNSTAD (NB!) 

— Mr Bjørn Martin AASEN (NB!) 

— Mr Olaf G AASLAND 

BRATTVÅG/HJELSET/ÅLESUND 1993 

Continued from p 30 — 

Before arriving Mr Håvik‘s private house in NO-Brattvåg, I‘d been informed 

my state employed, Norwegian foes recently had burglarized the dwelling in- 

stalling their satanic cobweb-optics and pinhole-microphones etc. 

As I moved into the small house, ‘twas a simple job to dovetail corresponding 

intelligence reports — and, empirically, I was NOT surprised to learn that even 

the toilet and bedrooms had been infected by AV surveillance contraptions. 

As soon as I went outside e.g to buy victuals or visit relatives in Brattvåg, I was 

pursued by a gang thoroughly psychopathic cops — many of them known from 

the Oslo-area and the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service. 

80 



80


The nauseating abuse of AV spy-appurtenances in Brattvåg was no way limited 

to my own, modest residence — the private abodes of my aunts/uncles, additional 

cousins and some other kinsfolk had been extensively befouled by this 

hellish material as well! 

It soon became unmistakably clear the police et al systematically recorded in- 

formation about my quotidian affairs — there was comprehensive recitals of 

decent conversations with in every respects estimable octogenarians, and de- 

scriptions of trifling everyday incidents without the slightest affinity to crimi- 

nality or otherwise blameworthy behavior..... 

The worldly ambassadors of Satanic hate and excruciating iniquity, the putrid 

malevolence exhibited by my Norwegian adversaries was no surprise how- 

ever — they merely proceeded along the extirpating course exactly mapped 

very well in advance! 

The continuous provocations waged by the cops the last week of December 

1992 and the first half of January 1993, included a number of break-ins and 

illegal searches — 

As I informed various persons — e.g independent lawyers — about the ongoing 

and state instigated terror, the police quickly forged a half dozen thoroughly 

false accusations against me; it was crucial, of course, to halt legal actions and 

investigation disclosing their contemptible criminality..... 

Consequently — January 14 th — two country policemen employed by the 

sheriff office in Brattvåg and accompanied by a female council physician 

wedged their way into my living room in order to imprison me at the formerly 

described, political calaboose at NO-Hjelset! 

The police officers and the dishonest, general practitioner — Ms Iris RELLING 

NIELSEN — refused to explain where they‘d obtained a key to open the 

mortise lock in the exterior door with, and later pretended I‘d declined to let 

them into the house.....; in reality they stealthily unlocked the outer main door 

and entered wholly without announcing their presence at a moment they posi- 

tively knew I — relaxing in the sitting room — tried to hire a trustworthy coun- 

sellor utilizing Mr Håvik‘s wiretapped phone! 

Arriving the wretched devildom at Hjelset, I had an introductory parley with the 

enemy collaborating physician, Mr Knut DROTTNING. 

Exclusively another shameful and unbesought pro forma palaver designed to 

―varnish‖ my reputation additionally, I returned the distasteful compliment by 

devotedly steering the guileful Mr Drottning along a track ensuring his ultimate 

downfall..... 

As regards aforesaid Mr Magnus AASHEIM, he steadfastly stuck to his 

scelerate monkey business encompassing v.g; thoroughgoing falsification of my 

81 



81


―medical record‖, clandestine cooperation/sessions with explicitly corrupt/ 

criminal/fiendish officials and active maintenance/masking of a practically 

unbroken chain sadistic/unwarranted transgressions and trumped-up charges 

aimed at sapping my psychosomatic health etc. 

Mr Johan FOSSE — a highly fraudulent, malicious and swelled-headed young 

quack belonging to the inner circle of arrantly rotten and servilely flattering 

accomplices surrounding Mr Aasheim, should also be listed amongst the potty- 

borne sociopaths doing their best to terrorize me at the politico-strategic Paddy- 

Dolfole at Hjelset — 

During January 1993 I formally engaged Mr Olav ØYEHAUG, NO-Molde, as 

my personal counsellor in connection to the ―compulsory commitment‖ — or 

more correctly stated; political enjailment — at Hjelset. 

Mr Øyehaug was a bonhomous and rather altruistic fellow with certain family 

ties to the Brattvåg-region — although his dipsomania significantly undermined 

his attorneyship etc once in a while, he was — purely ethically spoken — 

number one amongst contemporary lawyers in Molde. 

In any event the felonious skunks in the administration at Hjelset did their best 

to unlawfully subvert Mr Øyehaug‘s professional efforts, and it‘s halfway 

remarkable they didn‘t intern him in order to quench legal remonstrations at 

that time.....! 

As a result of my unreserved human rights advocation and juridical objections 

in respect of the extended maltreatment suffered, Mr Aasheim and his truckling 

scapegraces decided to supplement the torture by coercively exposing me to 

intramuscular injections with the neurotoxic cholinesterase inhibitor Trilafon* 

(*Basically a popular trade name for the heterocyclic sulfur compound perphen- 

azine — a piperazinyl phenothiazine, C21H26ClN3OS, with chemical name 

4-[3-(2-chlorophenothiazin-10-yl)propyl]-1-piperazineethanol and molecular 

weight 403.97). Cf pp 89–103. 

Like the majority of other anticholinesterases* (*Various substances contravening 

solvolysis of the neurotransmitter acetylcholin. By inhibiting the hydrolytic- 

catalytic action of the enzyme cholinesterase — i.e acetylcholinesterase, accumulation 

of acetylcholin in the body will reach potentially fatal levels rapidly) 

— e.g the chemical warfare agents Tabun (O-ethyldimethylamidophosphorylcyanide/etyl 

dimethylamidocyanophosphate, C5H11N2O2P) and Sarin (isopropyl 

methylphosphonofluoridate, C4H10FO2P) — Trilafon toxicologically influences 

certain nerve tissue v.g by pathologically altering the cholinergic synaptic trans- 

mission at neuroeffector/-muscular junctions item in the autonomic ganglia and 

central nervous system. 

Malignantly affecting e.g the tropic, receptive, conductive and transmissive 

82 



82


functions of the neurons, neuroleptic drugs — and cholinergic antagonists on 

the whole — are notorious for their explicit psychosomimetic properties. 

Blockading the dopamine receptors and woefully overturning v.g the cortico- 

diencephalic mechanism* (*Hypothalamus is the part of this apparatus acti- 

vating, controlling and integrating e.g the peripheral autonomic mechanism, 

endocrine activity and numerous somatic functions. The hypothalamic nuclei 

controlling the anterior lobe of the pituitary — the adenohypophysis — do so 

by synthesizing substances entering the portal system and thus activating the 

glandular cells of the pituitary. The adenohypophysis secrets v.g growth hormone, 

thyroid-stimulating hormone [i.e "thyrotropin"], adrenocorticotropin, 

follicle-stimulating hormone, prolactin, interstitial cell-stimulating hormone 

[i.e "luteinizing hormone"], melanocyte-stimulating hormone, β-lipotropin and 

many peptides of varying significance. The neurohypophysis produces and 

secrets e.g vasopressin and oxytocin. 

The hypothalamic hormones are v.g; thyrotropin-releasing hormone, growth 

hormone-releasing hormone, somatostatin [i.e "growth hormone-inhibiting 

hormone"], gonadotropin-releasing hormone [i.e "luteinizing hormone-releasing 

hormone"] and a prolactin-inhibiting factor commonly classified as 

―dopamine‖. 

All neurons elaborating hypophysiotropic hormones are influenced by the 

hypothalamic neurotransmitters — e.g dopamine, serotonin, acetylcholine, 

norepinephrine and endorphins — modifying the secretory activity of anterior 

pituitary hormones.), perphenazine intake is strongly productive of e.g general 

weakness, clumsiness, mental confusion, visual/auditory hallucinations, speech 

disturbances, alienation, disorganization and extensive reality distraught — 

those empoisoned are typically unable to distinguish between objective events 

and medicament induced, sensorineural/perceptual disarray etc. 

When the state paid molesters at the political dungeon at NO-Hjelset realized 

Mr Øyehaug and I planned to bring an action against the Norwegian Ministry of 

Social Affairs, they forthrightly — only slightly delayed by a few conspirational 

conversations — decided to intoxicate me with perphenazine.....because, as 

Mr Aasheim later confessed, they were wholly aware the psychosis causing and 

devitalizing properties of the drug. 

So — accompanied by further and most extensive corruption of my "medical 

record" etc, Mr Aasheim and his scummy accomplices made a feverish and 

arrantly blackhearted effort to chemically stir up genuine daftness and signifi- 

cantly impair my sturdy health and dianoetic capacity....! 

This utterly contemptible and flagrantly criminal campaign to wipe me out by 

underhandedly distributing detrimentally psychoactive substances was not 

unique however —; it's next to sure the main constituent of the granulate meti- 

culously smirched on my bread in Oslo (cf p 18) was ergot* (*i.e the mycelial 

83 



83


mass of the fungus Claviceps purpurea infecting rye and some other grasses 

— contains several poisonous alkaloids causing ergotism. The potent hallucino- 

gen "LSD" — "lysergic acid diethylamide" [C15H15N2COOH] — was first 

synthesized from ergot in 1943. LSD acts as a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, and 

a larger dose ergot excessively stimulating the serotoninergic system may 

trigger the serotonin syndrome** — **symptoms include v.g confusion/delusions, 

panic, bizarre behavior, restlessness, lethargy, epileptiform convulsions, 

tremor, muscle jerks/disorders, gangrene, extremital paresthesia, weakness, 

sweating, abdominovesical cramping, vomiting, abortion, vasoconstriction, 

angiorrhexis, hypoxemia, hemolysis, cerebral/cardiac infarction, platelet 

clotting, dyspnea, acrotism, kidney failure, anuria, hematuria, dipsosis, delusional 

stupor, hyperthermia and death), and the sickening mixture of enfeebling 

narcotics I was compelled to gulp down at NO-Åse (cf p 22) had been selec- 

tively designated to induce snafu/derangement, unconsciousness/amnesia and 

general asthenia/indisposition.....! 

Aforementioned action against the Ministry of Social Affairs had been laid to 

July 22 nd , 1993 — "Case #83-175 A." (corrected: "Case #93-175 A."), Sunnmøre 

District Court (NO-Ålesund). 

The situational putrescence considered, we had no hope whatsoever impartial 

and otherwise competent doomsmen should be appointed — and our gloomy 

expectations was duly confirmed: 

As president of the superbly damnable kangaroo court had been installed Mr 

Finn LYNGHJEM (cf Doc #377, entries of May 13, 1998 and Nov 07, 2000) 

— a professional double-dealer and duffer symptomatically serving as chairman 

of the state operated committee notoriously supposed to check over the "formal 

legality" of compulsory commitments and forced drugging etc undertaken by 

Norwegian officials, 

and as lay judges was telltalely picked out the Nazi-sympathizing lobotomy- 

advocate Mr Karl-Ewerth HORNEMAN (NO-Trondheim) — a formerly 

police employed fogy-bogie and skull-jinx obnoxiously given to public adulte- 

ration, and Mr Arild HUNSTAD (NO-Ålesund) — at that time a subordinate 

physician wholly directed by Ms Åse SVENDSEN ROLAND (cf pp 24–25), 

the sexually perverted and sadistic head of the psychiatric lockup where he was 

permanently employed. 

The Norwegian Courts of Justice Act* (*also termed the "Court Act") of Aug 

13, 1915, expressly provides that: 

§ 53; 

.....all judges should hold a Norwegian citizenship and be trustworthy men 

or women (cf §§ 60 and 76 etc ib), 

84 



84


§ 60; 

.....all judges — except lay-judges and assessors — must sign a binding 

assurance obliging them to exert their office conscientiously (cf §§ 52, 53 

and 65 ibid, item the Norwegian Constitution Article 21), 

§ 76; 

.....only persons markedly competent as co-judges and members of the jury 

through their righteousness, skills and independence should be elected (cf §§ 

52, 53, 60 and 65 ib), and that 

§ 108; 

.....nobody can operate as a judge or juror when particular circumstances 

potentially diminishing his impartiality eventuates (cf §§ 106 and 109 etc 

ibid). 

Furthermore; § 107 ib explicitly lays down that ".....neither judges nor jurors 

can serve as experts in one and the same case.....(in this case all jury members 

— viz Mr Horneman and Mr Hunstad — in their capacity as buddy-buddy 

psychiatrists and tainted mercenaries chummily backing up their accomplices/ 

seniors, functioned as — experts)", and sec's 112, 113 and 115 ibid emphasizes 

that the president of the court and his jurors are obliged to inform one another 

and the respective parties about their actual disqualification. In this court case 

unambiguous inhability after §§ 106 (items 1, 4 and 6), 107 and 108 in the Nor- 

wegian Courts of Justice Act existed, and neither judge nor lay judges possessed 

the moral and intellectual qualifications required by §§ 53, 60 and 76 ib (Mr 

Lynghjem and Mr Horneman both had a Stanford-Binet IQ of 127 [cf Doc 

#377, entry of Nov 07, 2000], and this alarming fact is in itself disqualifying...; 

though — at least in this connection — a pitifully modest score, a general and 

minimum IQ of 140 should be required of judges at all law courts)....and — not 

only was there a very distinct lack of professional competency and noological 

capability.....; we're dealing with downright corruption! 

Handpicked to cover up official turpitude and give the various illegalities a 

most treacherous garnish of "respectability", corresponding jury's felony may be 

prosecuted/adjudicated usw in agreement with — e.g — subsequent sections of 

the Norwegian Penal Code of May 22, 1902: 

§ 110; 

A judge, juror or assessor who in such capacity acts against his better 

judgment shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 

five years. 

If he thereby caused or was accessory to causing any person to be 

wrongfully subjected to penalty or to a greater penalty than he deserved, 

he shall be liable to imprisonment for a term not less than two years. 

85 



85


If the felony has resulted in the execution of a death sentence or the 

serving of a custodial sentence for more than five years, imprisonment 

for a term not exceeding 21 years may be imposed. (Cf §§ 275 and 276) 

§ 120; 

If a public servant in any record pertaining to his office makes a false 

entry or conceals the truth, or if he in preparing any official copy, 

telegram or telephone message or in stamping, marking or any other 

official attestation which is issued to serve as evidence makes or attests 

any false statement or conceals the truth, he shall be liable to loss 

of office or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding three years, but 

not exceeding six years if he has acted for the purpose of obtaining 

for himself or another an unlawful gain or injuring any person. 

(Cf §§ 116, 117, 123, 124, 275 and 276 ib) 

§ 275; 

Any person who, for the purpose of obtaining for himself or another an 

unlawful gain or inflicting damage, neglects another person's affairs 

which he manages or supervises or act against the other person's interests 

shall be guilty of breach of trust. 

The penalty for breach of trust is imprisonment for a term not exceeding 

three years. Fines may be imposed in addition to a sentence of imprison- 

ment. An accomplice shall be liable to the same penalty. Under 

especially extenuating circumstances fines alone may be imposed. 

A penalty pursuant to this section shall not be applicable to an act 

that comes under section 255, cf section 256. 

§ 276; 

The penalty for gross breach of trust is imprisonment for a term not 

exceeding six years. Fines may be imposed in addition to a sentence 

of imprisonment. An accomplice shall be liable to the same penalty. 

In deciding whether a breach of trust is gross, special regard shall be 

paid to whether the act has caused considerable economic damage, 

whether it has been committed by a public official or any other person 

by a breach of the special confidence placed in him as a consequence 

of his position or activity, whether the offender has kept false accounts 

or books or has destroyed, damaged, or concealed accounts, books or 

other documents, or whether he has knowingly caused material loss 

or danger to another person's life or health. 

86 



86


A complex case drenched with conventionally aggravating circumstances, 

accumulation, concurrence and uncommon constellations otherwise entailing 

increased penalty, the following sections of the Norwegian Penal Code has 

particular interest for the assessment of sentence: 

§ 62; 

If any person has by one or more acts committed more than one felony 

or misdemeanour punishable by imprisonment or detention, a joint cus- 

todial sentence shall be imposed which must be more severe than the 

highest minimum penalty prescribed for any of the felonies or misdem- 

eanors and must in no case exceed the highest penalty prescribed for 

any of them by more than 50 percent. The joint custodial penalty shall 

normally take the form of imprisonment when any criminal acts would 

have been punishable thereby. 

The provisions of the first paragraph shall apply correspondingly if a 

joint sentence of community service is imposed. If community service 

is imposed as well as unconditional sentence of imprisonment, in ass- 

essing the sentence of community service the unconditional sentence of 

imprisonment shall be taken into account. 

If any of the felonies or misdemeanours should have been punished by 

imprisonment, the same supplementary penalties shall be imposed in the 

case of detention as would have applied in the case of imprisonment. 

§ 63; 

If any person has by one or more acts committed more than one felony 

or misdemeanour punishable by fines, a joint fine shall be imposed 

which must be more severe than that which any one of the felonies or 

misdemeanours should have incurred. 

The court may, when some of the felonies or misdemeanours should 

have been punished by a custodial sentence and others by fines, regard 

the felonies or misdemeanours for which fines are prescribed as aggra- 

vating circumstances instead of pronouncing sentence for them. 

As his legal representative, the Norwegian Attorney-General — Mr Bjørn 

HAUG — had appointed assistant lawyer Ms Bergljot WEBSTER. 

Ms Webster was thus employed at the same office as assistant advocate 

Ms Hanne HARLEM* (*cf p 63 item Doc #377 — entries of Oct 18 and 

26) who — pathognomonically — functioned as Mr Haug's personal assi- 

stant...! 

It's perfectly clear Ms Webster and Ms Hanne Harlem indulged in numerous 

and unmistakably conspirational conversations the weeks and days before att- 

ingent court case.....and, perhaps you've guessed it; Hanne is the younger sister 

87 



87


of Ms Gro HARLEM BRUNDTLAND* (*cf pp 31, 70, 71, 72 and 76)! 

As regards Mr Magnus Aasheim* (*cf pp 29–30 and 81–82), it pleased him 

to become somatically "sick" during the doomful court case, so — he never 

gave a testimony (the depraved jury had excellent opportunities to examine Mr 

Aasheim telephonically, but symptomatically declined to make use of this 

possibility). 

The political oubliette at NO-Hjelset was represented by Mr Hans Peter 

MØLLER* (*cf p 29), who cooperated closely with said Ms Webster. 

Mr Møller and Ms Aase SVENDSEN ROLAND* (*cf pp 24, 25 and 84) — 

together with Mr Tore FÆSTØ* (*county psychiatrist and notorious screwball 

from NO-Molde hired and paid by Norwegian authorities to gloss over their 

heinous felony) — was of course amongst the few "witnesses" "examined" by 

the severely hell-ridden mock court. 

During the theatrical questioning of Ms Svendsen Roland, my lawyer — Mr 

Øyehaug — and I was forebodingly chased out of the fetid court room.....; Mr 

Øyehaug characterized the exclusion as flagrantly illegal, and told he never had 

experienced a similar shut out in his long-standing, professional career! 

When it comes to myself, I hung around the first day of the fateful lawsuit only. 

Soundly aware the satanic machination partaken by the rotten jury, my pro 

forma presence fostered "certain supranational objectives".....; through their 

premeditatedly nefarious judgment, the profane jury was allowed to irrevocably 

doom itself.....and, on behalf of the "Executive Council", I feel extremely 

delighted to inform you Mr Karl-Ewerth Horneman now is unalterably 

deposited in the worst subdivision of Hell where his agonized ululation greatly 

delectates the specially educated and remorseless tormentors! 

Carrying the signatures of Mr Lynghjem, Mr Horneman and Mr Hunstad, the 

sublunar judgment conclusion is nothing but a most mephitic and verbatim re- 

production of the acutely stinking humbug opportunistically fabricated by 

aforesaid Mr Aasheim and Mr Møller. The allegation on page 1 of the flag- 

itious libel — stating that the parties and legal representatives of the mock 

proceeding beforehand had been informed about the identity of the appointed 

jurors and that no objections as regards the composition of the kangaroo court 

had been submitted — is tactical fiddle-faddling.....; in any case neither Mr 

Øyehaug nor I can recall or physically detect the letter of July 02, 1993, refer- 

red to by Mr Lynghjem and his damnable accomplices. 

It should be rather unnecessary to bring home the corrupted and wholly scanda- 

lous "judgment conclusion" is thoroughly and legally invalid — 

88 



88


In June 1951 the French surgeon Henri-Marie LABORIT, Esq, obtained the 

compound ―4560-RP‖ from Société des Usines Chimiques Rhône-Poulenc — a 

parisian manufacturer of synthetic textiles, organic chemicals and pharmaceuticals 

(since 1961 known as Rhône-Poulenc SA). 

Mr Laborit had served as an army surgeon during World War II, and was still 

searching for a substance efficiently curing surgical/traumatic shock and war 

neurosis. Administering 4560-RP to test animals and persons about to undergo 

operative chirurgery, Mr Laborit discovered that systemic stress and presurgical 

anxiety was significantly reduced, and thus concluded he was dealing with a 

chemical powerfully influencing the central nervous system and autonomic 

functions. 

Discovered and first synthesized Oct 3 rd and Dec 11 th 1950, respectively, 4560- 

RP (i.e 10-[3-dimethylaminopropyl]-2-chlorphenothiazine) was initially tested 

on hospitalized, French bedlamites in January/February 1952. The results of the 

inaugural experiments was reported to representatives of Société Medico- 

Psychologique in Paris, who concluded the psychoactive properties of 4560-RP 

— now termed ―chlorpromazine‖ — had medical value. From June 1952 chlor- 

promazine was commonly prescribed by French physicians. 

While chlorpromazine* (*trade names Largactil/Thorazine) is considered the 

prototype of neuroleptic drugs generally, perphenazine* (*trade names 

Trilafon/Fentazine — cf p 82) was formally introduced a couple of years later. 

Though slightly different pharmaco-/toxicokinetically, perphenazine basically 

has the same pharmacodynamic and toxicological index as chlorpromazine. 

Perphenazine negatively affects practically all organs/parts of the human body, 

and on account of the more than 7000 adverse effects documented by a truly 

lavish number clinical laboratory procedures and analytical techniques etc, we 

might unimpeachably wonder if this chemopsychiatric noxa is administered 

mainly for its explicitly pathopoietic properties! 

In any case it takes at least 5000 — five thousand — compactly composed pages 

to give a scientifically commendable description of the pathogenic attributes 

substantially assignable to perphenazine.....and it is, of course, far outside the 

scope of this unpretending report to present an exhaustive treatise on the 

medicopsychological/biochemical/pathophysiological etc damages brought 

about by this chthonian toxicant. I shall nevertheless venture to launch a 

resolutely abridged sketch indicating some of the baneful side effects verily 

89 



89


attributable to perphenazine/Trilafon/Fentazine, as I believe this may be of 

common interest and value — 

Firstly perphenazine will overturn and largely invalidate the endogenous pro- 

duction, chemical properties and natural distribution etc of several catechol- 

amines chiefly generated by hydroxylation of the L-isomeric amino acid 

tyrosine* (*cf tyrosinase → cathecol oxidase). 

The 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine* (*DOPA) formed by the tyrosine hydroxylase 

is the biosynthetic precursor of the essential cathecholamines dopamine* (*[3,4- 

dihydroxyphenyl]ethyl amine), noradrenaline* (*norepinephrine) and 

adrenaline* (*epinephrine). 

The cathecolamines serves and triggers an impressive number specialized 

physiological and neurochemical etc functions and actions impeded by the 

toxicological impact of perphenazine; vital mechanisms regulating e.g blood 

pressure, heart rate, breathing, metabolism and muscle tone are temporary or 

permanently corrupted/destroyed. Dangerously interfering with the hydroxy- 

lation of phenylalanine to tyrosine and subsequent dihydropteridine reductase, 

the transamination of tyrosine to p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate and concurrent 

reaction with O2 to form homogentisate is significantly incapacitated, thus 

provoking detrimental accumulation of the nerve poison phenylpyruvic acid in 

the body fluids as well as in varietal tissues where it evades most drug 

monitoring and toxicological screening procedures usw. Exerting a generally 

cytopathogenic effect, perphenazine obstructs the natural interaction between 

various nitrogenase and reductase agents, and consequently upset the entire 

nitrogen 

equilibrium/metabolism; hydrolysis of ATP* (*adenosine triphosphate) and 

hepatic amino acid degradation is incapacitated, and the constructive functions 

of v.g the enzymes alanine/aspartate aminotransferase and glutamate dehydro- 

genase perilously hampered. 

Whereas practically all fundamental properties of cells are products of molecular 

interactions between their respective nucleic acids and proteins, the metabolically 

decisive amounts of the adenine nucleotides ATP/ADP/AMP is relatively 

disproportionated by the principally cytoclastic influence waged by perphenazine 

— ATPs phosphoryl transfer potential is diminished, and efficient hydro- 

lysis of phosphocreatine obstructed. 

Adenosine triphosphate is the universal main carrier of all forms of chemical 

energy in living organisms — as it transfer energy to other molecules, ATP loses 

its terminal phosphate group as inorganic phosphate* (*orthophosphate, Pi), or 

two of its phosphate groups as inorganic pyrophosphate* (*PPi), becoming 

adenosine diphosphate* (*ADP) or adenosine monophosphate* (*AMP), respectively. 

Described hydroxylation of ATP to ADP/Pi and AMP/PPi relies on the catalytic 

purveyance of the enzymes hexokinase* (*catalyzing the phosporylation of glu- 

90 



90


cose by ATP and regenerates ADP for the creatine kinase), creatine kinase and 

adenylate kinase item the intermediate properties of phosphoenolpyruvate* 

(*central in the conversion of phosphoglycerate to pyruvate — CH3COCOOH. 

The pyruvic acid is thus converted to acetyl coenzyme A in which form it may 

be regarded as the origin of the tricarboxylic acid cycle — also termed ―Krebs‘ 

cycle‖ or ―citric acid cycle‖; a cyclical series biochemical reactions where the 

two-carbon acetyl coenzyme A initially interacts with the four-carbon oxaloace- 

tate to yield the six-carbon citrate and to liberate coenzyme A. The actual 

reaction is catalyzed by citrate synthase, and via interconversions of various 

carboxylic acids the acetyl coenzyme A formed from pyruvate finally is 

completely oxidized to carbon dioxide.) 

While the oxidative decarboxylation of pyruvate to form acetyl coenzyme A 

(taking place within the mitochondria where electron transport by way of the 

respiratory chain generates a proton gradient across the cytosolic side of the 

inner, mitochondrial membrane) marks the commonly accepted nexus between 

glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle, the concomitant and stepwise 

circulatory oxidations where hydrogen atoms or electrons are removed from 

intermediate compounds etc quantitatively represents the major, degradative 

pathway for the generation of ATP from ADP and inorganic phosphate (as a 

matter of fact the oxidation of each nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide molecule 

is coupled to the formation of three ATP molecules, while accompanying 

oxidation of flavin adenine dinucleotide begets two molecules of ATP — this 

way each turn of the cycle may lead to the production of 11 ATP molecules 

[counting the molecule in, we may calculate the ―net yield‖ to 12 ATP molecules 

per molecule of acetyl coenzyme A and — additionally — oxidation of the 

two pyruvate molecules derived from fragmentation of glucose has given us two 

ATP molecules.....and the cycle also generates one molecule of guanosine 

triphosphate equivalent to one ATP molecule; we may thus conclude that the 

aerobic oxidation of two pyruvate molecules makes available to the cell at least 

15 times more ATP per molecule of glucose catabolized than is produced 

anaerobically. Nevertheless; acetyl coenzyme A doesn‘t exclusively arise from 

the oxidation of pyruvate, but also from that of fats and several amino acid comprising 

proteins]!) 

All in all we may correctly state that the oxidative phosphorylation where electrons 

from nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide or flavin adenine dinucleotide are 

transferred to carbon dioxide by electron carriers is responsible for the generation 

of roughly 90 percent of the ATP molecules formed when glucose is 

completely oxidized to CO2/H2O — and this process is thus, by far, the major 

source of ATP in aerobic organisms. 

Otherwise the rate of the tricarboxylic acid cycle is adjusted to meet frequently 

changing needs for cellular ATP, and the actual turnover of ATP is typically 

very high; an athlete weighing 100 kilos won‘t do a lot of physical exercising or 

heavy manual labor before he‘ve consumed his own body weight — or more — 

91 



91


of ATP (a sedentary, 80 kilos officeholder normally expends 60–70 kg ATP in 

24 hours)! 

The cellulotoxic properties of Trilafon/Fentazine (perphenazine) adversely 

affects most of the 4–7 trillion reactions ordinarily taking place within each cell 

every second, and the destructive metabolic impact of this alienist praised morbificum 

is no way limited to oxidative subversion of amino acids, carbohydrates 

and fatty acids in the tricarboxylic acid cycle....; the overall efficaciousness of 

the ―Embden-Meyerhof pathway‖ (the pyruvate produced during the anaerobic 

breakdown of glucose [i.e glucolysis] is either converted to acetyl coenzyme A 

— and thus enters the tricarboxylic acid cycle — or to lactic acid, ethanol, carbon 

dioxide or a few other, organic products) and the ―urea cycle‖* (*this cycle 

is linked to the tricarboxylic acid cycle through the synthesis of fumarate** 

[**i.e butenedioic acid, HCOOHC:CHCOOH] hydrated to malate and thus 

oxidized to oxaloacetate. The oxaloacetate may undergo transamination to 

aspartate, be converted into glucose or pyruvate or condensate with acetyl 

coenzyme A to form citrate) are also deleteriously impeded! 

The poisonous influence of perphenazine will seriously hamper almost every 

step of the glycogenesis, glycogenolysis and gluconeogenesis* (*i.e the format- 

ion of glucose from noncarbohydrate sources) — multitudinous enzymecatalyzed 

reactions are desperately impaired, and the antiporter function of the 

transport protein ATP-ADP translocase* (*i.e the adenine nucleotide carrier — 

constituting about 15% of the inner mitochondrial membrane protein) as well as 

the specialized missions of many other, mitochondrial symporters/antiporters/ 

carriers etc, consequentially corrupted. 

The adenylate kinase dependent hydrolyzation of ATP are curtailed, as perphenazine 

has messed up the optimal concentration of Mg 2+ and thus weakened 

the capacity of the magnesium ion to form a complex with ATPs terminal phos- 

phate groups — reducing the negative charge on the ion thereby becomes ardu- 

ous, and the whole substitution reaction are endangered (in addition the general 

stability of the carbonyl group in pyruvic acid has been fundamentally perverted, 

and later in the glycolysis it‘ll be burdensome for the reactive phosphate ester to 

transfer a phosphate group back to the adenosine diphosphate and thus regenerate 

ATP). 

Animadverted subversion of the ATP purveyance etc will also harm the ATPdriven 

―calcium pump‖ — the ―Ca 2+ –ATPase‖ — and a sodium–calcium exchanger 

using the Na + gradient across the plasma membrane as the main energy 

source (cf the ―Na + –K + pump‖). 

The distribution of body fluids is largely determined by osmotic forces, and the 

concentration of certain solutes in these fluids is decisive for the osmotic concentration* 

(*i.e the ―osmolality‖). 

Extracellular fluids (including blood plasma) — containing sodium as their pre- 

92 



92


dominant cation, and intracellular fluids — having potassium as their dominant 

cation, respectively amount to 25 and 33 percent of the body weight.....and ATP 

hydrolysis drives the pumping of sodium/potassium ions across the plasma 

membrane. 

The abnormalities of the acid–base balance of the blood brought about by perphenazine, 

are normally accompanied by characteristic/pathological changes in 

electrolyte concentrations in the plasma. 

Acetyl coenzyme A cannot enter the tricarboxylic acid cycle unless it condenses 

with oxaloacetate, and the synthesis of oxaloacetate by carboxylation of pyruvate 

is dangerously havocked by perphenazine — further; biotin* (*vitamin B4, 

C10H16O3N2S), a covalently attached prosthetic group of pyruvate carboxylase 

and a well-known carrier of O2, is not carboxylated unless acetyl coenzyme A is 

bound to the actual enzyme. The allosteric/catalytic properties of pyruvate carboxylase 

are — of course — undermined by perphenazine, and the functions of 

oxaloacetate as a stoichiometric intermediate in gluconeogenesis torpedoed.....the 

conversion of oxaloacetate into amino acids for protein synthesis is 

largely obstructed, and the entire production of intermediates for biosyntheses 

caretaken by the tricarboxylic acid cycle handicapped. 

The driving force of oxidative phosphorylation is the electron transfer potential 

of NADH* (*the reduced form of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide) and 

FADH2* (*the reduced form of flavin adenine dinucleotide) relative to that of 

O2, and in the respiratory chain electrons are transferred from NADH to O2 

through a sequence of three protein complexes called NADH-Q reductase and 

cytochrome oxidase. The operational power of these transmembrane complexes 

responsible for pumping protons across the inner mitochondrial membrane (i.e 

from the matrix to the cytosolic side) are severely quenched by perphenazine, as 

the initial binding of NADH and subsequent transfer of its two high-potential 

electrons to the flavin mononucleotide prosthetic group of corresponding 

complex has been significantly throttled by the neurocytotoxic qualities of the 

drug — ideal/adequate output of the reduced form of flavin mononucleotide is 

thereby thwarted. 

As coenzymes the oxidized forms of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (except 

for the presence of an additional phosphate group, the oxidized form of nicotin- 

amide adenine dinucleotide phosphate is identical with the former) are actively 

involved in more than 500 different operations, and hundreds of enzymes 

require their nicotinamide moiety — however; most of the functions of the 

actual oxidoreductases/dehydrogenases etc are spoiled by perphenazine....the 

conversion of alcohols to aldehydes/ketones, amino acids to keto acids, hemi- 

acetals to lactones and aldehydes to acids are but a few examples of reactions 

where catalytic efficiency has beeen hazardously frustrated by this nocent quack 

dope! 

93 



93


As regards peptide hormones, catecholamines and receptors of the G-protein 

class utilizing guanine nucleotide-binding proteins to interface with target 

proteins (e.g phospholipase C), perphenazine makes it knotty for corresponding 

ligand hormone to bind to the actual receptor protein thus activating the adeny- 

late cyclase through the guanine nucleotide regulatory protein binding guanosine 

triphosphate* (*GTP). 

Generally impairing the GTPase activity in regulatory protein and thus damaging 

the 21-kd ras proteins cycling between GTP and GDP* (*guanosine di- 

phosphate) forms, perphenazine will corrupt the GTP form of these proteins 

(stimulating cell growth and differentiation) item the 120-kd integral membrane 

protein and adjacent transmembrane segments of adenylate cyclase and, 

resultantly, significantly increase the cancer risk. 

The formation and further hydrolyzation of cyclic adenosine monophosphate* 

(*cAMP) to 5‘-AMP by a specific phosphodiesterase is hindered by perphenazine, 

as the activation of adenylate cyclase converting ATP to cAMP and the 

normal 3‘-OH group of the ribose unit attacking the α-phosphoryl group of 

ATP to form a phosphate bound with the concomitant release of pyrophosphate 

has been greatly and negatively upset by the unilaterally injurious effects of this 

politically abused and virose downer. 

