Skip to main content

Parenthood in Norway: Between Politics and Science

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenging Popular Myths of Sex, Gender and Biology

Part of the book series: Crossroads of Knowledge ((CROKNOW,volume 1))

  • 2592 Accesses

Abstract

Norwegian legislators have recently altered the legal regulations for the parental leave. Parents are now given the chance to split the existing one year of leave fifty-fifty. A newly proposed bill even seeks to make paternity leave mandatory. Several Norwegian medical and psychological experts have opposed this newly introduced legislation. Their argument is that ‘Research shows that…’ young children may show symptoms of stress reactions and in the worst case suffer from mental health disorders later in life when the primary caregiver changes during the child’s first year of life. Many of the experts implicitly seem to defend a normative idea of static ‘natural preferences’ between men and women, as a basis for a conservative political outlook, that neglects that deducing from scientific knowledge to political decision-making rarely is straightforward. The experts in question rarely seem to recognise that questions of maternity and paternity leave, also concerns opposing values and political priorities, for instance equal rights between the sexes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ellingsæter, A. L., & Leira, A. (2006). Introduction: politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. In A. L. Ellingsæter & L. Arnlaug (Eds.), Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 1–24). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Leira, A. (2006). Parenthood change and policy reform in Scandinavia, 1970s–2000s. In A. L. Ellingsæter & L. Arnlaug (Eds.), Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 27–51). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 585–595.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2009). Norway: The making of the father’s quota. In S. B. Kamerman & P. Moss (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies (pp. 191–206). Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Leira, A. (1998). Caring as social right: Cash for childcare and daddy leave. Social Politics, 5, 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Engh, C., & Ruud, S. (2008, March 4). Politikerne må forstå hvorfor kvinner stritter imot [Politicians must understand why women resist]. Aftenposten, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kennair, L. E. O. (2008, March 4). Nettprat – Advarer mot å ta permisjon fra mor [Internet talk – Cautions against taking permission from the mother]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://tux1.aftenposten.no/nettprat/kennair2008/

  9. Vikøyr, H. (2008, March 7). Omsorg på skift kan skade spedbarn [Changing care giver may harm infants]. Verdens Gang, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berg-Nielsen, T. S. (2010). Følsom, formbar og uferdig. Epigenetikk, utvikling av hjernen og stressbarhet. In: E. Befring, I. Frønes, & M.-A. Sørlie (Eds.), Sårbare unge. Nye perspektiver og tilnærminger [Vulnerable young ones. New perspectives and approaches] (pp. 75–85). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunnar, M. R., & Donzella, B. (2002). Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 199–220.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vikøyr, H. (2008, March 7). Høres rimelig ut [Sounds reasonable]. Verdens Gang, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Markestad, T. (2010, May 12). Valgfrihet for barnas skyld [Parental choice for the children’s sake]. Dagbladet, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kværness, R. (2010, May 20). For barnas skyld [For the sake of the children]. Dagbladet, 66.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Holter, Ø. G., & Lorentzen, J. (2010, November 3). God familiepolitikk [Better family politics]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/article3885971.ece

  16. Holter, Ø. G., Egeland, C., & Svare, H. (2008). Likestilling og livskvalitet [Equality and quality of life]. Oslo: Work Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2009). Spedkost 12 måneder. Landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant 12 måneder gamle barn [Diet for infants. National survey among infants aged 12 month]. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Men’s Panel. (2008). Equality and social inclusion Ministry of Children 10. Oslo: Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Rose, S. (2001). Moving on from old dichotomies: Beyond nature-nurture towards a lifeline perspective. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 3–7. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.40.s3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fausto-Sterling, A., Gowaty, P. A., & Zuk, M. (1997). Evolutionary psychology and Darwinian feminism. Feminist Studies, 23, 402–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. (2000). A natural history of rape biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ertzeid, H. (2008, March 4). Dette er så dumt at det bare kunne være sagt av en professor [This is so stupid it can only come from the mouth of a professor]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/politikk/article2292562.ece

  23. Vassnes, B. (2008, March 6). Det man ikke vet… [What we don’t know…]. Dagbladet, 48.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lawler, S. (2000). Mothering the self. Mothers, daughters, subjects. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tjernshaugen, K. (2010, October 17) To av tre spurte sier nei til pappakvote [Two out of three say no to father’s quota]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article3860173.ece

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ole Jacob Madsen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Madsen, O.J. (2013). Parenthood in Norway: Between Politics and Science. In: Ah-King, M. (eds) Challenging Popular Myths of Sex, Gender and Biology. Crossroads of Knowledge, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01979-6_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics