Abstract
Norwegian legislators have recently altered the legal regulations for the parental leave. Parents are now given the chance to split the existing one year of leave fifty-fifty. A newly proposed bill even seeks to make paternity leave mandatory. Several Norwegian medical and psychological experts have opposed this newly introduced legislation. Their argument is that ‘Research shows that…’ young children may show symptoms of stress reactions and in the worst case suffer from mental health disorders later in life when the primary caregiver changes during the child’s first year of life. Many of the experts implicitly seem to defend a normative idea of static ‘natural preferences’ between men and women, as a basis for a conservative political outlook, that neglects that deducing from scientific knowledge to political decision-making rarely is straightforward. The experts in question rarely seem to recognise that questions of maternity and paternity leave, also concerns opposing values and political priorities, for instance equal rights between the sexes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ellingsæter, A. L., & Leira, A. (2006). Introduction: politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. In A. L. Ellingsæter & L. Arnlaug (Eds.), Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 1–24). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Leira, A. (2006). Parenthood change and policy reform in Scandinavia, 1970s–2000s. In A. L. Ellingsæter & L. Arnlaug (Eds.), Politicising parenthood in Scandinavia. Gender relations in welfare states (pp. 27–51). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Winnicott, D. W. (1960). The theory of the parent-infant relationship. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41, 585–595.
Chodorow, N. J. (1978). The reproduction of mothering: Psychoanalysis and the sociology of gender. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Brandth, B., & Kvande, E. (2009). Norway: The making of the father’s quota. In S. B. Kamerman & P. Moss (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies (pp. 191–206). Bristol: The Policy Press.
Leira, A. (1998). Caring as social right: Cash for childcare and daddy leave. Social Politics, 5, 362–378.
Engh, C., & Ruud, S. (2008, March 4). Politikerne må forstå hvorfor kvinner stritter imot [Politicians must understand why women resist]. Aftenposten, 4–5.
Kennair, L. E. O. (2008, March 4). Nettprat – Advarer mot å ta permisjon fra mor [Internet talk – Cautions against taking permission from the mother]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://tux1.aftenposten.no/nettprat/kennair2008/
Vikøyr, H. (2008, March 7). Omsorg på skift kan skade spedbarn [Changing care giver may harm infants]. Verdens Gang, 4–5.
Berg-Nielsen, T. S. (2010). Følsom, formbar og uferdig. Epigenetikk, utvikling av hjernen og stressbarhet. In: E. Befring, I. Frønes, & M.-A. Sørlie (Eds.), Sårbare unge. Nye perspektiver og tilnærminger [Vulnerable young ones. New perspectives and approaches] (pp. 75–85). Oslo: Gyldendal Akademisk.
Gunnar, M. R., & Donzella, B. (2002). Social regulation of the cortisol levels in early human development. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 27, 199–220.
Vikøyr, H. (2008, March 7). Høres rimelig ut [Sounds reasonable]. Verdens Gang, 4–5.
Markestad, T. (2010, May 12). Valgfrihet for barnas skyld [Parental choice for the children’s sake]. Dagbladet, 74.
Kværness, R. (2010, May 20). For barnas skyld [For the sake of the children]. Dagbladet, 66.
Holter, Ø. G., & Lorentzen, J. (2010, November 3). God familiepolitikk [Better family politics]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/meninger/debatt/article3885971.ece
Holter, Ø. G., Egeland, C., & Svare, H. (2008). Likestilling og livskvalitet [Equality and quality of life]. Oslo: Work Research Institute.
Norwegian Directorate of Health. (2009). Spedkost 12 måneder. Landsomfattende kostholdsundersøkelse blant 12 måneder gamle barn [Diet for infants. National survey among infants aged 12 month]. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Health
The Men’s Panel. (2008). Equality and social inclusion Ministry of Children 10. Oslo: Ministry of Children, Equality and Social Inclusion.
Rose, S. (2001). Moving on from old dichotomies: Beyond nature-nurture towards a lifeline perspective. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 3–7. doi:10.1192/bjp.178.40.s3.
Fausto-Sterling, A., Gowaty, P. A., & Zuk, M. (1997). Evolutionary psychology and Darwinian feminism. Feminist Studies, 23, 402–417.
Thornhill, R., & Palmer, C. (2000). A natural history of rape biological bases of sexual coercion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ertzeid, H. (2008, March 4). Dette er så dumt at det bare kunne være sagt av en professor [This is so stupid it can only come from the mouth of a professor]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/politikk/article2292562.ece
Vassnes, B. (2008, March 6). Det man ikke vet… [What we don’t know…]. Dagbladet, 48.
Lawler, S. (2000). Mothering the self. Mothers, daughters, subjects. London: Routledge.
Tjernshaugen, K. (2010, October 17) To av tre spurte sier nei til pappakvote [Two out of three say no to father’s quota]. Aftenposten. Retrieved from http://www.aftenposten.no/nyheter/iriks/article3860173.ece
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Madsen, O.J. (2013). Parenthood in Norway: Between Politics and Science. In: Ah-King, M. (eds) Challenging Popular Myths of Sex, Gender and Biology. Crossroads of Knowledge, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01979-6_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01979-6_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-01978-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-01979-6
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)