Cyclic adenosine monophosphate is supposed to bind to the regulatory subunit 

of protein kinase thus dissociating the catalytic subunit vitally responsible for 

the phosphorylation of a wide spectrum enzymes and other proteins, and it enhances 

the degradation of storage fuels, increases the secretion of acid by the 

gastric mucosa, leads to the dispersion of melanin pigment granules, diminishes 

the aggregation of blood platelets and induces the opening of chloride channels 

etc. 

All enzymes are believed to be synthesized intracellularly, and most of them 

certainly carry out their functions within the cells in which they are formed.... 

anyhow; many of those enzymes later finding their way into the blood or otherwise 

exerting their functions within extracellular fluids, will have the better part 

of their constructive properties devastated by perphenazine — the catalytic ope- 

rativeness of the proteases and other hydrolases (secreted into the gastrointestinal 

tract) item the plasma-specific enzymes* (*enzymes concerned e.g with 

fibrinolysis and the functionality of the blood-clotting mechanism and comple- 

ment system) are dramatically suppressed.....this may — amongst dozens of 

other complications — catastrophically lower the general immune response, and 

lead to partial/complete and potentially fatal paralysis of certain viscerimotor/ 

splanchnic nerves. 

The list of metabolic disturbances and overall pathogenicity linked to perphenazine 

intake is almost endless; all catabolic pathways of the branched-chain amino 

acids* (*leucine, isoleucine and valine) are devitalized, and the natural out- 

94 



94


put and properties of e.g oxidative decarboxylase, valine transaminase and iso- 

valeryl-CoA-dehydrogenase corrupted — there‘ll be sulfur amino acids disorders, 

and pathological alterations of the imino acid metabolism.....convenient 

conversion of methionine to homocysteine is sapped, and crucial functions of 

cystathionine synthease, serine, proline oxidase and pyrroline-5-carboxylic acid 

dehydrogenase vehemently perverted. 

Perphenazine will perilously inhibit the thermal transition of ribonuclease, and 

the conformational transition of α-lactalbumin is either slowed down or comple- 

tely barred — the formation of molten globules is constrained, and the hydrogen 

bond donor of serine, aspartate and asparagine is frequently harmed (natural dis- 

ruption of α-helicles is thereby obstructed).....basically; the stabilization of 

intermediates necessary for unimpaired protein folding is crippled. 

In the Krebs-Hensleit cycle* (*i.e the urea cycle) the intermediate properties of 

citrulline, arginine, ornitrine and arginiosuccinic acid are strongly reduced by 

perphenazine, and the ominous presence of this psychotogenic nosotoxicant will 

induce multiform, systemic irregularities of the amino acid metabolism — 

we‘ll find several substrate-specific defects, and there‘ll be grave histidine, 

lysine and glycine metabolism abnormalities. 

Perversion of the proline oxidase and lysine/glycine metabolism etc will deplete 

the vital/steric repulsion of the pyrrolidone rings found in the proline/hydroxy- 

proline residues of the collagen helix (collagen — the most abundant protein in 

man/mammals — has no hydrogen bonds within its triple helix strands, hence 

the stability of the three collagen helicles depends on indicated repulsion...anyhow; 

because there‘s no space near the helix axis for a larger amino acid, every 

third residue of its superhelical cable must be glycine, and the three intertwined 

strands of corresponding superhelix are bonded to each other by — hydrogen.), 

and described suppression of v.g the proteases/hydrolases etc will detrimentally 

affect the functions of three major digestive enzymes — viz; chymotrypsin 

(hydrolyzing proteins in the small intestine), trypsin and pepsin — the enzyme/ 

zymogen synthesizing in the acinar cells of the pancreas is sabotaged. 

The extracellular protein collagen is commonly known as the main fibrous com- 

ponent of the skin, bone, teeth, cartilage and tendon, and attingent gutting of its 

primary/secondary/tertiary/quaternary structure etc by perphenazine is associated 

with a very extensive range disagreeable implications; the conversion of 

many lysine side chains to aldehydes and the further combination of said aldehydes 

with the ε-amino groups of intact lysine chains is recurrently diverted, and 

the degradation of cross-linked collagen/elastin and subsequent formation of 

(iso-)desmosins from cross-linked lysine fragments menacingly vacillated — 

there‘ll be disturbances of the water/electrolyte balance, acid–base imbalances, 

a most distressing variety of e.g cardiovascular/liver/biliary tract/renal/splenetic/ 

95 



95


duodenal/pancreatic/gastroenterological/periodontal/hematic diseases, and 

frequently axonal degeneration, demyelination, mono-/polyneuropathies, radi- 

culoneuropahty/-neuritis, radiculomyelopathies, radiculalgia, paralyses, meta- 

bolic/endocrine neuropathies, myotonias/tremors/hemiataxia/dyskinesias, intra- 

cranial haemorrhage, cerebral infarction, akinetic/rigid syndromes, vasoneuro- 

pathy, angioparalysis/vasoparesis, angiomalacia, angiolymphitis, osteoarthro- 

pathies, osteitis, ostealgia, ostempyesis/osteomyelitis, periostitis, cemento- 

clasia/odontolysis/odontonecrosis, cementitis, caries, odontagra/odontia and 

odontobothritis.....usw! 

Colinear with their polypeptide products, perphenazine may also affect the 

exons of the collagen gene and their sequence in messenger ribonucleic acid* 

(*mRNA) — pernicious nucleic acid hybridization is but one of many, potential 

outcomes (Cells contain several kinds of RNA, and the mRNA is the template 

for protein synthesis — an mRNA molecule is produced for each gene, or group 

of genes, that is to be expressed, and — in a sequence determined by the mRNA 

template — ―transfer RNA‖* [*tRNA] carries amino acids in an activated form 

to the ribosome for peptide-bond formation. In effect; RNA are used to translate 

―DNA‖ — ―deoxyribonucleic acid‖ — into protein, and the amino acid sequence 

of proteins are specified by DNA. A sequence of these bases is called a 

codon, and specifies an amino acid. An exon is a block of DNA encoding part 

of a given polypeptide chain, and many exons encode structural/functional units 

of proteins.....indeed; an entire domain of a protein may be encoded by a single 

exon!). 

Petitionary befitting and professionally agreeable though, I regret to say may un- 

pretentious treatise on perphenazine and some of its accursed side effects has 

been significantly marred both qualitatively and quantitatively by principled ob- 

servance of the retaliatory precautions announced at page 12 of this report. 

Proceeding within the choking and flimsy limitations dictated by conventional, 

medical knowledge, I shall close my run-of-the-mill discourse with a handful 

remarks of more summary nature. 

Perphenazine is an explicitly backstabbing poison capable of maiming and 

killing you in a truly horrifying number of ways....; 

96 



96


intake is associated with enduring/irreversible impairment 

of v.g the (specification may be slightly overlapping): 

autonomic nervous system, thalamus/epithalamus, subthalamic nucleus, 

pituitary, hypothalamus, corpus interpedunculare/striatum, psychocortical 

center, locus ceruleus/niger (substantia ferruginea/nigra), pes infraorbital/ 

anserinus, cerebellar (inferior/middle/superior) peduncle, vermis cerebelli/ 

inferior/superior, peduncle of flocculus, tegmentum, pons cerebelli/varolii 

(corticopontive fibres), crura cerebri/cerebelli, endocrine glands, viscero- 

peritoneal/-visceral functions/reactions and protein/carbohydrate/fat/purine/ 

constructive metabolism. 

More or less common 

SIDE EFFECTS 

of Perphenazine / Trilafon / Fentazine 

intake includes e.g (specification may be partially overlapping): 

paramutism/haphephobia, pessimism/melancholia/depression/ 

suicidality/apathy/la belle indifference/intropunitiveness/hyphedonia/ 

lethargy/asthenia/somnolence/hypoaffectivity, anhedonia/frigidity/ 

impotence/apareunia/dyspareunia/anaphrodisia/mastodynia/mastade- 

nitis/anorgasmy/emmeniopathy/kysthitis/cervicovaginitis, lesions 

of cranial nerves (Olfactory/Optic/Oculomotor/Trochlear/Trigeminal/ 

Abducens/Facial/Vestibulocochlear/Glossopharyngeal/Vagus/Spinal 

Accessory/Hypoglossal), logopathia/bradyphrasia/dysprosody/pykno- 

phrasia/lalorrhea/aprosody/raving/autoecholalia/verbomania/hypologia/ 

odynacusis/autophony/onomatomania/logagnosia, embryopathy/abortion/ 

dystocia/teratogenesis/fetal distress/abruptio placentae, pericystitis/endo- 

metritis/salpingitis/perisalpingoovaritis/orchiopathy/bradyspermatism/ 

orchidalgia/aspermatism/dyspermia/asthenospermia/azoospermia/mal- 

emission, psychoparesis/hyponoia/paralogia/dyslogia/paranomia/mnem- 

asthenia/pseudomnesia/bradylexia/dyscalculia, visual/auditory/haptic/ 

extracampine/olfactory/kinetic hallucination (hallucinosis), dispersonal- 

ization/delusion/ambivalence/ambitendency/impulsion/compulsion/hypo- 

97 



97


chondria/distractibility/nervousness/confusion/erethisophrenia/irritability/ 

obfuscation, neurogenic/irritable bladder, urinary/fecal incontinence, diarrhea, 

prostatorrhea/prostatosis/prostatism/prostatovesiculitis/prostato- 

megaly/prostatodynia/paraproctitis, didymitis/epididymitis, interstitial/ 

parenchymatous mastitis, psychosexual disorders, erotophobia, copro- 

lagnia/-philia, délire de toucher, paraphilia, halitosis, glossopyrosis/ 

glossoplegia/glossospasm, coated tongue, stomatitis, psychosis/psycho- 

neurosis/monomania/dysergasia/paranoia/delirium/geophagia, toxicomania 

(drug addiction, dipsomania/alcoholism etc), autochthonous/fixed/compul-sive 

ideation (idée fixe), catalepsy, hemiparesis/hemiplegia, hemiopalgia, 

distress/malaise/hangover, icterus obstructive/sanguinis, pustulation, 

odontopathy/odontalgia, mastoiditis, glossoptosis, parosmia/dysgeusia/ 

parosphresia/cacogeusia, gnathalgia, nictitating spasm, postocular 

neuritis, oculomotor nerve paralysis, oculogyric crisis, cycloplegia/ 

cyclophoria, photophobia/photangiaphobia, mydriasis/miosis, pinhole/ 

fixed/tonic pupil, pupilloplegia, central/cerebral/essential/laryngeal/ 

ocular/objective/organic/peripheral/subjective/auditory/toxic/vestibular 

vertigo, conjunctivitis, cephalalgia, encephalopathy, gutturotetany, pseud- 

acusis, tinnitus auricum, bradyacusia, cillosis, glaucoma, astheno- 

pia, kearatoscleritis/keratopathies, nephelopia/diplopia, object 

blindness, cyclic vomiting, emesis, moniliasis, xerostomia/ptysis/ 

ptyalism (salivation), odaxesmus, logaditis, xanthoderma/jaundice, 

asterixis/tremor, pallor, nasal congestion, rhinorrhea/rhinopharyngitis/ 

rhinomycosis, tic convulsive/facial/spasmodic/habit/douloureux, oneir- 

ism/nightmares/noctambulism, allodynia/alliesthesia, salaam convulsion, 

torticollis/retrocollis/cervicodynia/nuchalgia, amnesic/motor apraxia, 

sore throat (angina simplex/acuta), amygdalopathy, angina abdominis/ 

decubitus/laryngea/Ludovici/maligna/variant/phlegmonous, amyotonia, 

phallalgia, epiglottiditis, vaginismus, prosopdynia/prosopneuralgia, 

neurogliomatosis, otalgia/otitis/otantritis/otoantritis, Reye's syndrome, 

anatropia, hemeralopia, antisociality/resentment/hostility/grudging/dis- 

loyalty/fabulation/paramania/desperation/cacoethes/perversion/immoral- 

ity/criminality/depravity/irresponsibility/recklessness/torpidity, thanato- 

phobia/anxiety/egotheism/theomania/theophobia/sophomania/megalomania, 

déjà vu/entendu, torpor intestinorum (constipation), pannus, nystagmus, 

paragraphia, affective disorders, ureteralgia/ureteritis/cystitis/hematuria/ 

hemobilinuria, tenesmus, defeatism/cunctation/underachievement/nolition/ 

listlessness/tedium/stinginess/affectaplasia (affectlessness)/incuriosity, 

indifference/egoism/parvanimity/fussiness/infantilism/petulance/crudeness/ 

impoliteness/passivity/negligence, social isolation/disintegration/expulsion/ 

stigmatization/degradation/retirement, eremitism/oikomania/oikophobia/ 

eccentricity/shyness/timidity/dysthesia/dread/vagabondism/sauntering/mis- 

anthropy, insomnia, incubus, gingivitis/periodontitis, uvulitis, wanness, 

98 



98


non-alignment/-attendance, epithymetic corruption, disinterest, touch-me- 

notishness, fallaciousness/illogicalness/absurdity, emotionalism/tenderness/ 

superexaltation/hypersensitiveness/maladdress/rambunctiousness/lability, 

mysophilia/-phobia, ablutomania, forced invalidity/unemployment/pension- 

ing, matrimonial/interpersonal disunion/havoc/destitution, accidentproneness, 

professional/educational downfall/shortcoming/abandon/rejection, 

impecuniosity, pauperization/vagrancy/begging/prostitution/ 

homelessness/hoboism, extraordinary complications/problems, extreme 

misery/misfortune, valetudinarianism/ruin, suspiciousness/misthought/ 

mispersuasion, detention/immurement/hospitalization/institutionalization, 

adenalgia, (attracts) official abuse/malversation/lawlessness/upsidaisyness/ 

persecution/arrogance/exploitation, victimization, impatience, self-denial/ 

-effacement, poor-spiritedness, clinophilia/bed-riddenness, Jocasta complex, 

phantasmality/reverie, surfeiting/gluttony/phagomania, moon-raising/moon- 

raking/alienation/alamortism/nebbishness, spectatoritis, flaccid paralysis, 

muscle cramping/twitching/weakness, slight/moderate dyspnea, hypopnea, 

hyperpnea, pnigophobia, myalgia/algiomotoricity, myatrophy, ponophobia, 

hepatosplenopathy/hepatonephromegaly, mismarriage, dysadrenalism, 

autoallergy, xerosis, hepatodynia/-lysis/-necrosis, myopathy/myo- 

paresis, paranephritis, dysdiadochokinesia, cinclisis/bradykinesia/ 

hypersynergia/hyporeflexia/dyscinesia, anisoaccommodation, dyscrin- 

ism, dysmetria/akinesia (algera/amnestica), apallesthesia, jejuno- 

ileitis, aperistalsis, polytendinitis, Guillain-Barré syndrome (poly- 

radiculoneuropathy), Parry's disease (hyperthyroidism), hypothymism, 

peripherapose, delayed/mixed neuropathy, toxic/clonic/tonic convulsion, 

wheezing/coughing/emptysis, bradycardia/tachycardia, ventricular 

fibrilation, abdominal cramps, hypersecretion by salivary/lacrimal/ 

sweat/bronchial glands, dystrypsia, muscular fasciculations, tightness 

in throat/chest, sternalgia, cardiac/local/swallow/vasovagal syncope, 

dysglobulinemia, hypo-/hypertension, ectopic rhytm, pyorrhea alveolaris, 

autoimmunity, paramima, vagotonia, necrocytosis, cancer/oncogenesis, 

tumultus cordis, cardialgia, epigastralgia, dyspepsia, pseudocrisis, tubulor- 

rhexis, dysgerminoma, neuroarthropathy, pyloroduodenitis, pychnemia, 

necrobiosis, hypopselaphesia, hypothalamic/endogenous obesity, fibrillo- 

lysis, thermoanesthesia/crymodynia/hypercryalgesia, pyrosis, pyocephalus, 

empyema, gene mutations/modifications, jaw necrosis, lung abscess, brain 

tumor, eczema, thalamic syndrome, flight of ideas, dipsesis/-osis, neuro- 

myositis, diabetes insipidus/mellitus, fibrinoid changes, endocrine/latent/ 

non-insulin-dependent diabetes, hypinosis, anemia, Farre's tubercles, 

diminished myodynamic/sthenometric/cardiovascular/psychometric/noo- 

metric potential, hiccups, fibropapilloma, anergastic reaction, fascitis, fibro- 

myalgia, hyperthermic reactions (thermacogenesis), permanent damage 

of thermoregulatory centers in the hypothalamus, irreversible tardive dys- 

99 



99


kinesia, "Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome" ("NMS"), cardiac dysrhytmias, 

diaphoresis, systemic infections, (acute) renal failure, renal insufficiency/ 

necrosis, pyelonephritis/renopathy, retinal changes, potentially 

fatal anaphylactic/asthmatic/allergic reactions caused by sodium 

bisulphite/hydrosulphite (NaHSO3) found in Trilafon injection, nocent 

potentiation of e.g the CNS-depressing effects of alcohol/opiates/seda- 

tives/analgetics/barbiturates/anesthetics/palliatives/tranquillizers and anti- 

convulsant medication etc, subversion of levodopa administration (v.g in 

patients with Parkinson's disease), augmentation of anticholinergic 

effects of atropine/antidepressants/antihistamines/insecticides usw, 

inhibition of diphenylhydantoin (sodium) metabolism, guanethidine 

antagonism aggravating hypertension, shock/syncope induced by concurrent 

use with e.g methyldopa and cardiorespiratory drugs (beta-adrenoceptor 

blockers), chemical mutagenesis — lasting/perilous corruption of DNA 

replication and RNA transcription, intra-/extragenic reversion ("genetic 

reversion" — accumulation and zygotic transfer of mutant genes), liver 

metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, accentuating of UV-induced 

mutations (repair and adequate substitution of radiation-damaged DNA 

segments are significantly hampered), glomerulonephritis (immune com- 

plexes tends to aggregate at the glomerular basement membrane), general 

decay, hemonephrosis, hematopericardium, presenility, abulia, presbyopi, 

interstitial/myocardial etc ischemia, arteriosclerosis, premature/unexpected 

death, Stokes–Adams syndrome/attack, aortic stenosis, carotid sinus hyper- 

sensitivity, vestibular schwannomas/neuronitis, herpetic eruption, Ménière's 

disease, venous jaw claudication, chorea, lateral medullary syndrome 

(occlusion of one vertebral artery — or the posterior inferior cerebellar 

artery), ipsilateral Horner's syndrome, paralysis of the soft pallate, weight- 

gain, galactorrhea, pituitary adenomas, hemochromatosis ("bronze dia- 

betes" — may be related to pituitary irradiation/adenoma/hyposecretion), 

Carney's syndrome (cardiac myxoma etc), fibrous/cystic/cartilaginous 

myxoma, Nelson's syndrome, Cushing's disease (pituitary adenoma), 

hypercalcemia (normally caused by hyperparathyroidism), Grave's disease, 

hypoglycemia, hypostasis, hemangiopericytoma, retroperitoneal fibro- 

sarcoma(-s), Addison's disease, Hodgkin's disease, autoimmune hepatitis, 

hematemesis, Crohn's disease, Zollinger–Ellison syndrome, syringobulbia, 

syringitis, retrosternal goitre, aortic aneurism, malignant/benign strictures, 

bulbar/pseudobulbar paralysis, pericardial effusion, sinus arrhytmia, Wolff– 

Parkinson–White syndrome, abnormal P/Q/R/S/T waves and S-T/P-R 

segment depression — QRS/Q-T interval irregularities (ECG variables), 

tuberculation, myoclonia, rhagades, thrombopenia/-pathy, eosinopenia, 

ESR abnormalities, phlebitis, cold extremities, pollakiuria, urina hysterica, 

bilirubinemia, dyschroa, dermatocelidosis/-pathy (generally degenerative 

changes in the skin — impaired visage/appearance), tenesmus, pruritus, 

100 



100


Bergeron's chorea (Dubini's disease), Déjérine's syndrome (syndrome de 

Déjérine–Roussy), tabes, Banti's syndrome, varicosis, hemorrhoids, 

Biermer's disease, rosacea, acne vulgaris/atrophica, spondylosis, bacterial 

vaginosis, lumbago/notalgia, leucinuria, Chiari–Frommel syndrome, 

leukemogenesis, Schamberg's disease, biliary cirrhosis (inflammatory 

destruction of interlobular bile ducts), portal hypertension, antitrismus, drug- 

induced (acute) hepatic failure, morning headache, recurrent laryngeal palsy, 

phrenic nerve palsy, myasthenic syndrome (Eaton–Lambert syndrome), 

Broca's dysphasia (lesions in the infero-lateral dominant front lobe — cf 

"Broca's area"), constructional dyspraxia (hemisphere lesions), 

cluster/tension headache, idiopathic neuralgia, Budd–Chiari syndrome, 

orthopnea, plethora, lytic bone metastases, formation of Charcot–Leyden 

and Charcot–Robin crystals (in diseased tissues and blood respectively), 

inhibition of plasma cholinesterase, various pharmacogenetic disorders 

(e.g corruped protein polymorphism and functional derangements caused 

by isoallelic variants), hemiballism, opisthotonos/emprosthotonos, vagino- 

mycosis, trismus, cerebrospinal fluid abnormalities, venous sinus thrombosis, 

sinusitis (inflammation of paranasal sinuses), progressive dementia, 

luteoma, Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada syndrome, astrocytomas/oligodendro- 

gliomas/meningiomas, compression of the medulla by herniation of the 

cerebellar tonsils caudally through the foramen magnum, scotomata, 

progressive muscular atrophy, progressive degeneration of motor neurons, 

progressive bulbar palsy, hemiglossitis, Alzheimer's disease (severe cortical 

neuronal loss — accumulation of extracellular amyloid fibrils in cerebral/ 

meningeal microvessels etc), reticuloma, axonal degeneration, mononeuritis 

multiplex, symmetrical sensory polyneuropathy, reticuloendothelioma/-osis, 

amyloidosis (disturbed immunoglobulin synthesis usw), myasthenia gravis, 

hemidysergia, osteoarthropathy/osteomalacia, Eaton–Lambert syndrome 

("myasthenic–myopathic syndrome" due to defective acethylcholine release 

at the neuromuscular juntion), Graefe's sign, bizarre dreams, gynecomastia, 

mastoptosis, mastocytoma/-carcinoma/-chondroma, adiposis cerebralis, 

abdomen pendulous, cerebropsychosis, glycuresis, amenorrhea, acid–base 

disorders, metabolic acidosis, Kussmaul's breathing, renal tubular acidosis, 

diabetic/lactic acidosis, obstructive sleep apnea, cystic fibrosis (dysfunction 

of exocrine glands etc), pituitary apoplexy, disequilibration syndrome, 

vascular steal syndrome, ambulatory/cyclic peritoneal dialysis, retriperitoneal 

fibrosis (progressive obstruction of ureters), perianeurysmal fibrosis, 

steatorrhea (pancreatic diseases), (chronic) diverticulitis, gastrointestinal 

malabsorption, nephrotic syndrome (most drugs inflicting v.g proteinuria 

may give rise to this syndrome), acquired asyndesis, ascites, tubulo- 

interstitial disease (progressive renal damage), renovascular disease, 

renal/vesical calculi (nephrolithiasis), idiopathic hypercalciuria, 

Goodpasture's syndrome (progressive glomerulonephritis etc — possible 

101 



101


death from renal failure), maintenance/renal dialysis ("hemodialysis" — 

erectile impotence and [secondary] infertility are common complications), 

rhematoid arthritis, bursitis, carpal tunnel syndrome, mioplasmia, pleural 

effusion, induction of organ-spesific/IgG/nuclear protein antibodies and 

cryoglobulins (cryoglobulinemia) — interaction of antinuclear antibodies 

and cell nuclei may originate v.g hematoxylin-stained deposits and 

hematinemia, morphea, Raynaud's disease (particularly in females), 

sclerodactylia, trigger finger, compartmental syndrome, olecranarthropathy, 

Osgood–Schlatter disease, calculosis (e.g prostatic calculi), amyloidosis, 

angioedema, vasovesiculitis, contact dermatitis, hemolytic anemia, pan- 

cytopenia, biliary stasis, systemic lupus erythematosus, hyperprolactinemia, 

gastritis, blood dyscrasias, EEG abnormalities, idiovariations, exacerbation 

of psychotic symptoms, exfoliative dermatitis, idiometritis, inappropriate 

ADH secretion, lymphoplasmacytoid/centrocytic lymphoma, paraproteinemia 

(Bence Jones protein — albumin-/proteinuria), cartilage degeneration, 

myxochondrofibrosarcoma, blockage of the nasolacrimal duct (normally 

accompanied by inflammation of the lacrimal sac), meibomitis, myxemia, 

keratoconus, acute anterior uveitis, reversed epinephrine effect, choro- 

iditis, retinal detachment (following oncogenesis or inflammation of 

the underlying choroid), optic neuropathy/atrophy (destruction of neural 

tissue), chronic simple glaucoma, exophthalmic goitre (i.e "Grave's disease" 

or "thyrotoxicosis"), myxedema, myoglobinuria, Pick's disease, medullary 

cancers (arising from cells producing thyrocalcitonin — frequently associated 

with another tumor arising in the adrenal medulla), acid eructations, 

protein-losing enteropathy, gastric/duodenal ulcer, hearthburn, carcinoid 

syndrome (serotonin producing tumors), flatulence, vipomas, irritable bowel 

syndrome, pseudohypoparathyroidism, secondary hypothyroidism (lack of 

pituitary "TSH" — "thyroid stimulating hormone"), lymphoreticular 

disorders, pseudogynecomastia (excess of fat in the breast area), 

lymphomatosis/-pathy, acute/chronic myelogenous leukemia, multiple 

sclerosis (focal disruption of blood–brain barrier and severe myelin damage 

etc), hemolytic crisis in G6PD*-deficient subjects (*Glucose-6-Phosphate 

Dehydrogenase), nausea, Parkinson's disease, impaired immune response, 

melena.....usw! 

Some of the side effects described may have a latency period of 

25–30 years as DNA damage is likely to accrue over a lifetime, and 

because the efficiency of our DNA repair mechanisms is 

individual and decreases with aging. 

102 



102


PERPHENAZINE / TRILAFON ® / FENTAZINE ® 

intake may induce "false positive" or "false negative" results of 

urine pregnancy tests... 

will reduce secretion of adrenocortical hormones and may thus 

interfere with metyrapone testing/treatment... 

is excreted readily in breast milk and will cross the human placental 

barrier — neonatal/fetal distress including cardiopulmonary arrest 

and fatal seizures/convulsions may result... 

intake may cause abnormal and potentially lethal complications and 

pathogenesis in subjects with absent/decreased C21-hydroxylase 

activity (usually congenital adrenal hyperplasia — enzyme defects 

may include P450 genes)... 

is a vicissitudinous carcinogen and DNA-corrupting substance 

whose recessive mutations may remain hidden for generations — 

until disclosed by homozygosity... 

are only prescribed/recommended/portrayed as therapeutics by 

individuals of insufficient intellectual/ethical/eunoic standard! 

intake may result in sudden/rapid death e.g by inducing: 

respiratory/cardiac/laryngotracheal/esophagal/supranuclear/ 

vasomotoric paralysis, aphagia, bronchoconstriction, cardiac 

spasm/arrest, vasodepression, acute/malignant cerebral/cardiac/ 

laryngeal edema, ganglionic stimulation, hypoxemia, hormonal 

breakdown, thyroid/extrapyramidal crisis, neurocirculatory coll- 

apse, abdominoperineal crisis, apnea, CNS depression, septicemia, 

hyperergia, anaphylaxis, toxonosis, mucosanguineous/fibrinopuru- 

lent agglutination/obstruction, pulmonary insufficiency/congestion, 

apoplexy, vagal summation, violent seizures and stupor! 

103 



103


The Norwegian 'Police "Security" Service' — "PST"* (*Norwegian acronym), 

is an arrantly autonomous subdivision of the Norwegian police force popularly 

supposed to detect, record, counteract and prosecute etc illegal activities 

presumably endangering Norway's national security. 

Normally we'll find a number of PST representatives at each and all police 

stations and sheriff offices in Norway, and as a rule of thumb the respective 

chiefs of police and sheriffs are personally and regularly engaged in various 

tasks on behalf of the Police "Security" Service — other PST agents 

traditionally — but not exclusively — includes middle-aged police 

inspectors/intendants and chief administrative officers. 

PST does also routinely employ younger police officers and civilians in order to 

infiltrate, corrupt, espy, provoke and/or overthrow etc human rights and pacifist 

organizations, Red Cross groups and medical treatment facilities, peace corps, 

closed institutions, charismatic sects, students' associations, social workers' and 

servicemen's associations, commissions on racial equality and ethnical minority 

coalitions, trade/labor unions, employers' federations, political parties and local 

councils, executive committees/sessions, administrative appeal bodies, joint 

councils for the welfare of immigrants, training/advisory/examining boards, 

agencies for international development/cooperation, iron and steel trades 

confederations, travel agents' associations, broadcasting staffs/corporations, 

shipbuilding and engineering unions, commonwealth offices, public finance and 

accounting institutes, trade/industry federations, associations for the care and 

resettlement of offenders, prison officers' associations, foreign 

delegations/embassies/consulates, importers/wholesalers/retailers of Russian 

merchandise/cars, free trade unions, editorial offices and publishing 

corporations, civil/public services associations, municipal workers' unions, debtcollecting 

agencies, Masonic lodges (esoteric brotherhoods etc on the whole), 

Officer Candidate Schools and Officer's Reserve Corps, Home Guard Subdistricts 

and the Civil Defence Rescue/Wardens' Service, public/mental health 

services, fire departments/brigades, production platforms in the North sea, 

mining partnerships etc at Svalbard, the Coast Guard, signal and 

telecommunications engineering departments, manufacturers/importers of 

security locks and alarm systems, information bureaux, 

scientific/technical/managerial staffs, airtraining corps, Special Forces and 

ranger units, scuba/diving clubs, aero/parachuting clubs, motorcycle (MC) clubs, 

rifle/pistol clubs, athletic federations, youth clubs, research establishments, 

cargo ships (tankers), shipping/offshore companies, manpower services 

commissions, societies of operative printers/illustrators/typographers and other 

104 



104


media personnel, communications and postal headquarters, transport 

organizations, diplomatic corps, equestrian federations (participation in 

outlandish horse/harness racing and show jumping may — like attendance at 

other sports events — provide excellent cover-up for espionage, break-ins, 

sabotage ventures, thefts and political assassinations), the highways and port 

authorities, the federal aviation administration, railway express agencies, coastal 

steamers, bus stations, the Customs, hotel/restaurant chains, holiday camps and 

travel agencies.....usw! 

The Norwegian Police "Security" Service has established several companies and 

otherwise provided civilian jobs for many of their operative agents — their 

officers may e.g disguise as shop assistants, storekeepers, sales representatives, 

managers/directors, dispatch clerks, electricians, telecommunications engineers, 

installers/fitters, personal computer retailers/consultants, system analysts, 

accountants, technical inspectors/repairmen, carpenters, cicerones, bartenders or 

superintendents. 

Here in Brattvåg they operated a seemingly unpretentious shop offering properly 

bugged scanners enabling you to "eavesdrop" some of the radio communication 

between ordinary patrol wagons etc — as far as we know this is the first time 

PST has entered upon a regular business venture exclusively to map the modi 

operandi of a single person...! 

The actual prevalence of psychopathological dysfunctions amongst the general 

population of Norway is truly horrendous, and — as correctly stated at page 10 

of nearby complaint, 90% of regular Norwegian police officers has clearly 

marked, psychopathic personality traits — we've found none amongst present 

PST officers not explicitly afflicted with antisocial personality traits and varying 

degrees of paranoia and/or melancholia. 

Since 1998 the Police "Security" Service has expanded both their formal and 

irregular cooperation with the Norwegian public health service dramatically (cf 

Doc #627, pp 60–61), and a substantial percentage thoroughly depraved and 

mentally ill politicians are largely blameworthy for this baleful development (cf 

Doc #2037). 

Precisely like PST the Norwegian public health service villainously misuses the 

devilish "cobweb-optics"* (*cf Doc #3217, pp 105–106) and concealed 

microphones (clothes are frequently bugged) etc to espy, provoke/terrorize and 

harm particularly upright persons investigating, recording and legally 

complaining usw their diversiform criminality* (*nosocomial/iatrogenic delicts 

may comprise intentional/premeditated/involuntary homicide, sexual 

abuse/perversion, torture/harassment, wilful poisoning/sickening, illegal 

detention/hog-tying, false accusations/complaints, thefts of 

money/organs/documents, illicit monitoring/eavesdropping, unlawful/offensive 

105 



105


postmortem examinations, bill forgery, embezzlement, drug abuse/addiction, 

and radical falsification of medical records...etc). 

Intimate collaboration between the public health service and PST provides 

significant "benefits" for both camps; Norwegian physicians, psychologists, 

sociologists and nurses etc may e.g systematically abuse the misplaced 

confidence of uninformed dullards to collect medical data and different 

background information on subjects of special interest to the police, while PST 

may supply v.g technical know-how/equipment and bug, search, rob and surveil 

etc the victims private homes/computers and — also — render impossible 

adequate/impartial criminal investigation and legal prosecution of the various 

felonies committed. 

Empirically some Norwegian Police "Security" Service officers are likely to 

employ lethal substances and spread contagious diseases in order to assassinate 

or disable their victims, and PST representatives may visit or break into 

hospitals/morgues/laboratories and certain factories/arsenals etc to 

underhandedly purchase or steal the chemicals/toxins/pathogens necessary to 

accomplish these goals. 

Norwegian policemen/-women permitted to associate freely with the common 

and noncriminal population in pandemia struck areas generally represents a 

special risk, and neither police officers, health professionals nor other 

Norwegian officials should normally be allowed to stroll unrestrained around in 

buildings/offices/apartments usw where they undisturbed can install and later 

abuse their satanic cobweb-optics and pinhole-microphones etc (these rules also 

and wholly apply outside Norwegian borders/territory) — cf Doc #2037, pp 91– 

92 etc. 

The cobweb-optics per se and its damnable misapplication is properly scorned in 

Isaiah 59, verses 5–8 (the Lord‘s Servant speaking): 

―They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a spider‘s web. Whoever 

eats their eggs will die, and when one is broken, an adder is hatched. 

Their cobwebs are useless for clothing; they cannot cover themselves 

with what they make. Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence 

are in their hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed 

innocent blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and 

destruction mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; 

there is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into 

crooked roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace.‖ 

106 



106


There are thousands of obnoxious examples illustrating the nationwide and 

massive abuse of the cobweb-optics and concealed microphones by PST 

representatives and the Norwegian health service, and one of the worst 

incidents in that respect doubtlessly took place here in my own county, 

Haram, in August 2001 when Mr Hector Hugo MIRANDA murdered his 

wife, children and himself in order to escape further persecution by 

Norwegian authorities. 

Mr Miranda — a political refugee who had suffered human rights violating 

incarceration and torture in his fatherland, had initially been silly enough to 

place his confidence in Norwegian authorities who forthrightly betrayed him 

and secretly surveilled his most private abodes. In agreement with their 

arrogant and thoughtless disposition, the Norwegian health professionals and 

police officers engaged to carry out the AV and absolutely condemnable 

monitoring fatally underestimated Mr Miranda's vigilance and resoluteness; 

it's clear Mr Miranda had been perfectly aware the abominable espionage 

several weeks before peremptorily deciding to slay his family and himself, 

and that he strongly suspected other immigrants in the insular vicinity was 

continuously offended in the same, iniquitous manner. 

Mr Miranda certainly became severely shocked as he prudently uncovered 

some of the accomplished treacherousness routinely partaken by the 

humanoid filth he naively had trusted for years, and as the dreadful 

extension of the demoniac and acutely human rights violating spying 

appeared steadily clearer, he correctly concluded his family never could 

acquire an adequate degree of freedom, security and dignity etc in a nation 

largely governed by bloody criminals/terrorists, sadists and lunatics....! 

Subsequent to Mr Miranda's death, local health authorities and collaborating 

sheriff — Mr Jens Vidar BJØRKEDAL (cf Doc #240) — naturally did their 

very best to cover up the illicit and lethally provocative maltreatment they'd 

exposed him to.....through their press releases and interviews those indirectly 

guilty of adjoining murders despicably portrayed themselves as the true 

victims deserving public sympathy usw! 

The Norwegian police force overflows with insidiously double-dealing and 

racist jingoists surreptitiously exerting themselves to minimize the number 

of immigrants in Norway, and it should be throughly emphasized that the 

PST et al systematically endeavor to depict e.g Muslims and refugees from 

developing countries as an especially criminal, dangerous, base-minded and 

generally worthless part of the Norwegian population. 

In order to publicly create and uphold a superficially believable picture of 

most foreigners as a grave intrastatal threat, Norwegian police officers — in 

increasingly degree through delinquent and hideously opprobrious 

cooperation with the official health service — will make industrious efforts 

107 



107


to provoke serious criminality and health problems etc amongst 

ethnic/religious minorities and nonnative individuals generally. 

The standardized procedure followed by PST representatives and other 

police officers involved in this kind of viperous monkey business, roughly 

runs like this: 

( 1 ) 

THE VICTIM IS SINGLED OUT AS AN UNWANTED 

OR PARTICULARLY EXPLOITABLE INDIVIDUAL 

He/she may e.g: 

Be a Rastafarian or profess the Islamic or Judaistic faith, 

be an organized biker or actively engage in human rights and 

peacekeeping work, 

belong to a colored race, 

stand out as sexually attractive/abusable, 

be endowed with certain talents arousing envy amongst the 

police officers, 

possess disclosing knowledge about criminality committed by 

Norwegian officials and local authorities, 

be sufficiently intelligent/righteous to constitute a noteworthy 

menace to corrupted/criminal officials, 

appear especially suitable for terrorization and illegal 

experimentation, 

have a conspicuously flawed character obviously susceptible to 

manipulation/indoctrination, malversation and threats, 

be selected more or less randomly to satisfy the explicitly 

criminotic and subhuman urge many Norwegian policemen/women 

harbors to humiliate, mistreat/harm, persecute and 

108 



108


dastardly assassinate etc those superior to or different from 

themselves. 

( 2 ) 

PREPARATORY STEPS TO SURVEIL/TERRORIZE/ 

ASSASSINATE SELECTED VICTIM ARE TAKEN 

The police — eventually in cooperation with the Norwegian public health service 

— are at this stage systematically/clandestinely gathering information about the 

victim's whereabouts, everyday routines, hobbies, circle of friends, family, 

religious faith, political opinions/activities, educational/intellectual level, sexual 

inclinations, income/debt situation, medical status, criminal record and personal 

peculiarities etc. 

Usually there'll be photographic reconnaissance and strategical missions to detect 

overall security deficiencies and to determine the exact types of 

doors/windows/hinges/locks and alarms etc installed in the victim's 

domicile/office. The police are rather likely to plug into central supply points, 

overhead connections and main junction boxes etc in order to manipulate/surveil 

the victim's electricity provisions — television sets, video cassette recorders, video 

monitors, PCs, printers, photocopiers, calculators, portable sound systems, ghetto 

blasters, CD/ROM/DVD players and phones are eavesdropped. 

If the PST agents deem it possible to approach the victim's habitat/workplace etc 

without detection or arousing suspicion, pinhole-microphones may be installed 

near the main entrance(-s) and perhaps immediately beneath/above windows 

expected to be left ajar — minuscule photocells are oftentimes embedded close to 

entry-/drive-/stairways, and the infernal cobweb-optics are most likely installed 

above — or next to — all front/back doors and on the outer side of windowpanes 

enabling visual monitoring of the kitchen, sitting/living/dining room(-s), offices, 

bedrooms, bathroom(-s), walk-in wardrobe(-s) and basement etc (if it's possible to 

break into e.g garden sheds, garages, cottages and boathouses without leaving 

easily visible clues, one should expect these places to be infected with spy 

accoutrements too — miniature radio/microwave transmitters and amplifiers etc 

may v.g be hidden between ceiling/floor joists and wall studs, beneath wall 

panels/sheathing, in board/foam/blanket insulation, or in warm-air and plumbing 

systems). 

GPS/GSM/digital vehicle tracking units may be tucked away in the victim's cars 

and motorcycles etc — these units normally have a built-in motion detector and 

emits digitally encrypted signals betraying geographical vehicle location and speed 

usw. Tracking units may display shortest distance to target in meters/feet/yards, 

109 



109


and are sometimes equipped with a sensitive microphone recording e.g 

conversations taking place inside or immediately outside bugged vehicle. 

Letters/e-mails are secretly opened/copied, and the house refuse scrutinized — 

those approaching the victim's main entrance(-s) etc will be photographed and/or 

filmed by employment of the cobweb-optics* (*the zooming properties and pic 

quality of this satanic undercover tech are rather hellacious). 

( 3 ) 

ACTIVE INFORMATION GATHERING — THE 

VICTIMS'S DOMICILE IS BUGGED INTERIORLY 

Permanently eavesdropping/tracking the unsuspecting victim's phones and vehicles 

will enable the aggressors to plot his/hers quotidian schedule fairly precisely. They 

may e.g learn that the victim enjoys his tennis/squash training Mondays and 

Thursdays from 6 to 8 PM, that he's likely to be away from home Fridays between 

6 and 9 PM as he regularly engages in voluntary/unpaid human rights work, that 

he's a gifted hobby mechanician painstakingly keeping his swanky Harley- 

Davidson MC in tip-top condition, and — very much to the green-eyed cops 

discontentment — that their sympathetic victim handles far heavier loads than 

themselves in honored weightlifting exercises as v.g the bench press, dead lift, 

squat and clean/jerk! Besides; reconnaissance has brought home that a standard pin 

tumbler lock produced by the massively police infiltrated Norwegian company 

TrioVing is installed in the victim's front door, and that his homely burglar alarm 

will be mere piece of cake to put out of action. 

Now.....: let's assume that one Thursday evening at 6:30 PM — while one of their 

training suit wearing agents discreetly keeps an eye on the tennis playing victim 

and another plainclothesman are watching the driveway leading to the latter's 

dwelling from his hideout at a nearby hill — two experienced PST officers 

effortlessly sabotages the victim's unsophisticated alarm system breaking into his 

otherwise unguarded house utilizing one of their numerous master keys..... 

Due to outlined intelligence gathering the depraved burglars will possess pretty 

accurate information about the various rooms and movables — taking care not to 

leave e.g foot- or fingerprints in macroscopic dust and normally avoiding speaking 

during their customary break-ins, the most deservedly detested intruders hardly 

ever throws away their time; while one of them expeditiously are installing their 

pinhole-tattlers, the other badguy may set up the fiendish cobweb-optics in a matter 

of minutes. Mikes are carefully concealed in (sheathing) boards/studs/joists etc 

110 



110


close to v.g tables, armchairs, sofas and beds — or wherever conversations are 

likely to take place! The cobweb-optics are traditionally installed alongside the 

upper/outermost borders of rooms — and just above/behind/beside e.g; 

writing/executive/secretarial desks, dressing/computer/printer/dining tables, 

display/filing cabinets, control/instrument panels, message displays, combination 

locks, keyboards, safes and mirrors usw. The sickly preoccupation with 

palli/pudenda item anorectal and scatological topics clearly unfolds as the vicious 

PST officers installs their cobweb-optics in close propinquity to private beds, 

shower cubicles, bathtubes, bidets, toilets and certain washbasins usw.....; the 

devilish spy-optics will usually be strategically fixed 50–120 centimeters above the 

floor on all sides of and in immediate proximity to indicated household 

constructions in order to provide maximal exposure of — and prime facilities for 

photographing/videotaping etc — genitourinary structures/functions, defecation 

and sexuality (it should be rightfully emphasized this kind of 

execrable/morbid/criminal sex-espionage has been actively and extensively 

partaken and shockingly oftentimes initiated by rotten nurses and senior personnel 

employed by the hideously corrupted public health service in Norway — cf Doc 

#4575 etc)...! 

During their "installation-break-ins", the PST thugs will bring with them some 

implements; a jimmy, hammer, file, multipurpose tool, needle-nose pliers, 

hacksaw, multimeter, an adjustable spanner, screws/nails, manual/electric 

drills/screwdrivers and various locksmithing/picking tools...etc. 

The jimmy and hammer will be utilized to carefully un-/refasten (sheathing) boards 

giving access to suitable hidings inside floor/walls/ceiling usw for v.g transmitters, 

transceivers, transponders, amplifiers, downconverters, repeaters, scanners, 

beaconing contraptions and a few other small-scale apparatuses. Amongst the 

preferred places to hide away electronic gadgetry, the extreme borders of 

attics/garrets should be mentioned especially — the fact access to the interior part 

of walls frequently are gained by temporary removing the outer framework of 

doorways and windows, are also particularly noticeable... 

Since 1999 a steadily increasing number of PST officers have worn balaclavas, 

gloves and a protective/concealable KEVLAR vest during their break-ins, and — 

contrary to former practices, a pistol firing the 9-mm Parabellum cartridge 

nowadays belongs to the standard outfit brought into your home by these 

disgustingly state supported assassins. 

111 



111


( 4 ) 

THE VICTIM'S FUNDAMENTAL HUMAN RIGHTS 

AND PRIVACY ARE ACUTELY VIOLATED — 

METHODICAL PROVOCATIONS AND ATTACKS 

At this point of time the state authorized aggressors will lean back in their chairs 

studying the victim's intimate indoor privacy on a number of video monitors 

installed in front of them. 

The thoroughly perverted and largely brainsick PST bullies will lewdly and 

permanently record scenes of the nude victim taking a shower or engaging in 

normal, sexual activities with his girlfriend/wife etc. Surprisingly oftentimes 

harboring homosexual tendencies and nearly always morbidly obsessed with 

penile bulkiness and shapes, the official paraphiliacs selectively will go for 

close-up shots of assholes and penoscrotal features (It should be emphasized 

though that these swinish voyeurs seldom enact their homoerotic propensities 

through sexual intercourse — as a matter of fact they're curiously dependent on 

their wives and concubines venerally as well as for "moral support"! Their 

mistresses are frequently spying and collecting information on behalf of their 

ball-fixated and most crooked under-the-cover dicks...)! 

Frowardly unwilling to distinguish clearly between well-paid and wholly 

consenting pornstars and the uninformed victims whose basic privacy they've 

villainously ruined through criminal intrusions and espionage, many of the PST 

officers 've watched hundreds of hard-core erotic films exclusively for pleasure 

while their hounded observanda are asleep or otherwise don't require constant 

attention. Besides their sexually motivated malefaction, the PST terrorists will 

record the personalia of every person visiting or otherwise enjoying social 

contact with the victim — all surveillance procedures referred to above may be 

extended so as to encompass the victim's family, friends and more peripheral 

acquaintances. 

The morally flyblown PST gangsters will also and especially register any 

personal peculiarities and routines of potential value for forthcoming attacks on 

the victim's health, life and belongings etc. 

As the state hired and notorious badasses feel they've acquired satisfying insight 

into the victim's household activities, systematical and covert provocations to 

spoil the latter's mental equilibrium are launched. 

In order to induce regular paranoia, the PST bugbears will design the variform 

harassment suchwise an alarming feeling of beeing persecuted results...: 

112 



112


Though he/she changed corresponding battery less than a month ago, the victim 

may wake up at the dead of night because the smoke detector in the hall right 

outside the bedroom emits high-pitched beeps — precisely as it's supposed to 

when the battery is about to run down! The victim will either remove 

permanently or for security reasons replace the battery immediately — however; 

if the latter solution is chosen, he or she may experience that the actual beeping 

reoccurs after a short period of time....! 

Inside the wall — less than two meters from the victim's bed — a hellish device 

constantly gives off ultrasonic noises inaudible to the human ear.....though 

"great" for keeping portrayed victim awake until daybreak (cf p 17)! 

Tired and confused after the nocturnal terrorism, the victim may discover that — 

although it had functioned perfectly well previous evening — the automatic 

filter coffee maker is stone-dead.....so, 40–50 minutes later, he/she will leave for 

work without the customary cups of coffee necessary to expel matutinal 

drowsiness —— 

Arriving at his workplace, the victim may search in vain for essential stationery 

and documents etc and perhaps discover that half a pint of coffee has been 

ostensibly spilled on the floor underneath his or hers computer table..... 

Unaware the illegal monitoring and ongoing PSYWAR* (*psychological 

warfare), the victim is likely to suspect some of his workmates are teasing him 

or her.....which in turn — and in perfect agreement with the evil-intended PSTplot 

— may give rise to peculiar questions, conflicts and groundless mistrust. 

Finishing work, the victim may find his private car unlocked — though he or 

she knows with absolute certainty the vehicle indeed was locked when they left 

it.....and returning home, the heckled thing may stumble upon a lump of wet 

concrete or some queer object placed just in front of their private main entrance! 

Well inside their apartment or house, the victim may observe a quizzical woman 

(actually a debauched stool pigeon hired and instructed by the PST officers) 

wearing a yellow sou'wester and spectacular poncho seemingly watching their 

residence from a nearby parking lot, and 20–30 minutes later they may receive a 

bizarre phone call. 

At this point of time the average victim have an impression of beeing recurrently 

haunted by disturbingly weird incidents, and a subversive insecurity feeling 

normally pervades their mind. In order to reinforce the rising paranoia and 

trigger a maximally overwhelming psychosis, the PST impalers will prolong the 

ultrasound directed sleep deprivation and oftentimes poison the victim's food or 

beverage with scarcely traceable doses psychoactive/hallucinogenic substances. 

Opportunistically "striking while the iron is hot" and loathsomely exploiting the 

chemogenic derangement, the PST officers may now phone the local emergency 

ward or mental health care personnel presenting themselves as v.g anxious 

neighbors, relatives or colleagues of the victim who prefers to be anonymous 

either because they fear violent reprisals or because their personal relationship 

113 



113


with the victim allegedly and otherwise will be spoiled if their identity usw 

perchance should be betrayed. 

Thereupon — slyly faking genuine and warmhearted concernment — the 

Norwegian police skunks speciously and rather detailed reports the victim's 

recent behavior as disquieting and socially offbeat with markedly 

psychopathological and potentially dangerous manifestations.....typically the 

threat portrayed and improper conduct represents to the surroundings and the 

victim's own life/health are massively accentuated/exaggerated. 

In some cases, however, the PST rats de facto will introduce themselves as 

police officers falsely claiming they've received several alarming complaints 

from trustworthy persons worrying about the victim's psychiatric status etc, and 

in other cases the entire and venomous hotchpot is an offensively rotten 

mishmash of clear-cut criminality and substantial corruption jumbled up through 

preplanned and deliberately lawless cooperation between the police and the 

ignominiously double-dealing public health service. 

Apprehended by the police and/or mental health care personnel the nescient 

victim — at least initially — may fancy he or she is surrounded by sincerely 

caring, respectable and reliable etc individuals anxious to relieve them from 

snarled and frightening circumstances. As the simplehearted victim most 

unwisely rattles off a truthful account of his weird experiences the preceding 

days, the frequently corrupted health professionals may nod encouragingly while 

launching a handful enmeshing though seemingly innocuous questions. When 

the victim a few days or weeks later — possibly accompanied by their lawyer — 

are permitted to look over and perhaps copy the different entries in their 

"medical record", they may — at first — feel fairly convinced they're studying 

the ghastly anamnesis usw of an absolute stranger...! 

The actual descriptions of their background and factual behavior etc may deviate 

perversely and distinctly systematically from the truth in order to falsely justify 

v.g compulsory and politically dictated commitments, trumped-up 

diagnoses/charges and sadistic/destructive abuse of neurotoxic chemicals etc. 

The police schemed provocations — which far and away may be more 

comprehensive, enduring and truculent than actually described above — may 

nevertheless be constructed, timed and intensified suchwise as to bring about 

other and more pernicious outcomes than unjustified psychiatric internment and 

stigmatizing alone.....and — in this connection — the most attractive of the 

alternative end results is to carry on and worsen the methodical terrorism until 

the victim attacks and hopefully kills an innocent person in pure desperation. 

Other frequently sought "payoffs" includes suiciding (the police may v.g 

surreptitiously and specifically manipulate the regular broadcasting reception 

playing songs/melodies on the victim's radio and/or television units exacerbating 

sadness and praising self-destruction), physical handicapping (may be induced 

114 



114


e.g through intoxication, covert radiation and various accident setups), or simply 

— assassination. 

( 5 ) 

PRACTICAL APPLICATION OF ACHIEVED RESULTS 

The police and their corrupted upholders will invariably and with hell-bent 

determination utilize all episodes/information — real as well as fabricated and 

illegally provoked/obtained — commonly deemed unacceptable to harm the 

victim and eventually the socioreligious/-cultural and ethnic etc subgroups 

pertinent to the latter. 

Most likely there'll be a number of vitiated press conferences/releases 

opportunistically stressing the economic needs and counterfeited, political 

downgrading of the police force — the difficult and assumedly unwholesome 

working conditions of Norwegian police officers will be grotesquely 

exaggerated, and wage claims typically accentuated.....demands for extended 

access to weaponry and immoral investigation procedures are apt to follow, and 

troublesome regulations restricting human rights violating policemanship and 

fiendish totalitarianism supporting the absolute police state, normally shoot 

down —— 

By and large brimming over with decayed sickees and back-alley jimcrowists, 

the Norwegian state apparatus just about plenary may go to truly astonishing 

lengths to actively support and safeguard against public exposure serious 

criminality committed by their police officers and assorted socii criminis, and 

various mass media — private as well as state owned — are very likely to 

reflect this inglorious fact! 

Cf Doc #2907 — "ANNOTATIONS". 

115 



115


PST IN BRATTVÅG 

Subsequent annotations may be read as an unmediated continuation of pp 80–81 

of nearby gravamen — 

Suspecting no criminality or irregularities aside from the satanic terrorism 

systematically brought about by themselves and their festered accomplices (cf 

pp 11–30 usw), the facinorous PST kooks nevertheless had their own and 

screwed motives for dragging on the trenchantly cranky harrying of me. 

During their nefarious and formerly described aggressions in Oslo, the various 

PST agents invariably reported they forthrightly had been detected whenever 

attempting to surveil or stealthily pursue me.....and this obviously represented an 

experiential novelty to the gunky flatfoots accustomed to undiscovered track and 

espy etc their usually woefully inattentive victims.....so — after plundering my 

attic-lodging in Oslo (stealing ready cash, my passport, dozens of books, 

documents and miscellaneous thingamajigs — everything perfectly legal stuff), 

these demon guided swine amongst swine decided to find out how it was 

practically possible to unmask their foul sleuths such and such! 

In NO-Brattvåg the PST goons forthwith acquired point-blank support for their 

wicked and lawless insanities from the evilest mortal ever settling in NO-Haram 

County; Mr Thorleif MARKEN (b Dec 16, 1940) — the local sheriff! 

Mr Marken was formally and permanently appointed sheriff in 1989, and held 

this office until 2001 when he relinquished due to somatic illness. 

It's extremely seldom — even amongst the worst criminals — we're 

encountering individuals entirely destitute of at least a few creditable personality 

traits, but indeed; Mr Marken is one of these rare creatures! 

Of humble birth and without close relatives approaching his inordinate 

malevolence and reasonable Stanford-Binet IQ of 143 (cf Doc #1536, p 87), Mr 

Marken consuetudinary conceals his real intentions and feelings from exposure 

— even the social interaction with his wife and children is a purely hammy 

business scurvily enacted to beguile these credulous everyday characters. 

During his incumbency Mr Marken's behavior and ratiocination steadily grew 

more offbeat and befuddled. Initially suspecting I was a mere fruitcake, his 

clodhopping mind transmuted my markedly altruistic and human rights 

advocating being into a cold-blooded and superbly adroit crimelord in a matter 

of months....the uncontested coordinator and spearhead of all organized 

criminality — particularly drug trafficking — in Norway (later — as he became 

even more cocksure as for my fancied leadership role, he generously expanded 

my criminal empire to encompass the entire Earth....)! 

116 



116


Mr Marken's unsound and eminently iniquitous brain almost unceasingly 

hatched new plots to terrorize, harm and murder me.....: for more than a year — 

the loaded pistol expectantly tucked away in the drawer unit of his executive 

desk — he impatiently waited for an opportunity to unprovokedly gun me down 

if I happened to enter his office in a legal errand (afterwards he'd planned to 

explain I physically had attacked him and suchwise rendered "self-defence" 

unavoidable), and for many months he meticulously framed his damned 

blueprint for slaying me while enjoying my vespertine promenade (Mr Marken 

were well acquainted with several experienced big game hunters residing near 

his native homestead in NO-Vestnes County, and he'd planned to employ one of 

these as sniper — convincing the ignorant and nationalistic marksman I was an 

extremely dangerous mass murderer and mafioso seriously endangering and 

sapping the very foundation of the whole, "democratic" nation....; — "You've 

shot bucks before, (name)!", Mr Marken cheerfully reassured himself. There's 

no evidence Mr Marken ever informed other PST representatives about his 

deranged designs.)! 

Otherwise Mr Marken was — and supposedly still is — an ardent adherent of 

poisoning and diversified application of maiming and lethal 

toxins/venoms/chemicals....: during the more than 20 break-ins at my private 

house in Åsen 4, Brattvåg, the PST butchers presumably infected and destroyed 

with cardiotoxic substances alone bedclothes, towels, clothing, books and 

paraphernalia etc worth at least US$5000 (cf Doc #377 — entry of Sep 29, 2000 

etc)....! 

While Mr Marken's personal PST engagement most definitely were morbidly 

out-of-bounds and totally indefensible, his established police lieutenant and 

second in command at the local sheriff office, Mr Kjell Børje MOE (cf Doc 

#377 — entries of Oct 19 and 28, 1998), wisely maintained a significantly 

squarer course vis-à-vis other PST agents. 

In striking contrast to the uniformly atrocious and radically false Mr Marken, Mr 

Moe is an experienced and generally well-thought-of military senior officer of 

sensible empathic and beneficent proclivity. Mr Moe never partook the 

attempted assassinations regularly launched by Mr Marken and other PST 

officers, but — alas — he certainly hold back piles of information about serious 

crimes committed by his colleagues...! 

Many of the lawbreaking PST activities in Brattvåg has been upheld, actively 

partaken and sometimes initiated by the slimy whited sepulchers of the 

categorically scandalous and largely condemnable public health service. 

Offering suitable sheltering, personnel, matériel and vast assistance in many 

other respects, sickly self-righteous and perversely wrongheaded "health" 

professionals in increasingly degree has adopted and underhandedly adapted to 

meet their specific and illicit needs the throughly unprincipled spy-tech 

117 



117


beforehand pertinent to special and intelligence gathering units of the police and 

armed forces alone! 

By studying pp 15–30 and 80–88 of nearby report, some of the unilaterally 

fiendish motives Norwegian health officials had — and still have — in regard to 

illegally surveilling, terrorizing and injuring me etc should be readily 

discernible/deductible. One of the truly queerish incentives in this connection 

nonetheless remains unexposed: Erelong the constantly vexing PST hellhounds 

had reported they were unqualified as to determine my exact intellectual level, 

but that they anyhow felt positively convinced my general IQ exceeded 150 

(farther down the mucky road — as they acquired knowledge of some of my 

modest childhood feats, they consulted independent experts unreservedly 

declaring the actual accomplishments certainly equalled a Stanford-Binet IQ 

prodigiously transcending 200 and most probably surpassing 250 on said scale) 

— and....their assertion quickly triggered the far and away most rabid, lawless 

and disgraceful quest for genius ever taking place in this wretched nation! 

So....; while vitiated PST hit men searched our private house in NO-Mauseidvåg 

(cf Doc #4000, entry of Jan 2005) and several other dwellings from basement to 

attic collecting psychobiographical material, appallingly criminal namby-pamby 

toads from the public health service systematically monitored my private 

activities in Åsen 4, Brattvåg....! And — once the Doc's ##599 and 777 had been 

published on the Internet (on Oct 17, 2002 and Feb 22, 2003, respectively), 3 

new SIGs appeared practically overnight: the first group were morbidly 

obsessed with clairvoyance/occultism and the prophecies of the French seer 

Nostradamus* (*b. 1503 – d. 1566); the second with medicine and 

pharmacology (cf Doc #599, p 55); and the third with religion and apocalyptical 

exegesis etc. These illegally founded and macabre SIGs are still kept alive by 

brainsick, Norwegian officials (By the way — the manifestly haywired 

preoccupation with parapsychological topics was not a wholly span-new 

craze.....: in 1998 when I — as a result of all over fraudulent accusations — 

were incarcerated at the political black hole at NO-Hjelset [cf Doc #377 — entry 

of Oct 30, 1998], the Norwegian author and schoolmaster — Mr Oddbjørn 

MYKLEBUST — together with a member of the "fair sex" were allowed to 

enter corresponding spudhole. Mr Myklebust and his female attendant had been 

admitted by Mr Arne RUSET* [*cf Doc #377 — entry of Nov 07, 2000] et al, 

and didn't introduce themselves or consult me directly — they merely kept some 

distance trying to look convincingly uninterested. Mr Myklebust had formerly 

published a book about a moderately second sighted kinswoman — Ms Olga 

TANDSTAD SKAUE — and was currently compiling material for a biography 

about her clairvoyant father, Mr Karl Johan TANDSTAD, and other Norwegians 

presumably possessing paranormal faculties. Ignorant his identity, whereabouts 

and objectives were duly imparted, Mr Myklebust and the accompanying 

woman left the scene after a while — slightly puzzled and discontended, I'm 

afraid...). 

118 



118


Personal connections with the faintest smell of romance or sexuality 've always 

aroused fervent, pathological reactions amongst Norwegian PST officers and 

"health" personnel...: 

In the autumn 2001 — when I most presumably saved her oldest daughter 

from being stabbed to death — the PST fiends broke into the private 

apartment of Ms Katrin JØSOK (b Sep 20, 1965), NO-Brattvåg. 

The PST swine suspected Ms Jøsok and her underaged daughters were 

particularly interesting specimens since I offered them this kind of 

personal assistance.....so — they conscientiously installed their hellish 

cobweb-optics in her sitting room, bedchambers, kitchen and 

bathroom.....etc! During the next weeks the exclusively male voyeurs 

scrutinized the perfectly unremarkable, bodily makeup of the small family 

without detecting anything unusual such and such — they concluded the 

teenybopper and her much younger sister had a physique altogether 

matching their respective age-groups, while they described the sexual 

attributes and general build of Ms Jøsok as "less attractive"...! 

The emetic and secret monitoring of Ms Inga DALSEGG (b Dec 14, 

1974) has been sufficiently portrayed in Doc #4575 of April 30, 2005. 

The brainsick spies were much amused by Ms Dalsegg's whimsical 

behavior until they witnessed scenes described as explicitly 

pedophilic.....and after a while they were bewildered by some of her 

apparently morbid idiosyncrasies as well. 

In the end of August 2005 I commenced the construction of a literally 

"heartsome" poster for Ms Tuva Magritt MOLVÆR (b Aug 21, 1985), 

NO-Langevåg — a nice girl and relative. 

Illegally downloading hundreds of banal sequences from the absolutely 

unpretentious composition process, the utterly ludicrous and wild-eyed 

psychologists/physicians etc nodded enthusiastically as they pruriently 

watched the "artful integration" of quixotic hearts and stars: "Aha — so 

this is how a true genius works......interesting, very interesting, indeed!" 

It didn't take many hours before the nematoid apostles of Satan had 

bugged and severely infected Ms Molvær's modest apartment in NO- 

Bergen with their infernal cobweb-optics, of course... 

AV studying the homely routines of this religious and gentle lady for a 

while, the contaminators concluded Ms Molvær seemed slightly 

depressed and listless — though they didn't quite understand why.....and 

since she never sullyed herself through improper conduct or off-putting 

remarks, the slimy onlookers strongly suspected she somehow had been 

informed about the ongoing monitoring of her privacy. 

119 



119


Dec 10 th , 2005, the Norwegian "Mensa-chick" Ms Anne Lene 

JOHNSEN showed up in NO-Brattvåg. 

Somewhat delayed due to womanly makeup redoing, she smilingly 

appeared outside the shopping center I was about to leave. A psychologist 

involved in the reprehensible and totally unlawful monitoring of me had 

recently told Ms Johnsen I probably appreciated military garments and 

nice-assed gals, so she had purchased a pair of brand-new camo trousers 

and — expectantly kneeling on her car seats — she soon did her best to 

favorably expose her yummy and "warlike" bum...! It was a well-disposed 

and charming miss, indeed — and a reasonably gifted one, too.....but alas: 

the lovable "IQ-lass" had been contemptibly befooled by stupider 

persons...! 

Some time ago ill-fated contaminants had broken into Ms Johnsen's 

private apartment installing their notorious cobweb-optics — allegedly to 

examine her mental health and "mating qualifications"! Though the vile 

intruders left many and easily detectable vestiges, the overconfident Ms 

Johnsen failed to notice anything irregular.....so — she had her sexuality 

and absolute privacy heinously and illegally violated by the state 

sponsored crackpots she unwisely relied on... 

Typically irradiating with delight when she managed to solve a given 

problem or formulate a particularly smashing sentence, the truly 

subhuman aggressors concluded Ms Johnsen not actually was crazy — 

she was "funny and slightly eccentric", only.....so they naturally decided 

to prolong the "delectable" monitoring of her indefinitely! 

During most of A 2006 I've had much and predominantly chummy 

contact with Ms Kjærsti Elida GUSECK (b June 18, 1973). 

Ms Guseck is a photogenic and rather amatorious primadonna, and the 

constantly marring PST officers and "health" professionals 've of course 

criminally downloaded dozens of strictly private photos of her from my 

PC and corresponding video monitor — also shots of explicitly 

pornographic nature...! 

It goes practically unsaid Ms Guseck's private apartments 've been 

systematically and massively infected with AV spy-tech — all her phone 

conversations 've been recorded, and comprehensive annotations on her 

intimate privacy journalized.....as a matter of fact Norwegian authorities 

permanently, illegally and lecherously have monitored the definite 

bedroom privacy of this half Austrian and sexually attractive lady for 

years! Cf Doc's ## 7084 and 8017 etc. 

Official and sexually motivated violations of the palsy-walsy privacy of 

juridically blameless citizens are extremely commonplace in Norway today, and 

120 



120


— to the extent parts of corresponding monitoring are formally/clandestinely 

logged, Norwegian authorities will go to absolute extremes to give their 

monstrous criminality the slightest shine of respectability...: — empirically 

exhaustively fraudulent accusations and the most absurd excuses may be 

recorded to cover up the principal motive of the scummy surveillance! 

During their long-standing presence in Brattvåg, the PST officers 've also carried 

out systematic and extensive monitoring etc wholly independent of the public 

health service and other official institutions....: they've e.g AV spied on health 

personnel engaging in sexual intercourse, WC visits and religious observances 

in their private homes (one of those suchwise espyed, Mr Sharan 

MOGHADDAM [cf Doc #377 — entries of Oct 30, 1998 item Aug 31 and Sep 

29, 2000 etc], has himself operated the cobweb-optics installed in my own and 

most private dwelling in Åsen 4, Brattvåg)...! 

— and oh...: the PST paranoiacs does of course suspect somebody somehow 

actively and secretly 've watched themselves during their stay here in Brattvåg 

— it's a truly majestic mess, is not it....?! 

שּׂ 

By studying and comparing the different documents enclosed and once in a 

while referred to in this complaint, one should acquire a fairly precise idea of the 

abject essentials constituting the "garden-variety terrorism" perfunctorily carried 

out by the nocuous PST vermin. 

121 



121


Studying nearby complaint and adjoining enclosures (cf p 2 — "Comments on 

disqualification"), reasonable sane and sagacious readers pretty soon will 

launch an almost inevitable question: "Can the various crimes and atrocities 

described in this report possibly 've been perpetrated by mentally sound 

creatures...?" 

Based on unique, comprehensive and well-structured collections of data on 

documentable criminality committed by Norwegian officials since 1992, it's 

quite easy to give a clear-cut answer to that query: 

"Certainly not.....the ghastly admixture of psychopathies, criminalism, 

hypocrisy, parvanimity, theomachy, lewdness and fiendishness verily 

characterizing the cracked personality of most Norwegian officials 

are, far and away, the worst European and first world example of 

gross intrapopular depravity and collective insaneness procurable!" 

Actively sustained by and largely including governmental authorities and 

flyblown principals of major state institutes, the innate corruption and wormy 

diabolism pervades all executive and official branches of the infected nation 

which — befittingly — 've been nicknamed "The Kingdom of Satan"! 

Although psychiatric ill-health and multifarious impairment of higher cerebral 

functions are alarmingly common amongst Norwegian officials, the greater part 

of them tends to be criminally responsible as personality disorders — 

particularly psychopathy — and various perversions are predominant conditions. 

The pathologically distorted thought and behavior patterns normally typifying 

Norwegian public officials and senior civil servants may however — viewed as 

an endemic phenomenon — partially rupture the commonly accepted boundaries 

imposed by international norms of disease classification. A genetically rooted 

and markedly offbeat syndrome symptomatically approaching classical 

psychopathy and frequently comprising atypical variants of the structural 

pathology conventionally associated with organic brain diseases, it's hardly 

unbecoming to introduce the acronym "NPSMS"* — *"Norwegian Police and 

Statesman Malignant Syndrome" (if more convenient, you may think of 

NPSMS simply as "Norwegian psychopathy" or "Norwegian folie", of 

course)...! 

In Doc's ##633 and 2037 — pp 67 and 95, respectively, I've described a number 

of NPSMS' more or less pathognomonic symptoms — viz: 

122 



122


Inadequate judgmental ability, imprudence, atelonoesis, 

rejoice in evildoing, ponerophilia, cruelty, sadism, dysempathy, 

superiority/inferiority complexes and complemental maladjust- 

ment/overcompensation, falsehood, charlatanism, hypocrisy, 

professional double-dealing, sickly self-assertiveness, arrogance, 

cantankerousness, megalomania, general lability, willful neglect 

and violation of ethical norms, criminalism, recidivism, dikephobia, 

corruptibility, deceitfulness, psychiatric conditions, delusional ideation, 

religious insecurity/confusion, theomachy, icono-/supericlasm, hamartio- 

philia, unwarranted suspiciousness/hostility, turncoat mentality, distrust- 

ful jingoism, impudence, prevaricated sociability, ergasiomimesis, feigned 

eunoia, refractoriness, spiteful envy, peevishness, aggression, irritability, 

anosognosia, gloominess, lecherousness and voyeurism.....etc. 

The above collection of personality traits and symptoms manifestly typical but 

not necessarily conclusive of NPSMS, clearly invites to differentiated 

diagnosing; while the moodiness and fluctuating self-image are amongst the 

distinguishing features of the borderline personality, the thoroughgoing reality 

distortion and oftentimes systematic misinterpretation of events exhibited by 

some NPSMS afflicted individuals are truly archtypical of regular psychoses. 

The severe, recurrent and wholly intentional misconduct and criminality 

fundamentally peculiar to NPSMS-villains are closest related to the antisocial 

personality disorder, however, but are more complex and frequently includes 

dangerous paranoia, religious delusions and sheer diabolism. 

In most psychiatric disorders it's relatively uncomplicated to identify some 

precipitating factors — i.e psychosocial and physical influence in all 

likelihood triggering the mental derangement. When it comes to the NPSMS it's 

usually hard to detect decisive, psychotogenic factors — as a matter of fact one 

may feel slightly ill at ease attempting to discriminate readily observable, 

morbid features from entirely self-willed and obviously unreasonable evilmindedness...! 

Ethically indefensible, evilness purely for the sake of evilness 

may assuredly be a ponerologically acceptable and ipso facto rational aim in 

itself (most religious dogmas omitted, of course).....consequently — motive and 

means appearing practically identical — unprovoked evilness may be seen both 

as a cardinal symptom and causa sine qua non of the Norwegian Police and 

Statesman Malignant Syndrome. 

As regards predisposing factors, genetic endowment and hereditary metabolic, 

anatomical and physiological insufficiencies in prefrontal cortices, the 

thalamencephalon, hypothalamus and limbic system may be crucial for the 

actual onset and subsequent diagnosing of NPSMS. Various somatosensory 

structures and convergence zones in the ventromedial prefrontal sector of the 

brain may be visibly damaged, and dysfunctions of the medial/lateral 

123 



123


orbitofrontal circuit, nucleus accumbens, ventral striatum, corpus Luysii and 

thalamic nuclei are common NPSMS features. Serotonin's neuronal transmitter 

functions and capability to modulate v.g dopaminergic neurons may be 

significantly reduced in NPSMS sufferers, and the GABAergic output pathways 

of neostriatum and globus pallidus tends to be impaired — monoamine based 

weaknesses and defective interconnections between the dorsolateral prefrontal 

cortex, anterior subgenual cingulate cortex and the ventral striatum may be 

NPSMS indicative. 

Despite depicted brain abnormalities, many NPSMS-caitiffs are capable of 

performing just about normally on standard neuropsychological tests — working 

memory, concentration and the general intelligence seems to be intact... 

Those unfamiliar with e.g: the bloodcurdling history of medicine; the execrable 

crimes inspired by physicians/nurses in Nazi Germany; the political role of 

psychiatrists in diagnosing dissenters/intellectuals as mentally ill; the numerous 

medical practitioners serving as regular torturers; the many vivisections on 

various prisoners/internees; the widespread falsification of medical reports to 

cover up serious crimes; the active involvement of physicians in weapon-related 

production.....etc.....may find the heinously extensive an untautly described 

cooperation between corrupted "health" professionals and notoriously criminal 

police officers (et al) downright shocking and unbelievable. 

There exist a universally acclaimed and professional code of deontological 

principles serving as ethical cornerstone for medical teachers and practitioners, 

namely the "Hippocratic oath"...: 

THE ORIGINAL HIPPOCRATIC OATH 

"I swear by Apollo the physician, and Aesculapius, and Health, and 

All-heal, and all the gods and goddesses, that, according to my 

ability and judgment, I will keep this Oath and this stipulation — 

to reckon him who taught me this Art equally dear to me as my pa- 

rents, to share my substance with him, and relieve his necessities 

if required; to look upon his offspring in the same footing as my 

own brothers, and to teach them this Art, if they shall wish to learn 

it, without fee or stipulation; and that by precept, lecture, and every 

other mode of instruction, I will impart a knowledge of the Art 

to my own sons, and those of my teachers, and to disciples bound 

by a stipulation and oath according to the law of medicine, but to 

none others. I will follow that system of regimen which, according 

to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of my patients, 

and abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous. I will 

give no deadly medicine to any one if asked, nor suggest any such 

124 



124


counsel; and in like manner I will not give to a woman a 

pessary to produce abortion. With purity and with holiness 

I will pass my life and practice my Art. I will not cut persons 

laboring under the stone, but will leave this to be done by men 

who are practitioners of this work. Into whatever house I enter, 

I will go into them for the benefit of the sick, and will abstain 

from every voluntary act of mischief and corruption; and, further 

from the seduction of females or males, of freemen and slaves. 

Whatever, in connection with my professional practice or not, 

in connection with it, I see or hear, in the life of men, which ought 

not to be spoken of abroad, I will not divulge, as reckoning that 

all such should be kept secret. While I continue to keep this Oath 

unviolated, may it be granted to me to enjoy life and the practice 

of the Art, respected by all men, in all times! But should I trespass 

and violate this Oath, may the reverse be my lot!" 

THE REVISED HIPPOCRATIC OATH 

"I promise that my medical knowledge will be used to benefit 

people's health. Patients are my first concern. I will listen to them, 

and provide the best care I can. I will be honest, respectful, and 

compassionate towards patients. I will do my best to help anyone 

in medical need, in emergencies. I will make every effort to ensure 

that the rights of all patients are respected, including vulnerable 

groups who lack means of making their needs known. I will exercise 

my professional judgment as independently as possible, uninfluenced 

by political pressure or the social standing of my patient. I will not 

put personal profit or advancement above my duty to my patient. 

I recognize the special value of human life, but I also know that pro- 

longation of human life is not the only aim of health care. If I 

agree to perform abortion, I agree that it should take place only 

within an ethical and legal framework. I will not provide treat- 

ments that are pointless or harmful, or which an informed and com- 

petent patient refuses. I will help patients find the information and 

support they want to make decisions on their care. I will answer as 

truthfully as I can, and respect patients' decisions, unless that puts 

others at risk of substantial harm. If I cannot agree with their requests, 

I will explain why. If my patients have limited mental awareness, I 

will still encourage them to participate in decisions as much as 

they feel able. I will do my best to maintain confidentiality about 

all patients. If there are overriding reasons preventing me keeping a 

patient's confidentiality, I will explain them. I recognize my know- 

125 



125


ledge has limits: I will get advice from colleagues when needed. 

I will acknowledge my mistakes. I will do my best to keep myself 

and my colleagues informed of new developments, and ensure that 

poor standards or bad practices are exposed to those who can im- 

prove them. I will show respect for all those with whom I work and 

be ready to share my knowledge by teaching others what I know. I 

will use my training and professional standing to improve the 

community in which I work. I will treat patients equitably and 

support a fair and humane distribution of health resources. I will 

try to influence and redirect authorities whose policies harm public 

health. I will oppose policies which breach internationally accepted 

standards of human rights. I will strive to change laws that are 

contrary to patients' interests or to my professional ethics. While 

I continue to keep this Oath unviolated, may it be granted to me 

to enjoy life and the practice of the Art, respected by all, 

in all times." 

The wholly deliberate and fulsomely imbuing lawlessness, terrorism and 

nefariousness arrogantly paraded by the Norwegian public "health" service (et 

al) in this case, represents an all-out and portentously hellish onslaught of the 

high-minded stipulations laid down in the Hippocratic oath — we are, 

categorically, facing the worst and most dishonorable example of state 

supported inequity, official folly and premeditated human rights violations seen 

in Norway after World War II (cf Doc #4588, p 120)...! 

A judicious and impartial being may turn over and search underneath each stone 

and windfall without finding factually extenuating circumstances in this 

case.....the intensely loathsome picture of an occupational group rapaciously 

vandalizing their professional code and, in symptomatic confederacy, illegally 

terrorizing a particularly valiant man opportunistically deemed morally and 

intellectually superior — and for that reason malevolently persecuted by 

depraved dunces, incessantly becomes more detailed and horridly scandalous as 

new pieces of evidence appears. 

Caveat lector...: 

"...according to my ability and judgment, I will keep 

this Oath and this stipulation...", 

"...I will follow that system of regimen which, according 

to my ability and judgment, I consider for the benefit of 

my patients, and abstain from whatever is deleterious and 

mischievous...", 

126 



126


"...with purity and with holiness I will pass my life 

and practise my Art...", 

"...into whatever house I enter, I will go into them for 

the benefit of the sick, and will abstain from every vol- 

untary act of mischief and corruption...", 

"...I will be honest, respectful, and compassionate towards 

patients...", 

"...I will make every effort to ensure that the rights of all 

patients are respected...", 

"...I will exercise my professional judgment as independently 

as possible, uninfluenced by political pressure or the social 

standing of my patient...", 

"...I will not provide treatments that are pointless or harmful, 

or which an informed and competent patient refuses...", 

"...I will acknowledge my mistakes...", 

"...I will try to influence and redirect authorities whose 

policies harm public health...", 

"...I will strive to change laws that are contrary to patients 

interests or to my professional ethics...", and 

"...I will oppose policies which breach internationally ac- 

cepted standards of human rights..." — — ; 

it certainly looks glorious on paper and screen, doesn't it...? The revolting truth, 

however, is that preaching human rights and ethical code observance to 

Norwegian authorities — the public "health" service vastly included — in this 

case invariably have had the same, questionable effects as solemnly offering a 

literally bloody, honeyed and invigorating sacrament to a swarm screwy, hellordained 

and plague-spreading rat fleas...: 

“As regards official criminality in Norway, the number explicit 

lawbreakings recorded by adjacent branch of Hellvow Anticorruption 

clearly reflects the execrable and usually well-masked contempt for 

human rights, democratic standards and the basic principles of 

127 



127


corresponding legal system distinctly prevalent amongst 

Norwegian officiaries practically routinely abusing their 

professional privileges to e.g seriously offend fellowmen 

and consequently elude the criminal investigation and 

prosecution juridically pertinent. 

The blatant hypocrisy and treacherous opportunism by and 

large characterizing nowadays Norwegian officials, was be- 

fittingly coined "bigoterie" in medieval France — germanely 

delineating the grungy and widespread practice amongst Norwe- 

gian Normans to worship the Christian Trinity as well as their 

heathen deities out of strictly materialistic motives.....whereas — 

following Christian baptism, the French regularly bestowed 

generous gifts on "converted" pagans. So, the largely marauding 

Norwegians shamelessly exploited Gallic benevolence and 

Catholic naïveté maximally, and quite a few of them underwent 

sacramental affusion and immersion more than seven times!” 

(Doc #2037, p 90); 

“Acquainted with various Christian doctrines, the Norwegian 

prime minister — Mr Kjell Magne Bondevik (cf Doc's ##1022 

and 1049 above) — and his religious accomplices believed they 

ruthlessly, endlessly and unpunished could exploit/abuse evan- 

gelical reassurances about forgiveness to repetitively commit the 

most disgusting offences! While seeing the pope for absolution 

or praying for exculpation, their ignoble minds were busy 

planning new, abominable violations!” 

(Doc #2037, p 97); 

“Priestly educated, the Norwegian Prime Minister found 

it highly praiseworthy to consecrate heaven-born 

righteousness on his filthy scaffold of thoroughly 

condemned post hoc fallacies ex ministerii — offering 

the human rights ritualistic irreverence and, devil-may- 

care, sacrilegiously slaughtering the cardinal virtues 

on his hellhole altar of mephitic self-gratification while 

passionately blessing the sepulchral liturgy satanically 

dictating the ceremonious under-the-table molestation 

of supernal sinlessness.....all the time disgracefully 

attempting to convince God that his bloody peccancy 

ex officio eucharistically glorified the macabrely pre- 

tended transubstantiation of political headlessness 

to deified ingenuity celestially appraised and factio- 

128 



128


nally benedictive; proh pudor — what a messy mass!” 

(Aphorisms &c, #37); 

“The „Norwegian plague‟* (*ie the „cobweb-optics‟) is now 

rapidly spreading throughout the world, and we hereby 

encourage the nations to battle this hellborn technology 

fiercely!” 

(Doc #3217, p 106); 

“Long-standing, ample and bitter experience ‟ve duly 

confirmed Norwegian authorities object vg generosity, 

compassion and mildness as exploitable weaknesses — 

as a frank invitation to carry on and intumesce their 

manipulative hellishness.....and; — if ever accepting 

their seemingly charitable offers, you give ‟em the upper 

hand, and they‟ll despise you even more because of 

your manifest humble and gullible nature!” 

(Doc #3217, p 104); 

“Yes indeed — we‟re chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs, 

forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral 

lepers.....but; since we effectively ‟ve blocked criminal investigation of our 

iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and successfully 

hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our inveterate 

transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally enforceable 

judgments against us.....and for that reason we are — at least in a 

profanely juridical sense — not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice 

Act sec 53, third per)! 

Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should 

bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our 

allelopathic lawbreaking.....‟cause it‟s an established truism that our 

surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and 

scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and 

Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and 

objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously, 

please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental 

corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament Building, 

and a leviathan monument at the royal palace square in Oslo where 

noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and confer dignity 

upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and — also — 

squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by 

our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!” 

(The professional philosophy of Norwegian judges. Doc #627, p 58); 

129 



129


“Norwegian authorities will comply with international 

law and human rights conventions exclusively if forced 

to by v.g military pressure, serious political scandals or 

massive fiscal/material/human losses.” 

(Doc #4588, p 121); 

“For more than 15 — fifteen — years I‟ve been working 

actively and altruistically with disclosing severe human 

rights violations and variform criminality committed by 

Norwegian officials. My human rights agitation and justi- 

fiable stinging reports ‟ve significantly disturbed culpable 

and heinously corrupted politicians, judges and police offi- 

cers et al who, consequently,‟ve done their very best to con- 

ceal their offences and to harm me. 

Representatives from the Norwegian Police „Security‟ Service 

‟ve also, several times, attempted to assassinate me — appa- 

rently with utterly scandalous assent from v.g the Supreme 

Court and the Norwegian Minister of „Justice‟.” 

(Doc #4588, p 119); 

“It‟s perfectly evident the rotten terrorism steadily exer- 

cised by Norwegian authorities aims at ruining my general 

health, mutilating my social relationships, marring my 

reputation, adding to my pecuniary expenses and — 

if possible — provoking criminality. 

My sociomedical situation here in Norway ‟ve been in- 

tolerable the last 12 — twelve — years, and I‟ve never 

had any future whatsoever in a nation satanically perse- 

cuting me because I‟m noble, insist on justice and vigo- 

rously defends the human rights and fundamental free- 

doms of man. Shortly; the ghoulish corruption, abject pol- 

troonery and utterly unreasonable fiendishness abidingly 

brandished by Norwegian authorities in my case, will fill 

every honorable man and woman with the most intense and 

enduring contempt and hostility towards them! 

There‟s no hope my situation here in Norway will improve — 

on the contrary Norwegian authorities will continue and extend 

their swinish violations of the human rights, and the exceptio- 

nally prolonged, intense and hateful terrorist attacks are 

doubtlessly strongly detrimental to my health etc.” 

(Doc #4588, p 121); 

130 



130


“The downright corruption and hell-destined iniquity 

abidingly displayed by Norwegian magistracy in 

juxtaposed facts of nearby case, are unparalleled in 

modern monarchic history of law, and execrable 

diabolism and gangrenous ghoulishness intero- 

sculates their exceedingly opprobrious criminality.” 

(Doc #103, pp 1–2); 

“Norwegian authorities has hitherto manifested nothing 

but depraved disrespect for international declarations and 

covenants of human rights when independent, extraterritorial 

investigators etc, potentially could uncover the heinous 

corruption which, especially the last 5 years, have infected 

increasingly larger parts of the official functions in 

the country.” 

(Doc #123, p 9); 

“Studying enclosed documents — Doc‟s ## 103, 108, 115, 123, 

135, 147, 161, 214, 240, 315, 339, 377, 590, 599 and 627 (tot 

54, fifty-four, pp) — makes unequivocally plain that we‟re dealing 

with multifold, aggravated, protracted and premeditated violations 

of the human rights and fundamental freedoms scornfully preplotted 

and deliberately perpetrated by Norwegian authorities. 

The systematic, repugnant, recidivistic and long-drawn-out violations 

does not only attest to a deep-rooted disrespect for basal human rights 

and lawfulness, it also demonstrate a transparent contempt for the 

discerning qualities and safeguarding potency of other nations. 

The sociopathic manipulation of facts and emetic hypocrisy wontedly 

promulgated by Norwegian politicians and their official delegates 

to cosmopolitan fora, circumstantiate the fact that Norwegian author- 

ities furtively look upon — inter alios — the United Nations, the Council 

of Europe and the International Helsinki Federation as inferior assem- 

blages of retarded easy marks and puling cowards! 

It's nevertheless perfectly clear that the depraved conduct abidingly 

exhibited by Norwegian government officials, police officers and judges 

etc in adjacent case complex, not ‟ve emerged from sane, honorable, 

equilibrated or brilliant minds — though they are criminally responsible, 

as they volitionally — fully aware the detrimental and lethal consequences 

of their undertakings — ‟ve chosen to breach the law, disregard the 

human rights, ignore contractual provisions and exuberantly indulge 

in putrid and lavish evildoing.” 

(Doc #633, pp 66–67); 

131 



131


“Ad nauseam we‘ve witnessed how Norwegian police officers 

expediently perpetrates and provokes grave criminality exclu- 

sively to ride high on the confusion and fear thereby produced. 

Besides, aposematically liberticidal bureaucrats opportunistically 

championing gross injustice steadfastly goosesteps towards the totali- 

tarian, Norwegian police state.....and in major respects the demo- 

cratic government system has proven ruefully deficient. 

In a regular tyranny statutes and the application of law normally 

will be adapted so as to legitimate, simplify and consolidate 

authoritarian oppression of „commoners‟ item — of course — 

the right to criminalize, confine and suitably stigmatize „dangerous‟ 

libertarians etc.” 

(Doc #2907, p 102); 

“Considered the occurrence of pathologic depression and stark 

madness are comparatively more frequent in Norway than else- 

where in Europe, it's especially noticeable Norwegian physicians 

clearly and statistically negatively distinguish themselves as proner 

to psychiatric suffering and bizarre fits etc than the population 

generally.” 

(Doc #1536, p 85); 

“Much in the same manner as the Sacred College 

of Cardinals and the pope symbolizes divine enlight- 

enment and moral splendor to pious Catholics and 

Christians globally, the Norwegian Parliament and 

present (anno 2003) prime minister serve as 

perfect epitomes of eclipsing diabolism and benighted 

depravity to philanthropists and human rights 

activists nationwide!” 


“The Devil and accomplished evildoers may be 

hard to detect when lurking beneath Norwegian 

altars, judgements-seats or corresponding parlia- 

ment rostrum, and cumbersome to exorcise when 

visibly safeguarded by national interests!” 


“After thoroughly studying the present Norwegian 

government, I feel absolutely convinced they‟re 

totally unable to behave ethical and wise inasmuch 

as it‟s a matter of choice — I‟ve never seen them 

132 



132


doing anything honorable or otherwise correct when 

opposing alternatives exist!” 


“Suicide is generally the last successful attempt 

Norwegian physicians makes to avoid justice!” 


“According to Mr Oscar Wilde „any preoccupation 

with ideas of what is right or wrong in conduct 

shows an arrested intellectual development‟ — 

hence the thoughtless injustice, unrestrained 

mindlessness and prodigiously liberal interpre- 

tation of facts so peculiar to Norwegian judges 

and Christian politicians, I suppose...!” 


“Bountiful evidence attests to the disturbing 

fact many Norwegian health professionals 

opportunistically confuses occupational success, 

deontological integrity and juridical blamelessness 

with illegally omissive and even resolutely 

untruthful patient journals!” 


“In steadfast concordance with his fragile psyche 

and social touchiness, the average Norwegian physician 

exclusively admits his gruesome mistakes inasmuch 

as you or somebody else are willing to take the whole 

and unabridged responsibility — the worst and 

best doctors will all valiantly stand by their errors 

to confirm their professional aptness!” 


“I‟m cultured, valiant, savvying, likeable, ingenious, 

truthful and incorruptible — in all major respects the 

manifest horror and living nightmare of 

most Norwegian bureaucrats!” 


“The present (A 2004) Norwegian government has 

unveeringly demonstrated conspicuous tolerance 

and significantly advanced the nation‟s commerce; 

133 



133


state aided lawbreaking generously appanaged 

by fateful misconceptions is by now an accepted 

way of living amongst officials, and parliament 

incited troublemaking has become 

a major industry!” 


“Beware professional fools who‟ve exalted sheer 

stupidity and vice to religion and thus faithfully 

believes in their „sacred‟ misconceptions, 

liturgical wickedness and „God-given‟ 

praiseworthiness!” 


“Law-abiding Norwegians should forthright join 

forces — fully prepared to protect themselves 

and suffering fellowmen against the rampageous 

criminality of Norwegian police officers!” 


“It‟s the moral and patriotic obligation of all worthy 

Norwegians to condemn and forcefully battle the 

ravaging assaults of nowadays (A 2004) 

Norwegian government!” 


“Above 90 percent of the crimes committed in Norway 

anno 2002 was triggered by public injustice reflecting 

addlepated directives of governmental easy marks 

insidiously aimed at casuistic legitimation of state 

propelled offences hitting beguiled victims of ballistic 

law-abidingness notoriously scoreboarded by bully 

pulpited mass media unawarely publishing political 

propaganda secularly enhancing criminality through 

additional restrictions following dioristic misconceptions 

of ontologic fractions embodying the societal mosaic 

broken by penal provisions obscuring clear-sightedness 

eo ipso segregating vitreous humor gnomologically 

expounded — respice finem!” 


134 



134


“The council physician accompanying the spiteful 

rascals exhibited a most charming, helminthoid appetency 

for dragging himself along the chitterling ambages of 

swinish, verminous, hog wild and bootlicking pig in a 

poke venality.....so, indeed; I was forthwith cloistered 

in one of the glorified state tophets of Norway — a loony 

bin and satanic point d‟appui for governmental 

beastliness (excerpt from Doc #377)!” 


“You won‟t tell this uppish meshuggener the truth — you‟re 

going to fabricate a tenable nursery-tale closely matching 

his unsightly ignorance.....yeah; you‟ll cheerfully piggyback 

his self-deceptive paralogisms and nod slyly approvingly 

when his shamus-amenable moonshine casts grotesque 

shadows onto the lunatic quagmire of grey matter consti- 

tuting the firmament of his castle-in-the-sky 

haecceity (about the „Norwegian physician injudiciously 

gawking at you behind his rosepink spectacles‟)!” 


“Keep the body armor on and your first aid kit at 

hand — Norwegian authorities are likely to stab 

you in the back anytime these days!” 


“Norwegian authorities appreciates nice lads and 

good girls — usually they‟re the simplest and 

most agreeable victims!” 


“The various facilities found in the Parliament Building 

(„the Pillbox‟) in Oslo, is a touching example of the 

altruistic compassion Norway shows her 

psychiatric outcasts!” 


“Synchronously with steadily growing disrespect for the 

human rights amongst Norwegian officials, the need to 

report related violations increases accordingly. 

Norwegian authorities routinely steals, obstructs, dest- 

roys and illegally copies etc jural communications to and 

from human rights tribunals/organizations AO, and actual 

135 



135


complainers ‟ve been incriminated, terrorized, confined, 

infected/poisoned and — murdered. 

Vanguarded by the national police force, Norwegian 

authorities systematically attempts to eradicate all possi- 

bilities for transmitting unbiased and wholly lawful reports 

on human rights conditions and official corruption etc in 

Norway —; thus special safeguarding of human rights 

communications to/from Norway is a must!” 

(Doc #3611, p 107). 

Preceding quotations clearly reflects much of the cap-à-pie Pharisaism and 

scurvy misconduct wontedly showed off by Norwegian officials attempting 

to belittle, conceal and obstruct adequate investigation etc of their extensive 

corruption. To these chronic and obtrusively arrogant malefactors, your 

adherence to soft-boiled human rights and ethical codes simply means they 

can protract and possibly intensify their obnoxious offences without risking 

dismaying sanctions and burdensome, international interference.....verily; 

your idealistic and perchance pusillanimous approach is nothing but an 

enheartening incitement to these naturally schizoid and overly low-minded 

felons! 

Instead of mollycoddling and inadvertently spurring Norwegian authorities 

mayheming the human rights, the world community at large and international 

fora in particular should go for explicitly pragmatic solutions to halt and 

legally punish corresponding and vaingloriously contemptuous criminality. 

More precisely, we can imagine a highly specialized, mobile and 

cosmopolitan intervention unit of superbly fit and comprehensively trained 

police officers duly commissioned to secure final proofs and forcibly 

apprehend state supported culprits — e.g in Norway... 

Principally dedicated to human rights' enforcement rather than conventional 

counterterrorist tasks, judicious application of cogent measures to prevent 

abuse of portrayed unit is crucial. 

In any event — and this point can hardly be overstressed: before international 

and politically powerful alliances are willing to resolutely and with required 

sternness arrest, imprison, convict and otherwise treat Norwegian officials in 

accordance with the categorical condemnation the latter's satanic 

fiendishness, double-dealing and odious corruption ex officio en effet calls 

for, the well-meant but woefully uncharged pro forma chiding normally 

launched by human rights organizations/tribunals scarcely becomes more 

than a waggish and downright encouraging brutum fulmen to Norwegian 

authorities...! 

136 



136


More specifically returning to the Norwegian public "health" service, it 

should be properly emphasized some of the meanest villains hired to 

routinely and absolutely illegally terrorize me here in NO-Brattvåg neither 

are physicians nor nurses, but fulsomely rotten ambulance drivers. 

A fairly homogeneous pack sociopaths and grubby good-for-nothings with a 

general Stanford-Binet IQ clustered betwixt 118 and 121, three of these 

befittingly and irrevocably hell-doomed chauffeurs has distinguished 

themselves by particularly swinish behavior — viz: 

1. Mr Ron Borge "Schizo" FINNØY, NO-Brattvåg, 

2. Mr Torgeir "Rattus" AKSLEN, NO-Brattvåg, and 

3. Mr Kjell-Arne OTTERLEI, NO-Brattvåg. 

For years on end we've witnessed how this accursed troika and other depraved 

"health" professionals wholly on their own initiative — or to carry out orders 

unlawfully sanctioned e.g by Norwegian government/parliament officials — 

orgiastically and with diabolic delight 've trampled to pieces central articles of 

the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights...: 

Article 6 

Every human being has the inherent right to life. This right shall 

be protected by law. No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his life. 

Article 7 

No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading 

treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without 

his free consent to medical or scientific experimentation. 

Article 9 

Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person. No one shall be 

subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. No one shall be deprived of his 

liberty except on such grounds and in accordance with such procedure as 

are established by law. 

Article 10 

All persons deprived of their liberty shall be treated with humanity and 

137 



137


with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person. 

Article 12 

Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, within that 

territory, have the right to liberty of movement and freedom to 

choose his residence. 

Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including his own. 

The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any restrictions 

except those which are provided by law, are necessary to protect 

national security, public order (ordre public), public health or morals 

or the rights and freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other 

rights recognized in the present Covenant. 

No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter his own 

country. 

Article 14 

All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the 

determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights 

and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair 

and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal 

established by law. The Press and the public may be excluded from 

all or part of a trial for reasons of morals, public order (ordre public) 

or national security in a democratic society, or when the interest of the 

private lives of the parties so requires, or to the extent strictly necessary 

in the opinion of the court in special circumstances where publicity would 

prejudice the interests of justice; but any judgment rendered in a criminal 

case or in a suit at law shall be made public except where the interest of 

juvenile persons otherwise requires or the proceedings concern matrimonial 

disputes or the guardianship of children. 

Article 16 

Everyone shall have the right to recognition everywhere as a person 

before the law. 

138 



138


Article 19 

Everyone shall have the right to hold opinions without interference. 

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall 

include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all 

kinds, regardless of frontiers, either orally, in writing or in print, in the 

form of art, or through any other media of his choice. 

Article 21 

The right of peaceful assembly shall be recognized. No restrictions may 

be placed on the exercise of this right other than those imposed in confor- 

mity with the law and which are necessary in a democratic society in the 

interests of national security or public safety, public order (ordre public), 

the protection of public health or morals or the protection of the 

rights and freedoms of others. 

Article 22 

Everyone shall have the right to freedom of association with others, 

including the right to form and join trade unions for the protection 

of his interests. 

No restrictions may be placed on the exercise of this right other than 

those which are prescribed by law and which are necessary in a 

democratic society in the interests of national security or public safety, 

public order (ordre public), the protection of public health or 

morals or the protection of the rights and freedoms of others. 

This article shall not prevent the imposition of lawful restrictions on 

members of the armed forces and of the police in their 

exercise of this right. 

Article 26 

All persons are equal before the law and are entitled without any discri- 

mination to the equal protection of the law. In this respect, the law shall 

prohibit any discrimination and guarantee to all persons equal and 

effective protection against discrimination on any ground such as race, 

colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, 

national or social origin, property, birth or other status. 

139 



139


We shall also take a further look at the UN Convention against Torture and 

Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (cf p 9 of 

this Complaint)...: 

The States Parties to this Convention, 

Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed 

in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the equal and 

inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foun- 

dation of freedom, justice and peace in the world, 

Recognizing that those rights derive from the inherent dignity 

of the human person, 

Considering the obligation of States under the Charter, in par- 

ticular Article 55, to promote universal respect for, and observance 

of, human rights and fundamental freedoms, 

Having regard to article 5 of the Universal Declaration of Human 

Rights and article 7 of the International Covenant on Civil and 

Political Rights, both of which provide that no one shall be subjected 

to torture, or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, 

Having regard also to the Declaration on the Protection of All Persons 

from Being Subjected to Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading 

Treatment or Punishment, adopted by the General Assembly on 

9 December 1975, 

Desiring to make more effective the struggle against torture and other 

cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment throughout 

the world, 

Have agreed as follows (Part I): 

Article 1 

For the purposes of this Convention, the term "torture" means any 

act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, 

is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining 

from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing 

him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of 

140 



140


having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third 

person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind, 

when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation 

of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other 

person acting in an official capacity. It does not include pain or 

suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to 

lawful sanctions. 

This article is without prejudice to any international instrument or 

national legislation which does or may contain provisions of 

wider application. 

Article 2 

Each State Party shall take effective legislative, administrative, 

judicial or other measures to prevent acts of torture in any territory 

under its jurisdiction. 

No exceptional circumstances whatsoever, whether a state of war 

or a threat of war, internal political instability or any other public 

emergency, may be invoked as a justification of torture. 

An order from a superior officer or a public authority may not be 

invoked as a justification of torture. 

Article 4 

Each State Party shall ensure that all acts of torture are offences 

under its criminal law. The same shall apply to an attempt to commit 

torture and to an act by any person which constitutes complicity or 

participation in torture. 

Each State Party shall make these offences punishable by appropriate 

penalties which take into account their grave nature. 

Article 6 

Upon being satisfied, after an examination of information available 

to it, that the circumstances so warrant, any State Party in whose 

territory a person alleged to have committed any offence referred to 

in Article 4 is present shall take him into custody or take other legal 

measures to ensure his presence. The custody and other legal 

141 



141


measures shall be as provided in the law of that State but may 

be continued only for such time as is necessary to enable any 

criminal or extradition proceedings to be instituted. 

Such State shall immediately make a preliminary inquiry into 

the facts. 

Article 7 

The State Party in the territory under whose jurisdiction a person 

alleged to have committed any offence referred to in Article 4 is 

found shall in the cases contemplated in Article 5, if it does not 

extradite him, submit the case to its competent authorities for the 

purpose of prosecution. 

These authorities shall take their decision in the same manner as 

in the case of any ordinary offence of a serious nature under the 

law of that State. In the cases referred to in Article 5, paragraph 2, 

the standards of evidence required for prosecution and conviction 

shall in no way be less stringent than those which apply in the cases 

referred to in Article 5, paragraph 1. 

Any person regarding whom proceedings are brought in connection 

with any of the offences referred to in Article 4 shall be guaranteed 

fair treatment at all stages of the proceedings. 

Article 9 

States Parties shall afford one another the greatest measure of assi- 

stance in connection with criminal proceedings brought in respect of 

any of the offences referred to in Article 4, including the supply of 

all evidence at their disposal necessary for the proceedings. 

States Parties shall carry out their obligations under paragraph 1 of this 

Article in conformity with any treaties on mutual judicial assistance 

that may exist between them. 

142 



142


Article 10 

Each State Party shall ensure that education and information 

regarding the prohibition against torture are fully included in 

the training of law enforcement personnel, civil or military, 

medical personnel, public officials and other persons who may 

be involved in the custody, interrogation or treatment of any indi- 

vidual subjected to any form of arrest, detention or imprisonment. 

Each State Party shall include this prohibition in the rules or 

instructions issued in regard to the duties and functions of 

any such person. 

Article 11 

Each State Party shall keep under systematic review interrogation 

rules, instructions, methods and practices as well as arrangements 

for the custody and treatment of persons subjected to any form 

of arrest, detention or imprisonment in any territory under its juris- 

diction, with a view to preventing any cases of torture. 

Article 12 

Each State Party shall ensure that its competent authorities proceed 

to a prompt and impartial investigation, wherever there is reasonable 

ground to believe that an act of torture has been committed in any 

territory under its jurisdiction. 

Article 13 

Each State Party shall ensure that any individual who alleges he has 

been subjected to torture in any territory under its jurisdiction has the 

right to complain to, and to have his case promptly and impartially 

examined by, its competent authorities. Steps shall be taken to ensure 

that the complainant and witnesses are protected against all ill- 

treatment or intimidation as a consequence of his complaint or 

any evidence given. 

143 



143


Article 16 

Each State Party shall undertake to prevent in any territory 

under its jurisdiction other acts of cruel, inhuman or degrading treat- 

ment or punishment which do not amount to torture as defined in 

Article 1, when such acts are committed by or at the instigation of or 

with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person 

acting in an official capacity. In particular, the obligations contained 

in Articles 10, 11, 12 and 13 shall apply with the substitution for refe- 

rences to torture or references to other forms of cruel, inhuman 

or degrading treatment or punishment. 

The provisions of this Convention are without prejudice to the 

provisions of any other international instrument or national law 

which prohibits cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or pun- 

ishment or which relates to extradition or expulsion. 

Whereas the Hippocratic oath lay emphasis on honesty, respectfulness and 

benevolence towards patients and impels physicians to champion international 

human rights and exercise their professional judgment uninfluenced by political 

pressure, physicians and other "health" personnel involved in this ill-omened 

case maliciously 've displayed the most inexpiable disregard inasmuch as dutiful 

compliance with ethical stipulations, the statutory rights of others and their 

vocational integrity otherwise are concerned.....honestly; it's stark impossible to 

find even the slightest trace of formally mitigating circumstances, respectability 

or professional adequacy in the uninterrupted orgy of lawless terrorism 

satanically indulged in by Norwegian medics AO since 1992! 

Anyhow, let's make it perfectly clear right now; the actual and radically massive 

violations of quoted articles noways applies to the Norwegian public "health" 

service alone — corresponding malversation has continuously been schemed 

and illicitly ratified v.g by diverse governmental bodies (cf pp 24–25, 29–31, 

68–74 and 83–88 usw), and does also — largely — include the other officials 

and establishments referred to as "Accused" at page 2 of nearby Complaint. 

Cf Doc #4575, p 117 etc: 

"All interference from Norwegian authorities in this case 've been 

unilaterally destructive, invidious, unwelcomed and 

largely criminal — clearly reflecting the mental illness, habitual 

double-dealing and emetic disregard for the human rights and 

fundamental freedoms of man indeed characterizing 

most of the malefactors." 

144 



144


The manifestly morbid preoccupation with supernormal intelligence and human 

genius constantly displayed by Norwegian physicians, psychologists, politicians, 

police officers et al has been touched upon earlier in this report (v p 118 — cf 

Doc #1536, p 85), and it should be timely to supply foregoing information with 

a few germane remarks. 

Studying the thousands of registered crimes and calamitous boo-boos wholly 

ascribable to Norwegian officials and local authorities the last decennium, we 

are struck not only by the unprovoked diabolism and radical unsoundness 

characterizing these misdeeds, but by the marked lack of foresight and stark 

fatuity as well. 

Inasmuch as essential parts of our noometric capability may be adequately 

evaluated through standardized and accurately scaled intelligence tests…..and 

given that we fairly correctly may equate corresponding IQ scores with our 

immanent/potential ability to acceptably handle diverse practical situations and 

precisely grasp more or less abstract/intricate problems/ideas professionally or 

otherwise encountered, we may assuredly ascribe much of said improvidence 

and bêtises ex officio to insufficient psychometric intelligence. 

At this point those of you familiar with the common classification of IQ scores 

may feel somewhat bewildered, as it previously 've been correctly stated several 

of the culprits actual to prosecute in this case possess' a general IQ equal or 

superior to 140 on the Stanford-Binet scale (cf pp 9–10). IQs corresponding to 

— or exceeding — indicated score are normally regarded as highly impressive, 

and many psychologists will set the intelligence quotient for "potential genius" 

at 140 or over. In the general Norwegian population 1 out of 190 people are 

expected to achieve a Stanford-Binet IQ of 140, and there are roughly 3 men for 

every woman reaching specified score. 

Howbeit —; comprehensive observations here in Norway bears witness to the 

fact individuals with a Stanford-Binet IQ in the 130–155 range are essentially 

unable to meet the dianoetic requirements necessary to acquire even passable 

understanding of more intricate scientific, moral and purely logical &c 

causata/implications/problems. Typically earning their university and first-class 

degrees relatively hands down, these noometrically — and oftentimes 

professionally — incompetent persons are likely to occupy central community 

positions. In cases where the shortcomer has maintained his/her moral and 

eunoic integrity, the psychometric inadequacy may be accidentally fatal indeed 

— though — regularly and pragmatically amendable, as the intellectually 

subpotent faultdoer will be genuinely eager to admit, correct and avoid e.g 

professional mistakes induced by noometrically overtaxing demands. 

Inasmuch as the dianoetic deficiency and related/professional fall downs are 

directly pertinent to NPSMS afflicted individuals/officials* (*cf pp 122–124) — 

which conspicuously often is the case in Norway, we empirically knows these 

145 



145


severely disordered and thoroughly dikephobic wrongdoers will do whatever 

practically feasible to cover up and belittle their errors/unsuitability/corruption 

— frequently at the expense of wholly guiltless persons facing false accusations 

and unwarranted castigation etc. 

As for the latter case, special attention should be called to the average Stanford- 

Binet IQ of Norwegian Parliament/Storting representatives at 127,5 (cf p 10) — 

which, not surprisingly, is 10–14 crucial points below corresponding scores for 

national/federal assembly members in any Euro-American country/state 

socioeconomically comparable with Norway. 

Without validating the factual foundation of his suppositions etc, it may be 

thematically justifiable though to refer to assistant professor of psychology at 

Princeton University* (*New Jersey, USA) — Mr Carl C BRIGHAM* (*creator 

of the well-known "Scholastic Aptitude Test") — who, in 1923, published "A 

Study of American Intelligence" where he concluded that the IQ of immigrants 

increased in proportion to the number of years of US residence — a 

phenomenon he ascribed to a lower proportion of Nordic blood over the years, 

rather than increased familiarization with cultural and educational factors…! 

Anyhow; the US Immigration Restriction Act of 1924 favored immigration 

from northern Europe, and restricted the entry of persons from other areas 

referred to as "biologically inferior" —— 

At the pages 9 and 85 I've fixed the lowest acceptable Stanford-Binet IQ of 

different judges/experts at 145 and 140, respectively — but indeed; this does not 

imply said scores are absolutely and professionally adequate! What indicated 

minimum levels does mark, however, are the highest IQ scores practically 

attainable a number of circumstantial factors and conventional requirements* 

realistically considered (*amongst the formal prerequisites, a sufficient and high 

degree of moral integrity, impartiality/independence and educational 

competency are indispensable). 

While a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 140 typically will enable otherwise 

competent members of the Norwegian courts of appeals to handle around 80% 

of the various lawsuits in a justifiable manner, a ditto IQ of 258 are required to 

keenly perceive and adequately evaluate usw the intricate nuances and 

multifarious facts relevant to the most complicated cases brought before these 

appellate tribunals. Although the present courts of appeals comprises a few 

judges with a Stanford-Binet IQ equalling or slightly exceeding 140, 45–50% of 

nowadays judgments/sentences should be overruled on account of regular 

corruption and the number/severity of procedural errors…..and, finally; whereas 

corruption are exlex altogether and portrayed degree of erroneousness legally 

unacceptable, it should be formally correct to render null and void all verdicts 

and conclusions passed on by these incompetent and obscenely pretentious 

kangaroo courts whatsoever — cf Doc #627 item nearby Complaint pp 2–8 and 

84–88 etc! 

146 



146


As for the widespread depravity amongst Norwegian judges, much of it is 

reflected by "The Professional Code and Ethical Philosophy of Norwegian 

Judges"* (*cf Aphorisms &c 107–109): 

“Yes indeed — we’re chronic crooks, murderers, perjurers, maniacs, 

forgers, dopenicks, drunkards, corrupted lamebrains and moral 

lepers.....but; since we effectively ’ve blocked criminal investigation of 

our iniquity, dexterously embezzled proofs against ourselves and 

successfully hampered a diversity of legal actions opposed to our 

inveterate transgressions and misfeasance, there exist no legally 

enforceable judgments against us.....and for that reason we are — at 

least in a profanely juridical sense — not guilty (cf the Courts of Justice 

Act sec 53, third per)! 

Moreover we strongly feel that the Norwegian society generally should 

bestow significantly more of their attention purely revering our 

allelopathic lawbreaking.....’cause it’s an established truism that our 

surreptitious foulness keep back the constitutional Ragnarok and 

scandalous imprisonment etc of Norwegian top politicians and 

Government officials unavoidably following unwarped trials and 

objective, judicial factfinding procedures! So.....treat us courteously, 

please, and immortalize our satanic statutory offenses and monumental 

corruption by placing a luciferous statue outside the Parliament 

Building, and a leviathan monument at the royal palace square in Oslo 

where noble-minded adulators can bring their burnt offerings and 

confer dignity upon our accomplished forensic diabolism and — also — 

squareshootingly commemorate the many illustrious adamites slain by 

our minister extolled vice.....AMEN!” 

Verily; though stinking, a shitfilled sack will stand upright…! 

Much silly has been said and written about supernormal IQs and persons of 

genius, and my personal comments on these touchy topics naturally ought to be 

very restricted in a UN report supposedly and largely dealing with — human 

rights violations…! 

First — let's take a look at the theoretical/global distribution of different IQ 

scores derived from standardized intelligence tests: 

147 



147

STANFORD-BINET 

IQ 


WECHSLER 

IQ 

CATTELL 

IQ 

148 



Expected 

RARITY, 1/x 

130 128 145 33 

135 133 153 70 

140 138 160 190 

145 142 168 400 

150 147 175 1020 

155 152 183 3400 

160 156 190 11 000 

165 161 198 40 000 

170 166 205 160 000 

175 170 213 700 000 

180 175 220 3 500 000 

185 180 228 20 000 000 

190 184 235 110 000 000 

195 189 243 700 000 000 

200 194 250 5 000 000 000 

205 198 258 33 333 330 575 

210 203 265 99 999 991 726 

215 208 273 

220 213 280 

258 248 337 

Based on statistical distribution etc, the various levels of superior IQs may be 

classified suchwise: 

STANFORD-BINET IQ CLASSIFICATION 

135–149 "high IQ" 

150–164 "very high IQ" 

165–179 "superhigh IQ" 

180– "noometric genius IQ" 

Arguably there are several degrees and categories of human genius, and I shall 

briefly specify but two of the latter — viz; "noometric" and "creative" genius. 

To satisfy the categorical and exclusively psychometric requirement for 

noometric genius, a general score equalling or exceeding a full-scale Stanford- 

148


Binet IQ* of 180 must be obtained on a correctly standardized, time limited and 

supervised intelligence test of high quality (*presently the Stanford-Binet 

intelligence test for adults are divided into 15 categories — viz; Vocabulary, 

Codes, Differences between Abstract Words, Arithmetical Reasoning, Proverbs, 

Ingenuity, Memory for Sentences, Repeating Digits Reversed, Sentence 

Building, Essential Similarities, Finding Reasons, Reconciliation of Opposites, 

Repeating Thought of Passage, Orientation and Opposite Analogies). 

To gain status as a creative genius, one must single-handedly create or blueprint 

an unspecified but normally considerable number of commonly 

valuable/interesting or distinctly serviceable products reflecting a degree of 

originality and general perfection unattainable through mere talent. 

Though a noometric genius don't have to demonstrate extraordinary creative 

ability — or a creative genius exceptional noometric capacity, there is a 

statistically significant correlation between extremely high IQ and first-class 

creativity; in an otherwise randomly selected group composed of 600 grown 

men and women who all have a general Stanford-Binet of 150, we'll expect to 

find but 1 — one — creative genius…..in a similarly composed group 

exclusively comprising individuals with a full-scale Stanford-Binet IQ of 180, 

we should normally find 66 — sixty-six — creative geniuses. 

The English philosopher and economist John STUART MILL* (*1806–1873) 

had a general Stanford-Binet IQ of 200, and his remarks on genius and 

originality etc were well-founded…: 

"Persons of genius, it is true, are, and are always likely to be, a small 

minority; but in order to have them, it is necessary to preserve the soil 

in which they grow. Genius can only breathe freely in an atmosphere 

of freedom. Persons of genius are, ex vi termini, more individual than 

any other people — less capable, consequently, of fitting themselves, 

without hurtful compression, into any of the small number of moulds 

which society provides in order to save its members the trouble of forming 

their own character. If from timidity they consent to be forced into one of 

these moulds, and to let all that part of themselves which cannot expand 

under the pressure remain unexpanded, society will be little the better for 

their genius. If they are of a strong character, and break their fetters, they 

become a mark for the society which has not succeeded in reducing them 

to commonplace, to point out with solemn warning as 'wild,' 'erratic,' and the 

like; much as if one should complain of the Niagara river for not flowing 

smoothly between its banks like a Dutch canal. 

I insist thus emphatically on the importance of genius, and the necessity 

of allowing it to unfold itself freely both in thought and in practice, being 

well aware that no one will deny the position in theory, but knowing 

149 



149


also that almost every one, in reality, is totally indifferent to it. 

People think genius a fine thing if it enables a man to write an 

exciting poem, or paint a picture. But in its true sense, that of 

originality in thought and action, though no one says that it is 

not a thing to be admired, nearly all, at heart, think that they can 

do very well without it. Unhappily this is too natural to be wondered 

at. Originality is the one thing which unoriginal minds cannot feel 

the use of. They cannot see what it is to do for them: how should they? 

If they could see what it would do for them, it would not be originality. 

The first service which originality has to render them, is that of opening 

their eyes: which being once fully done, they would have a chance of 

being themselves original. Meanwhile, recollecting that nothing was ever 

yet done which some one was not the first to do, and that all good things 

which exist are the fruits of originality, let them be modest enough to 

believe that there is something still left for it to accomplish, and assure 

themselves that they are more in need of originality, the less they are 

conscious of want. 

In sober truth, whatever homage may be professed, or even paid, to real 

or supposed mental superiority, the general tendency of things throughout 

the world is to render mediocrity the ascendant power among mankind." 

"No government by a democracy or a numerous aristocracy, either in its 

political acts or in the opinions, qualities, and tone of mind which it fosters, 

ever did or could rise above mediocrity, except in so far as the sovereign 

Many have let themselves be guided (which in their best times they always 

have done) by the counsels and influence of a more highly gifted and in- 

structed One or Few. The initiation of all wise or noble things comes and 

must come from individuals; generally at first from some one individual. 

The honour and glory of the average man is that he is capable of following 

that initiative; that he can respond internally to wise and noble things, and 

be led to them with his eyes open. I am not countenancing the sort of 'hero- 

worship' which applauds the strong man of genius for forcibly seizing on 

the government of the world and making it do his bidding in spite of itself. 

All he can claim is freedom to point out the way. The power of compelling 

others into it is not only inconsistent with the freedom and development of 

all the rest, but corrupting to the strong man himself. It does seem, however, 

that when the opinions of masses of merely average men are everywhere 

become or becoming the dominant power, the counterpoise and corrective 

to that tendency would be the more and more pronounced individuality of 

those who stand on the higher eminences of thought. It is in these circum- 

stances most especially, that exceptional individuals, instead of being de- 

terred, should be encouraged in acting differently from the mass. In other 

150 



150


times there was no advantage in their doing so, unless they acted not 

only differently but better. In this age, the mere example of non- 

conformity, the mere refusal to bend the knee to custom, is itself a service. 

Precisely because the tyranny of opinion is such as to make eccentricity 

a reproach, it is desirable, in order to break through that tyranny, that 

people should be eccentric. Eccentricity has always abounded when and 

where strength of character has abounded; and the amount of eccentricity 

in a society has generally been proportional to the amount of genius, mental 

vigour, and moral courage it contained. That so few now dare to be eccentric 

marks the chief danger of the time." 

(From the essay "On Liberty", 1859) 

As for Mr Mill's ready treatise on genius and originality/eccentricity, it should 

be sternly emphasized any creative genius or person with a general Stanford- 

Binet IQ equalling/exceeding 165 runs a practically constant and very 

considerable risk of being misunderstood, persecuted and unlawfully exploited 

by less gifted and perhaps violently envious individuals. While creative geniuses 

may sublimate and turn (inter-)personal conflicts to astounding account, purely 

noometric geniuses may frequently get the best of it by minimizing intimate 

association with those sporting a full-scale Stanford-Binet IQ below 160….. 

Quite a few things are left to say about human genius and supernormal IQs, but 

I'm afraid we must stick to our guns and already now concentrate on how these 

topics concerns certain human rights matters. 

Behind the previously indicated and markedly pathological interest in 

paranormality and genius exhibited by Norwegian authorities, we find the deepseated 

inferiority complex and narrow-minded egotism broadly explaining their 

preoccupation. From the very first these natural-born villains and mountebanks 

searched for esoteric and absurd ways to elevate their base intellect…; perhaps 

geniuses depended on some secret ingesta or regimen skyrocketing their 

creativity and IQs….?! 

Fatefully mixed with archtypical NPSMS symptoms* (*cf pp 122–124) as v.g 

psychiatric idiosyncrasies, pronounced criminalism and unjustifiable hostility, 

said selfishness has — in any case — triggered the most pernicious chain of 

wholly deliberate, systematical and decidedly ill-starred human rights violations 

ever seen in Norway! It's perfectly evident many of the crimes dealt with in this 

petition and corresponding documents had been very difficult to commit and 

impossible to get away with in a relatively uncorrupted and otherwise healthy 

society…..and lo — as might be expected; behind the wormy stage settings we 

find the meanest herd of mentally deranged, felonious, self-aggrandizing and 

151 



151


utterly condemnable misfits and conspiring officials ever sighted in a claimed — 

not to say pretended — democracy! — and, behold; I'm truthfully characterizing 

the innately psychopathic descendants of a notoriously fiendish people duly 

mentioned by the hounded and grotesquely misknown genius William James 

SIDIS (1898–1944)…: 

"These Norse invaders in 'Vinland,' as they named the country, treated the 

native inhabitants (whom they named 'Skrellings,' or 'skinned people') 

about the same way as they did in Europe — as subjects for pillage and 

slave-raids. They raided as far as the 'Wonderstrand' (Cape Cod), and 

they usually made themselves enemies wherever they went, in America 

as in Europe." 

(From Chapter III of the unpublished manuscript "The Tribes and the States") 

Mr Sidis, by the way, most effectively revenged himself by withholding, 

forswearing and burlesquing his gorgeous genius…..and the witlessly harassing 

world shall certainly be unable to make up for the scientific losses thereby 

imposed! 

In regard to the recurrently described and vehemently prevailing rottenness 

among Norwegian officials, it should be highly seasonable to quote some up-tothe-situation 

passages from the oftentimes misinterpreted Bible: 

(God speaking:) 

"Here is my servant, whom I uphold, my chosen one in whom I delight; 

I will put my Spirit on him and he will bring justice to the nations. 

He will not shout or cry out, or raise his voice in the streets. A bruised 

reed he will not break, and a smouldering wick he will not snuff out. 

In faithfulness he will bring forth justice; he will not falter or be 

discouraged till he establishes justice on earth. 

In his law the islands will put their hope." 

(The LORD's Servant speaking:) 

"Listen to me, you islands; hear this, you distant nations: Before I 

was born the LORD called me; from my birth he has made mention of my 

name. He made my mouth like a sharpened sword, in the shadow of his 

hand he hid me; he made me into a polished arrow and concealed me 

in his quiver. He said to me, 'You are my servant, Israel, in whom I will 

152 



152


display my splendour.' 

But I said, 'I have laboured to no purpose; I have spent my strength in 

vain and for nothing. Yet what is due to me is in the LORD's hand, 

and my reward is with my God.' 

And now the LORD says — he who formed me in the womb to 

be his servant to bring Jacob back to him and gather Israel to 

himself, for I am honoured in the eyes of the LORD and my God has 

been my strength— he says: 

'It is too small a thing for you to be my servant to restore the tribes 

of Jacob and bring back those of Israel I have kept. I will also make 

you a light for the Gentiles, that you may bring my salvation to the 

ends of the earth.' 

This is what the LORD says — the Redeemer and Holy One of 

Israel — to him who was despised and abhorred by the nation, to 

the servant of rulers; 'Kings will see you and rise up, princes will 

see and bow down, because of the LORD, who is faithful, the Holy 

One of Israel, who has chosen you.' 

Surely the arm of the LORD is not too short to save, nor his ear 

too dull to hear. But your iniquities have separated you from 

your God; your sins have hidden his face from you, so that he will 

not hear. For your hands are stained with blood, your fingers with 

guilt. Your lips have spoken lies, and your tongue mutters wicked 

things. No-one calls for justice; no-one pleads his case with integrity. 

They rely on empty arguments and speak lies; they conceive trouble 

and give birth to evil. They hatch the eggs of vipers and spin a 

spider‟s web. Whoever eats their eggs will die, and when one 

is broken, an adder is hatched. Their cobwebs are useless for 

clothing; they cannot cover themselves with what they make. 

Their deeds are evil deeds, and acts of violence are in their 

hands. Their feet rush into sin; they are swift to shed innocent 

blood. Their thoughts are evil thoughts; ruin and destruction 

mark their ways. The way of peace they do not know; there 

is no justice in their paths. They have turned them into crooked 

roads; no-one who walks in them will know peace. 

The Sovereign LORD has given me an instructed tongue, to know 

the word that sustains the weary. He wakens me morning by 

morning, wakens my ear to listen like one being taught. The 

Sovereign LORD has opened my ears, and I have not been 

rebellious; I have not drawn back. I offered my back to those 

who beat me, my cheeks to those who pulled out my beard; 

I did not hide my face from mocking and spitting. Because the 

153 



153


Sovereign LORD helps me, I will not be disgraced. Therefore have 

I set my face like flint, and I know I will not be put to shame. 

He who vindicates me is near. Who then will bring charges 

against me? Let us face each other! Who is my accuser? 

Let him confront me! It is the Sovereign LORD who helps 

me. Who is he who will condemn me? They will all wear out 

like a garment; the moths will eat them up. 

Who among you fears the LORD and obeys the word of his 

servant? Let him who walks in the dark, who has no light, 

trust in the name of the LORD and rely on his God. 

But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves with 

flaming torches, go, walk in the light of your fires and of 

the torches you have set ablaze. 

This is what you shall receive from my hand: 

You will lie down in torment. 

Truth is nowhere to be found, and whoever shuns evil becomes 

a prey. The LORD looked and was displeased that there was no 

justice. He saw that there was no-one, he was appalled that 

there was no-one to intervene; so his own arm worked salvation 

for him, and his own righteousness sustained him. He put on 

righteousness as his breastplate, and the helmet of salvation on 

his head; he put on the garments of vengeance and wrapped 

himself in zeal as in a cloak. According to what they have 

done, so will he repay wrath to his enemies and retribution 

to his foes; he will repay the islands their due. From the 

west, men will fear the name of the LORD, and from the 

rising of the sun, they will revere his glory. For he will come 

like a pent-up flood that the breath of the LORD drives 

along. 

'The Redeemer will come to Zion, to those in Jacob who 

repent of their sins,' declares the LORD. 

'As for me, this is my covenant with them,' says the LORD. 

'My Spirit, who is on you, and my words that I have put 

in your mouth will not depart from your mouth, or from 

the mouths of your children, or from the mouths of their 

descendants from this time and for ever,' says the LORD." 

(Excerpts from Isaiah chaps. 42, 49, 50 and 59) 

154 



154


To enhance specific and general understanding, the biblical passages should be 

contextually interlinked with e.g Doc's ##115, 377, 599, 627, 633, 777, 1022, 

1049, 1536, 2037, 2418, 2907, 3611, 4000, 4588, 6097 and 7011. 

One should — by no means — be astonished to find perfect congruity between 

the fiendish persecution and various crimes outlined in said Documents, and the 

pervading injustice and evilness biblically depicted…: 

The LORD's Servant 

is of course an absolute prime target for all kinds of hellish onslaughts, 

and the Norwegian police force — in particular — has constantly been a 

most willing instrument of unmitigated and veritably Satanic diabolism! 

HANDLING OF STATE SUPPORTED CRIMINALITY 

Nearby Complaint and coupled Documents considered, it should be obvious 

enough there exist a highly acute need to counteract and permanently do away 

with the illegal and intensely hateful terrorism routinely exerted by Norwegian 

authorities. 

As beforehand stated (cf p 3), it is positively laid down in sec's 2 and 3 of the 

Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, that various and international 

Human Rights conventions/covenants are fully applicable as Norwegian law — 

and even prior to other legislation in case of controversy. 

According to the Norwegian Criminal Procedure Act sec's 223–225, criminal 

acts shall be reported to and investigated by — the police…..i.e; by the slimy 

larrikins committing a good many of the crimes mentioned in nearby Complaint 

and concatenated Documents! 

It is certainly in the cards the Norwegian police almost exclusively attracts 

notorious badasses and psychopaths wholly unfit to assume any sizable degree 

of responsibility (cf pp 104–121), and — as a matter of fact and course; 2000 of 

the worst policemen/-women in active service should be locked up straightaway 

(the overall treatment of these prisoners should be extraordinary harsh indeed), 

and another 3000 of these chronic malfeasants summarily fired (hard-core 

criminals who can be sentenced and enjailed somewhat later without seriously 

endangering the noncriminal population should, due to overcrowded nuthouses 

and penitentiaries etc, be assigned to this category) — remaining personnel, 

chiefly minor lawbreakers and incurable sociopaths, should be very closely 

superintended and permanently excluded from the national police force 

155 



155


whenever practically feasible to supplant them with morally and otherwise 

competent persons! 

The Norwegian prison service is entirely comparable with the police in respect 

of downright corruption, and the actual statuses of various courts of "justice" are 

animadverted upon e.g at pp 146–147 — cf Doc #627 etc. 

Without specifying the exact number of severely corrupted and particularly 

dangerous judges, district recorders, public prosecutors, politicians, "health" 

professionals AO necessary to shut in forthwith, a high-security prison camp 

providing adequate accommodations for 11 000* non-proliferation lifers will do 

in this connection (*not incl the 2000 police employees/executives beforehand 

indicated) — another 20 000** of the most depraved public officials and civil 

servants should be summarily fired and, as far as practically possible, 

imprisoned later on (**not incl the 3000 police employees/executives 

beforehand indicated). 

While the Norwegian island "Bjørnøya" at 74.31ºn 19.01ºe may be singled out 

as a suitable location for our gargantuan prison camp(-s), I'm afraid it's next to 

impossible to realize portrayed mass seizing and subsequent incarcerations 

without massive and hardbought international/military support…..so, in 

consequence, the actual and permanent eradication of Norwegian state 

corruption is ordained by the stipulations irrevocably laid down in Doc #599 — 

cf Doc #4000 item pp 152–155 above. 

At any rate — and for a while, we shall concentrate on certain guidelines the 

self-aware citizen may observe in order to battle and protect him-/herself against 

the subversive everyday corruption exerted by Norwegian authorities. 

Generally, state initiated/supported criminality are considerably facilitated and 

furthered by the fact most commoners lacks reliable and sufficient information 

about the actual and oftentimes extensive corruption partaken by their 

authorities…..and those unsuspecting of — and perhaps largely unacquainted 

with — flagrant evilness and injustice, very easily becomes victims of e.g 

official propaganda and disinformation designed to create/nourish unjustified 

confidence and cover up corresponding depravity. Moreover, perverted officials 

and senior civil servants are also, normally, in a particularly convenient position 

when it comes to manipulating the press, hiding their malefaction, and evading 

criminal investigation of — and legal actions against — themselves…..and, here 

in Norway, they're quite ready to exploit that bothersome fact! 

So, inferentially; those caring for their personal integrity and condemning 

said iniquity should — first and foremost — highten their overall 

suspiciousness vis-à-vis the Norwegian state apparatus (cf PRECAUTION 

#1 below). 

156 



156


The Norwegian state apparatus are composed of individuals, and its overall 

quality depends on the individual capability and moral standard of these 

persons…..thus, in view of this fact; one should collect/record as much 

relevant information about Norwegian officials and senior civil servants as 

practically affordable without ethically compromising oneself (cf 

PRECAUTION #2 below). 

On the whole, official corruption in Norway depends on suppressing as much 

information about the actual malversation as possible, and — if found out — 

adroitly misrepresenting and belittling corresponding crimes vis-à-vis the hoi 

polloi and untainted public servants…..hence; responsible persons should, as a 

rule, endeavor to detect and impart knowledge of state actuated/sustained 

lawbreaking generally (cf PRECAUTION #3 below). 

To determine whether a given crime has been committed or not, one need a 

certain familiarity with the statutory provisions and practical application of law 

etc…..therefore; everybody eagerly fighting state supported criminality in 

Norway and possessed of normal or higher IQ should strive to acquire 

comprehensive knowledge of international law and human rights 

conventions/covenants in general, and all aspects/implications of Norwegian 

jurisprudence/legislation and state constitution/administration in particular 

(cf PRECAUTION #4 below). 

Empirically, public servants in Norway are especially prone to give their mean 

disposition full rein when they has an ax to grind, feel above suspicion or able to 

elude complications unfavorable to themselves, and whenever one of the rabid 

vampire bats they have in their sinistrous belfry — for special and perhaps 

unexpected reasons — runs wholly riot regardless of implications…..in any 

case; upright individuals should normally denounce and attempt to 

prevent/avoid/eliminate situations maintaining/aggravating or particularly 

likely to trigger official corruption, and also take specific/concrete etc 

measures to guard themselves and select persons against the material 

manifestations and noxious implications of state waged criminality (cf 


In order to take effective measures against the various manifestations and 

harmful side effects of official corruption, tactical/strategical information about 

the aggressor(-s) is required…..consequently; those intending to protect 

themselves and others against the wide-ranging and pernicious criminality 

157 



157


exercised by Norwegian authorities, should systematically 

gather/analyze/evaluate accurate information e.g about the attacker's target 

identification/description, standing operating procedure, political mandate, 

regular armed forces support/involvement, conflict spectrum, 

strategical/tactical intentions/aim, documentable/previous modi operandi, 

projected/actual time/point/methods of attack, principal approach, outlined 

withdrawal plans, pugnacity/depravity, command strength, manning level, 

task organization, leadership structure, mobility, general interoperability, 

military training/capacity, armament, technical outfit/know-how, 

mental/physical ability, psychiatric profile/status, formal schooling, 

ideological foundation, professional doctrines, former acts of 

violence/hostility/sabotage etc, collaborationist networking, intelligence 

systems/procedures/direction/build-up, countermeasures, countercountermeasures, 

communication facilities/net and economic/material 

back-up apparatuses (cf PRECAUTION #6 below). 

As stressed in Doc's ##103, 135, 627 (p 61), 3217 and 3611 item at pp 1 and 10 

of nearby Petition, Norwegian authorities are very prone to steal, obstruct, 

embezzle, corrupt/falsify, destroy and unlawfully copy human rights documents 

and formal complaints etc dealing with state supported criminality partaken or 

exclusively masterminded and carried out by Norwegian officials…..so, for that 

sake; efficient steps to guard — particularly — human rights 

communications and other legal correspondence against illegal interference 

from Norwegian authorities, should be taken (cf PRECAUTION #7 below). 

Nowadays Norway is an irrevocably condemned and mortally wounded police 

state led by small-minded lower-class rascals naturally unable to handle even 

moderate responsibility, and Norwegian authorities are — in perfect agreement 

with this revolting fact — most eager to glorify and break new ground for their 

acutely festering corruption…..so, that being the case; high-principled 

nonconformists should resolutely boycott and sap the foundation of state 

operated and private establishments/enterprises/organizations etc actively 

or passively supporting said malversation (cf PRECAUTION #8 below). 

In faithful concordance with their vitiated disposition and trivial intellect, 

Norwegian officials are villainously ready to espy/ill-treat/harm and ruthlessly 

exploit to their own advantage any person overtly demonstrating eminent 

intelligence and creative faculty (cf p 151 above)…..so, seen that activities and 

products enriching/sustaining the Norwegian tyranny must be avoided; idealists 

possessed of outstanding IQ and creativity should do whatever feasible to 

158 



158


hide their mental excellence and render unexploitable actual creations and 

notes etc potentially valuable to Norwegian authorities and their 

collaborators (cf PRECAUTION #9 below). 

The horrid corruption consuetudinary exerted by Norwegian officials is certainly 

not an admirable or in any respects a copyworthy example…..so — always 

mindful worldly rules and regulations are nothing but spurious collections of 

factitious views and fallible arguments harbored and autocratically forwarded by 

frailty mortals; virtuous men and women should zealously reprobate 

corresponding depravity and take every acceptable measure to safeguard 

their personal integrity while exemplarily shunning all kinds and degrees of 

unethical behavior themselves (cf PRECAUTION #10 below). 

It's both arduous and largely inadvisable to fight the widespread and deep-rooted 

corruption systematically indulged in by Norwegian officials wholly 

unassisted…..so — l'union fait la force; upright individuals earnestly battling 

the shockingly profuse malversation routinely partaken or exclusively 

actuated and carried through by Norwegian authorities, should willingly 

cooperate and enter into more stable alliances with — particularly — 

foreign organizations/companies/fora/persons honestly advocating human 

rights matters and possessed of specialized know-how etc (cf 


Those efficiently persecuting the lowering criminality regularly perpetrated by 

Norwegian officials and senior civil servants, will frequently be exposed to hate- 

ful and illicit attacks planned, supervised and carried out by the culprits…..so — 

particularly if health and life is seriously endangered; human rights activists 

AO subject to unlawful and markedly malevolent hostilities wholly or partially 

ascribable to Norwegian authorities, should normally and without undue 

hesitation apply for political asylum outside Norway (cf PRECAUT- 

ION #12 below). 

The number of countermeasures and recommendations offhandedly 

emphasized on should certainly be both doubled and tripled in a more 

comprehensive and less suppressed memorandum…..so — just to level 

off somewhat; instead of expanding our improvised and tactically abrid- 

ged list point by point, we shall now enumerate it and supply the pre- 

cautions/admonitions already launched with some apposite remarks: 

159 



159


PRECAUTION #1 

HIGHTEN YOUR OVERALL SUSPICIOUSNESS VIS-À-VIS 

THE NORWEGIAN STATE APPARATUS 

Cf p 156 above. 

Nationwide and efficient dissemination of cover-up fibs, insidious bread and 

circuses stuff and popularizing propaganda are vital to Norwegian authorities 

frenetically upkeeping, camouflaging and odiously glorifying their pestilent 

corruption. The main dispenser of official propaganda in Norway is the state 

governed "Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation"* (*i.e "Norsk rikskring- 

kasting" — "NRK", cf p 14), and it's naturally imperative to warn particularly 

against stuff spread by this increasingly authority menial agitprop — though; 

one should constantly be on one's guard against all kinds of irregular and schem- 

ingly victim directed/designed press elements in general (cf p 114 etc). 

As stressed above, the fatally contaminated Norwegian state apparatus are com- 

posed of individuals…..and the individual corruptibility and actual depravity of 

these persons determines — summa summarum — the degree of corruption gene- 

rally ascribable to Norwegian authorities. While the satanic iniquity of Norwegian 

authorities are befittingly underscored many places in this Complaint — cf e.g pp 

10, 68–69, 72–73 and 104–137 (cf Doc's ##103, 115, 339, 377, 627, 633, 1022, 

1536, 2037, 2418, 2907, 3217, 3611, 4000, 4575, 4588, 5007, 5817, 6097, 7011 

and 7084 &c), the actual point here, in any case, is that our alertness in no way 

should be limited to the various parts of the state apparatus per se — our suspic- 

iousness should indeed encompass the corresponding culprits' private activities 

and circle of acquaintances too. 

None possessed of an adequate degree of moral integrity, perspicacity and infor- 

mation would nowadays — and voluntarily — work as a senior civil or public 

servant here in Norway…..and, dealing with the actual officeholders, we should 

always keep in mind we're up against individuals not quitting their despective jobs 

either because they — for various reasons — feels forced to stay, are unaware 

serious corruption, are unable to comprehend the nature or implications of their 

own or others' malfeasance, or because they consciously — sufficiently aware 

the incriminating/ponerological/immoral aspects of their misconduct — supports 

or actively partakes indicated malversation. 

Although there are multifarious and hitherto undescribed aspects and degrees of 

160 



160


the foregoing assertion, the golden rule is never to rely on a Norwegian senior 

civil servant or official whatsoever…..whereas unimpelled employment with and 

amicable contributions to nowadays Norwegian authorities normally points 

to dangerous moral/intellectual/informational defects. 

Regardless of our empirically and otherwise well-founded distrust, we may to a 

given extent intercommunicate and associate feignedly jovially with the actual 

officeholders to meet tactical requirements like the gathering, evaluation and 

spreading of essential intelligence…..in most circumstances, however, it's 

generally unbecoming to distinctly respectable persons to communicate needlessly 

and unobliged/volitionally keep company with these authority hired individuals 

who for preventive reasons should be brusquely denied admittance to all assemb- 

lies of zealously upright and sharply discerning men and women. 

As an absolute debarment of Norwegian senior state and public officials from all 

groups of superbly wise and virtuous persons may seem unduly extreme to some of 

you, I shall spend a few minutes explaining why such radical measures nevertheless 

are recommendable. 

Initially we shall pay particular attention to some articles of "The Constitution 

of the Kingdom of Norway": 

ARTICLE 1 

The Kingdom of Norway is a free, independent, indivisible and 

inalienable Realm. Its form of government is a limited and 

hereditary monarchy. 

ARTICLE 3 

The Executive Power is vested in the King, or in the Queen if she 

has succeeded to the Crown pursuant to the provisions of Article 6 

or Article 7 or Article 48 of this Constitution. When the Executive 

Power is thus vested in the Queen, she has all the rights and obli- 

gations which pursuant to this Constitution and the Law of the Land 

are possessed by the King. 

ARTICLE 4 

The King shall at all times profess the Evangelical-Lutheran religion, 

and uphold and protect the same. 

ARTICLE 5 

The King's person is sacred; he cannot be censured or accused. The 

responsibility rests with his Council. 

161 



161


ARTICLE 9 

As soon as the King, being of age, accedes to the government, he 

shall take the following oath before the Storting: "I promise and 

swear that I will govern the Kingdom of Norway in accordance 

with its Constitution and Laws; so help me God, the Almighty 

and Omniscient." 

If the Storting is not in session at the time, the oath shall be made in 

writing in the Council of State and be repeated solemnly by the 

King at the first subsequent Storting. 

ARTICLE 12 

The King himself chooses a Council from among Norwegian cit- 

izens who are entitled to vote. This Council shall consist of a 

Prime Minister and at least seven other Members. 

More than half the number of the Members of the Council of 

State shall profess the official religion of the State. 

The King apportions the business among the Members of the 

Council of State, as he deems appropriate. Under extraordinary 

circumstances, besides the ordinary Members of the Council of 

State, the King may summon other Norwegian citizens, although 

no Members of the Storting, to take a seat in the Council of State. 

Husband and wife, parent and child or two siblings may never 

sit at the same time in the Council of State. 

ARTICLE 13 

During his travels within the Realm, the King may delegate the 

administration of the Realm to the Council of State. The Council 

of State shall conduct the government in the King's name and on 

his behalf. It shall scrupulously observe the provisions of this 

Constitution, as well as such particular directives in conformity 

therewith as the King may instruct. 

The matters of business shall be decided by voting, where in the 

event of the votes being equal, the Prime Minister, or in his 

absence the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State 

who is present, shall have two votes. 

The Council of State shall make a report to the King on 

matters of business which it thus decides. 

ARTICLE 19 

The King shall ensure that the properties and prerogatives of the 

State are utilized and administered in the manner determined by 

162 



162


the Storting and in the best interests of the general public. 

ARTICLE 21 

The King shall choose and appoint, after consultation with his 

Council of State, all senior civil, ecclesiastical and military 

officials. Before the appointment is made, such officials shall 

swear or, if by law exempted from taking the oath, solemnly 

declare obedience and allegiance to the Constitution and the 

King, although senior officials who are not Norwegian natio- 

nals may by law be exempted from this duty. 

The Royal Princes must not hold senior civil offices. 

ARTICLE 22 

The Prime Minister and the other Members of the Council of 

State, together with the State Secretaries, may be dismissed 

by the King without any prior court judgment, after he has 

heard the opinion of the Council of State on the subject. The 

same applies to senior officials employed in government offices 

or in the diplomatic or consular service, to the highest- 

ranking civil and ecclesiastical officials, commanders of regi- 

ments and other military formations, commandants of forts 

and officers commanding warships. Whether pensions should 

be granted to senior officials thus dismissed shall be deter- 

mined by the next Storting. In the interval they shall receive 

two thirds of their previous pay. 

Other senior officials may only be suspended by the King, 

and must then without delay be charged before the Courts, 

but they may not, except by court judgment, be dismissed nor, 

against their will, transferred. 

All senior officials may, without a prior court judgment, 

be discharged from office upon attaining the 

statutory age limit. 

ARTICLE 30 

All the proceedings of the Council of State shall be entered in 

its records. Diplomatic matters which the Council of State 

decides to keep secret shall be entered in a special record. The 

same applies to military command matters which the Council 

of State decides to keep secret. 

Everyone who has a seat in the Council of State has the duty 

to frankly express his opinion, to which the King is bound 

163 



163


to listen. But it rests with the King to make a decision ac- 

cording to his own judgment. 

If any Member of the Council of State is of the opinion 

that the King's decision conflicts with the form of govern- 

ment or the laws of the Realm, or is clearly prejudicial to 

the Realm, it is his duty to make strong remonstrances 

against it, as well as to have his opinion entered in the 

records. A Member who has not thus protested is deemed 

to have been in agreement with the King, and shall be 

answerable in such manner as may be subsequently de- 

cided, and may be impeached by the Odelsting before 

the Court of Impeachment. 

ARTICLE 31 

All decisions drawn up by the King shall, in order to be- 

come valid, be countersigned. The decisions relating to 

military command are countersigned by the person who 

has presented the matter, while other decisions are counter- 

signed by the Prime Minister or, if he has not been present, 

by the highest-ranking Member of the Council of State present. 

ARTICLE 41 

If the King is absent from the Realm unless commanding in 

the field, or if he is so ill that he cannot attend to the govern- 

ment, the person next entitled to succeed to the Throne shall, 

provided that he has attained the age stipulated for the King's 

majority, conduct the government as the temporary executor 

of the Royal Powers. If this is not the case, the Council of 

State will conduct the administration of the Realm. 

ARTICLE 44 

The Princess or Prince who, in the cases mentioned in Article 

41, conducts the government shall make the following oath in 

writing before the Storting: "I promise and swear that I will 

conduct the government in accordance with the Constitution 

and the Laws, so help me God, the Almighty and Omniscient." 

If the Storting is not in session at the time, the oath shall be 

made in the Council of State and later be presented to the 

next Storting. The Princess or Prince who has once 

made the oath shall not repeat it later. 

164 



164


ARTICLE 81 

All Acts (with the exception of those mentioned in Article 79) 

are drawn up in the name of the King, under the seal of the 

Realm of Norway, and in the following terms; "We, X, make 

it publicly known: that the decision of the Storting of the date 

stated has been laid before Us: (here follows the decision). In 

consequence whereof We have assented to and confirmed, as 

We hereby do assent to and confirm the same as Law under 

Our Hand and the Seal of the Realm." 

ARTICLE 96 

No one may be convicted except according to law, or be 

punished except after a court judgment. Interrogation by 

torture must not take place. 

ARTICLE 99 

No one may be taken into custody except in the cases deter- 

mined by law and in the manner prescribed by law. For 

unwarranted arrest, or illegal detention, the officer concerned 

is accountable to the person imprisoned. 

The Government is not entitled to employ military force 

against citizens of the State, except in accordance with the 

forms prescribed by law, unless any assembly disturbs the 

public peace and does not immediately disperse after the 

Articles of the Statute Book relating to riots have been read 

out clearly three times by the civil authority. 

ARTICLE 102 

Search of private homes shall not be made except in criminal cases. 

ARTICLE 110 

It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to 

create conditions enabling every person capable of work 

to earn a living by his work. 

Specific provisions concerning the right of employees 

to co-determination at their work place shall be laid 

down by law. 

ARTICLE 110 C 

It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State to re- 

165 



165


spect and ensure human rights. Specific provisions for 

the implementation of treaties hereof shall be 

determined by law. 

We shall also take a look at some sections of the Norwegian Civil Service Act of 

March 4, 1983 (no. 3): 

SECTION 1 

This Act applies to employees of the Norwegian Civil 

Service. The Act applies to senior civil servants where 

expressly stated. The Act does not apply to ministers 

or state secretaries. 

A senior civil servant (embetsmann) is either a govern- 

ment official appointed by the King and installed as a 

senior civil servant or an official who is temporarily 

appointed by the King in a senior administrative post. 

A civil servant (tjenestemann) is any employee of the 

Norwegian Civil Service who is not a senior civil servant. 

The King may stipulate that the Act shall apply to other 

employees whose salary and working conditions are laid 

down through collective agreements between the govern- 

ment and Civil Service unions. In cases of doubt, the King 

may stipulate to whom the Act shall apply, and may also 

decide that groups of employees wholly or partly shall be 

excepted from the Act when special grounds so indicate. 

The King may then lay down special regulations. 

SECTION 5 

Civil servants are appointed by the King, or if the King so 

directs, by a ministry, by a collegiate board for an agency 

or group of agencies, or by an appointment committee. The 

procedure to be followed in connection with appointments 

is laid down in regulations. The King may set out general 

guidelines for the practice of the right of appointment. 

The appointment committee shall have an equal number of 

representatives from the staff and from the management. 

The chairman shall be appointed by the management. 

166 



166


Regulations shall also be laid down giving further par- 

ticulars concerning the composition of the committee 

and the appointment of staff representatives. 

If the civil servants are not represented in the board of 

an agency or group of agencies, at least two representa- 

tives for the civil servants shall sit on the board when 

appointment cases are handled in such cases as referred 

to in sections 8–10 and 12–17. 

If a board or appointment committee does not reach agree- 

ment about an appointment, each member may demand 

that the case be referred to the ministry concerned or to 

the agency designated in the regulations. The demand shall 

be submitted in writing. The candidate appointed must then 

be chosen from the applicants supported by members of 

the appointment committee. 

If among the applicants there are any who have been dis- 

missed or summarily discharged pursuant to section 10 

or have received notice of dismissal or summary discharge 

from a post with equal or higher pay and the appointment 

committee wishes to appoint another applicant, the case 

shall be decided by the King or by an agency thereby 

authorized. This applies also in cases where the right of 

appointment is laid down in a separate Act. 

The person appointed shall be notified of the appointment 

in writing. The notification shall contain information about 

any special conditions decided. In the case of temporary 

appointments the notification shall also specify the duration of 

the appointment or the assignments that shall be carried out. 

SECTION 11 

A civil servant always has a right to resign his post. 

The period of notice shall be, unless otherwise laid 

down in regulations: 

during the probationary period: three weeks, 

if the length of service is one year or less: one month, 

if the length of service exceeds one year: three months. 

Shorter periods of notice may be laid down in regulations 

or collective agreements. 

SECTION 14 

Senior civil servants (other than judges) and civil servants 

167 



167


who are not by Statute subject to another disciplinary au- 

thority may be subjected to disciplinary measures for: 

infringement of official obligations or failure to fulfil 

official duties, 

improper behaviour in or outside of the service that dam- 

ages the respect or confidence essential to the post. 

As disciplinary measures, senior civil servants and civil 

servants may be subjected to a written reprimand, or to loss 

of seniority for a period of one month to two years. 

Civil servants may also as a disciplinary measure, either 

permanently or for a limited period be demoted 

to a lower grade. 

An ordinary service reprimand shall not be regarded as 

a disciplinary measure. 

Disciplinary measures are entered in the officer's re- 

cord or personnel card. Regulations stipulate when the 

entry shall be removed. 

Any officer may demand a printout of his/her record 

or personnel card. 

SECTION 15 

A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily 

discharged when he: 

has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a 

gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning 

or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties, 

by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves 

himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or 

confidence that is essential to the post. 

The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to 

punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving 

him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation. 

SECTION 21 

If a senior civil servant or civil servant is subjected to 

disciplinary measures or summary discharge for a criminal 

offence, this shall not preclude normal criminal prosecution, 

but assessment of the sentence shall take the disciplinary 

measures or summary discharge into consideration. 

Voilà! 

168 



168


In nearby Complaint the terms "senior civil servant" and "senior state official" 

applies to any government official and official permanently/temporarily appointed 

by the Norwegian King in Council of State pursuant to Article 21 of the here- 

inabove cited Constitution. 

A "civil servant", "public servant", "public official" or an "official" may, in this 

Complaint, be any person employed by the Norwegian Civil Service or by a local 

authority in Norway who is not a senior civil servant or a senior state official. 

Studying Article 1 of the Norwegian Constitution, we learn that Norway is a 

limited and hereditary monarchy. The present monarch — King Harald V the 

Headless (cf pp 31 and 68–69), was born the 21 th of February 1937, and formally 

swore the oath specified in Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution Feb 21, 1958. 

Mr Headless, upon the death of his father, took office as Norwegian head of state 

January 17 th 1991, and officially swore the oath laid down in Article 9 of the Nor- 

wegian Constitution four days later. 

To those acquainted with the innate corruptibility, judgmental maladroitness 

and psychopathological temperament prevalent amongst Norwegian senior civil 

servants and officials (cf pp 122–124 above), it should be no surprise to find 

essential parts of the Norwegian Constitution going on the rocks right from the 

start….. 

The "hereditary monarchy" referred to in Article 1 of said Constitution, is founded 

on the regulations of Article 6 ib — sic: 

"The order of succession is lineal, so that only a child born in 

lawful wedlock of the Queen or King, or of one who is her- 

self or himself entitled to the succession may succeed, and so 

that the nearest line shall take precedence over the more remote 

and the elder in the line over the younger. 

An unborn child shall also be included among those entitled to 

the succession and shall immediately take her or his proper place 

in the line of succession as soon as she or he is born into the world. 

The right of succession shall not, however, belong to any person 

who is not born in direct line of descent from the last reigning Queen 

or King or a sister or brother thereof, or is herself or himself 

a sister or brother thereof. 

When a Princess or Prince entitled to succeed to the Crown of Norway 

is born, her or his name and time of birth shall be notified to the first 

Storting in session and be entered in the record of its proceedings. 

For those born before the year 1971, Article 6 of the Constitution 

as it was passed on 18 November 1905 shall, however, apply. For 

those born before the year 1990 it shall nevertheless be the case 

that a male shall take precedence over a female." 

169 



169


Now — to cut this gangrenous matter short: 

We're convinced Mr Headless' father, King Olav V, was 

an illegitimate child clearly and legally unentitled to inherit 

and in any respects occupy the Norwegian Throne (cf Article 

6 above)…..and — even if King Headless claims he here- 

tofore has been completely ignorant of his familial illegi- 

timacy, we feel quite sure he has been fully cognizant of 

this scandalous fact since his youth (cf Aphorisms 

&c ##135 and 137). 

In any event King Harald V the Headless most flagrantly has violated the oaths 

laid down in Article 9 and Article 44 of the Norwegian Constitution — he has 

repetitively and mala fide sanctioned and awarded the most serious and dishono- 

rable examples of state supported rottenness and premeditated human rights vio- 

lations ever seen in modern Norway (cf pp 31, 68–69 and 126 etc), and his regal 

malversation are intensely disgraceful and totally condemnable indeed. 

The Council of State (cf Article 12 of the Norwegian Constitution) — or "King's 

Council" (cf pp 30–31 above) — normally consist of the Norwegian King en per- 

sonne, the Prime Minister, the Minister of Finance, the Minister of Local Govern- 

ment and Regional Development, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Minister 

of Defence, the Minister of Environment, the Minister of Petroleum and Energy, 

the Minister of International Development, the Minister of Trade and Industry, the 

Minister of Transport and Communications, the Minister of Education and 

Research, the Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion, the Minister of Justice and 

the Police, the Minister of Children and Equality, the Minister of Culture and 

Church Affairs, the Minister of Health and Care Services, the Minister of 

Government Administration and Reform, the Minister of Agriculture and Food, the 

Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs, and the administrative head of the Office 

of the Prime Minister functioning as the Council's secretary. 

The various members of the Council of State represents the political core of the 

Norwegian Government, and the nation's highest administrative authority are 

correspondingly vested in the King's Council (cf Article 3 of the Norwegian Constitution). 

Said minister councillors acts in their capacity as political supremos of 

their respective government ministries — e.g the Ministry of Justice and the Police 

or the Ministry of Health and Care Services, and more or less subordinate to these 

ministries we find a conglomerate of directorates and different administrative 

organs. 

Norway is divided into 19 distinct counties, and each county consists of a number 

of municipalities together forming the county municipality — partially selfgoverning, 

said counties and corresponding municipalities are balefully under the 

heel of central/national authorities though. 

170 



170


Basically the county municipalities and attingent county councils with their 

boards of aldermen/-women represents the main link between the Norwegian 

state administration and local authorities — the respective county governors, 

county executives and chairmen/-women of the county councils being principal 

collaborators (cf p 34 etc). 

In addition to more exoteric channels, the subversive influence of central 

Norwegian authorities may reach local government officers AO through a truly 

lavish number of alternative, obscure and irregular pathways — local members of 

political parties/organizations, police/customs/prison officers, military personnel 

(frequently occupying civilian posts), tax office staffers, fire marshals, Red Cross 

principals, journalists/editors, local industrialists, council engineers, Civil Defence 

regional commissioners, chairmen/-women of municipal councils, deputy chiefs, 

city managers, district recorders, public prosecutors, professional/lay judges, 

Probation and Aftercare Service confederates, State Agency for the Recovery of 

Fines/Damages/Costs associates, social security & health sector employees/ 

executives, and friends/relatives etc of said/potential agents may oftentimes be of 

particular interest on that score. 

No matter how; the crucial point is that corruption initiated by the Norwegian 

government apparatus — empirically — spreads rapidly to the remotest and most 

subordinate officials at municipality level…..and, in many cases, vice versa! 

Obviously enough it's practically impossible, even for extraordinary gifted and 

otherwise well-informed persons, to be sufficiently acquainted with all the strictly 

individual personality traits and widely different circumstances determining the 

professional career and political sympathies usw of everyone employed by central/ 

local authorities in Norway, and — complementarily — our preventive measures 

must be adapted to counteract the negative consequences of our ignorance. 

On the other hand, to be sure, we don't actually need a lot of specifically personal 

information about one and all serving as a senior civil or public servant here in 

Norway to wholly justifiable declare these officeholders personae non gratae as a 

group, in general, and under certain circumstances, in particular… 

What's truly indispensable in this connection — besides the fact we next to never 

are possessed of the information strictly required to assess precisely all relevant 

aspects of said officeholders professional attachment etc — are reliable/copious/ 

varied/long-standing and preferably firsthand experience as for the crimes fact- 

ually brought about or actively sustained by a statistically significant number and 

blend of Norwegian senior state and public officials…..and the recurrent theme in 

this Petition is, assuredly ipso facto, various aspects of the accursed corruption 

amongst persons employed by the Norwegian state or a local authority in Norway! 

On the basis of reliable data on criminality committed or explicitly patronized by 

Norwegian authorities since 1992, it's certain beyond the shadow of a doubt afore- 

171 



171


mentioned officeholders generally represents an extreme threat not only to the 

individual joie de vivre, security and integrity usw of Norwegian citizens, but — 

on the whole — to the human race and Earthly existence as well (cf pp 122 and 

152–155, item Doc's ## 555 [pp 55–56], 633, 777, 2037 and 4000 etc)! 

While the grisly prevalence of NPSMS-related misconduct amongst Norwegian 

senior civil servants and officials has been touched upon earlier (cf pp 122–124 

and 151–152 &c), it should be underscored the prognosis in full-blown sociopathy 

is quite unfavourable — a troublesome fact rendering medical efforts to weaken 

and eradicate the psychopathological foundation of the fulsome corruption practi- 

cally useless…..so, tant mieux; let's return to our prison camps at Bjørnøya (cf pp 

155–156)! The most warped and dangerous Norwegian officeholders should be 

interned forthwith for the same reason as it normally makes sense to isolate 

patients suffering from highly communicable and potentially fatal diseases from 

the healthier part of the general population — it's a matter of preventing the 

spread and influence of illness-/havoc-causing agents! 

Possessed of no artistic talent or noometric potential of great import and lacking 

patrician refinement, dignity and leadership qualities altogether, these scandalously 

appointed officeholders and natural born losers has no beneficial functions in a 

wholesome, human rights respecting and meritoriously sophisticated society what- 

soever…; the morbid lawbreaking, low-brow insensateness and truculent terrorism 

of these state paid villains and archpharisees are absolutely detrimental to all kinds 

of intellectual, cultural and moral excellence, and — consequently — they represents 

a special danger to distinctly noble-minded and superbly gifted individuals 

whose creative zest, health and socioeconomic prosperity Norwegian authorities 

are exceedingly likely to mess up illegally and ruin completely as far as practically 

possible. 

So, to sum up a couple of main points: 

1. NEVER RELY ON A NORWEGIAN SENIOR CIVIL SERVANT 

OR OFFICIAL WHATSOEVER. 

2. NORWEGIAN OFFICEHOLDERS NORMALLY AND IN VARIOUS 

WAYS/DEGREES ADDS A CLEARLY DESTRUCTIVE AND INFER- 

IOR ANGLE TO WHATEVER GATHERING AND ASSOCIATION 

THEY'RE PERMITTED TO JOIN, AND SHOULD — IN PARTICU- 

LAR AND AS A GROUP — BE MERCILESSLY AND COMPLETE- 

LY BARRED FROM PARTICIPATION AND INCLUSION IN ALL 

MEETINGS AND ORGANIZED FELLOWSHIPS OF OUTSTAND- 

INGLY GIFTED AND HONORABLE MEN/WOMEN. 

THIS SUBSECTION IS INTENTIONALLY INCOMPLETE, AND 

MAY BE SUBJECT TO FUTURE ALTERATION/EXPANSION! 

172 



172


PRECAUTION #2 

RECORD AS MUCH RELEVANT INFORMATION ABOUT 

NORWEGIAN OFFICIALS AND SENIOR CIVIL SERVANTS 

AS PRACTICALLY AFFORDABLE WITHOUT ETHICALLY 

COMPROMISING YOURSELF 


Information about intelligence targets/procedures/evaluation etc is of particular 

interest to Norwegian authorities, and this Precaution is therefore left provisio- 

nally uncommented. 

PRECAUTION #3 

RESPONSIBLE PERSONS SHOULD, AS A RULE, ENDEAVOR 

TO DETECT AND IMPART KNOWLEDGE OF STATE ACTU- 

ATED/SUSTAINED LAWBREAKING GENERALLY 


The extent of this Precaution should be obvious enough — further comments 

deemed unnecessary in praesent! 

173 



173


PRECAUTION #4 

EVERYBODY EAGERLY FIGHTING STATE SUPPORTED 

CRIMINALITY IN NORWAY AND POSSESSED OF NORMAL OR 

HIGHER IQ SHOULD STRIVE TO ACQUIRE COMPRE- 

HENSIVE KNOWLEDGE OF INTERNATIONAL LAW AND 

HUMAN RIGHTS CONVENTIONS/COVENANTS IN GENERAL, 

AND ALL ASPECTS/IMPLICATIONS OF NORWEGIAN JURIS- 

PRUDENCE/LEGISLATION AND STATE CONSTITUTION/ 

ADMINISTRATION IN PARTICULAR 


Explanatory comments are hardly required! 

PRECAUTION #5 

UPRIGHT INDIVIDUALS SHOULD NORMALLY DENOUNCE 

AND ATTEMPT TO PREVENT/AVOID/ELIMINATE SITUATIONS 

MAINTAINING/AGGRAVATING OR PARTICULARLY LIKELY 

TO TRIGGER OFFICIAL CORRUPTION, AND ALSO TAKE 

SPECIFIC/CONCRETE ETC MEASURES TO GUARD THEM- 

SELVES AND SELECT PERSONS AGAINST THE MATERIAL 

MANIFESTATIONS AND NOXIOUS IMPLICATIONS OF 

STATE WAGED CRIMINALITY 


Amongst the many material manifestations and noxious implications of state 

waged criminality, it may be worthwhile to say a few words about the illicit break- 

174 



174


ins, thefts and monitoring frequently approved or personally carried out by 

Norwegian senior civil and civil servants. 

To some extent this disgusting and weighty topic has been focused on earlier — cf 

pp 105–115, but it may be appropriate to supply the foregoing information with a 

handful useful annotations. 

Safeguarding your dwelling house, apartment, commercial premises, office 

building — or whatever — against unwarranted intrusion and burglary, almost in- 

variably implies installing high security locks/doors and a sophisticated alarm and 

access control system…..the standard five pin household lock and US$250 burglar 

alarm you purchased through your local hardware dealer or a celebrated online 

shop won't stop a dedicated and professional cracksman! 

As for the security locks and alarm/access system the rule of thumb is: 

BUY SUCH ITEMS — as well as all computer supported surveillance 

devices/systems, safes, reinforced stationery/filing cabinets, safety glass, 

fiber optics, video monitors/units/cameras, CCTV connection panels, 

communications equipment generally, switchboards/terminals, micro- 

wave transmitters, GPS articles, tamper indicating sensors, ELINT/ 

SIGINT/electromagnetic/acoustoelectronic/nuclear usw shielding…etc — 

OUTSIDE NORWAY! 

There are quite a few and widely different kinds of high security locks being 

manufactured today, and some of them can't be purchased by "the man in the 

street". Anyhow; you're looking for an up-to-date security lock produced outside 

Norwegian borders by a company/lockmaker wholly without significant 

ties to Norway. 

High security locks are normally spacer-free, biaxial with solid sidebars, and the 

deadbolt are thoroughly ruggedized — the keyways, plugs/rotors, hulls/cylinder 

cases, rings and massive face- and strike plate are most likely made of first class 

hardened steel, and they're efficiently secured against the "vibration" and "onepin-at-a-time" 

lock picking techniques. 

High security doors are usually made of hardened steel, and should be dimensioned 

to stop NATO's 7.62 x 51mm armor-piercing rounds. Each door should 

be furnished with at least two high security locks, oversized/bulletproof escutch- 

eons covering the shutting stile all the way to the closest jamb, and ultrasolid 

hinges impossible to demolish with a gauge 12 shotgun and slugs at point-blank 

range (jambs, thresholds and top rails etc should all be extremely solid, of 

course, and preferably made of steel). 

Otherwise, your security measures may include e.g; guards, watchdogs, door/ 

window bars, steel shutters, exit/entrance turnstiles, gates, containers, advanced 

cipher locks, massive padlocks/chains, barbed wire, reinforced concrete barri- 

175 



175


cades, fortified walls/fences/stockades, augmentation of natural impediments, 

tactical compartmentalization of out-/indoor spaces (vg secure/private/admini- 

strative/public areas), moats, various traps, footbridges, underground/secret 

rooms/passageways, protective lighting, elevators, and numerous security 

systems. 

All strategic doors, windows, skylights/trapdoors, ladders etc should be equipped 

with high-quality tamper indicating devices, and particularly strict moni- 

toring of stairwells and hallways are obligatory. 

Electronic/audiovisual etc surveillance of your strictly private/professional 

premises and sites should always be generously indicated by easily visible/ 

understandable warning/safety/prohibition symbols/signs/notices, and welcomed 

guests should — if deemed necessary — be informed orally about the monitoring. 

Moreover, it should be clearly emphasized that all security measures 

dealt with in this subsection are specifically and exclusively aimed at pre- 

venting/detecting unwarranted INTRUSION and BURGLARY; 

corresponding surveillance should — ON NO ACCOUNT — include 

audiovisual etc monitoring of accepted visitors'/employees'/executives' 

strict privacy* (*a senior civil or civil servant forcing his way into your private 

house/apartment or office building on the pretext of carrying out his/her duty, is 

not an "accepted visitor" — he/she is an unwanted INTRUDER). 

Said surveillance should — IN NO CIRCUMSTANCES — trespass the 

following Regulation (cf Doc #2037, pp 92–93): 

REGULATION 

―Whoever supposing they actually are, has been or in the future will 

become victims of uninvited and undesirable monitoring, overhearing 

or spying in their private houses, apartments, lodgings, vehicles or 

abodes or in any unspecified dwelling, construction or place of residing 

apart from this where compelled* to stay for a given time, can — independent 

of religious faith and theological opinions and whether the spytechnology 

are mobile or stationary — by addressing God Almighty in 

silent or voiced prayer, righteously demand eternally condemned and 

maximally severely punished in Hell anybody directly or indirectly 

guilty in exercising or authorizing aforesaid violations of their privacy, 

and their application shall immediately be registered and granted in 

agreement with the stipulations laid down by Me, God‘s Servant, in 

nearby Regulation and otherwise.‖ 

*Welcomed guests should, of course, be entirely free to leave your premises/sites whenever you or themselves 

want — they are in no way, and as far as this Regulation applies, "compelled to stay"! 

176 



176


REGULATORY 

PARTICULARIZATION/AMPLIFICATION 

1) Those applying for condemnation and punishment of their 

aggressors in conformity with above Regulation, can‘t themselves 

employ vg electronic, technical, wave-based, optical, vitreous or 

visual contrivances, composites, arrangements or constructions 

offending others privacy pursuant to said Regulation. 

2) As for Jewish officials directly acting on behalf of Israeli 

authorities and for information gathered through clairvoyance, 

there are moderate modifications in respect of above Regulation, 

but abuse are punished in either case. 

3) The Regulation is wholly inapplicable vis-à-vis God‘s and Satan‘s 

angels, and does primarily — but not exclusively — apply to 

mankind. 

4) The human body is a most private and inalienable abode, and the 

Regulation perfectly apply to all kinds of detectors, sensors, 

transmitters, electronics and technology etc installed in or at it — 

item in or at clothing, movables, paraphernalia, outfit and 

personal luggage — without the owners explicit and voluntary 

consent. 

5) In regular psychiatric institutions, medical hospitals and 

authentic health care situations where observation is strictly 

required for life rescuing reasons, observers/sensors/cameras 

wholly visible or tactile for the patient may be employed in critical 

phases — whereas secret monitoring is punishable in agreement 

with above Regulation. 

6) The Regulation wholly apply to hidden and overt audiovisual 

surveillance in buildings and constructions formally and 

authentically consecrated worship of God Almighty — whereas 

use of plain smoke/fire/gas detectors/alarms in said structures are 

permissible. 

7) Divine enforcement of the Regulation is entirely independent of 

and unaffected by human, worldly and transmundane 

beliefs/opinions, sanctions/conventions/agreements, 

laws/rules/jurisprudence and approval etc. 

177 



177


8) The Regulation has Tellurian and cosmical extent and 

applicability. 



PRECAUTION #6 

THOSE INTENDING TO PROTECT THEMSELVES AND OTHERS 

AGAINST THE WIDE-RANGING AND PERNICIOUS CRIMINALITY 

EXERCISED BY NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES, SHOULD SYSTE- 

MATICALLY GATHER/ANALYZE/EVALUATE ACCURATE INFOR- 

MATION E.G ABOUT THE ATTACKER'S TARGET IDENTIFICAT- 

ION/DESCRIPTION, STANDING OPERATING PROCEDURE, POL- 

ITICAL MANDATE, REGULAR ARMED FORCES SUPPORT/IN- 

VOLVEMENT, CONFLICT SPECTRUM, STRATEGICAL/TACTICAL 

INTENTIONS/AIM, DOCUMENTABLE/PREVIOUS MODI OPERAN- 

DI, PROJECTED/ACTUAL TIME/POINT/METHODS OF ATTACK, 

PRINCIPAL APPROACH, OUTLINED WITHDRAWAL PLANS, 

PUGNACITY/DEPRAVITY, COMMAND STRENGTH, MANNING 

LEVEL, TASK ORGANIZATION, LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE, MO- 

BILITY, GENERAL INTEROPERABILITY, MILITARY TRAINING/ 

CAPACITY, ARMAMENT, TECHNICAL OUTFIT/KNOW-HOW, 

MENTAL/PHYSICAL ABILITY, PSYCHIATRIC PROFILE/STATUS, 

FORMAL SCHOOLING, IDEOLOGICAL FOUNDATION, PROFESS- 

IONAL DOCTRINES, FORMER ACTS OF VIOLENCE/HOSTILITY/ 

SABOTAGE ETC, COLLABORATIONIST NETWORKING, INTELLI- 

GENCE SYSTEMS/PROCEDURES/DIRECTION/BUILD-UP, COUNT- 

ERMEASURES, COUNTER-COUNTERMEASURES, COMMUNI- 

CATION FACILITIES/NET, AND ECONOMIC/MATERIAL 

BACK-UP APPARATUSES 

178 



178

Cf pp 157–158 above. 


Much of the wide-ranging and pernicious criminality exercised by Norwegian 

authorities may correctly be described as downright/unprovoked/brainsick/ 

systematic/premeditated/satanic and totally illegal/condemnable 

TERRORISM….and naturally; in order to protect yourself and others from 

destructive terrorist acts, you need reliable/ample/detailed background information 

etc on the attacker! 

Otherwise, this Precaution is left tactically uncommented (cf Precaution #2)…. 

whereas one of the thumb rules in this and some other connections is: 

NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES WILL, SOONER OR LATER, 

CRIMINALLY/VEHEMENTLY ABUSE ANY PIECE OF IN- 

FORMATION/EQUIPMENT THEY CAN LAY THEIR BLOOD- 

STAINED HANDS ON! 

PRECAUTION #7 

EFFICIENT STEPS TO GUARD — PARTICULARLY — HUMAN 

RIGHTS COMMUNICATIONS AND OTHER LEGAL CORRESPON- 

DENCE AGAINST ILLEGAL INTERFERENCE FROM NORWEGIAN 

AUTHORITIES SHOULD BE TAKEN 


Postal safeguarding of human rights communications in Norway are briefly dealt 

with in Doc #3611 — cf Doc #3217 etc. 

Total boycott of DHL and the official postal services of Norway* (*i.e; Posten 

Norge BA) are recommended. 

Human rights documents and legal correspondence etc may be sent successfully 

from one of Norway's neighboring countries — e.g Sweden. 

179 



179


Application of sophisticated encryption devices/systems and unconventional 

stratagems should be considered. 

PRECAUTION #8 

HIGH-PRINCIPLED NONCONFORMISTS SHOULD RESOLUTELY 

BOYCOTT AND SAP THE FOUNDATION OF STATE OPERATED AND 

PRIVATE ESTABLISHMENTS/ENTERPRISES/ORGANIZATIONS 

ETC ACTIVELY OR PASSIVELY SUPPORTING OFFICIAL 

NORWEGIAN MALVERSATION 


With reference to this matter, it should be appropriate to quote a few passages 

from Doc #599, pp 55–56 (figures were up-to-date by Nov 2002): 

"The loss of human lives through above referred atrocities and lawlessness 

wholly attributable to the Norwegian police, Government and Parliament 

etc, has already surpassed the total number of killed — civilians/militaries — 

due to World War II…! 

Basically Norwegian authorities — through longtime and premeditated cri- 

minality and terrorism — efficiently, and in spite of hundredfold warnings, 

have rendered impossible the introduction of medicaments practically 

100% effective in the treatment of all groups and varieties of malignant 

neoplasms (notice that cancer not is a single disease, but at least 120 

variform diseases with, however, the common characteristic of abnormal 

cell growth [cycles]). 

How many persons will die of cancer in, e.g, the USA alone this year — 

550 000…? 

Very aware their horrid crimes against mankind could create major 

problems if and when discovered, the Norwegian Parliament established 

a separate committee to evaluate the danger of war — the actual comm- 

ittee were formally dissolved last spring. 

180 



180


Nothwithstanding that — I'll explain why farther down — it would be 

highly appropriate, wise and advantageous to embargo, exclude and 

in other ways boycott Norway the next 500 years, ye shall not military 

attack the country during stated Quingentium. 

Howbeit; if I — no matter how — as a direct or an ambagious result 

of my mortal enemies gangrenous hostilities should become lethally in- 

jured, the global outlock is apocalyptically different from the guaran- 

teed security offered through the Quingentium-Agreement alluded to 

by Nostradamus, and I shall lay no restrictions on you. 

Nostradamus, through seraphic/empyrean guidance, truly knew I were 

the one and only ever able to empower and offer you a quingentium- 

agreement in order to secure planet Earth from destruction 500 years 

onward from AD 2002! 

No matter how dark and dangerous the situation might appear; planet 

Earth will endure as long as the Quingentium-Agreement are observed. 

During corresponding quingentium waging war would be difficult and 

unnecessary — it'll always be possible to contrive more intelligent so- 

lutions…and as far as the populace of the Earth observe the actual 

Agreement, so will I, and throughout the duration of the contract* 

(*500 years) ye will be given several and reassuringly auguries pro- 

ving that our treaty indeed is valid. 

For the next quingentium there'll be no great prophet — and ye won't 

be in need of one either… 

If you want me set going the 

QUINGENTIUM-AGREEMENT, 

I solely demand that you, the nations of the world, in confederacy 

and for the next 500 years to come effectively embargo (not medi- 

cal remedies and drugs), exclude and in most ways boycott the 

Kingdom of Norway and its official representatives by reason of 

the 50 000 000 (— fifty mil —) persons who, hitherto, have suff- 

ered and finally died due to the sheer and unprovoked evilness 

exercised by Norwegian authorities since AD 1992! 

I'm quoting some passages from the composition "Woe unto you, Norway" 

(Cf Doc #108): 

Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who deceive the world and 

bamboozle pious politicians to honor Satan! 

181 



181


Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who drink to one another 

with blood from blameless victims of your evilness! 

Woe unto you, dissembling Norway, who globally pretends to help 

while devastating righteousness and succoring flagitiousness! 

Verily, scurvy Norway; your heinous wickedness and nefarious lies 

shall vehemently torment you till Earth passes away! 

Verily, scurvy Norway; those supporting or trading with you shall 

inexorably gather God’s scathing wrath! 

Verily, scurvy Norway; you’ve cogently aroused the ire of heavenly 

hosts and shall ride your condigned fate! 

Norway will survive your boycott, and normal sociodynamic etc conditions 

and progress swiftly regained when the last traces of hooked wickedness and 

hamartiological vitiation substantiated by the very being and nitwitted 

villainy of the offenders in casu are sufficiently extirpated.....which render 

necessary an intestine purgatory lasting 500 years. 

Whether you wish to turn me down upon reading this document or — as 

Nostradamus predicts — let me illuminate you and brighten your 

future.....that‟s up to you now!" 

Whereas Norwegian authorities hitherto has exerted themselves to prevent the 

boycott required by the Quingentium-Agreement, they will — in the near 

future — be among those most eagerly encouraging it! 

Anyhow — let me remind you of what's written in the Bible (cf pp 152–155 of 

this Petition, item Doc #4000 etc): 

"Who among you fears the LORD and obeys the word 

of his servant? 

Let him who walks in the dark, who has no light, trust 

in the name of the LORD and rely on his God. 

But now, all you who light fires and provide yourselves 

with flaming torches, 

go, walk in the light of your fires and of the torches you 

have set ablaze. 

This is what you shall receive from my hand: 

You will lie down in torment." 

182 



(Isaiah 50:10–11) 

182


When it comes to "state operated and private establishments/enterprises/ 

organizations etc actively or passively supporting official Norwegian 

malversation", the list of actual culprits are quite long….nevertheless — 

it'll serve a couple of supreme objectives to, eventually, present a more 

elaborate survey later on. 

In the meantime and independent of your nationality/whereabouts; 

boycott Norwegian authorities and their known/vile collaborators 

pitilessly at every turn and down the line! 

PRECAUTION #9 

IDEALISTS POSSESSED OF OUTSTANDING IQ AND CREATIVITY 

SHOULD DO WHATEVER FEASIBLE TO HIDE THEIR MENTAL EX- 

CELLENCE AND RENDER UNEXPLOITABLE ACTUAL CREATIONS 

AND NOTES ETC POTENTIALLY VALUABLE TO NORWEGIAN 

AUTHORITIES AND THEIR COLLABORATORS 

Cf pp 158–159 above. 



Though the term "outstanding IQ" exclusively applies to a full-scale Stanford- 

Binet IQ ≥ 165 (cf pp 148–151), it'll be wise to make precautionary allowances 

for the fact Norwegian authorities are damned liable to persecute illegally top- 

notchers and markedly creative individuals with a ditto IQ as low as 125. 

Nowadays high IQ societies exists all over the world, and they're all — in 

general — quite honest and above board as regards membership personalia and 

organizational details. Such openheartedness may certainly be convenient if you 

happens to live in a country where Civil Service employees/executives and top 

politicians won't conspire against you solely on account of your superior IQ…. 

183 



183


'cause, quorum pars magna fui; Norway, in symptomatic conformity with its 

star-crossed NPSMS prevalence* (*cf pp 122–124 &c), is — as far as one 

knows — the only nation where official "health" personnel AO has rushed off a 

formal application for carte blanche experimentation with and illegal/lifelong 

incarceration of a completely unconsenting/guiltless person exclusively because 

he, supposedly, were possessed of outstanding intelligence! 

According to the partially disallowed plot, the chosen victim and experimentee 

was to be portrayed as a particularly dangerous maniac by means of false 

accusations/statements and massive psychotomimetic drugging — thus 

"justifying" the internment usw (cf pp 22–31 and 80–103 etc)! 

Careful investigation has confirmed the planned experiments included regular/ 

diversified torture, sexual abuse, and a considerable number life-endangering 

hostilities which — perhaps — had shocked the infamous Nazi doctor Josef 

MENGELE…! 

Notwithstanding the fact Norwegian senior civil, ecclesiastical (cf Doc #7011 

&c) and military officials solemnly has declared obedience/allegiance to the 

Constitution* (*cf ARTICLE 21, p 163 of this Petition), Article 7 in the 

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights unambiguously lays 

down that: 

―No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, 

inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment. 

In particular, no one shall be subjected without his 

free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.‖ 

The Norwegian Human Rights Act of May 21, 1999, has turned international 

human rights conventions/covenants into a fundamental part of Norwegian 

legislation (cf pp 3 and 155), and Article 110 c. of the Norwegian Constitution 

correspondingly reads (cf pp 165–166) — sic: 

"It is the responsibility of the authorities of the State 

to respect and ensure human rights. Specific provis- 

ions for the implementation of treaties hereof shall be 

determined by law." 

Anyway — as things actually have turned out in this exceedingly macabre case, 

said experimentee has been diabolically and continuously terrorized/surveilled 

in his private house etc since 1992 (cf pp 15–25, 28–31, 68–74 and 80–84, item 

Doc #4588 &c), and the stark psychopathic culprits has all the time, and without 

exception, been perfectly aware the thoroughly criminal extent/implications of 

184 



184


their nefarious malversation — cf Section 15 of the Norwegian Civil Service 

Act of March 4, 1983 (no. 3): 

"A senior civil servant or civil servant may be summarily 

discharged when he: 

has shown gross negligence in the service or is guilty of a 

gross breach of official duties or despite a written warning 

or reprimand has repeatedly breached his official duties, 

by improper behaviour in or outside the service proves 

himself unworthy of his post or damages the respect or 

confidence that is essential to the post. 

The provision in this section shall not restrict the right to 

punish a senior civil servant or civil servant by depriving 

him of his post pursuant to the rules of penal legislation." 

Essential and engaging though, I won't discuss the purely juridical/psychopathological 

aspects of official Norwegian corruption further in this specific subsection 

(if this and related topics are of particular interest, you may e.g study my Apho- 

risms &c ##1–4, 7–14, 16, 19–34, 37–52, 54–67, 71–72, 74, 76–82, 84, 96, 98– 

120, 123–128, 130, 134, 136–140, and 143–166) — we shall, on the other hand, 

take a look at some practical precautions against the explicitly morbid/unlawful 

persecution of outstandingly intelligent/creative individuals wantonly indulged in 

by Norwegian authorities the latter years: 

Whereas the cobweb-optics* (*cf pp 105–111, item Doc #3217 [pp 105–107]) and 

eavesdropping devices are vehemently abused by state paid baddies practically 

everywhere in Norway — in/at airports, railroad stations/cars, subways, ferryboats, 

havens, busses, taxicabs, rent-a-cars, hotels/motels/hostels, tourist homes/accom- 

modations, restaurants/cafés, barrooms, cabarets/casinos/resorts, playhouses, cinemas, 

museums/collections/galleries, stadia/gyms, travel agencies, lobbies, commer- 

cial premises, shops, office buildings, conference centers, universities/schools, embassies/consulates, 

churches/meetinghouses, hospitals, ticket counters, campgrounds, 

parks, bathrooms/pissoirs/WCs, private houses/apartments/cottages/ 

vehicles…etc, the two most important rules in this connection are: 

1. Unless strictly required; 

DON'T ENTER NORWEGIAN TERRITORY! 

& 

185 



185


2. If already inside Norwegian borders; 

LEAVE NORWEGIAN TERRITORY AS SOON AS 

AFFORDABLE! 

Possessing a Norwegian citizenship or displaying goodwill vis-à-vis Norwegian 

officials and senior civil servants, significantly increases the risk Norwegian auth- 

orities will persecute/surveil/exploit you illegally — therefore the next pair of rules 

are: 

3. If you're a Norwegian subject; 

ANNUL YOUR NORWEGIAN CITIZENSHIP AS 

SOON AS JURIDICALLY FEASIBLE! 

4. Independent of your nationality/whereabouts; 

AVOID CONTACT WITH NORWEGIAN AUTHORI- 

TIES AND ALL KINDS OF PRO-NORWEGIAN ELE- 

MENTS, AND NEITHER SAY NOR DO ANYTHING 

SOCIOPOLITICALLY ADVANTAGEOUS TO NOR- 

WAY! 

Observance of these four basic rules will, as far as Norwegian authorities 

are implicated, normally render steps to hide your intellec- 

tual superiority unnecessary. 

I'm completely aware the explicit exhortations laid down in PRECAUTION #9 

not yet has been touched upon directly, and it should be underscored a more exten- 

sive and scientifically well-founded treatise on the actual topics and some inter- 

related themes are appropriate. Nonetheless — I shall launch a few provisional 

guidelines applying insofar as you're staying within Norwegian territory or are 

closely monitored by Norwegian authorities: 

Norwegian authorities will almost invariably try to obtain authentic test results 

confirming your superior intelligence level — consequently; 

A. RENDER ALL TEST RESULTS REFLECTING NOO- 

METRIC EXCELLENCE WHOLLY INACCESSIBLE/ 

UNVERIFIABLE TO NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES, 

AND — GIVEN A STANDARD DEVIATION OF 16 

186 



186

Moreover…: 


POINTS — MAKE SURE ALL SCORES OFFICIALLY 

AVAILABLE INDICATES A GENERAL IQ ANY- 

WHERE IN THE 92–116 RANGE! 

B. CAREFULLY IMITATE THE TYPICAL BEHAVIOR OF 

PERSONS WITH A FULL-SCALE STANFORD-BINET 

IQ IN THE 105–115 RANGE, AND DO NOTHING POIN- 

TING TO A GENERAL IQ MORE THAN ONE STAND- 

ARD DEVIATION ABOVE THE POPULAR MEAN! 

C. In their frenzied quest for your real IQ, Norwegian author- 

ities are highly liable to employ trickish/damnable methods 

— so; 

CONSTANTLY BE ON YOUR GUARD AGAINST V.G 

FLASHING/SCINTILLATING LIGHTS/DISPLAYS &C 

DESIGNED TO MEASURE THE PUPILLARY LIGHT 

REFLEX, PET/MEG/MRI/CT/BRAIN SCANNING TO 

DETERMINE THE COMPARATIVE SIZE/COMPACT- 

NESS/SHAPE OF CERTAIN BRAIN STRUCTURES, 

EEG/TACHISTOSCOPE/VISUOSENSORY/NEURO- 

LOGICAL EXAMINATIONS, COVERT/SUBTLE 

CHECKUPS/INTERVIEWS/QUESTIONNAIRES, COM- 

PUTER GAMES, PUZZLES/LABYRINTHS, BRAINY/ 

POINTLESS WITTICISMS/CARTOONS, PREARRAN- 

GED SITUATIONS/SETUPS/DILEMMAS INTENDED 

TO TEST YOUR QUICK-WITTEDNESS/KNOWLEDGE/ 

SKILLS, AND ALL KINDS OF DISGUISED/PLAIN PER- 

SONALITY/APTITUDE/MULTIPLE-CHOICE/ASSOCI- 

ATION/VOCABULARY/MEMORY/NUMERIC/SPATI- 

AL/SPEED/ACCURACY/SOCIOMETRIC USW TESTS! 

D. Always remember your very presence and outstanding in- 

telligence are regarded as an imminent danger by Norweg- 

ian authorities anxious to cover up their opprobrious cor- 

187 



187

Finally…: 


ruption — hence; 

BE MENTALLY AND OTHERWISE PREPARED TO 

CONFRONT E.G UNWARRANTED INTERNMENTS/ 

SEIZURES/SEARCHES/INTERROGATIONS/ENFOR- 

CEMENTS/FINES/FEES/REJECTIONS, FALSE ACCU- 

SATIONS/COMPLAINTS, FORGERIES, KANGAROO 

COURTS, MISCARRIAGES OF JUSTICE, CHARAC- 

TER ASSASSINATIONS, BREAK-INS/THEFTS/VAN- 

DALISM/SABOTAGE, UNPROVOKED/PERNICIOUS 

ASSAULTS, INTENTIONAL NEGLIGENCE/INDISCRE- 

TION, AND ILLEGAL/EXTENSIVE SPYING/HARASS- 

MENT/PROVOCATIONS/INTERFERENCE/RESTRIC- 

TIONS…ETC! 

E. Norwegian authorities, suspecting your offspring has inherited 

your superior IQ, are extremely apt to persecute/ 

abuse/harm/intern/retain/indoctrinate usw your descen- 

dants — thus; 

NEITHER GIVE BIRTH TO NOR RAISE CHILDREN 

WITHIN NORWEGIAN TERRITORY/JURISDICTION! 

F. EMPLOY/ADAPT PRECAUTIONS/ADMONITIONS/ 

INFORMATION GIVEN ELSEWHERE IN THIS PE- 

TITION, AND DON'T BE AFRAID TO MAKE ENTIRE- 

LY NEW PROVISIONS! 



188 



188


PRECAUTION #10 

VIRTUOUS MEN AND WOMEN SHOULD ZEALOUSLY REPROBATE 

THE HORRID CORRUPTION CONSUETUDINARY EXERTED BY 

NORWEGIAN (SENIOR) CIVIL SERVANTS AND POLITICIANS AND 

TAKE EVERY ACCEPTABLE MEASURE TO SAFEGUARD THEIR 

PERSONAL INTEGRITY WHILE EXEMPLARILY SHUNNING ALL 

KINDS AND DEGREES OF UNETHICAL BEHAVIOR THEMSELVES 


On account of "chronological implications", I've decided to leave this otherwise 

interesting Precaution uncommented…! 


UPRIGHT INDIVIDUALS EARNESTLY BATTLING THE SHOCKING- 

LY PROFUSE MALVERSATION ROUTINELY PARTAKEN OR EXCLU- 

SIVELY ACTUATED AND CARRIED THROUGH BY NORWEGIAN 

AUTHORITIES, SHOULD WILLINGLY COOPERATE AND ENTER 

INTO MORE STABLE ALLIANCES WITH — PARTICULARLY — 

FOREIGN ORGANIZATIONS/COMPANIES/FORA/PERSONS HONEST- 

LY ADVOCATING HUMAN RIGHTS MATTERS AND POSSESSED 

OF SPECIALIZED KNOW-HOW ETC 


The scope of this Precaution is largely self-evident…! 

189 



189



HUMAN RIGHTS ACTIVISTS AO SUBJECT TO UNLAWFUL AND 

MARKEDLY MALEVOLENT HOSTILITIES WHOLLY OR PARTIAL- 

LY ASCRIBABLE TO NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES, SHOULD 

NORMALLY AND WITHOUT UNDUE HESITATION APPLY 

FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM OUTSIDE NORWAY 


The heinous array of crimes habitually indulged in by Norwegian officials and 

senior civil servants the latter years, are largely and manifestly ascribable to the 

tremendous prevalence of indigenous sociopathy* characteristic of Norway 

(*cf pp 122–124 &c). Based on continuous and exacting observations since 

1992, it's perfectly evident Norwegian "health" personnel and police officers 

directly executing and criminally liable for the atrocities partially described in 

nearby Petition and elsewhere has derived sexual excitement and significant 

satisfaction from their systematic nefariousness and lawbreaking. 

Combined with fixed and markedly paranoic personality traits, the deep-rooted 

psychopathy and sadism by and large hallmarking Norwegian senior state 

officials and public servants are practically incurable* (*cf pp 122–127, 155– 

156 and 172 &c). 

Under otherwise "normal" circumstances and the disastrous ascendancy and pro- 

fane catholicity of state supported criminality considered, it's hardly anything 

but a waste of time and energy to bring legal/intrastatal actions against the slimy 

politicians and (senior) civil servants constituting the rotten hard core of official 

Norwegian malversation….and, especially if you're a high-principled human 

rights activist, the only acceptable alternative left may be to apply for political 

asylum outside Norway in order to escape explicitly nocent and unlawful 

persecution. 

Article 14 in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 12 in 

the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights respectively 

reads — sic: 

190 



190


ARTICLE 14 

"Everyone has the right to seek and to enjoy in 

other countries freedom from persecution." 

ARTICLE 12 

Everyone lawfully within the territory of a State shall, 

within that territory, have the right to liberty of move- 

ment and freedom to choose his residence. 

Everyone shall be free to leave any country, including 

his own. 

The above-mentioned rights shall not be subject to any 

restrictions except those which are provided by law, are 

necessary to protect national security, public order (or- 

dre public), public health or morals or the rights and 

freedoms of others, and are consistent with the other 

rights recognized in the present Covenant. 

No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of the right to enter 

his own country. 

Whereas the official obligation to recognize and ensure effective observance of 

international human rights treaties are firmly established in current Norwegian 

legislation &c (cf pp 3, 155, 165–166 and 184, item Doc #633), the obnoxious 

malfeasance and systematic disregard for lawfulness actually displayed by Nor- 

wegian authorities charged with easily documentable and serious human rights 

violations necessitates extraordinary steps to ensure the complainant's personal 

security! 

As regards applications for political asylum, those submitting such requests 

should pay close attention to these well-founded guidelines: 

191 



191


1. One of the main rules in this connection is; 

APPLICATIONS FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM 

SHOULD NORMALLY BE LAUNCHED OUT- 

SIDE NORWEGIAN TERRITORY. 

2. If Norwegian authorities realizes you're going 

to lodge an application for political asylum some- 

where, they'll normally do their very best to 

terrorize/surveil you and sabotage the actual 

and perfectly legal request — so; 

AVOID IMPRUDENT REMARKS AND DETEC- 

TABLE PREPARATIONS/ACTIONS INDIRECT- 

LY OR OTHERWISE BETRAYING YOUR OB- 

JECTIVES, AND CARRY OUT YOUR PLANS 

WITHOUT UNDUE HESITATION/COMPLICA- 

TIONS.* 

*Be especially aware that all information stored in digital/personal 

computers/databanks/diaries and cellular phones etc easily may be 

intercepted and accurately reconstructed by Norwegian authorities 

AO utilizing more or less distant ELINT/TEMPEST equipment! 

3. I guess it's rather unnecessary to warn particularly 

against the official postal services of Norway (i.e 

"Posten Norge BA") and formally registered cou- 

rier/transport agencies operating within Norwegian 

territory — in any case; 

APPLICATIONS FOR POLITICAL ASYLUM 

SHOULD AS FAR AS PRACTICALLY POSS- 

IBLE BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO RESPON- 

SIBLE AUTHORITIES OF THE ADDRESSED NA- 

TION(-S) — ACTIVE COOPERATION WITH 

NATIVE NORWEGIANS SHOULD NORMALLY 

BE AVOIDED AT ALL STAGES OF THE APP- 

LICATION PROCESS. 

192 



192


4. Be aware Norwegian authorities or their accom- 

plices possibly has contaminated your vehicles, 

luggage, clothes, passport, driver's license, and 

VISA/credit/ID card(-s) &c with minuscule 

tracking/eavesdropping devices — hence; 

LET AN AUTHORIZED AND TRUSTWORTHY 

EXPERT ON TECHNICAL SURVEILLANCE 

COUNTERMEASURES SPEND A FEW MINU- 

TES CHECKING OVER POTENTIALLY IN- 

FECTED PARAPHERNALIA/OBJECTS. 

5. If your application for political asylum is granted, 

Norwegian authorities will go to great lengths to 

pinpoint your new whereabouts — thus; 

CHANGE ALL ESTABLISHED BEHAVIOR PAT- 

TERNS, PERSONAL PECULIARITIES AND HOB- 

BIES ETC POTENTIALLY PROVIDING YOUR 

ENEMIES WITH A CLUE TO YOUR HIDEOUT. 

6. When your application for political asylum has been 

granted, Norwegian authorities will scrutinize each 

letter/fax/e-mail and phone call &c from you reaching 

their territory in order to find compromising infor- 

mation — therefore; 

REDUCE ALL CONTACT WITH NORWEGIAN 

CITIZENS/COMPANIES/ORGANIZATIONS USW 

TO AN ABSOLUTE MINIMUM, AND FOLLOW 

THE DIRECTIONS FOR SUCH COMMUNICAT- 

ION ORDAINED BY THE NATIONAL SECURITY/ 

INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF YOUR RESIDENT- 

IAL COUNTRY. 

7. No matter how well-founded and formally correct your 

application(-s) for political asylum are — Norwegian 

authorities are highly apt to expose you to new and po- 

tentially life-endangering atrocities inasmuch as they're 

able to locate and approach you….consequently; 

193 



193


MAKE SPECIFIC PREPARATIONS — PREFE- 

RABLY IN COOPERATION WITH THE AU- 

THORITIES OF YOUR RESIDENTIAL COUN- 

TRY — ENABLING YOU TO DETECT AND EF- 

FICIENTLY STOP POTENTIAL ASSASSINS AND 

TERRORISTS UNDERHANDEDLY EMPLOYED 

BY NORWEGIAN AUTHORITIES. 

Recipients of political asylum applications submitted by Norwegian citizens 

should among other things: 

A. Keep in mind it's quite unlikely a Norwegian sub- 

ject would take the trouble to launch an applicat- 

ion for political asylum unless he/she is an authentic 

victim of serious human rights violations actively 

supported or carried out by Norwegian authorities. 

B. Take adequate measures to protect the applicant 

against further hostilities/criminality brought about 

or carried out by Norwegian authorities. 

C. Be aware Norwegian authorities are highly liable to 

spread false/detrimental information about the 

applicant. 

D. Offer the applicant a new identity if this is likely to 

improve his/her personal security. 

E. Clandestinely transfer the applicant to a new country 

if this makes it more difficult for Norwegian authori- 

ties to detect/attack him/her. 

F. Encourage the applicant to make a formal human 

rights complaint against the Kingdom of Norway. 

194 



194


G. Take into consideration the conspicuous prevalence 

of psychopathology, sadism and double-dealing 

amongst Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil 

servants at all stages of the formal application 

management. 

195 



195


A few jury-rigged remarks on the 2007 edition of 

FORMAL COMPLAINT 

VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

The 2007 version of this official — though tactically incomplete and slightly 

unconventional — human rights petition, gives a partially unique and 

unvarnished picture of certain aspects and implications of the state supported 

corruption obnoxiously suffusing next to all parts of the Norwegian Civil 

Service. 

Precisely as anticipated, Norwegian authorities has maintained and segmentally 

reinforced their intensely criminal, human rights violating, and contemptuously 

subhuman terrorism throughout AD 2007 (cf pp 1, 10, 122–124, item Doc 

#4588 etc), and I've described and formally reported a tiny fraction of the 

various offences only. On the whole, this year may be seen as a practically 

unbroken chain of state actuated crimes, insanities, and malicious provocations 

massively corroborating and justifying whatever denouncement of Norwegian 

authorities set forth in nearby Complaint....indeed; the execrable picture of a 

nation governed by a pack evil-minded, lunatic, and vehemently depraved 

lowbrows enthusiastically subverting justice and promoting stark diabolism has 

become still clearer (cf p 126 &c), and my beforehand well-set antipathy toward 

these slimy and absolutely condemnable representatives of mankind are 

significantly strengthened! 

Whereas — as continuously and unambiguously demonstrated since 1992 — 

Norwegian authorities are both unable and totally unwilling to behave in 

compliance with international human rights conventions and globally accepted 

etiquette, it‘s certainly high time drastic steps are taken to remove, incarcerate, 

and replace the heinously foul recidivists responsible for the corresponding and 

state supported criminality dealt with in nearby Complaint and enclosed 

documents* (*cf p 2 ib). Without efficient neutralization of these arrantly 

criminal elements and — preferably — stabilizing international intervention, 

Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants will continue to annihilate 

essential human rights regulations just for hell of it, and arrogantly — typically 

with distinct delight — ignore Norwegian law whenever deemed necessary to 

upkeep/escalate/hide etc their sociopathic terrorism or protect themselves and 

their rotten accomplices against legal prosecution. 

As expectable — the endemic character and genetic base of the ―Norwegian 

Police and Statesman Malignant Syndrom‖* (*―NPSMS‖, cf pp 122–124 etc) 

considered, the extensive criminalism, general ineptness, theological insecurity, 

196 



196


and psychopathological disregard for ethical norms usw by and large typifying 

nowadays Norwegian politicians and (senior) civil servants, has an abundance of 

historical parallels. 

In 1388/-89 popular vacuity, religious confusion, aristocratic disintegration, and 

a fatal lack of higher leadership qualities among the native administrators forced 

Norway into a political union with Denmark lasting until 1814. During said 

epoch Norway — more or less — functioned as a Danish province, and most 

administrative posts were permanently occupied by Danes and Germans. 

In July 1814 Sweden launched a military attack on Norway, and within two 

weeks the Danish/Norwegian king — Christian Frederick — resigned....and, 

in consequence, the politically fatuous Norwegians had to accept a union with 

Sweden lasting until 1905 (cf the ―Treaty of Kiel‖). 

One of many things worth emphasizing in this connection is the upsetting fact 

the political impotence, goofiness, self-conceit, irresponsibility, unsoundness, 

and general degeneration etc necessitating the unions with Denmark and Sweden 

are inheritable defects very much alive and kicking AD 2007.....and, as stated 

beforehand (cf p 122 &c), the state supported criminality described in this report 

and enclosed documents couldn‘t have been planned and carried out by 

mentally sound individuals. We‘re up against a most felonious bunch 

psychopathic good-for-nothings, and — demonstrably incapable of governing 

themselves and others in a juridically and otherwise acceptable manner, I firmly 

believe nowadays Norwegian Government and national assembly should be 

forcibly and completely replaced by way of well-accommodated international 

intervention. 

Notwithstanding the self-evident fact we can‘t accept a soiled pack criminal 

insanes as administrators, official representatives and civil servants, it may be 

convenient to take a further look at the 

United Nations Convention against Corruption* 

*Preamble: 

The States Parties to this Convention, 

Concerned about the seriousness of problems and threats posed by 

corruption to the stability and security of societies, undermining the 

institutions and values of democracy, ethical values and justice and 

jeopardizing sustainable development and the rule of law, 

197 



197


Concerned also about the links between corruption and other forms of 

crime, in particular organized crime and economic crime, including 

money-laundering, 

Concerned further about cases of corruption that involve vast quantities 

of assets, which may constitute a substantial proportion of the resources 

of States, and that threaten the political stability and sustainable 

development of those States, 

Convinced that corruption is no longer a local matter but a transnational 

phenomenon that affects all societies and economies, making 

international cooperation to prevent and control it essential, 

Convinced also that a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach is 

required to prevent and combat corruption effectively, 

Convinced further that the availability of technical assistance can play an 

important role in enhancing the ability of States, including by 

strengthening capacity and by institution-building, to prevent and combat 

corruption effectively, 

Convinced that the illicit acquisition of personal wealth can be 

particularly damaging to democratic institutions, national economies and 

the rule of law, 

Determined to prevent, detect and deter in a more effective manner 

international transfers of illicitly acquired assets and to strengthen 

international cooperation in asset recovery, 

Acknowledging the fundamental principles of due process of law in 

criminal proceedings and in civil or administrative proceedings to 

adjudicate property rights, 

Bearing in mind that the prevention and eradication of corruption is a 

responsibility of all States and that they must cooperate with one another, 

with the support and involvement of individuals and groups outside the 

public sector, such as civil society, non-governmental organizations and 

community-based organizations, if their efforts in this area are to be 

effective, 

Bearing also in mind the principles of proper management of public 

affairs and public property, fairness, responsibility and equality before the 

198 



198


law and the need to safeguard integrity and to foster a culture of rejection 

of corruption, 

Commending the work of the Commission on Crime Prevention and 

Criminal Justice and the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime in 

preventing and combating corruption, 

Recalling the work carried out by other international and regional 

organizations in this field, including the activities of the African Union, 

the Council of Europe, the Customs Cooperation Council (also known as 

the World Customs Organization), the European Union, the League of 

Arab States, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and 

Development and the Organization of American States, 

Taking note with appreciation of multilateral instruments to prevent and 

combat corruption, including, inter alia, the Inter-American Convention 

against Corruption, adopted by the Organization of American States on 

29 March 1996, the Convention on the Fight against Corruption involving 

Officials of the European Communities or Officials of Member States of 

the European Union, adopted by the Council of the European Union on 

26 May 1997, the Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public 

Officials in International Business Transactions, adopted by the 

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development on 21 

November 1997, the Criminal Law Convention on Corruption, adopted 

by the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 27 January 

1999, the Civil Law Convention on Corruption, adopted by the 

Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe on 4 November 1999, 

and the African Union Convention on Preventing and Combating 

Corruption, adopted by the Heads of State and Government of the African 

Union on 12 July 2003, 

Welcoming the entry into force on 29 September 2003 of the United 

Nations Convention against transnational Organized Crime, 

Have agreed as follows: 

199 



199

CHAPTER I 

General provisions 

Article 1 

Statement of purpose 


The purposes of this Convention are: 

(a) To promote and strengthen measures to prevent and combat 

corruption more scientifically and effectively; 

(b) To promote, facilitate and support international cooperation and 

technical assistance in the prevention of and fight against corruption, 

including in asset recovery; 

(c) To promote integrity, accountability and proper management of 

public affairs and public property. 

Article 6 

Preventive anti-corruption body or bodies 

1. Each State Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental 

principles of its legal system, ensure the existence of a body or 

bodies, as appropriate, that prevent corruption by such means as: 

(a) Implementing the policies referred to in Article 5 of this 

Convention and, where appropriate, overseeing and coordinating 

the implementation of those policies; 

(b) Increasing and disseminating knowledge about the prevention of 

corruption. 

2. Each State Party shall grant the body or bodies referred to in 

paragraph 1 of this article necessary independence, in accordance 

with the fundamental principles of its legal system, to enable the 

body or bodies to carry out its or their functions effectively and 

free from any undue influence. The necessary material resources 

and specialized staff, as well as the training that such staff may 

require to carry out their functions, should be provided. 

3. Each State Party shall inform the Secretary-General of the United 

Nations of the name and address of the authority or authorities that 

200 



200


may assist other State Parties in developing and implementing 

specific measures for the prevention of corruption. 

Article 7 

Public sector 

1. Each State Party shall, where appropriate and in accordance with 

the fundamental principles of its legal system, endeavour to adopt, 

maintain and strengthen systems for the recruitment, hiring, 

retention, promotion and retirement of civil servants and, where 

appropriate, other non-elected public officials: 

(a) That are based on principles of efficiency, transparency and 

objective criteria such as merit, equity and aptitude; 

(b) That include adequate procedures for the selection and training of 

individuals for public positions considered especially vulnerable to 

corruption and the rotation, where appropriate, of such individuals 

to other positions; 

(c) That promote adequate remuneration and equitable pay scales, 

taking into account the level of economic development of the State 

Party; 

(d) That promote education and training programmes to enable them to 

meet the requirements for the correct, honourable and proper 

performance of public functions and that provide them with 

specialized and appropriate training to enhance their awareness of 

the risks of corruption inherent in the performance of their 

functions. Such programmes may make reference to codes or 

standards of conduct in applicable areas. 

2. Each State Party shall also consider adopting appropriate legislative 

and administrative measures, consistent with the objectives of this 

Convention and in accordance with the fundamental principles of 

its domestic law, to prescribe criteria concerning candidature for 

and election to public office. 

3. Each State Party shall also consider taking appropriate legislative 

and administrative measures, consistent with the objectives of this 

Convention and in accordance with the fundamental principles of 

its domestic law, to enhance transparency in the funding of 

candidatures for elected public office and, where applicable, the 

funding of political parties. 

201 



201


4. Each State Party shall, in accordance with the fundamental 

principles of its domestic law, endeavour to adopt, maintain and 

strengthen systems that promote transparency and prevent conflicts 

of interest. 

Article 8 

Codes of conduct for public officials 

1. In order to fight corruption, each State Party shall promote, inter 

alia, integrity, honesty and responsibility among its public officials, 

in accordance with the fundamental principles of its legal system. 

2. In particular, each State Party shall endeavour to apply, within its 

own institutional and legal systems, codes or standards of conduct 

for the correct, honourable and proper performance of public 

functions. 

3. For the purpose of implementing the provisions of this article, each 

State Party shall, where appropriate and in accordance with the 

fundamental principles of its legal system, take note of the relevant 

initiatives of regional, interregional and multilateral organizations, 

such as the International Code of Conduct for Public Officials 

contained in the annex to General Assembly resolution 51/59 of 12 

December 1996. 

4. Each State Party shall also consider, in accordance with the 

fundamental principles of its domestic law, establishing measures 

and systems to facilitate the reporting by public officials of acts of 

corruption to appropriate authorities, when such acts come to their 

notice in the performance of their functions. 

5. Each State Party shall endeavour, where appropriate and in 

accordance with the fundamental principles of its domestic law, to 

establish measures and systems requiring public officials to make 

declarations to appropriate authorities regarding, inter alia, their 

outside activities, employment, investments, assets and substantial 

gifts or benefits from which a conflict of interest may result with 

respect to their functions as public officials. 

6. Each State Party shall consider taking, in accordance with the 

fundamental principles of its domestic law, disciplinary or other 

202 



202


measures against public officials who violate the codes or standards 

established in accordance with this article. 

Article 11 

Measures relating to the judiciary and prosecution services 

1. Bearing in mind the independence of the judiciary and its crucial 

role in combating corruption, each State Party shall, in accordance 

with the fundamental principles of its legal system and without 

prejudices to judicial independence, take measures to strengthen 

integrity and to prevent opportunities for corruption among 

members of the judiciary. Such measures may include rules with 

respect to the conduct of members of the judiciary. 

2. Measures to the same effect as those taken pursuant to paragraph 1 

of this article may be introduced and applied within the prosecution 

service in those State Parties where it does not form part of the 

judiciary but enjoys independence similar to that of the judicial 

service. 

Article 19 

Abuse of functions 

Article 24 

Concealment 

Each State Party shall consider adopting such legislative and other 

measures as may be necessary to establish as a criminal offence, 

when committed intentionally, the abuse of functions or position, 

that is, the performance of or failure to perform an act, in violation 

of laws, by a public official in the discharge of his or her functions, 

for the purpose of obtaining an undue advantage for himself or 

herself or for another person of entity. 

Without prejudice to the provisions of article 23 of this 

Convention, each State Party shall consider adopting such 

legislative and other measures as may be necessary to establish as 

a criminal offence, when committed intentionally after the 

commission of any of the offences established in accordance with 

this Convention without having participated in such offences, the 

203 



203


concealment or continued retention of property when the person 

involved knows that such property is the result of any of the 

offences established in accordance with this Convention. 

Article 25 

Obstruction of justice 

Each State Party shall adopt such legislative and other measures as 

may be necessary to establish as criminal offences, when 

committed intentionally: 

(a) The use of physical force, threats or intimidation or the promise, 

offering or giving of an undue advantage to induce false testimony 

or to interfere in the giving of testimony or the production of 

evidence in a proceeding in relation to the commission of offences 

established in accordance with this Convention; 

(b) The use of physical force, threats or intimidation to interfere with 

the exercise of official duties by a justice or law enforcement 

official in relation to the commission of offences established in 

accordance with this Convention. Nothing in this subparagraph 

shall prejudice the right of State Parties to have legislation that 

protects other categories of public officials. 

Article 32 

Protection of witnesses, experts and victims 

1. Each State Party shall take appropriate measures in accordance 

with its domestic legal system and within its means to provide 

effective protection from potential retaliation or intimidation for 

witnesses and experts who give testimony concerning offences 

established in accordance with this Convention and, as appropriate, 

for their relatives and other persons close to them. 

2. The measures envisaged in paragraph 1 of this article may include, 

inter alia, without prejudice to the rights of the defendant, 

including the right to due process: 

(a) Establishing procedures for the physical protection of such persons, 

such as, to the extent necessary and feasible, relocating them and 

permitting, where appropriate, non-disclosure or limitations on the 

204 



204


disclosure of information concerning the identity and whereabouts 

of such persons; 

(b) Providing evidentiary rules to permit witnesses and experts to give 

testimony in a manner that ensures the safety of such persons, such 

as permitting testimony to be given through the use of 

communications technology such as video or other adequate means. 

3. States Parties shall consider entering into agreements or 

arrangements with other States for the relocation of persons 

referred to in paragraph 1 of this article. 

4. The provisions of this article shall also apply to victims insofar as 

they are witnesses. 

5. Each State Party shall, subject to its domestic law, enable the views 

and concerns of victims to be presented and considered at 

appropriate stages of criminal proceedings against offenders in a 

manner not prejudicial to the rights of the defence. 

Article 36 

Specialized authorities 

Each State party shall, in accordance with the fundamental 

principles of its legal system, ensure the existence of a body or 

bodies of persons specialized in combating corruption through law 

enforcement. Such body or bodies or persons shall be granted the 

necessary independence, in accordance with the fundamental 

principles of the legal system of the State Party, to be able to carry 

out their functions effectively and without any undue influence. 

Such persons or staff of such body or bodies should have the 

appropriate training and resources to carry out their tasks. 

Article 37 

Cooperation with law enforcement authorities 

1. Each State Party shall take appropriate measures to encourage 

persons who participate or who have participated in the commission 

of an offence established in accordance with this Convention to 

supply information useful to competent authorities for investigative 

and evidentiary purposes and to provide factual, specific help to 

205 



205


competent authorities that may contribute to depriving offenders of 

the proceeds of crime and to recovering such proceeds. 

2. Each State Party shall consider providing for the possibility, in 

appropriate cases, of mitigating punishment of an accused person 

who provides substantial cooperation in the investigation or 

prosecution of an offence established in accordance with this 

Convention. 

3. Each State Party shall consider providing for the possibility, in 

accordance with fundamental principles of its domestic law, of 

granting immunity from persecution to a person who provides 

substantial cooperation in the investigation or prosecution of an 

offence established in accordance with this Convention. 

4. Protection of such persons shall be, mutatis mutandis, as provided 

for in article 32 of this Convention. 

5. Where a person referred to in paragraph 1 of this article located in 

one State Party can provide substantial cooperation to the 

competent authorities of another State Party, the States Parties 

concerned may consider entering into agreements or arrangements, 

in accordance with their domestic law, concerning the potential 

provision by the other State Party of the treatment set forth in 

paragraphs 2 and 3 of this article. 

Article 43 

International cooperation 

1. States Parties shall cooperate in criminal matters in accordance with 

articles 44 to 50 of this Convention. Where appropriate and 

consistent with their domestic legal system, States Parties shall 

consider assisting each other in investigations of and proceedings in 

civil and administrative matters relating to corruption. 

2. In matters of international cooperation, whenever dual criminality 

is considered a requirement, it shall be deemed fulfilled irrespective 

of whether the laws of the requested State Party place the offence 

within the same category of offence or denominate the offence by 

the same terminology as the requesting State Party, if the conduct 

underlying the offence for which assistance is sought is a criminal 

offence under the laws of both States Parties. 

206 



206

Article 48 

Law enforcement cooperation 


1. States Parties shall cooperate closely with one another, consistent 

with their respective domestic legal and administrative systems, to 

enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement action to combat the 

offences covered by this Convention. States Parties shall, in 

particular, take effective measures: 

(a) To enhance and, where necessary, to establish channels of 

communication between their competent authorities, agencies and 

services in order to facilitate the secure and rapid exchange of 

information concerning all aspects of the offences covered by this 

Convention, including, if the States Parties concerned deem it 

appropriate, links with other criminal activities; 

(b) To cooperate with other States Parties in conducting inquiries with 

respect to offences covered by this Convention concerning: 

i. The identity, whereabouts and activities of persons suspected of 

involvement in such offences or the location of other persons 

concerned; 

ii. The movement of proceeds of crime or property derived from the 

commission of such offences; 

iii. The movement of property, equipment or other instrumentalities 

used or intended for use in the commission of such offences; 

(c) To provide, where appropriate, necessary items or quantities of 

substances for analytical or investigative purposes; 

(d) To exchange, where appropriate, information with other States 

Parties , concerning specific means and methods used to commit 

offences covered by this Convention, including the use of false 

identities, forged, altered or false documents and other means of 

concealing activities; 

(e) To facilitate effective coordination between their competent 

authorities, agencies and services and to promote the exchange of 

personnel and other experts, including, subject to bilateral 

agreements or arrangements between the States Parties concerned, 

the posting of liaison officers; 

(f) To exchange information and coordinate administrative and other 

measures taken as appropriate for the purpose of early 

identification of the offences covered by this Convention. 

207 



207


2. With a view to giving effect to this Convention, States Parties shall 

consider entering into bilateral or multilateral agreements or 

arrangements on direct cooperation between their law enforcement 

agencies and, where such agreements or arrangements already exist, 

amending them. In the absence of such agreements or arrangements 

between the States Parties concerned, the States Parties may 

consider this Convention to be the basis for mutual law 

enforcement cooperation in respect of the offences covered by this 

Convention. Whenever appropriate, States Parties shall make full 

use of agreements or arrangements, including international or 

regional organizations, to enhance the cooperation between their 

law enforcement agencies. 

3. States Parties shall endeavour to cooperate within their means to 

respond to offences covered by this Convention committed through 

the use of modern technology. 

Article 49 

Joint investigations 

States Parties shall consider concluding bilateral or multilateral 

agreements or arrangements whereby, in relation to matters that 

are the subject of investigations, prosecutions or judicial 

proceedings in one or more States, the competent authorities 

concerned may establish joint investigative bodies. In the absence 

of such agreements or arrangements, joint investigations may be 

undertaken by agreement on a case-by-case basis. The States 

Parties involved shall ensure that the sovereignty of the State Party 

in whose territory such investigation is to take place is fully 

respected. 

Article 50 

Special investigative techniques 

1. In order to combat corruption effectively, each State Party shall, to 

the extent permitted by the basic principles of its domestic legal 

system and in accordance with the conditions prescribed by its 

domestic law, take such measures as may be necessary, within its 

means, to allow for the appropriate use by its competent authorities 

of controlled delivery and, where it deems appropriate, other 

208 



208


special investigative techniques, such as electronic or other forms 

of surveillance and undercover operations, within its territory, and 

to allow for the admissibility in court of evidence derived 

therefrom. 

2. For the purpose of investigating the offences covered by this 

Convention, States Parties are encouraged to conclude, when 

necessary, appropriate bilateral or multilateral agreements or 

arrangements for using such special investigative techniques in the 

context of cooperation at the international level. Such agreements 

or arrangements shall be concluded and implemented in full 

compliance with the principle of sovereign equality of States and 

shall be carried out strictly in accordance with the terms of those 

agreements or arrangements. 

3. In absence of an agreement or arrangement as set forth in paragraph 

2 of this article, decisions to use such special investigative 

techniques at the international level shall be made on a case-by-case 

basis and may, when necessary, take into consideration financial 

arrangements and understandings with respect to the exercise of 

jurisdiction by the States Parties concerned. 

4. Decisions to use controlled delivery at the international level may, 

with the consent of the States Parties concerned, include methods 

such as intercepting and allowing the goods or funds to continue 

intact or be removed or replaced in whole or in part. 

Although it lies outside the scope of this improvised survey to give a more 

comprehensive treatise on the legal applicability of the UN Convention against 

Corruption in this specific case, there‘s no doubt wise utilization of this and a 

couple other international conventions will provide the means necessary to 

remove and replace the present members of the Norwegian Government/Storting 

et al in a judicially acceptable manner. 

On account of strong historical ties and significant linguistic/sociocultural 

similarities, it may be convenient to replace — inter alios —nowadays 

Norwegian Storting/Government/Supreme Court members with highly 

intelligent and reliable Swedes…..and I faithfully believe international fora like 

— e.g — the United Nations and the Council of Europe should work 

systematically and fast toward indicated goal. 

Oct 28 ha I officially demanded the Norwegian Prime Minister, Minister of 

Justice and several members of the Norwegian Supreme Court (inter alios) 

209 



209


summoned before a competent Court of Impeachment (cf Doc #9080)….and, as 

expected, Norwegian authorities immediately responded with new crimes and 

haughty provocations. 

When it comes to the various crimes and harassments etc described in nearby 

UN report and corresponding documents (cf p 2), Norwegian authorities — 

nervously aware it‘ll be extremely hard to find as much as a single sane and 

uncorrupted psychiatrist/psychologist/judge/politician usw outside Norway not 

stamping their inordinate misconduct as violently psychotic and totally 

unacceptable — have collectively decided to deny all factualities and cover up 

their execrable offences as best they can (cf pp 9–10 &c). This preplanned 

flimflam represents no substantial hindrance in any case, whereas the putrid 

falsehood, ignoble low-mindedness and deep-seated criminal makeup are clearly 

written all over these state employed felons who‘ll be utterly unable to deceive 

or impress truly sophisticated, genuinely truth-seeking and highly 

intelligent/intuitive persons. 

November 29, 2007 

Wilh. Werner WINTHER 

210 



210

APPENDIX 


Members of the Norwegian Storting AD 2005– 

Stortinget 

President: Mr JAGLAND, Thorbjørn Vice President: Mr HAGEN, Carl I 

Lagtinget 

President: Mr LØNNING, Inge Vice President: Mr LÅNKE, Ola T 

Odelstinget 

President: Ms BRØRBY, Berit Vice President: Mr BALLO, Olav G 

Members: 

AASLAAND, Terje (Arbeiderpartiet) 

AASLAND, Tora (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

AGDESTEIN, Marianne Aa (Arbeiderpartiet) 

AKSELSEN, Olav (Arbeiderpartiet) 

AMUNDSEN, Per-Willy (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ANDERSEN, Dag Terje (Arbeiderpartiet) 

ANDERSEN, Karin (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

ANDERSEN, Torbjørn (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ANUNDSEN, Anders (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ARNESEN, Bendik H (Arbeiderpartiet) 

ASMYHR, Hans Frode K (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ASPAKER, Elisabeth (Høyre) 

ASPHJELL, Jorodd (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BALLO, Olav Gunnar (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

211 



211


BEKKEMELLEM, Karita (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BERGO, Magnar L (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

BJØRNFLATEN, Anne Marit (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BJØRNSTAD, Vidar (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BREDVOLD, Per Roar (Fremskrittspartiet) 

BREEN, Thomas (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BREKK, Lars Peder (Senterpartiet) 

BRENDE, Børge (Høyre) 

BRUSTAD, Sylvia (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BRØRBY, Berit (Arbeiderpartiet) 

BØHLER, Jan (Arbeiderpartiet) 

CHAUDHRY, Akhtar (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

CHRISTOFFERSEN, Lise (Arbeiderpartiet) 

DAHL, André O (Høyre) 

De RUITER, Freddy (Arbeiderpartiet) 

DJUPEDAL, Øystein (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

DUESUND, Åse Gunhild W (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

DØRUM, Odd Einar (Venstre) 

DÅVØY, Laila (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

ELDEGARD, Gunvor (Arbeiderpartiet) 

ELLINGSEN, Jan Arild (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ELVIK, Åsa (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

ENG, Sigrun (Arbeiderpartiet) 

ENGER. Inger S (Senterpartiet) 

ENGESET, Martin (Høyre) 

ERIKSEN, Dagrun (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

ERIKSSON, Robert (Fremskrittspartiet) 

FALDET, Eirin (Arbeiderpartiet) 

FLÅTTEN, Svein (Høyre) 

FOSS, Per-Kristian (Høyre) 

FOSTERVOLD, Kåre (Fremskrittspartiet) 

FREDRIKSEN, Jan-Henrik (Fremskrittspartiet) 

GILTUN, Vigdis (Fremskrittspartiet) 

GISKE, Trond (Arbeiderpartiet) 

GITMARK, Peter S (Høyre) 

GJUL, Gunn Karin (Arbeiderpartiet) 

GRANDE, Trine S (Venstre) 

GRIMSTAD, May-Helen M (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

GULLVÅG, Steinar (Arbeiderpartiet) 

GUNDERSEN, Gunnar (Høyre) 

212 



212


GÅSVATN, Jon J (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HAGA, Åslaug (Senterpartiet) 

HAGEBAKKEN, Tore (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HAGEN, Carl I (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HAGESÆTER, Gjermund (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HALLERAKER, Øyvind (Høyre) 

HALVORSEN, Kristin (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

HANSEN, Eva Kristin (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HANSEN, May (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

HANSEN, Sigvald O (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HANSEN, Svein Roald (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HANSEN, Torbjørn (Høyre) 

HANSSEN, Bjarne Håkon (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HAUGEN, Arne L (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HEGGØ, Ingrid (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HELLELAND, Trond (Høyre) 

HENRIKSEN, Per Rune (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HILDENG, Britt (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HJEMDAL, Line Henriette H (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

HOKSRUD, Bård (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HOLMBERG, Kari Lise (Høyre) 

HOLMÅS, Heikki (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

HORNE, Solveig (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HUITFELDT, Anniken (Arbeiderpartiet) 

HØGLUND, Morten (Fremskrittspartiet) 

HØIE, Bent (Høyre) 

HØYBRÅTEN, Dagfinn (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

JACOBSEN, Bjørn (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

JAGLAND, Thorbjørn (Arbeiderpartiet) 

JAKOBSEN, Alf E (Arbeiderpartiet) 

JENSEN, Lena (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

JENSEN, Siv (Fremskrittspartiet) 

JOHANSEN, Irene (Arbeiderpartiet) 

JOHNSEN, Espen (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KHAN, Saera (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KJOS, Kari K (Fremskrittspartiet) 

KLEPPA, Magnhild M (Senterpartiet) 

KLUNGLAND, Rolf Terje (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KNUDSEN, Ulf Erik (Fremskrittspartiet) 

KNUTSEN, Tove Karoline (Arbeiderpartiet) 

213 



213


KONGSHAUG, Leif Helge (Venstre) 

KORSBERG, Øyvind (Fremskrittspartiet) 

KOSMO, Silvia K (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KRISTIANSEN, Ivar (Høyre) 

KRISTOFFERSEN, Asmund (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KRISTOFFERSEN, Gerd Janne (Arbeiderpartiet) 

KVASSHEIM, Gunnar (Venstre) 

LANGELAND, Hallgeir H (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

LARSEN, Anne Margrethe (Venstre) 

LEIRSTEIN, Ulf (Fremskrittspartiet) 

LIEN, Tord (Fremskrittspartiet) 

LJUNGGREN, Anna (Arbeiderpartiet) 

LODE, Trond (Senterpartiet) 

LUDVIGSEN, Gunvald (Venstre) 

LUNDTEIGEN, Per Olaf (Senterpartiet) 

LYDVO, Hilde M (Arbeiderpartiet) 

LYSKLÆTT, Vera (Venstre) 

LØITE, Inger (Arbeiderpartiet) 

LØNNING, Inge (Høyre) 

LØVIK, Petter (Høyre) 

LÅNKE, Ola T (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

MANDT-BARTHOLSEN, Sonja (Arbeiderpartiet) 

MARTHINSEN, Marianne (Arbeiderpartiet) 

MICAELSEN, Torgeir (Arbeiderpartiet) 

MOE, Ola B (Senterpartiet) 

MYRLI, Sverre (Arbeiderpartiet) 

NAVARSETE, Liv Signe (Senterpartiet) 

NESVIK, Harald T (Fremskrittspartiet) 

NIELSEN, Eva M (Arbeiderpartiet) 

NISTAD, Thore A (Fremskrittspartiet) 

NORDTUN, Tore (Arbeiderpartiet) 

NYBAKK, Marit (Arbeiderpartiet) 

OLSEN, Gunn (Arbeiderpartiet) 

OPHEIM, Torfinn (Arbeiderpartiet) 

PEDERSEN, Helga (Arbeiderpartiet) 

PEDERSEN, Torny (Arbeiderpartiet) 

PETERSEN, Jan (Høyre) 

RAMIN-OSMUNDSEN, Manuela (Arbeiderpartiet) 

REIKVAM, Rolf (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

RIIS-JOHANSEN, Terje (Senterpartiet) 

214 



214


RUDIHAGEN, Torstein (Arbeiderpartiet) 

RYAN, Inge (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

RYTMAN, Jørund (Fremskrittspartiet) 

RØYS, Heidi G (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

SAHL, Jan (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

SAMUELSEN, Alf Ivar (Senterpartiet) 

SANDAL, Reidar (Arbeiderpartiet) 

SANDBERG, Per (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SANDE, Erling (Senterpartiet) 

SANNER, Jan Tore (Høyre) 

SCHMIDT, Åse M (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SJØLI, Sonja Irene (Høyre) 

SKJELSTAD, André N (Venstre) 

SKJÆLAAEN, Rune J (Senterpartiet) 

SKULSTAD, Ivar (Arbeiderpartiet) 

SKUMSVOLL, Henning (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SOLBERG, Erna (Høyre) 

SOLBERG, Hill-Marta (Arbeiderpartiet) 

SOLHEIM, Erik (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

SOLHJELL, Bård Vegar (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

SOLHOLM, Lodve (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SOLVIK-OLSEN, Ketil (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SORTEVIK, Arne (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SPONHEIM, Lars (Venstre) 

STARHEIM, Åge (Fremskrittspartiet) 

STOKKAN-GRANDE, Arild (Arbeiderpartiet) 

STOLTENBERG, Jens (Arbeiderpartiet) (Arbeiderpartiet) 

STORBERGET, Knut (Arbeiderpartiet) 

STRØM, Tor-Arne (Arbeiderpartiet) 

STRØM-ERICHSEN, Anne-Grete (Arbeiderpartiet) 

STØRE, Jonas G (Arbeiderpartiet) 

SUND, Eirin Kristin (Arbeiderpartiet) 

SUNDSBØ, Dagfinn (Senterpartiet) 

SVENDSEN, Kenneth (Fremskrittspartiet) 

SYVERSEN, Hans Olav (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

SØREIDE, Ine Marie E (Høyre) 

SØRFONN, Ingebrigt S (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

TEIGEN, Dag Ole (Arbeiderpartiet) 

TENDEN, Borghild (Venstre) 

THOMMESSEN, Olemic (Høyre) 

215 



215


THOMSEN, Ib (Fremskrittspartiet) 

THORKILDSEN, Inga Marte (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

TRETTEBERGSTUEN, Anette (Arbeiderpartiet) 

TYBRING-GJEDDE, Christian (Fremskrittspartiet) 

TØRRESDAL, Bjørg (Kristelig Folkeparti) 

VAKSDAL, Øyvind (Fremskrittspartiet) 

VALLE, Ågot (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

VALLERSNES, Finn Martin (Høyre) 

VEDUM, Trygve S (Senterpartiet) 

WICKHOLM, Truls (Arbeiderpartiet) 

WIDTH, Per Ove (Fremskrittspartiet) 

WOLDSETH, Karin S (Fremskrittspartiet) 

ØVERAAS, Eli S (Senterpartiet) 

ØYE, Signe (Arbeiderpartiet) 

The Norwegian Government Nov AD 2007 

Prime Minister: 

Mr Jens STOLTENBERG (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Finance: 

Ms Kristin HALVORSEN (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

Minister of Local Government and Regional Development: 

Ms Magnhild M KLEPPA (Senterpartiet) 

Minister of Foreign Affairs: 

Mr Jonas G STØRE (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Defence: 

Ms Anne-Grete STRØM-ERICHSEN (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of the Environment: 

Ms Tora AASLAND (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

Minister of Petroleum and Energy: 

Ms Åslaug HAGA (Senterpartiet) 

216 



216


Minister of Development Cooperation: 

Mr Erik SOLHEIM (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

Minister of Trade and Industry: 

Mr Dag Terje ANDERSEN (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Transport and Communications: 

Ms Liv Signe NAVERSETE (Senterpartiet) 

Minister of Knowledge: 

Mr Bård Vegar SOLHJELL (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

Minister of Labour and Social Inclusion: 

Mr Bjarne Håkon HANSSEN (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Justice: 

Mr Knut STORBERGET (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Equality and Consumer Affairs: 

Ms Manuela RAMIN-OSMUNDSEN (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Culture and Church Affairs: 

Mr Trond GISKE (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Health and Care Services: 

Ms Sylvia BRUSTAD (Arbeiderpartiet) 

Minister of Renewal: 

Ms Heidi G RØYS (Sosialistisk Venstreparti) 

Minister of Agriculture and Food: 

Mr Terje RIIS-JOHANSEN (Senterpartiet) 

Minister of Fisheries and Coastal Affairs: 

Ms Helga PEDERSEN (Arbeiderpartiet) 

217 



217


A summary appendix to the 2009 edition of 

FORMAL COMPLAINT 

VS THE KINGDOM OF NORWAY 

As for anno 2008, the scandalous and grossly criminal malconduct of Norwegian 

authorities throughout the year mirrors and substantially testifies to the 

sinistrous but most accurate portrayal found in Formal Complaint vs the 

Kingdom of Norway* (*FOCO) pp 196―197. 

Whereas a precise and thoroughly verified description of the rotten and assuredly 

morbid terrorism waged by Norwegian (senior) civil servants already exist, it 

should be synoptically defensible to put forth a somewhat cursory presentation 

of a few main events taking place during 2008 and the first trisection of this 

year. 

May 7―June 20, 2008: 

On May 7 Document #9125 and corresponding enclosures (cf Internet Documents 

by Wilh. Werner Winther* − *INDO − and the separated document 

Impeachment found at www.scribd.com/wwerner778689) are formally handed 

over to the notoriously trustless and violently corrupted sheriff office in NO- 

Brattvåg. 

As for this specific complaint/application and firmly based on broad/inimical 

experience with official corruption in general, I cherished no illusions whatsoever 

prosecuted authorities would comply with Norwegian law or otherwise 

fulfill their juridical obligations according to international covenants/regulations 

(cf Doc #9125, p 218)….and sure enough: 

When I telephonically contacted the Norwegian Parliament archivist Ms Lene 

ANDREASSEN (AO) June 18, she was most astonished to discover Document 

#9125 and complemental attachments could be found absolutely nowhere in 

their − in other respects − tidy archives! Still somewhat bewildered, Ms 

Andreassen asked me to send a copy of Doc #9125 to her fax machine 

straightaway….and I did. 

June 20 I had a new phone conversation with Ms Andreassen who declared she 

had received my fax sending and intended to place Doc #9125 before Mr 

Thorbjørn JAGLAND* and/or Mr Inge LØNNING* (*presidents of the 

Norwegian Parliament/Lagting, respectively ‒ cf FOCO p 211) that afternoon. 

218 



218


It should surprise nobody harboring even a slightly realistic conception of the 

execrable corruption suffusing the Norwegian state apparatus to learn that 

heretofore − ie April 16, 2009 − nothing has been heard from Norwegian authorities 

in this matter since June 20, 2008…! 

An interesting parallel to this established ―shut-up-like-a-clam-policy‖ and 

―keep-up-your-appearance-tactic‖ has been described in INDO, p 35 (cf Doc 

#377, entry of Aug 26, 2000 ib). 

August 26, 2008: 

The low-tension distribution lines supplying electricity to my private house in 

Åsen 4, NO-Brattvåg, are physically disconnected by representatives of the 

highly questionable company Nordvest Nett AS. 

While Nordvest Nett AS underhandedly talked their planned sabotage operation 

over with my local authority and government employed enemies, no 

forewarning whatever was passed on to me….of course! 

Nordvest Nett AS later attempted to justify the vandalism by referring to an 

electricity bill I neither had paid nor by any manner of means had been informed 

about. When it comes to the bill, per se, it quickly − and not unexpectedly − 

turned out to be at least three times higher than my actual power consumption 

warranted…! 

With reference to this foul-smelling matter, it should be emphasized that 

Norwegian police officers − doubtlessly with the diabolic blessings of the 

Norwegian government/Storting et al − maliciously has manipulated my power 

supply accommodations for years as a means of, e.g, sabotaging electric articles 

and inducing exorbitant expenditures (cf INDO Doc‘s ##7084, 9257 and 9311 

&c). 

Moreover, one call attention the off-putting fact a boom truck belonging to 

Nordvest Nett AS has been employed in order to facilitate second/third/top floor 

Cobweb-installing* (*cf FOCO pp 105, 106, 109 and 111, item INDO pp 

105―106 [Doc #3217] etc) − this company is evidently involved in aggravated 

criminality and human rights violations advocated and aggressively carried out 

by Norwegian authorities, and should be intensely distrusted! 

August 28, 2008: 

In the middle of the night my neighbor in Åsen 7 (Brattvåg) – Mr Ingolf Peder 

ABELSETH* (*cf INDO Doc #5817, p 126) – rapidly develops potentially life- 

threatening glossopharyngeal edema as a result of intoxication brought about by 

219 



219


Norwegian officials, and his emergency travel to a nearby hospital is dangerously 

impeded by a number of unusual occurrences. 

August 29, 2008: 

A comprehensive application for political asylum is formally handed in outside 

Norwegian borders. 

This entry may be subject to future amplifications. 

September 05, 2008: 

The low-tension distribution lines and corresponding supply point are reconnected 

by representatives of Nordvest Nett AS – cf entry of Aug 26, 2008. 



An unknown man associated with Norwegian authorities telephonically annoys 

Mr Ingolf Peder ABELSETH* (*cf INDO Doc #5817, item entries of Aug 28 

2008, Sep 15 2008, Oct 22 2008, Nov 06 2008, Nov 07 2008, Nov 08 2008, Dec 

05 2008 and Mar 03 2009) who refuses to talk with him. 


This night an explosive fire destroys the detached house privately owned and 

inhabited by a married couple related by blood to Mr Ingolf Peder ABELSETH* 

(*cf INDO Doc #5817, item entries of Aug 28 2008, Sep 09 2008, Oct 22 2008, 

Nov 06 2008, Nov 07 2008, Nov 08 2008, Dec 05 2008 and Mar 03 2009) – the 

husband dies in the flames, but his moderately injured and more energetic wife 

escapes. 

Said couple and one of their sons guested Mr Abelseth habitually, and one of 

their granddaughters befriends Ms Kjærsti Elida GUSECK* (*cf INDO, Doc‘s 

## 7084 and 8017) as well as the latter‘s mother. Mentioned granddaughter also, 

a few days before the fire, visited Mr Abelseth in order to rent an apartment in 

his house. 

220 



220


In the afternoon, when described fire had been extinguished, Mr Sigmund 

Martin EKREM* (*cf INDO, Doc‘s ##214 and 1536 &c) – next-door-neighbor 

of the burnt-out-ruins – decided to inspect the optical smoke alarm/detector 

affixed to the ceiling in the hall next to his kitchen and sitting room….and 

immediately discovers someone very recently – probably the day before – has 

removed/stolen his only security device! 

Now – to cut the matter short; we strongly believe Mr Ekrem‘s smoke alarm/ 

detector was stolen by the same Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service officers 

burglarizing the burned house less than 14 hours before the actual fire broke out, 

and we‘re absolutely convinced indicated police officers are perfectly identical 

with two of the slimy psychopaths terrorizing Mr Abelseth and myself…! 

Furthermore one believe we‘re dealing with most willful and aggravated arson, 

and emphasize that the Norwegian Police ―Security‖ Service has under-the-table 

access to a number of incendiary systems and – vg – acid/water/sugar based 

ignition/delay mechanisms leaving no documentable traces. 

October 21, 2008: 

A few applications for political asylum are formally/personally submitted to 

embassies in Oslo. 


October 22, 2008: 

Mr Ingolf Peder ABELSETH* (*cf entry of August 28, 2008) has repetitively/ 

telephonically been harassed by an unknown man somehow associated with 

Norwegian authorities. 

November 06, 2008: 


2008, Sep 09 2008, Sep 15 2008, Oct 22 2008, Nov 07 2008, Nov 08 2008, Nov 

24 2008, Dec 05 2008 and Mar 03 2009) has been invited to dinner by his 

officially appointed support person, Mr Kjell KALVØY (NO-Brattvåg). 

Mr Abelseth is away from his home several hours today, and psychopathic 

officials seizes the opportunity to – once again – break into his private dwelling 

house in Åsen 7, Brattvåg. 

221 



221




2008, Sep 09 2008, Sep 15 2008, Oct 22 2008, Nov 06 2008, Nov 08 2008, Nov 

24, 2008, Dec 05 2008 and Mar 03 2009 ) shows the first symptoms of the 

recurrent poisoning continuing till his death about four months later. 


I was making for my own home in Åsen 4 when I – at 07:45 PM – recognized 

that the light had been switched on in the untenanted and normally empty 

basement in Åsen 7, Brattvåg (I had visited corresponding house half an hour 

ago, and positively knew the actual light in the laundry room had been turned 

off when I left). 

A speedy investigation testified to the fact somebody had entered and left the 

basement through a locked and practically unused door a few minutes earlier. 

On the first floor Mr Ingolf Peder ABELSETH* (*cf INDO Doc #5817, item 

entries of Aug 28 2008, Sep 09 2008, Sep 15 2008, Oct 22 2008, Nov 07 2008, 

Nov 24 2008, Dec 05 2008 and Mar 03 2009) – the only resident and owner of 

the house – peacefully watched television completely unaware someone just had 

broken into his dwelling (Mr Abelseth was born in 1918, and depended on a 

walking chair and hearing aids – in the course of the year he had, with great 

efforts, entered the basement only once). 

Well, booby-trapped/contaminated or not – for safety‘s sake I decided to steer 

clear of the basement for a couple of days…! 



2008, Sep 09 2008, Sep 15 2008, Oct 22 2008, Nov 07 2008, Nov 08 2008, Dec 

05 2008 and Mar 03 2009) is somewhat disquieted this afternoon, because in the 

morning – around 08:00 AM – he‘d discovered a great number of huge 

footprints in his private garden. 

It had snowed quite a bit between 02 and 03 AM that night, and the tracks left 

by the paper boy about 05:15 AM had partially destroyed some of the intruder‘s 

larger/deeper footmarks….so, as the latter prints was covered by a thin snow 

layer, the uninvited guest had prowled around just before 03:00 AM studying 

the basement windows in Åsen 7, Brattvåg! 

222 



222


223 



223


224 



224


225 



225

FORMAL COMPLAINT - Sweden Confidential

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?